A coyote was rescued from the waters of Miami Bay, and crowds gathered at the scene and shared firefighters’ enthusiasm for rescuing the animal. By the end of the day, he was shot in the head, and outrage spread across Florida. Contributing to current debates in urban geography and conservation biology, this paper builds upon established acceptance of nonnative animal killability to demonstrate how killability is manufactured and extended to “native” urban animals. Uneven applications of lethal implementation of policies are central to this investigation. The Miami Bay coyote helps us visualize the overlapping and contradictory policies humans have created for animals classified as “native” when they live in “wild” spaces, but classified as “nuisance” when living in urban spaces—environments constructed by and for humans, both physically and epistemologically. The coyote highlights the ephemeral impact one animal can have on urban humans who are often unaware of the lethal consequences of “nuisance” policy. Whereas discourses about nonnative and invasive killability have received significant attention, narratives that render native animals killable remain underexplored. Native urban animals are subject to destruction when they encounter a human that deems them a “nuisance” throughout the United States. This paper traces the systems of power that keep native urban animals killable and invisible. I argue for the need to consider urban animals through a reflexive lens to overcome inherent anthropocentrisms and reckon with our (re)production of narratives that manufacture urban animals’ killability and designation as insignificant others.
AgambenG (1998) Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
4.
AsdalKDruglitroTHinchliffeS2016) Humans, animals and biopolitics: The more-than-human condition. New York, NY: Routledge, 10, 9781315587639.
5.
BerlREFiskJJvan EedenLM, et al. (2025) Foundational principles of an applied cultural evolutionary science for natural resource management and conservation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences380(1940). doi:10.1098/rstb.2024.0262
6.
BlueGAlexanderS (2015) Coyotes in the city: Gastro-ethical encounters in a more-than-human world. In: Critical Animal Geographies, Routledge, 149–163.
BuhrmesterMBurnhamDJohnsonD, et al. (2018) How moments become movements: Shared outrage, group cohesion, and the lion that went viral. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution6: 54.
11.
Cavanagh CJ (2018) Political ecologies of biopower: diversity, debates, and new frontiers of inquiry. Journal of Political Ecology 25(1): 402-425.
12.
ConnorsJPShort GianottiA (2023) Becoming killable: White-tailed deer management and the production of overabundance in the Blue Hills. Urban Geography44(10): 2121–2143.
13.
Collard R-C and Gillespie K (2015). Introduction. In: Gillerspie K and Collard R-C (eds) Critical Animal Geographies. London and New York: Routledge.
14.
CorbinJMStraussA (1990) Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology13(1): 3–21.
15.
CrowleySLHinchliffeSMcDonaldRA (2018) Killing squirrels: Exploring motivations and practices of lethal wildlife management. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space1(1-2): 120–143.
16.
DayerAARedfordKHCampbellKJ, et al. (2020) The unaddressed threat of invasive animals in US national parks. Biological Invasions22(2): 177–188.
17.
DericksonKDRoutledgeP (2015) Resourcing Scholar-Activism: Collaboration, Transformation, and the Production of Knowledge. The Professional Geographer67(1): –7.
Guenther KM (2020) The Lives and Deaths of Shelter Animals: The Lives and Deaths of Shelter Animals. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
34.
HadidianJSimonLJChildsMR (2002) The “nuisance” wildlife control industry: animal welfare concerns. In Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference (Vol. 20, No. 20).
35.
HarawayDJ (2003) The Companion species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness (Vol. 1, pp. 3–17). Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
36.
HarawayD (2008) When species meet. Minneapolis, Minnesota: U of Minnesota Press.
37.
HarawayD (2016) Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.
38.
Jepson P and Barua M (2015). A theory of flagship species action. Conservation and Society 13(1): 95-104.
39.
KatlamGPrasadSAggarwalM, et al. (2018) Trash on the menu: Patterns of animal visitation and foraging behaviour at garbage dumps. Current Science115(12): 2322–2326.
40.
Kristeva J (2024) Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. Columbia University Press.
41.
KirkseySEHelmreichS (2010) The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cultural Anthropology25(4): 545–576.
42.
KopninaH (2017) Beyond multispecies ethnography: Engaging with violence and animal rights in anthropology. Critique of Anthropology37(3): 333–357.
43.
LindseyPABalmeGAFunstonPJ, et al. (2016) Life after cecil: Channelling global outrage into funding for conservation in Africa. Conservation Letters9(4): 296–301.
44.
LorimerJ (2007) Nonhuman charisma. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space25(5): 911–932.
45.
LynchMJ (2019) To protect and kill: US fish and wildlife service’s management of human–wildlife conflict, 1996-2011. society & Animals27(2): 174–196.
MarguliesJDKaranthKK (2018) The production of human-wildlife conflict: A political animal geography of encounter. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences95: 153–164.
49.
McCubbinSGHovorkaAJ (2020) Visioning African lionscapes: Securing space, mobilizing capital, and fostering subjects. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space3(4): 1053–1073.
50.
Nagy K and Johnson II DP (2013) Trash animals: How we live with nature’s filthy, feral, invasive, and unwanted species. U of Minnesota Press.
51.
NarayananY (2023) For multispecies liberatory futures: Three principles toward “progress” in anti-anthropocentric environmental geography. Progress in Environmental Geography2(3): 179–190.
52.
NelsonMPBruskotterJTVucetichJA, et al. (2016) Emotions and the ethics of consequence in conservation decisions: Lessons from cecil the lion. Conservation Letters9(4): 302–306.
53.
OgdenLAHallBTanitaK (2013) Animals, plants, people, and things: A review of multispecies ethnography. Environment and Society4(1): 5–24.
54.
PetersonA (2019) Problem animals. Environmental Ethics41(2): 129–141.
55.
RoutledgePDriscoll DericksonK (2015) Situated solidarities and the practice of scholar-activism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space33(3): 391–407.
56.
RutherfordS (2022) Villain, vermin, icon, kin: Wolves and the making of Canada. McGill-Queens University Press.
57.
SinhaABaruaM (2020) Nonhuman lifeworlds in urban India. The Philosopher108(1): 22–27.
58.
SrinivasanK (2013) The biopolitics of animal being and welfare: Dog control and care in the UK and India. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers38(1): 106–119.
59.
SrinivasanK (2014) Caring for the collective: Biopower and agential subjectification in wildlife conservation. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space32(3): 501–517.
60.
SrinivasanKKasturiranganR (2017) Conservation and invasive alien species: Violent love. In: The Palgrave International Handbook of Animal Abuse Studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 433–452.
61.
SrinivasanK (2022) Re-animalising wellbeing: Multispecies justice after development. The Sociological Review70(2): 352–366.
62.
TrueloveY (2018) Negotiating states of water: Producing illegibility, bureaucratic arbitrariness, and distributive injustices in Delhi. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space36(5): 949–967.
63.
TsingAL (2015) The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
64.
van EedenLMMartinJVFiskJ, et al. (2025) Species nativeness as a cultural paradigm in conservation. Biological Conservation311: 111415.
65.
WahyudiantoISholahuddinAWidjajaniR (2025) Policy implementation analysis of restrictions on participatory planning proposals in development planning consultation. International Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities (IJRSS) ISSN: 2582-6220, DOI: 10.47505/IJRSS6(1): 175–186.
