Abstract
Objectives:
Women with exercise-associated amenorrhea demonstrate cardiovascular perturbations such as endothelial dysfunction and altered lipid profiles. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of pharmacological/nutraceutical and non-pharmacological interventions for improving these cardiovascular perturbations.
Design, Data Sources, and Eligibility Criteria:
A literature search was performed in October 2023 and updated in July 2024 of CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Cochrane Library, Embase (Ovid), MEDLINE (Ovid), SPORTDiscus (EBSCOhost), and Scopus from inception to present with no date or language limitations and four sources of gray literature. Experimental and quasi-experimental pre–post studies of women with exercise-associated amenorrhea, using pharmacological/nutraceutical or non-pharmacological intervention, were included.
Results and Summary:
Three studies from three countries were included. Interventions included 9 months of low-dose oral contraceptives and 4 weeks of folic acid (10 mg/day). Both interventions improved endothelial function in women experiencing exercise-associated amenorrhea, from 1.42% to 4.88% and 3.0% to 7.7%, respectively. The impact of oral contraceptives on lipids was conflicting, and increases were seen in select inflammatory markers, including high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and tumor necrosis factor.
Conclusion:
Oral contraceptives or folic acid may improve the endothelial dysfunction associated with exercise-associated amenorrhea. As cardiovascular disease remains a global cause of mortality for women, further investigation into the long-term cardiovascular consequences of impaired vascular and lipid profiles of exercise-associated amenorrhea is warranted.
Introduction
Women remain under-researched for cardiovascular disease (CVD), and efforts to improve cardiovascular health in women have stagnated over the last decade.
1
It is important to consider less recognized possible risk factors for CVD in women, such as secondary amenorrhea. Secondary amenorrhea is characterized by cessation of menses for at least three consecutive months and estrogen deficiency.
2
A common form of secondary amenorrhea is functional hypothalamic amenorrhea (FHA), which is estimated to affect 17.4 million women globally,
3
accounting for about one-third of all cases of secondary amenorrhea.2,4 There are three interrelated, often overlapping pathogeneses of FHA, including exercise-associated (EAA), weight-loss or stress-related.
5
While the prevalence is 3%−14% in the general population,6–8
it rises to 40%−56% in recreational and competitive endurance athletes (
Women in their reproductive years are considered to be at a lower risk of CVD when compared with age-matched men. 19 For men and women, impaired endothelial function is a permissive factor in the development of atherosclerosis.20,21 Regular aerobic exercise training attenuates the age-associated decline in endothelial function. 22 However, sex differences in this finding have been reported. Aerobic exercise augmented endothelial function in middle-aged men compared with untrained men. 23 In contrast, estrogen-deficient, trained postmenopausal women demonstrated endothelial function similar to untrained postmenopausal women, but estradiol therapy was shown to augment endothelial function in response to endurance training. 24 This suggests that estrogen may be essential in conferring endothelial adaptations to exercise in women. 24
In the vasculature, endogenous estrogen is essential in maintaining vessel integrity and vascular function. Estrogen increases the production and bioavailability of endothelial nitric oxide
A recent systematic review and meta-analyses 34 found that compared with age- and fitness-matched controls with eumenorrhea, women experiencing EAA demonstrated significantly lower estrogen levels. The EAA women demonstrated significantly reduced flow-mediated dilation (FMD), suggesting the beneficial effects of exercise may be obviated in these women.35,36 The EAA women also demonstrated adverse lipid profile changes, including significantly higher total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides. These findings are consistent with lipid profiles in postmenopausal women. 37 Lastly, nonsignificant differences were found between groups for oxidative stress and apolipoproteins. It is not known if the cardiovascular perturbations of EAA present a potential future cardiovascular health burden. Therefore, we sought to synthesize the evidence seeking to improve the cardiovascular perturbations in women experiencing EAA.
A preliminary search of the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,
Review question
What is the effectiveness of non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions to improve the cardiovascular perturbations of EAA?
Methods
As we used previously published anonymized data, informed consent or approval from an institutional review board was not required. The JBI methodology for systematic reviews of effectiveness was followed in the conduct of this review and synthesis.
38
The review was conducted in accordance with an
Inclusion criteria
Participants
This review included studies that included exercise-trained women experiencing EAA. The authors acknowledge that amenorrhea is experienced by those whose biological sex assigned at birth is “female,” but they may not identify as cisgender; recognizing language inconsistencies in the literature, we included studies that described their sample as females or women. We considered “exercising” as purposeful exercise for a minimum of 2 hours per week and less than 2 hours per week as sedentary 39 and EAA as the absence of menses for a minimum of three consecutive cycles. 2 Due to variability in the ages of experiencing menarche, no lower age limit was applied. 40 To reflect the age of early natural menopause, we set an upper age limit of 45 years. 41
Intervention
This review considered studies that used pharmacological/nutraceutical interventions (
Comparator
This review considered any pre–post comparison of a pharmacological/nutraceutical or non-pharmacological intervention for EAA against a control group.
Outcomes
The primary outcome of interest was endothelial function, as it is a sentinel event in the development of atherosclerosis and can predict future cardiovascular events.20,21 The secondary outcomes included additional cardiovascular perturbations of EAA (lipid profiles, inflammatory markers, arterial stiffness, or changes to cardiovascular physiology). Studies were excluded if no cardiovascular data were reported.
Types of studies
This review considered experimental and quasi-experimental study designs, including randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, pre–post studies, and interrupted time-series studies. We excluded non-research-based designs.
Search strategy
This search is reported according to the PRISMA-S extension for searching, 42 and methodological guidance for searching was sought from the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Chapter 4: Searching for and Selecting Studies. 43 The search strategy aimed to locate published and unpublished studies. A preliminary search was performed in MEDLINE (Ovid) on October 17, 2023. The text words in the titles and abstracts of relevant articles and the index terms were used in developing the full search strategy for MEDLINE (Ovid). The comprehensive and systematic search strategy was developed collaboratively with an experienced health sciences librarian (M.K.) to identify all relevant published studies.
The following bibliographic databases were searched from inception to November 15th, 2023: Medline (1946 to Present) and EMBASE (1974 to Present)
Study selection
Following the systematic search, the identified citations were collated and uploaded to Endnote V20.4 (Clarivate Analytics, PA, USA), and duplicates were removed manually. Citations were uploaded into the JBI System for the Unified Management, Assessment, and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI; Joanna Briggs Institute, Adelaide, Australia).
44
Two independent reviewers (N.L.T., J.S.) performed all screening stages. A pilot test was performed with 7% (50) of the titles and abstracts. As one reviewer’s responses were a constant, we were unable to calculate Cohen’s kappa; reviewer agreement was 96%. Titles and abstracts were then screened against

PRISMA flow diagram. Search results and study selection and inclusion process. 45 PRISMA, preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Assessment of methodological quality
Two independent reviewers (N.L.T., J.S.) critically appraised the selected studies for methodological quality using standardized JBI critical appraisal instruments. 38 Both reviewers discussed the results in a final appraisal in accordance with the JBI methodology. 38 Disagreements were resolved through discussion. We determined the level of methodological quality as fair if less than 50% of the items were rated “yes,” moderate if between 51% and 80% of the items were rated “yes,” and good if more than 80% of the items were rated “yes.” All studies were included regardless of methodological quality.
Data extraction and synthesis
Two independent reviewers (N.L.T., J.S.) extracted data using the standardized data extraction tool from JBI SUMARI, 46 following a pilot test with one study to ensure both reviewers were extracting sufficient data. The extracted data included details about the study setting, participant characteristics and groups, intervention, comparator, outcomes, methods, and results. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. Due to the differences in study groups and interventions, a meta-analysis was not performed, and the data are described narratively.
Results
Study inclusion
A total of 1414 records were retrieved through database searching and citation chaining. After removing duplicates, 858 records were screened by title and abstract for eligibility. Of the remaining records, nine full-text articles were retrieved and assessed for eligibility. Six articles were excluded; articles with reasons for exclusion are provided in Supplementary Table S1. The remaining three studies were included and critically appraised.
Methodological quality
Three studies were assessed for methodological quality. The results of the critical appraisals are found in Supplementary Tables S2 and S3. One study was of fair quality 47 and two were of good quality.48,49 All studies provided reasons for exclusions or withdrawals. Potential confounding causes of secondary amenorrhea, such as thyroid disease and pituitary tumors, were addressed by way of inclusion/exclusion criteria in the individual studies. All the studies included exercise-trained women. One study compared EAA with exercising women with eumenorrhea and a sedentary control group. 48 One compared EAA with exercising women with eumenorrhea, 49 and one compared two groups of EAA (OCP vs. a control group of Calcium and Vitamin D). 47
Characteristics of included studies
The three included study designs were a single-blind randomized clinical trial
47
and two pre–post quasi-experimental studies.48,49 Characteristics of the included studies are summarized in Table 1. The studies included in this review were published between 2005 and 2018 in three countries, Iran,
47
Sweden,
48
and the United States,
49
and were conducted in medical centers. The total number of participants in all studies was 69, and the number of participants per study ranged from 13 to 36. The population consisted of exercise-trained women participating in various types of endurance training. The inclusion/exclusion criteria were clearly defined, requiring participants to be physically active, healthy, free of preexisting disease, and not taking hormonal therapy such as OCPs. The identified interventions included folic acid 10 mg per day for 4 weeks
49
and 9 months of low-dose monophasic, combined OCP (30 µg ethinyl estradiol and 150 µg levonorgestrel).47,48 No non-pharmacological/nutraceutical interventions, such as lifestyle modifications, were identified that were eligible for this review. However, there is some evidence showing that endothelial function can be improved with the resumption of menses.50,51 Outcomes were measured reliably, and two studies48,49 used appropriate statistical analysis. Two studies considered EAA to be the absence of menses for three or more consecutive cycles,48,49 and one required participants to experience EAA for at least 2 years.
47
Primary outcomes included endothelial function,48,49 bone mineral density, and cardiovascular perturbations (lipid profiles, inflammatory markers,
Characteristics of Included Studies
Values are mean (SD). AA, athletes with amenorrhea; BP, blood pressure; EA, athletes with eumenorrhea; FHA, functional hypothalamic amenorrhea; FMD, flow-mediated dilation; HR, heart rate; OCP, oral contraceptive pills.
Review findings
Endothelial function
Rickenlund et al. 48 reported that following 9 months of OCP use, FMD% significantly increased from 1.42% to 4.88% in EAA and sedentary controls from 4.59% to 7.01%, while a nonsignificant difference was noted in exercising women with eumenorrhea from 6.59% to 5.25%. Hoch et al. 49 found a significant increase in FMD% from 3.0% to 7.7% in EAA when treated with folic acid for 4 weeks, while FMD% remained statistically similar in exercising women with eumenorrhea (6.7%–5.9%).
Lipid profiles
Rickenlund et al. 48 reported that lipid profiles did not differ between amenorrheic and eumenorrheic athletes before or after 9 months of OCP use. Within groups, high-density lipoprotein significantly decreased in all groups. Dadgostar et al. 47 found that after 9 months of OCP, very low-density lipoprotein, Apo B, and Apo B/Apo A ratio were decreased in athletes who were amenorrheic at study entry. No differences were found in high-density lipoprotein, triglycerides, or Apo A. See Table 2.
Lipid Profiles
Values are mean ± SD or median (P25−P75). Legend: Apo A, apolipoprotein A; Apo B, apolipoprotein B; HDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; VLDL, very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Inflammatory markers
Rickenlund et al. 48 reported an overall significant increase in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and tumor necrosis factor-α within, but not between groups following 9 months of OCP use. These authors also reported an overall significant decrease within, but not between, groups in vascular cell-adhesion molecule-1. Dadgostar et al. 47 reported no significant differences in inflammatory markers after 9 months of OCP use. See Table 3.
Inflammatory Markers
Values are mean ± SD or median (P25–P75). Legend: hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; IL-6, interleukin 6; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha; VCAM-1, Vascular cell adhesion protein-1.
Discussion
In this review, we sought to identify the effectiveness of pharmacological/nutraceutical interventions that may improve the cardiovascular perturbations in vascular and lipid profiles observed in women with EAA. The identified outcomes included endothelial dysfunction, lipid profiles, and inflammatory markers. The evidence in this area is limited. This systematic review identified one experimental and two quasi-experimental studies. The identified interventions included folic acid 10 mg per day for 4 weeks 49 and 9 months of low-dose monophasic, combined OCP (30 µg ethinyl estradiol and 150 µg levonorgestrel).47,48
There were some conflicting findings on the effect of OCPs on lipid profiles in EAA. This may have been partly due to small sample sizes, and it is unclear if correction for multiple comparisons was performed by Dadgostar et al. 47 Increases were observed in the inflammatory markers, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and tumor necrosis factor-α. Importantly, both folic acid supplementation and OCPs lead to improvements in endothelial function. The exact mechanisms of action are unclear. The improvements in endothelial function from folic acid are postulated to be due to the regeneration of tetrahydrobiopterin, a cofactor in the nitric oxide synthase production of endothelium-derived nitric oxide.52,53 In OCPs, the mechanism is thought to be the estrogenic component, as estrogen increases the bioavailability of nitric oxide.54,55
The findings on improvements to endothelial dysfunction are consistent with evidence exploring the use of estrogen replacement in estrogen-deficient pre- and postmenopausal women. Exogenous estrogen supplementation has been shown to improve endothelial function in premenopausal women who have undergone bilateral oophorectomy and hysterectomy 56 and to positively affect the endothelium in postmenopausal women.57,58 Folic acid supplementation has also been shown to exert variable effects on endothelial function in eumenorrheic exercising women. For example, in eumenorrheic runners, 6 weeks of 10 mg per day of folic acid significantly increased FMD values by 3.5%. 59 In contrast, 4 weeks of folic acid at 10 mg per day did not statistically alter FMD in eumenorrheic runners, 49 suggesting a longer duration of supplementation of folic acid may be needed to help bring about improvements in FMD. However, in eumenorrheic, oligomenorrheic, and amenorrheic professional ballet dancers who presented with reduced FMD (<5%) at study entry, 4 weeks of 10 mg per day of folic acid significantly increased FMD from ∼3% to 7%, 60 suggesting that folic acid may exert favorable vascular effects in women who present with impaired FMD, regardless of menstrual status.
While treatment with folic acid and OCP may improve endothelial function, neither addresses the underlying cause of EAA nor the consequences of energy deficiency in women with FHA. Non-pharmacological treatment of FHA should be the prioritized treatment strategy, including increased energy availability, weight gain, and resumption of normal menses. 61 Regular menstruation and estrogen levels are important to bone health62–65 and confer cardioprotective effects.26,54,61,66 It is important to note that there may be challenges to restoring energy balance (and subsequently menstruation) in women with FHA due to complex factors, including concerns about leanness or body image, athletic performance, and patterns of disordered eating. 10 The withdrawal bleeding associated with OCPs is not a restoration of menses but rather a result of exogenous hormones and can create a false sense of security.
Women may choose to use estrogen-containing OCPs for numerous reasons, such as contraception, management of painful periods, menstrual migraines, premenstrual syndrome, or acne. 67 In exercising women with FHA, estrogen-containing OCPs may be administered to protect bone health in those with very low bone mineral density. 61 However, OCP use is not consistently associated with improvements in bone mineral density in endurance athletes.68,69 Negative effects of OCPs on bone health are associated with the “first pass effect,” whereby ethinyl estradiol metabolism in the liver decreases hepatic synthesis of Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I). 70 IGF-I is an important stimulus for bone formation. With consideration of contraceptive needs and contraindications, the current recommendation for women with FHA requiring pharmacological therapy is hormone replacement therapy consisting of transdermal estrogen with cyclic progesterone. 61 Common side effects of combined OCP use include regular vaginal bleeding, nausea, bloating, sore or tender breasts, and headaches. 71 Hypertension may also occur in ∼4% to 5% of women. 72 OCPs have also been associated with a 1.6-fold increased risk of myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke (risk is highest in OCPs containing >50µg of estrogen) 73 and a small absolute increased risk of venous thrombosis, particularly during the first year. 74 Low-dose OCPs contain less than 50 µg of estrogen, with high-dose OCPs containing 50 µg or greater. 75 Currently, low-dose OCPs are the preferred formulation. 72
As CVD remains the leading cause of death for women globally, 1 it is important to consider strategies to increase the reporting and, thereby, the subsequent recognition and treatment of FHA in women. Beyond the cardiovascular perturbations, FHA is associated with deleterious effects on bone mineral density and changes to metabolic hormone profiles and reproductive hormones. 2 While it is positive to note that endothelial function can be improved in EAA with the resumption of menses,50,51 the long-term cardiovascular consequences of FHA in this population of women remain unknown. Importantly, the clinical significance of these findings requires larger, long-term studies.
Study Limitations
This review has several limitations. One included study 47 had several methodological flaws that may affect the validity of the findings. Furthermore, the limited evidence makes it challenging to determine the magnitude of effectiveness of the identified interventions, as a meta-analysis could not be performed. Due to our inclusion and exclusion criteria, we cannot generalize our findings to women beyond those with EAA. It is important to note there was heterogeneity between studies for the diagnostic criteria of FHA and the type and duration of exercise training. Lastly, as the included studies had small sample sizes, the risk for type II errors is high.
Conclusions
Cardiovascular disease presents a global health burden for women, remaining a leading cause of mortality. It is imperative to begin considering the impact of less recognized risk factors for CVD that may occur during the reproductive years for women, such as FHA. Due to the limited number of studies examining interventions to improve these cardiovascular perturbations of EAA, a meta-analysis for the magnitude of the effectiveness of these interventions cannot be performed at present. However, it appears that the endothelial dysfunction may be improved with hormonal contraceptives and folic acid supplementation. As the long-term cardiovascular effects of hypoestrogenemia in athletic women of reproductive age are unknown, future prospective studies are warranted. Lastly, increasing awareness in women and clinicians of the adverse cardiovascular alterations associated with energy deficiency is urgently needed.
Authors’ Contributions
N.L.T.: Conceptualization, data acquisition, analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, and writing—original draft. J.S.: Analysis and writing—review/editing. E.O.D.: Conceptualization, interpretation, and writing—review/editing C.M.: Conceptualization and writing—review/editing A.H.: Writing—reviewing/editing M.K.: Investigation and writing—review/editing. C.M.N.: Conceptualization, formal analysis, resources, supervision, and writing—review/editing.
Footnotes
Data Availability
The authors declare that all supporting data are available within this article and supplemental file. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist is available in Data S1.
Ethics Statement
The research reported has adhered to the relevant ethical guidelines.
Patient Consent
The authors confirm that patient consent is not applicable to this article, as it is a review article that looked at de-identified, published articles.
Patient and Public Involvement
Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
Supplemental Material
Abbreviations
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
