Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background: Marital satisfaction is an integral part of the life of Pakistani women. Married women cannot get satisfied with their lives without marital satisfaction. But previous studies hint at the possible role of sexual satisfaction in addition to marital satisfaction to bring about overall satisfaction with life in married women.

Aims: This study was designed with an objective to assess the mediating role of sexual satisfaction in marital satisfaction as a predictor and satisfaction with life as an outcome in married Pakistani women. Previous studies have demonstrated a possible link among marital satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, and satisfaction with life.

Settings and Design: One hundred married women of childbearing age (18-48 years, M = 29 years) were recruited by a convenient sampling method from the three hospitals of Bahawalpur in the South Punjab state of Pakistan.

Methods and Material: Three questionnaires (a) Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale; (b) Index of Sexual Satisfaction, and (c) Satisfaction with Life Scale, were administered to collect the data.

Statistical Analysis: The results were analyzed by the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM, USA), version 25, and Process Macro, version 3.4, and expressed in the form of descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, and frequencies), mediation analysis, analysis of co-variance, analysis of variance and t test.

Results and Conclusion: The unstandardized indirect effects yielded a significant mediation (IE = 0.4757, SE = 0.1786, P < .05, LL = 0.1736, UL = 0.8681). The sexual satisfaction fully mediated the relationship between marital satisfaction and satisfaction with life in married women. It was concluded that married women cannot get marital satisfaction and satisfaction with life without a satisfied sexual life.

Keywords

Marital satisfaction psychological well-being satisfaction with life sexual satisfaction women health and sexuality women sexual dysfunctions

Introduction

It has been estimated that more than 90% of world’s population will get married at least once.¹ The satisfied marital relationship and its determinants are always of interest to social scientists globally. Sexual issues, such as sexual satisfaction, are one of the biggest determining factors in marital adjustment and satisfaction.^{2, 3} In recent times, there has been tremendous increase in studies focusing on male sexuality and its relationship with psychosocial phenomena, but the role of sexuality in women’s lives is largely ignored.⁴ The available studies are done with Western women only.⁵ In countries like Pakistan, it has not always been easy to study the link of sexual processes with other psychological phenomena such as marital satisfaction in women. Pakistan is a conservative Islamic country which has Eastern collectivistic values culture. It is deeply ingrained in Women in Pakistan not to openly discuss their marital and sexual matters and honor the dignity of their husbands and families. The patriarchy and collectivistic nature of decision-making in Pakistani society left little room for studies related to sexual satisfaction in the context of marital relationship among women.⁶ The present research was conducted to fill this gap.

Ellis defined marital satisfaction as a state of contentment, satisfaction, and pleasure that each member of a married couple enjoys mutually when all aspects of their living together are taken into account.⁷ It depicts the overall state of affairs of each member of a married couple.⁸ There are several dimensions of the concept of marital satisfaction such as sexual satisfaction, receiving support from partner, participation in decision-making process, relationship with partner’s family, social support, psychological well-being, and satisfaction with life.^9-13 Marital satisfaction depends on variables such as the gender of partner,¹² duration of being married,¹⁴ age,¹⁵ age at the time of marriage,¹⁶ the number of marriages,¹⁶ the number of children,^17-18 socioeconomic and work status,^{16, 19} and education.²⁰

The association of several demographic variables with marital satisfaction has different results. The duration of being married has mixed results on marital satisfaction. Some studies report that marital satisfaction decreases as the time of being married increases,^{21, 22} whereas some other studies report the opposite.^{23, 24} Age also influences marital satisfaction. The individuals in middle age group experience more marital problems and less satisfaction as compared to individuals in old age.^{21, 25-28} Similarly, age at the time of marriage is also important in marital satisfaction.^{29, 30} More age at the time of marriage is associated with greater marital satisfaction and less divorce rates. Number of marriages also impacts marital satisfaction. It has been shown that marital satisfaction was high within first marriages than in second or later marriages.³¹ Duration of marriage appeared to affect marital satisfaction significantly in first marriages as compared to second or later marriages.³¹

The presence of children in a marital relationship is associated with marital satisfaction although increase in the number of children could lead to marital problems.^{26, 32} In Asian cultures, having a male child significantly contributes towards marital satisfaction.³³ The effects of education and work status of women on marital satisfaction are mixed. Majority of studies associate education and employment of women with marital satisfaction, some studies report no effects of women education and employment on marital satisfaction while some others report lowered marital satisfaction in employed women as compared to unemployed women.^{24, 34-42}

Sexual satisfaction of a woman can be understood by applying one of the many models of female sexual response or functioning. Sexual functioning of a woman can be understood in terms of phases or stages of sexual response cycles presented by various theorists. One such theory was presented by Masters and Johnson involving 4 stages of sexual response in women, namely excitement, plateau, orgasm, and resolution. This model was presented in the 1960s and is known as the linear model of female sexual response.⁴³ This model views female sexual response progressing from the first stage till the end in a linear fashion. The successful experience through these stages often results in sexual satisfaction. Sexual satisfaction is the end product of the sexual response cycle in women.^{44, 45} Renowned sex therapist Helen Singer Kaplan revised the stage model of Masters and Johnson and presented her 3-stage model consisting of desire, arousal, and orgasm.⁴⁶ The model of Masters–Johnson–Kaplan has been criticized as it did not take into consideration non biological factors of sexuality like relationship.⁴⁷

In 1977, 2 researchers Whipple and Brash McGreer suggested another model of female sexual functioning known as the circular model.⁴⁸ This model noted that females’ sexual function does not always function in a biological linear way.⁴⁹ This model has been based on the work done by Reed and outlines 4 stages of female sexual response, namely seduction (desire), sensations (excitement and plateau), surrender (orgasm), and reflection (resolution). If a woman’s sexual experiences demonstrate satisfaction and pleasure for her, she will be seeking another such experience hence making the cycle circular.

Contrary to the circular model, Basson and colleagues presented another model of female sexual response known as the non-circular model.^{44, 50-53} Basson’s model considers the female sexual function distinctively different from the male sexual function. The female sexual function is affected by psychosocial factors such as relationship satisfaction and past sexual experiences. Unlike male sexuality, female’s sexual function is guided by her partner and her attraction toward the partner and not by her own biological libido. Females seek out sexual activity in the context of a relationship. According to Basson, the goal of female sexuality is emotional satisfaction and not always physical satisfaction.^{44, 53} Basson’s model places more emphasis on emotional, psychological, and relational aspects of a woman’s sexual response, whereas the Masters–Johnson–Kaplan model places more emphasis on physical aspects of a woman’s sexual response.⁵⁴

The current studies regarding the female sexual function model view female sexuality from the biopsychosocial model taking into consideration physical and psychosocial factors surrounding sexual expression.^{44, 49, 55} But majority of studies report that healthy women endorsed circular models of sexual response.⁵⁶

Studies have found a significant relationship between improved sexual functioning and high sexual satisfaction.^57-60 The latter is defined as one’s subjective evaluation of all aspects related to one’s sexuality within a relationship.⁶¹ Sexuality is an integral part of a woman’s marital satisfaction and satisfaction with life.^62-65

Failure in satisfaction of sexual needs results not only in physical and mental symptoms but also ruins the quality of marital relationships, thus leading to decreased marital satisfaction.^{66, 67} Factors such as number of children, being pregnant, and relationship quality determine the quality of sexual functioning.⁶⁸ Previous studies establish that marital satisfaction leads to improved sexual functioning in women and vice versa.^{2, 69, 70}

Marital relationships are the strongest indicators of psychological well-being and satisfaction with life in married individuals.⁷¹ Sexual satisfaction is one of the factors leading to satisfaction with life.⁷² Sexual dysfunctions lead to lowered psychological well-being and satisfaction with life among women.⁷³

Satisfaction with life is a subjective concept. It includes concepts such as happiness, peace of mind, and fulfillment. Studies have established a direct link between marital satisfaction and satisfaction with life.⁷⁴ The studies indicate that the relationship between marital satisfaction and satisfaction with life is 2-way.^{75, 76} Numerous studies show that sexual satisfaction is an essential condition of satisfaction with life, well-being, quality of life, emotional satisfaction, and happiness.^{77, 78} Sexual health and satisfaction has been shown to help lead to a satisfied life in women, but this variable is under explored when it comes to its relationship with other variables of human importance.⁷⁹ The essential nature of sexual satisfaction in securing one’s well-being makes it one of the important variables to be researched.

Given the importance of sexual satisfaction in maintaining a satisfied life and marriage, the present study investigated the mediating role of sexual satisfaction in marital satisfaction as predicting satisfaction with life in married women. It was assumed that the linear relationship between marital satisfaction and satisfaction with life in women was mediated by the presence of variable of sexual satisfaction.

Materials and Methods

Participants

A total of 100 married women of reproductive age ranging from 18 years to 48 years (M = 29 years) were included in the sample. The sample was selected conveniently from the outpatient gynecology departments of three hospitals in Bahawalpur in South Punjab state of Pakistan.

Inclusion Criteria

The married women of child-bearing age residing in Bahawalpur in South Punjab state of Pakistan were included in the sample.

Exclusion Criteria

The single, widow, pregnant, or menopausal women or women under the age of 18 years were excluded from the sample.

Instruments

Demographic Information Questionnaire

A demographic information questionnaire was designed to record the demographics of the married women including duration of marriage, age, age at the time of marriage, number of marriage, number of children, work status, and education of married women.

Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale

The Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale⁸⁰ (KMSS) is a 3-item self-report, quick, and easy-to-administer standardized scale to measure marital satisfaction. The items are scored on 7 point Likert scale ranging from extremely dissatisfied (1) to extremely satisfied (7). The scale score is a sum of the total obtained score of the participant. The total scale score may range from minimum 3 to maximum 21. The higher scores mean better marital satisfaction. The Cronbach alpha reliability of the scale has been estimated to be 0.84. The discriminant validity of the scale has been estimated to be 0.76.

The Index of Sexual Satisfaction

The Index of Sexual Satisfaction⁸¹ (ISS) is a self-report short scale to measure the degree of satisfaction or dissatisfaction in a dyadic relationship. The scale consists of 25 Likert-type items. The maximum score is 100. The higher scores above 30 indicate the degree of sexual dissatisfaction in the dyadic relationship. The scale has internal consistency and test–retest reliability of 0.90. The discriminant validity of the scale is 0.76.

Satisfaction With Life Scale

The Satisfaction with Life Scale⁸² (SWLS) is a 5-items scale designed to measure one’s overall general satisfaction with life. This is a 7-point Likert scale and the responses are recorded either strongly agree (7) to strongly disagree (1). The score can range from minimum 5 to maximum 35. The higher scale score indicates higher satisfaction with life. The Cronbach alpha reliability of the scale is 0.87, whereas test-–retest reliability of the scale is 0.82.

Procedure

The nature of the study was explained to each participant fully and written informed consent was taken from all the participating women. The standardized versions of three questionnaires (a) KMSS (b) ISS, and (c) SWLS were administered to the participants.

Table 1.

Descriptive Statistics of Demographic Variables

Demographic Variables	N	Minimum	Maximum	Mean	Std Deviation
Duration	100	1.00	18.00	6.8700	4.00670
Age	100	18.00	48.00	29.4600	6.93901
Age at time of marriage	100	14.00	33.00	21.6200	3.87111
No of marriage	100	1.00	3.00	1.0900	0.32083
No of children	100	0.00	6.00	1.9100	1.70024
Work status	100	1.00	2.00	1.4200	0.49604
Education	100	1.00	2.00	1.1800	0.38612

Table 2.

Frequencies of Demographic Variables

Demographic Variables Characteristics		Frequency	%
Duration	1-10 years	77	77
	11-18 years	23	23
	Total	100	100
Age	18-34 years	76	76
	35-48 years	24	24
	Total	100	100
Age at time of marriage	18 years or below	21	21
	19 years or above	79	79
	Total	100	100
No. of marriage	First marriage	92	92
	Second/third marriage	8	8
	Total	100	100
No. of children	Issueless	30	30
	1 child	13	13
	2 children	23	23
	3 children	16	16
	4 or more children	18	18
	Total	100	100
Work status	Housewife	58	58
	Working women	42	42
	Total	100	100
Education	Educated	82	82
	Illiterate	18	18
	Total	100	100

Statistical Analysis

Data was analyzed by the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM, USA), version 25, and Macro Process, v3.4. The analysis were presented by descriptive statistics including mean, standard deviation, frequencies, mediation analysis, analysis of co-variance, analysis of variance, and independent samples t test. In these analyses, mediation is significant when the 95% bias corrected and accelerated confidence intervals for the indirect effect did not include zero.^{83, 84} The data were collected after obtaining the approval from the Research Ethics Committee at the institution of the authors’ affiliation.

Results

Tables 1 and 2 describe the descriptive statistics including mean, standard deviation, and frequencies of the demographic variables. A total of 100 married women participated in the study whose age ranged from 18 to 48 years (M = 29.4600, SD = 6.93901). There were 76% women in the age range of 18-34 years while there were 24% women in the age range of 35-48 years. They had been married for at least 1 year and maximum for a period of 18 years (M = 6.8700, SD = 4.00670). Majority of the women had been married for 10 or less years (77%), while only 23% had been married for more than 10 years. At the time of marriage, their minimum age was 14 years and maximum age was 33 years (M = 21.6200, SD = 3.87111). A total of 21% women had been married when they were 18 or less years, while majority (79%) had been married when they were 19 years or above. The majority (92%) had been married for the first time (M = 1.0900, SD = 0.32083). The minimum number of children was none and maximum number of children was 6 (M = 1.9100, SD = 1.70024). A total of 30% women were issueless whereas 13% had 1 child, 23% had 2 children, 16% had 3 children, and 18% of the women had 4 or more children. A total of 58% women were housewives whereas 42% were working women. A total of 82% women were educated whereas 18% were illiterate.

The results of mediation analysis of sexual satisfaction have been outlined in Table 3. The bootstrapping analyses with 10,000 samples^{83, 84} revealed a significant indirect effect of marital satisfaction on satisfaction with life via sexual satisfaction (LL = 0.1736, UL = 0.8681). Results based on 10,000 bootstrapped samples indicated that whilst the total effect of marital satisfaction on satisfaction with life was significant (TE = 0.7429, SE = 0.1482, P = .0000), the direct effect was not (DE = 0.2672, SE = 0.1608, P = .0998). Sexual satisfaction fully mediated the relationship between marital satisfaction and satisfaction with life (IE lower 95% CI = 0.1736, upper 95% CI = 0.8681). Such participants who indicated high levels of marital satisfaction were more likely to experience sexual satisfaction, and through sexual satisfaction, more likely to indicate satisfaction with life. Because zero is not in the 95% confidence interval of IE, the indirect effect is significantly different from zero at P < .05 (2-tailed).

Table 3.

Results of Mediation Analyses (With Process, v3.4)

Effect	Non Standardized Coefficients (Standardized Coefficients)	T	P	SE	95% CI LL	95 % CI UL
A (predictor-mediator)	0.8182 (.5719)	6.9020	.0000	0.1185	0.5830	1.0535
B (mediator-outcome)	0.5814(.5056)	5.1716	.0000	0.1124	0.3583	0.8045
c (DE)	0.2672	1.6616	.0998	0.1608	–0.0520	0.5864
ab (IE)	0.4757			0.1786	0.1736	0.8681
ab (IE)	0.0690 (partially standardized)			0.0272	0.0244	0.1294
ab (IE)	0.7892 (completely standardized)			0.1104	0.1010	0.5276
c (TE)	0.7429(0.4517)	5.0114	.0000	0.1482	0.4487	1.0371

Notes:

1. LL = lower limit; UL = upper limit.

2. N = 100. Model 4. Bootstrapping = 10,000 samples. 95% CI: Corrected 95% confidence intervals. Predictor: marital satisfaction; mediator: sexual satisfaction; outcome: satisfaction with life; P < .05.

Table 4.

Results of Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA)

Demographic Variables	Type III Sum ²	df	F	Sig.	Partial Eta ²
Duration	0.002	1(51)	0.000	0.986	0.000
Age	4.340	1(51)	0.541	0.465	0.010
Age at time of marriage	0.727	1(51)	0.091	0.765	0.002

Table 5.

Results of Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

Demographic Variables		df	F	Sig.
No. of marriage	Marital satisfaction	2(97)	0.808	0.449
	Satisfaction with life	2(97)	0.628	0.536
	Sexual satisfaction	2(97)	0.337	0.715
No. of children	Marital satisfaction	6(93)	0.306	0.932
	Satisfaction with life	6(93)	0.556	0.764
	Sexual satisfaction	6(93)	0.739	0.620

Table 6.

Results of Independent Samples t Test

Demographic Variables		M(SD)	t	df	Sig.	95% CI LL	95% CI UL
Work status	Marital satisfaction	16.2586(3.98048)HW17.2143(4.45868)W	–1.126	98	0.263	–2.63922	.72789
	Satisfaction with life	22.1724(6.49463)HW22.9524(7.47338)W	–0.556	98	0.579	–3.56270	2.00277
	Sexual satisfaction	19.0862(5.45567)HW21.4762(6.48916)W	–1.941	98	0.056	–4.84064	.06067
Education	Marital satisfaction	16.9878(4.20022)E15.1667(3.92953)I	1.684	98	0.095	–0.32482	3.96710
	Satisfaction with life	22.6220(7.09310)E21.9444(6.07282)I	0.376	98	0.708	–2.90049	4.25550
	Sexual satisfaction	20.6707(5.94014)E17.4444(5.69026)I	2.102	98	0.038	0.17999	6.27259

Note: HW = housewives; W = working women; E = educated women; I = illiterate women.

Table 4 outlines the results of analysis of covariance run to see the effect of marital and sexual satisfaction on satisfaction with life when controlling for duration of marriage, age, and age at the time of marriage among women. There was found no significant effect of marital and sexual satisfaction on satisfaction with life among women when duration of marriage (F(1,51) = 0.000, P > .05), age (F(1,51) = 0.541, P > .05), and age at the time of marriage (F(1,51) = 0.091, P > .05) were controlled.

Table 5 gives the results of analysis of variance calculated to see the effects of demographic variables, namely, number of marriage and number of children on marital and sexual satisfaction and satisfaction with life among women. There was no significant effect of number of marriage (F(2,97) = 0.808, P > .05); (F(2,97) = 0.337, P > .05); (F(2,97) = 0.628, P > .05); and children (F(6,93) = 0.306, P > .05); (F(6, 93) = 0.739, P > .05); (F(6,93) = 0.556, P > .05) on marital and sexual satisfaction and satisfaction with life respectively among women.

Table 6 describes the results of independent samples t test calculated to see the difference in means of work status and education for marital and sexual satisfaction and satisfaction with life among women. Statistically non-significant difference was found in housewives (M = 16.2586, SD = 3.98048; M = 19.0862, SD = 5.45567; M = 22.1724, SD = 6.49463) versus working women (M = 17.2143, SD = 4.45868; M = 21.4762, SD = 6.48916; M = 22.9524, SD = 7.47338) on marital (t(98) = –1.126, P > .05) and sexual satisfaction (t(98) = –1.941, P > .05), and satisfaction with life (t(98) = –0.556, P > .05), respectively. Non-significant difference was found in means of educated (M = 16.9878, SD = 4.20022; M = 20.6707, SD = 5.94014; M = 22.6220, SD = 7.09310) versus illiterate women (M = 15.1667, SD = 3.92953; M = 17.4444, SD = 5.69026; M = 21.9444, SD = 6.07282) on marital satisfaction (t(98) = 1.684, P > .05) and satisfaction with life (t(98) = 0.376, P > .05). However, statistically significant difference was found in educated and illiterate women on sexual satisfaction (t(98) = 2.102, P < .05). Educated women were found to be more sexually satisfied as compared to illiterate women.

Discussion

Marital satisfaction not only leads to a happy family but also plays a pivotal role in satisfaction with life of women. Women especially in the eastern part of the world derive special meanings from marriage and places heavy emphasis on marital relationships. In the cultural context of Pakistan, marital satisfaction is a big determinant of satisfaction with life, especially in women.⁶ This holds true for women of other similar cultures too, like Iran.⁸⁵

But previous studies report that marital satisfaction is dependent upon certain other areas of marital relationship such as sexual satisfaction, which is a key component of a woman’s marital satisfaction.⁸⁶ Sexual satisfaction has been found to be a main factor in one’s marital satisfaction and satisfaction with life. Lack of sexual satisfaction has been shown to lower marital satisfaction and satisfaction with life in women. There has been a negative relationship between lack of sexual satisfaction and marital satisfaction among women.⁸⁷ The same relationship has been expressed true by this study.

Current models of sexual functioning of women attribute the lack of sexual satisfaction to many factors including biopsychosocial factors. These factors may include marital issues, partner performance during the sexual activity, sexual dysfunctions, lack of emotional satisfaction, and childbirth. The construct of sexual satisfaction is inseparable from marital satisfaction in women. Together, they lead to satisfaction with life in women.³³ Satisfaction with life is considered synonymous with general well-being, psychological well-being, and happiness. Sexual satisfaction alone can lower a woman’s satisfaction with life, but sexual satisfaction’s combined effect with marital satisfaction is similar and can lower satisfaction with life.

Together marital satisfaction and sexual satisfaction depend on a number of demographic factors such as duration of being married, age of woman, age at the time of marriage, number of marriages, number of children, work status of woman, and her educational qualifications.^{16, 87} These demographic variables impact marital and sexual satisfaction in a number of ways. It is worth mentioning that none of these demographic variables were found to affect marital and sexual satisfaction of women in this study. The only difference was noted among educated and illiterate women in sexual satisfaction. This difference could be attributed to the role of education in making a woman sensible enough to become sexually satisfied as compared to illiterate women.^{72, 85} The education equips a woman in a better way to deal with her sexuality leading to sexual satisfaction in a relationship. Being educated provides a woman chances of comprehending different aspects of her sexual and reproductive life thereby increasing her sexual satisfaction in the relationship.

Limitations

Further studies may be conducted with a larger sample size drawn from other areas of Pakistan and should involve women from all segments including other demographics as well.

Further research needs to be done on other mediators of relationship between marital satisfaction and satisfaction with life in women.

Conclusion

Marital satisfaction is an area of ultimate importance for Pakistani women. It is considered the ultimate goal of a successful woman in a Pakistani society.⁶ But marital satisfaction cannot lead to satisfaction with life of a woman in isolation from sexual satisfaction, which has been shown to affect marital satisfaction and various aspects of a woman’s well-being. It is important to educate married women about the importance of satisfied sexual health and its role in maintaining a satisfied marital life and satisfaction with life.⁸⁸ This education can be imparted at the time of marriage and periodically later on by family physicians and mental health and marital counsellors. Moreover, women should undergo screening of sexual dysfunctions periodically so as to keep them healthy both sexually and psychologically.

Author Contributions

Ahmad Bilal: Conceptualization; Samina Rasool: Data curation; Ahmad Bilal: Formal analysis; Ahmad Bilal: Methodology; Ahmad Bilal: Supervision; Samina Rasool: Writing—original draft; Ahmad Bilal: Writing—review and editing.

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the original contribution of the participating women. Without their participation, the present research would not have been possible. We also like to acknowledge the support of the hospital management for allowing us to collect data from their outpatient departments.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Ahmad Bilal

References

Shackelford

Buss

DM.

Marital satisfaction and spousal cost-infliction. Pers Indiv Differ . 2000;28(5):917-928.

Rahmani

Alahgholi

Merghati Khuee

How does sexual satisfaction relate to marital satisfaction among Iranians. Int J Obstet Gynecol . 2009;107(2):S558-S559.

Alahveriani

Rajaie

Shakeri

Lohrasbi

Studying the relationship between sexual disorder and marriage satisfaction in those suffering from depression. Procedia Soc Behav Sci . 2010;5(0):1672-1675.

Sobecki

Curlin

Rasinski

Lindau

ST.

What we don’t talk about when we don’t talk about sex: results of a national survey of U.S. obstetrician/gynecologists. J Sex Med . 2012; 9:1285-1294.

Bradbury

Fincham

Beach

SR.

Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: a decade in review. J Marr Fam . 2000; 62:964-980. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00964.x.

Qadir

Silva

Prince

Khan

Marital satisfaction in Pakistan: a pilot investigation. Sex Relat Ther . 2005;20(2). doi: 10.1080/14681990500113260.

Tavoni

Anisi

Postpartum sexual functioning and sexual factor associated. Paper presented at 2nd Congress of Familial and Sexual Problems; Shahed University, Tehran, Iran; 2005.

Nichols

Pace-Nichols

Becvar

Napier

. Handbook of Family Development and Intervention . New York: Wiley; 2000.

Javanmard

Mohammadi Garegozlo

The study of relationship between marital satisfaction and personality characteristics in Iranian families. Proc Soc Behav Sci . 2013;84:4.

10.

Korporaal

Broese van Groenou

van Tilburg

TG.

Health problems and marital Satisfaction among older couples. J Aging Health . 2013;25(8):1279-1298.

11.

Molden

DCL

Finkel

Kumashiro

Rusbult

MC.

Perceived support for promotion-focused and prevention-focused goals: Associations with well-being in unmarried and married couples. J Psychol Sci . 2009;20(7):787-793.

12.

Rostami

Gol

HC.

Prediction of marital satisfaction based on spiritual intelligence. Proc Soc Behav Sci . 2014:116:4.

13.

Wong

Goodwin

Experiencing marital satisfaction across three cultures: a qualitative study. J Soc Personal Relationships . 2009;26(8):1011-1028.

14.

Lavner

Bradbury

TN.

Patterns of change in marital satisfaction over the newlywed years. J Marr Fam . 2010; 72:1171-1187. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00757.x.

15.

Schmitt

Kliegel

Shapiro

Marital interaction in middle and old age: a predictor of marital satisfaction. Int J Aging Hum Dev . 2007; 65:283-300. doi: 10.2190/AG.65.4.a.

16.

Amrelahi

Roshan Chesly

Shairi

Nik Azin

Marital conflict, marital satisfaction, and sexual satisfaction: comparison of women with relative marriage and women with non-relative marriage. CPAP . 2013;2(8):11-22.

17.

Twenge

Campbell

Foster

CA.

Parenthood and marital satisfaction: A meta-analytic review. J Marr Fam . 2003; 65:574-583. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00574.x.

18.

Onyishi

Sorokowski

Sorokowska

Pipitone

RN.

Children and marital satisfaction in a non-Western sample: having more children increases marital satisfaction among the Igbo people of Nigeria. Evol Hum Behav . 2012; 33:771-774. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.06.005.

19.

Lichter

Carmalt

JH.

Religion and marital quality among low-income couples. Soc Sci Res . 2009; 38:168-187. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.07.003.

20.

Heaton

TB.

Factors contributing to increasing marital stability in the United States. J Fam Issues . 2002; 23:392-409. doi: 10.1177/0192513X02023003004.

21.

Teimourpour

Moshtagh Bidokhti

Pourshanbaz

The relationship between attachment styles, marital satisfaction and sex guilt with sexual desire in Iranian women. JPCP . 2012;1(1):18-29.

22.

Ziaei

Jannati

Mobasheri

The relationship between marital and sexual satisfaction among married women employees at Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci . 2014;8(2):44-51.

23.

Duncan

. The relationship between trait forgiveness and marital adjustment in heterosexual individuals [dissertation]. Minneapolis, MN: Capella University; 2008.

24.

Zainah

Nasir

Ruzy Suliza

Noraini Md

Effects of demographic variables on marital satisfaction. Asian Soc Sci . 2012;8(9):46-49.

25.

Abra

RC.

Determinants of marital satisfaction among Ghanaian couples

[unpublished master’s thesis]. Cape Coast, Ghana: University of Cape Coast; 2001.

26.

Jose

Alfons

Do demographics affect marital satisfaction. J Sex Marital Ther . 2007;33(1):73-85.

27.

Gorchoff

John

Helson

Contextualizing change in marital satisfaction during middle-age An 18-year longitudinal study. Psychol Sci . 2008;19(11):1194-200.

28.

Tabatabaei

Panahandeh

Hasanabadi

Roshani

Attari

Relation between general health and marital satisfaction in employees of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. J Res Behav Sci . 2012;10(6):491-499.

29.

Dabone

KT.

Effects of age on marital satisfaction of married people in Sunyani Municipality. Int J Res Soc Sci . 2014;3(8):1-10.

30.

Rotz

Why have divorce rates fallen? The role of women’s age at marriage. J Hum Res . 2016;51(4):961-1002.

31.

Mirecki

Chou

Elliott

Schneider

CM.

What factors influence marital satisfaction? Differences between first and second marriages. J Divorce Remarriage . 2013;54(1):78-93. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2012.743831.

32.

Hirschberger

Srivastava

Marsh

Cowan

PHA.

Attachment, marital satisfaction, and divorce during the first fifteen years of parenthood. Pers Relat . 2009;16(3):401-420.

33.

Guo

Huang

Marital and sexual satisfaction in Chinese families: exploring the moderating effects. J Sex Marital Ther . 2005;31(1):21-29.

34.

Wagheiy

Miri

Ghasemipour

A survey about effective factors on the marital satisfaction in employees of two Birjand Universities. J Birjand Univ Med Sci . 2009;16(4):43-50.

35.

Orathinkal

Vansteenwegen

The effect of forgiveness on marital satisfaction in relation to marital stability. Contemp Fam Ther . 2006;28(2):251-260.

36.

Pepping

CHA

Halford

WK.

Attachment and relationship satisfaction in expectant first-time parents: the mediating role of relationship enhancing behaviors. J Res Pers . 2012;46(6):770-774.

37.

Madanianan

Syed Mansor

SMSH.

Marital satisfaction and demographic traits in an emigrant sample: Rasch analysis. Procedia Soc Behav Sci . 2013; 107:96-103.

38.

Jadiri

Jan bozorgy

Tabatabai

. Examine the relationship between marital satisfaction with demographic factors. J Religion Psychol . 2009:2(5).

39.

Barongo

Okwara

Aloka

Masoka

NO.

Association of levels of education and marital experience on marital satisfaction among selected marriages in Kisii township Kisii county. Res Humanit Soc Sci . 2015;5(8):27-32.

40.

Zare

Golmakani

Shareh

Shakeri

Khadem Ghaebi

Factors related to marital satisfaction in primiparous women during postpartum period. JMRH . 2014;2(2):120-127.

41.

Shopiro

Gottman

Carrere

The baby and marriage. University of Washington. J Fam Psychol . 2000;14(1):59-70.

42.

Schramm

and

Harris VW. Marital Quality

Income: an examination of the influence of government assistance. J Fam Econ Issues . 2011;32(3):437-448.

43.

Masters

Johnson

. Human Sexual Response . Boston, MA: Little Brown & Co; 1996.

44.

Basson

Female sexual response: the role of drugs in the management of sexual dysfunction. Am Coll Obstet Gynecol . 2001; 98:350-352.

45.

Sierra

Buela-Casal

. Evaluación y tratamiento de las disfunciones sexuales. In: Buela-Casal

Sierra

, eds. Manual de evaluación y tratamientos psicológicos . 2nd ed. Madrid, Spain: Biblioteca Nueva; 2004:439-485.

46.

Kaplan

. Disorders of Sexual Desire . Simon and Schuster; 1979.

47.

Damjanovic

Duisin

Barisic

The evolution of the female sexual response concept: Treatment Implications. Srp Arh Celok Lek . 2013;141(3-4):268-274. doi: 10.2298/SARH1304268D.

48.

Whipple

Brash-McGreer

Management of female sexual dysfunction. In: Sipski

Alexander

Gaithersburg

, eds. Sexual Function in People with Disability and Chronic Illness. A Health Professional’s Guide . Aspen Publishers; 1997:509-534.

49.

Whipple

. Women’s sexual pleasure and satisfaction. A new view of female sexual function. The Female Patient . 2002; 27:39-44.

50.

Basson

The female sexual response: A different model. Journal of Sex &Marital Therapy . 2000;26(1):51-65. doi: 10.1080/009262300278641

51.

Basson

Althof

Davis

Summary of the recommendations on sexual dysfunctions in women. J Sex Med . 2004; 1:24-34.

52.

Basson

Leiblum

Brotto

Definitions of women’s sexual dysfunctions reconsidered: advocating expansion and revision. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol . 2003; 24:221-229.

53.

Basson

Recent advances in women’s sexual function and dysfunction. Menopause . 2004;11(6 Part 2):714-725.

54.

Thomas

Thurston

RC.

A biopsychosocial approach to women’s sexual function and dysfunction at midlife: a narrative review. Maturitas . 2016; 87:49-60.

55.

Fugl-Meyer

Sjögren Fugl-Meyer

Sexual disabilities, problems and satisfaction in 18 to 74-year-old Swedes. Scand J Sexology . 1999;2(2):79-105.

56.

Giraldi

Kristensen

Sand

Endorsement of models describing sexual response of men and women with a sexual partner: an online survey in a population sample of Danish adults ages 20-65 years. J Sex Med . 2015; 12:116-128.

57.

Henderson

Lehavot

Simoni

JM.

Ecological models of sexual satisfaction among lesbian/bisexual and heterosexual women. Arch Sex Behav . 2009; 38:50-65.

58.

Smith

AMA

Patrick

Heywood

Body mass index, sexual difficulties and sexual satisfaction among people in regular heterosexual relationships: a population based study. Intern Med J . 2012; 42:641-651. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2011.02597.x.

59.

Dundon

Rellini

AH.

More than sexual function: predictors of sexual satisfaction in a sample of women age 40-70. J Sex Med . 2010; 7:896-904. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01557.x.

60.

Rosen

Heiman

Long

Fisher

Sand

MS.

Men with sexual problems and their partners: findings from the international survey of relationships. Arch Sex Behav . 2016; 45:159-173. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0568-3.

61.

Lawrance

Byers

ES.

Sexual satisfaction in long-term heterosexual relationships: the Interpersonal Exchange Model of Sexual Satisfaction. Pers Relat . 1995; 2:267-285.

62.

Laumann

Paik

Rosen

RC.

Sexual dysfunction in the United States: prevalence and predictors. JAMA . 1999;281(6):537-544.

63.

Leiblum

Koochaki

Rodenberg

Barton

Rosen

RC.

Hypoactive sexual desire disorder in postmenopausal women: US results from the Women’s International Study of Health and Sexuality (WISHeS). Menopause . 2006;13(1):46-56.

64.

Biddle

West

D’Aloisio

Wheeler

Borisov

Thorp

Hypoactive sexual desire disorder in postmenopausal women: quality of life and health burden. Value Health . 2009;12(5):763-772.

65.

Ventegodt

Sex and the quality of life in Denmark. Arch Sex Behav . 1998;27(3):295-307.

66.

Mohammad

Yousef

Bagher

Predicting marital adjustment based on sexual satisfaction among married men and women. Paper presented at: First scientific conference on education and psychology of social and cultural damages; 2015; Soroush-e Hekmat Razavi Center for Islamic Studies and Research, Iran.

67.

Jahanfar

Saeid

Mowlaeinejad

Hussein

. Handbook of Sexual Disorders . Tehran, Iran: Salami Publications; 2010.

68.

Witting

Santtila

Alanko

Female sexual function and its associations with number of children, pregnancy, and relationship satisfaction. J Sex Marital Ther . 2008;34(2):89-106.

69.

Shakerian

Evaluation of the factors influencing marital satisfaction in the students of Islamic Azad Uiversity in Sanandaj. Sci J Kurdistan Univ Med Sci . 2010;14(4):40-49.

70.

Rezaipour

Taghizadeh

Faghihzadeh

SRA.

Survey study of relationship between woman’s experience of orgasm and marital relation satisfaction in health care centers of Arak. Hayat . 2004;9(3-4):44-51.

71.

Joo

Jun

Wang

The relations between marital quality and psychological well-being among Korean middle aged couples. Gerontol . 2015;55(2):111.

72.

María del Mar

Pablo

Carlos

. A systematic review of sexual satisfaction. Int J Clin Health Psychol . 2014;14(1):67-75.

73.

Clegg

Towner

Wylie

Should questionnaires of female sexual dysfunction be used in routine clinical practice. Maturitas . 2012;72(02):160-164.

74.

Gupta

Nafis

Does martial adjustment and psychological wellbeing differ in working and non-working female. Int J Res Eng Soc Sci . 2014;4(3): 61-72. doi: 10.25215/0103.006.

75.

Cohen

Geron

Farchi

Marital quality and global well-being among older adult Israeli couples in enduring marriages. Am J Fam Ther . 2009; 37:299-317.

76.

Kandjani

Reza

Azar

Masoud

Sima

Reza

HS.

Correlation between women’s psychopathological condition and marital satisfaction. Pajoohandeh . 2008;6.

77.

Stephenson

Sullivan

KT.

Social norms and general sexual satisfaction: the cost of misperceived descriptive norms. Canadian J Homosex . 2009;18(3):89-105.

78.

Carrobles

Gámez-Guadix

Almendros

. Funcionamiento sexual, satisfacción sexual y bienestar psicológico y subjetivo en una muestra de mujeres Españolas [Sexual functioning, sexual satisfaction, and subjective and psychological well-being in Spanish women]. Anales de Psicología . 2011;27(1): 27-34.

79.

Bridges

Lease

Ellison

CR.

Predicting sexual satisfaction in women: implications for counselor education and training. J Cousel Dev . 2004; 82:158-166. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2004.tb00297.x.

80.

Schumm

Nichols

Schectman

Grigsby

CC.

Characteristics of responses to the Kansas marital satisfaction scale by a sample of 84 married mothers. Psychol Rep . 1983; 53:567-572.

81.

Hudson

. The WALMYR Assessment Scales Scoring Manual . Tallahassee, FL: WALMYR Publishing; 1992.

82.

Diener

Emmons

Larsen

Griffin

The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess . 1985;49(1):71-75.

83.

Preacher Kristopher

and

Hayes AF. SPSS

SAS Procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput . 2004;36(4):717-731.

84.

Preacher

Rucker

Hayes

AF.

Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behav Res . 2007;42(1):185-227.

85.

Rahmani

Merghati Khoei

Alah Gholi

Sexual satisfaction and its relation to marital happiness in Iranians. Iran J Public Health . 2009;38(4):77-82.

86.

Ayub

Iqbal

The factors predicting marital satisfaction: a gender difference in Pakistan. Int J Interdiscip Soc Sci: Annu Rev . 2012;6(7):63-73.

87.

Tavakol

Nasrabadi

Moghadam

Salehiniya

Rezaei

A review of the factors associated with marital satisfaction. GMJ . 2017; 6(3):197-207. doi:10.22086/gmj.v0i0.641.

88.

Davison

Bell

LaChina

Holden

Davis S.

The relationship between self-reported sexual satisfaction and general well-being in women. J Sex Med . 2009; 6:2690-2697.

Marital Satisfaction and Satisfaction With Life: Mediating Role of Sexual Satisfaction in Married Women

Abstract

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Participants

Inclusion Criteria

Exclusion Criteria

Instruments

Demographic Information Questionnaire

Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale

The Index of Sexual Satisfaction

Satisfaction With Life Scale

Procedure

Descriptive Statistics of Demographic Variables

Frequencies of Demographic Variables

Statistical Analysis

Results

Results of Mediation Analyses (With Process, v3.4)

Results of Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA)

Results of Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

Results of Independent Samples t Test

Discussion

Limitations

Conclusion

Author Contributions

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

ORCID iD

References