Prioritizing Barriers and Facilitators of Traditional,Complementary,and Integrative Medicine Service Use: A Delphi and Analytical Hierarchy Process Study in Iran
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
Prioritizing Barriers and Facilitators of Traditional,Complementary,and Integrative Medicine Service Use: A Delphi and Analytical Hierarchy Process Study in Iran
Recognizing and prioritizing the factors that influence the selection of treatment options is essential for effective health service planning and an appropriate health care delivery system. This study aimed to identify and prioritize the barriers and facilitators to the use of Traditional, Complementary, and Integrative Medicine (TCIM) in Iran.
Materials and Methods:
A two-phase, mixed-methods study was conducted. First, a two-round Delphi survey was conducted with a panel of 32 experts, including specialists in Persian medicine (PM) and health policymakers, to acheive consensus on a list of barriers and facilitators within the Iranian context. Subsequently, the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) was applied with a 12-expert panel to determine the relative weight and priority of the agreed-upon criteria.
Results:
The Delphi process yielded consensus on 18 facilitators and nine barriers. The facilitators were categorized into two main dimensions (Cultural and social facilitators, and Systemic facilitators) and six sub-dimensions. In comparison, the barriers formed four main dimensions (service delivery barriers, policy challenges, financial barriers, and knowledge and attitudinal barriers). Quantitative AHP results revealed that among facilitators, “effects of health professionals” (Final Weight: 0.29) was the most critical dimension, with “Recommendation and referral by conventional physicians (CPs)” (Final Weight: 0.18) as its top factor. Conversely, among barriers, “Policy Challenges” (Final Weight: 0.50) was the most significant dimension, substantially outweighing others.
Conclusion:
The findings highlight that the recommendation of TCIM by CPs are the strongest facilitator; yet, overarching policy challenges critically hamper its implementation. Addressing this disconnect requires integrated policy reforms and interdisciplinary collaboration to leverage TCIM within Iran’s health care system effectively.
HillJ, SeguinR, PhangaT, et al.Facilitators and barriers to traditional medicine use among cancer patients in Malawi. PLoS ONE2019;14(10):e0223853; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223853
2.
NgJY.Insight into the characteristics of research published in traditional, complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine journals: a bibliometric analysis. BMC Complement Med Ther2021;21(1):185; doi: 10.1186/s12906-021-03354-7
De Moraes Mello BoccoliniP, Siqueira BoccoliniC. Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use in Brazil. BMC Complement Med Ther2020;20(1):51; doi: 10.1186/s12906-020-2842-8
5.
YounB-Y, MoonS, MokK, et al.Use of traditional, complementary and alternative medicine in nine countries: A cross-sectional multinational survey. Complement Ther Med2022;71(4):102889; doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2022.102889
6.
Abdipour MehrianSR, UddinS, GhahramaniZ, et al.Evidence-based practice in traditional persian medicine (TPM): A stakeholder and social network analysis. BMC Complement Med Ther2024;24(1):253; doi: 10.1186/s12906-024-04564-5
7.
FjærEL, LandetER, McNamaraCL, EikemoTA. The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in Europe. BMC Complement Med Ther2020;20(1):108–109; doi: 10.1186/s12906-020-02903-w
8.
MoeiniR, MozaffarpurSA, MojahediM, et al.The prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use in the general population of Babol, North of Iran, 2018. BMC Complement Med Ther2021;21(1):113; doi: 10.1186/s12906-021-03281-7
9.
HashempurMH, MosavatSH, HeydariM, ShamsM.Medicinal plants’ use among patients with dyslipidemia: an Iranian cross-sectional survey. Journal of Complementary and Integrative Medicine2019;16(3); doi: 10.1515/jcim-2018-0101
10.
LeeEL, RichardsN, HarrisonJ, et al.Prevalence of use of traditional, complementary and alternative medicine by the general population: A systematic review of national studies published from 2010 to 2019. Drug Saf2022;45(7):713–735; doi: 10.1007/s40264-022-01189-w
11.
LegesseFM, BabantoAM. Factors associated with the use of traditional medicine in Wolaita zone, southern Ethiopia. Sage Open2023;13(1):21–32; doi: 10.1177/21582440231153038
12.
OgbuCE, OparanmaCO, KirbyRS. Factors associated with the use of complementary and alternative medicine/therapy among United States adults with asthma. Healthcare2023;11(7):983.
13.
YalmanF, SancarT. The relationship of factors affecting traditional and complementary medicine practices with regular drug use, presence of chronic disease and level of knowledge: A cross-sectional research. J Tradit Complem Med2022;5(1):31–39; doi: 10.5336/jtracom.2021-84840
14.
AshrafH, SalehiA, SousaniM, et al.Use of complementary alternative medicine and the associated factors among patients with depression. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med2021;2021(1):6626394; doi: 10.1155/2021/6626394
15.
ChukasemratN, CharakornC, LertkhachonsukA-A. The use of complementary and alternative medicine in Thai gynecologic oncology patients: Influencing factors. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med2021;2021(1):1322390–1322399; doi: 10.1155/2021/1322390
16.
YousefiM, ReihaniH, HeydariM, et al.Complementary and alternative medicine use among cancer patients in Iran: A systematic review. Prev Med Rep2024;39:102644; doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102644
17.
LogielA, JorsE, AkugizibweP, et al.Prevalence and socio-economic factors affecting the use of traditional medicine among adults of Katikekile Subcounty, Moroto District, Uganda. Afr Health Sci2021;21(3):1410–1417; doi: 10.4314/ahs.v21i3.52
18.
ChingwaruW, VidmarJ. Prevalence, perceptions and factors influencing the use of traditional and complementary medicine (T&CM) in Zimbabwe’s adult population: The case of Bindura District. Eur J Integr Med2016;8(4):484–493; doi: 10.1016/j.eujim.2016.03.007
19.
VaeziAA, SotoudehA, NamiranianN, et al.Facilitators and barriers of herbal medicine use in diabetic patients: A qualitative study. J Educ Health Promot2021;10(3):303; doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1451_20
20.
ChatterjeeA. Evaluating the barriers to the utilization of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in the United States: An exploratory study. Adv Integr Med2023;10(4):167–171; doi: 10.1016/j.aimed.2023.10.002
21.
AsareC, AziatoL, BoamahD.Facilitators and barriers to the clinical administration of herbal medicine in Ghana: a qualitative study. BMC Complement Med Ther2021;21(1); doi: 10.1186/s12906-021-03334-x
22.
TangkiatkumjaiM, BoardmanH, WalkerD-M.Potential factors that influence usage of complementary and alternative medicine worldwide: a systematic review. BMC Complement Med Ther2020;20(1):363; doi: 10.1186/s12906-020-03157-2
23.
AziatoL, AntwiHO. Facilitators and barriers of herbal medicine use in Accra, Ghana: An inductive exploratory study. BMC Complement Altern Med2016;16(4):142–149; doi: 10.1186/s12906-016-1124-y
24.
IjazN, CarrieH. Governing therapeutic pluralism: An environmental scan of the statutory regulation and government reimbursement of traditional and complementary medicine practitioners in the United States. PLOS Glob Public Health2023;3(8):e0001996; doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001996
25.
RahayuYYS, ArakiT, RosleineD. Factors affecting the use of herbal medicines in the universal health coverage system in Indonesia. J Ethnopharmacol2020;260:112974–112978; doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2020.112974
26.
NajibiSM, SarikhaniY, HajimonfarednejadM, et al.A scoping review of the barriers and facilitators in the use of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine: Insights for health policy development. J Health Popul Nutr2025;44(1):188; doi: 10.1186/s41043-025-00934-y
27.
NasaP, JainR, JunejaD. Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness. World J Methodol2021;11(4):116–129; doi: 10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116
28.
MsibiPN, MogaleR, De WaalM, et al.Using e-Delphi to formulate and appraise the guidelines for women’s health concerns at a coal mine: A case study. Curationis2018;41(1):e1–e6; doi: 10.4102/curationis.v41i1.1934
29.
SchultsJ, KleidonT, ChopraV, et al.International recommendations for a vascular access minimum dataset: A Delphi consensus-building study. BMJ Qual Saf2021;30(9):722–730; doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011274
30.
NajibiSM, LotfiF, KharazmiE, et al.Identification and prioritization of indicators of hospital bed allocation in Iran. World Med & Health Policy2023;15(4):356–379; doi: 10.1002/wmh3.550
31.
BahadoriM, TeimourzadehE, FarzanehA, et al.Prioritizing research needs: Insights from a healthcare organization in Iran. Arch Pharm Pract2011;2(3):135–140.
32.
HwangC-L, LinM-J. Group decision making under multiple criteria: methods and applications. Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.
33.
PMBarnes, EPowell-Griner, KMcFann, et al.editors. Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults: United States, 2002. Seminars in integrative medicine. Elsevier; 2004.
34.
GuetzB, BidmonS. The impact of social influence on the intention to use physician rating websites: Moderated mediation analysis using a mixed methods approach. J Med Internet Res2022;24(11):e37505; doi: 10.2196/37505
35.
TrübnerM, PatzinaA, LehmannJ, et al.Health information-seeking behavior among users of traditional, complementary and integrative medicine (TCIM). BMC Complement Med Ther2025;25(1):111; doi: 10.1186/s12906-025-04843-9
36.
ChungVC, HoFF, LaoL, et al.Implementation science in traditional, complementary and integrative medicine: An overview of experiences from China and the United States. Phytomedicine2023;109(14):154591; doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2022.154591
37.
PoyntonL, DowellA, DewK, et al.General practitioners’ attitudes toward (and use of) complementary and alternative medicine: A New Zealand nationwide survey. N Z Med J2006;119(1247):U2361.
38.
WongCHL, TseJVH, NilsenP, et al.Barriers and facilitators to promoting evidence uptake in Chinese medicine: A qualitative study in Hong Kong. BMC Complement Med Ther2021;21(1):200–211; doi: 10.1186/s12906-021-03372-5
39.
MakhavhuEM, Masala-ChokweME, RamukumbaTS. Exploring patient referral practices of traditional healthcare practitioners in Soshanguve, Gauteng Province, South Africa. Afr Health Sci2024;24(1):262–268; doi: 10.4314/ahs.v24i1.31
40.
IkhoyamehM, OketeWE, OgboyeRM, et al.Integrating traditional medicine into the African healthcare system post-Traditional Medicine Global Summit: Challenges and recommendations. Pan Afr Med J2024;47:146; doi: 10.11604/pamj.2024.47.146.43011
41.
LampiaoF, ChisakaJ, ClementsC. Communication between traditional medical practitioners and western medical professionals. Front Sociol2019;4(21):37; doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00037
42.
BrewerNJ, TurriseSL, Kim-GodwinYS, et al.Nurses’ knowledge and treatment beliefs: Use of complementary and alternative medicine for pain management. J Holist Nurs2019;37(3):248–259; doi: 10.1177/0898010118822212
43.
EckertM, AmarellC, AnheyerD, et al.Integrative pediatrics: Successful implementation of integrative medicine in a German hospital setting—concept and realization. Children (Basel)2018;5(9):122; doi: 10.3390/children5090122
44.
MutomboPN, KasiloOMJ, JamesPB, et al.Experiences and challenges of African traditional medicine: Lessons from COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Glob Health2023;8(8):e010813; doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010813
45.
RajaM, CramerH, LeeMS, et al.Addressing the challenges of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine research: An international perspective and proposed strategies moving forward. Perspect Integr Med2024;3(2):86–97; doi: 10.56986/pim.2024.06.004
46.
SarrisJ. Current challenges in appraising complementary medicine evidence. Med J Aust2012;196(5):310–311; doi: 10.5694/mja11.10751
47.
SpakS. The position of indigenous knowledge in Canadian co-management organizations. Anthropologica2005:233–246.
48.
OuelletC, SaïasT, SitV, et al.Access to indigenous and allopathic medicines: A systematic review of barriers and facilitators. gjcpp2018;9(2); doi: 10.17161/gjcpp.v9i2.20712
49.
DureyA, ThompsonSC. Reducing the health disparities of Indigenous Australians: Time to change focus. BMC Health Serv Res2012;12(10):151; doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-151
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
