Abstract
The National Toxicology Program (NTP) reports 60 two-year inhalation studies in both mice and rats on single agents or closely related agents. “Cadmium and cadmium compounds” and “diesel exhaust particulates” were omitted from this analysis due to lack of results regarding a particular compound. No Ames test data were available for antimony trioxide, nickel sulfate hexahydrate, and indium phosphide. For antimony trioxide, a comet assay was used as a surrogate for the Ames test. To eliminate selection bias, all positive Ames assay test results and any statistically significant increase in lung tumor incidence over background in an NTP two-year inhalation study were accepted at face value. For the 58 compounds tested via inhalation by NTP, there is a high degree of discordance between mice and rats in the susceptibility to develop lung tumors. The causation of tumors at anatomical sites outside the lung via the inhalation route is also discordant in mice and rats, for example, 11/58 (19%) of agents tested in the NTP inhalation studies using mice and rats were negative in the Ames assay test and showed lung tumors in mice only. The ability to form lung tumors in mice in the absence of genotoxicity demonstrates that other mechanisms, for example, cytotoxicity followed by reparative cellular proliferation, might be involved. Mouse and rat data are discordant regarding the ability to induce tumors at organ sites outside the lungs—0/58 as compared with 16/58, respectively. Mice and rats display distinctly different patterns of both lung tumor development and development of tumors outside the lungs.
Introduction
The National Toxicology Program (NTP) is a branch of the United States Department of Health and Human Services. One of NTP’s major current programs is “The Toxicology in the 21st Century: The Role of the National Toxicology Program.”
1
On their website, NTP describes this program as follows: The Role of the National Toxicology Program is to support the evolution of toxicology from a predominantly observational science at the level of disease-specific models to a predominantly predictive science focused upon a broad inclusion of target-specific, mechanism-based, biological observations. The intent of NTP vision is to expand the scientific basis for making public health decisions on the potential toxicity of environmental agents.
The NTP National Institute of Environmental Health Science (NIEHS) website references 60 two-year inhalation studies conducted in both rats and mice on single agents or closely related agents. 2 Two of the 60 inhalation studies were conducted on “cadmium and cadmium compounds” 3 and on “diesel exhaust particulates.” 4 These two studies were omitted from this analysis due to lack of results regarding a particular compound. In each of the 58 two-year rodent inhalation studies analyzed herein, the mouse strain B6C3F1 was used. In 55/58 studies, the rat strain employed was F344/N. Wistar Han rats were used for the inhalation studies on Trim® VX and antimony trioxide. Osborne-Mendel rats were used for the inhalation study of allyl glycidyl ether. For three compounds, no Ames assay test data were available: antimony trioxide, nickel sulfate hexahydrate, and indium phosphide. Antimony trioxide had a positive comet assay, so that result was considered equivalent to a positive Ames assay test.
In the vast majority of cases where a benign adenoma in the rodent lung was seen, a malignant bronchioloalveolar carcinoma was also detected. Since benign adenomas in rodent lungs are precursors to the development of malignant bronchioloalveolar carcinomas, 5 the practice of considering the tumor types as interchangeable for counting purposes was followed. In a limited number of cases, the only anatomical site outside the lung that developed tumors was the nasal passages. In this analysis, the nasal passages are considered separately from the lungs, but it could also be argued that tumorigenicity of the lungs and nasal passages could be combined although there are microanatomical and physiological differences between the two anatomic locations. 6
NTP considers results from the Ames assay test to be very important in its deliberations as illustrated by the following statement from a recent Report on Carcinogens.
10
DNA reactivity combined with
Statistical methods
The following tests were applied to assess the statistical significance of the differences in proportions. 14
Pooled test:
Unpooled test:
Results
Summary analysis of the 58 different agents tested in two-year inhalation studies conducted on both rats and mice by the NTP.
NTP: National Toxicology Program.
aBorderline at 95% significant difference between rats and mice at
bStatistically significant difference between rats and mice at
cStatistically significant difference between rats and mice at
dStatistically significant difference between rats and mice at
eStatistically significant difference between rats and mice at
fStatistically significant difference between rats and mice at
gStatistically significant difference between rats and mice at
hNo significant difference in Ames assay positive and Ames assay negative agents at
iStatistically significant difference in Ames assay positive and Ames assay negative agents at
jNo significant difference between rats and mice at
kNo significant difference between rats and mice at
Eleven out of 58 agents tested in the NTP inhalation studies using rats and mice were negative in the Ames assay test and showed lung tumors in mice only (Table 2). Ten of the 11 chemicals (90.9%) in Table 2 are insoluble or slightly soluble in water, soluble in organic solvents, and have moderately hydrophobic log base 10 octanol–water partition coefficients of 0.17, 1.85, 2.10, 2.13, 2.42, 2.53, 2.61, 3.15, 3.30, 3.66, and 3.80. These moderate log
11/58 Total NTP inhalation studies conducted in rats and mice are negative in the Ames assay and had lung tumors for mice only.
NTP: National Toxicology Program.
Ten of the 11 chemicals in this table are insoluble or slightly soluble in water, soluble in organic solvents, and have hydrophobic octanol–water partition coefficients of 0.17, 1.85, 2.10, 2.13, 2.42, 2.53, 2.61, 3.15, 3.30, 3.66, and 3.80. These chemicals induce hyperplasia in the airways of mice.
aAll physicochemical values are from the Hazardous Substances Database unless otherwise designated.
Three out of 58 agents tested in the NTP inhalation studies using rats and mice were negative in the Ames assay test and showed lung tumors in rats only (Table 3). These three agents contain metals and are not soluble in water. When laboratory rats are exposed to inorganic particles to the point that lung overload occurs, both benign and malignant tumors may develop. Rats exhibit relatively fast pulmonary clearance of dust and appear to retain pulmonary burdens of dust predominantly in macrophages within alveoli. Mice do not experience similar particle overload effects. 17
3/58 Total NTP inhalation studies conducted in rats and mice that are negative in the Ames assay test and show lung tumors for rats only.
NTP: National Toxicology Program; MMAD: mass mean aerodynamic diameter.
The three agents in this table contain metals, consist of particles, and are not soluble in water.
aAll physicochemical values are from the Hazardous Substances Database unless otherwise designated.
Five out of 58 (8.6%) agents tested in the NTP inhalation studies using rats and mice were negative in the Ames assay test and showed lung tumors in both rats and mice (Table 4). Four out of five agents (80%) in Table 4 are powdered metals. One of the five (20%), Trim VX is a water-soluble oil that forms a chemical emulsion. Each of these five agents caused inflammation and hyperplasia in the lungs. In Table 5, 9/58 (15.5%) agents tested in NTP inhalation studies conducted in rats and mice were positive in the Ames assay test and showed lung tumors in both rats and mice. Three out of nine (33.3%) of these agents were metals.
5/58 Total NTP inhalation studies conducted in rats and mice are negative in the Ames assay test and show lung tumors in both rats and mice.
NTP: National Toxicology Program.
Four of the five agents in this table are powdered metals. One of the five, Trim VX is a water-soluble oil that forms a chemical emulsion. Each of these five agents caused inflammation and hyperplasia in the lungs.
aAll physicochemical values are from the Hazardous Substances Database unless otherwise designated.
9/58 Total NTP inhalation studies conducted in rats and mice are positive in the Ames assay test and show lung tumors in both rats and mice.
NTP: National Toxicology Program.
aAll physicochemical values are from the Hazardous Substances Database unless otherwise designated.
In Table 6, 6/58 (10.3%) of the total NTP studies conducted using rats and mice were positive in the Ames assay test and showed lung tumors in mice only. All six of these chemicals were direct acting Ames assay mutagens that did not require metabolic activation by rat liver S9 to display mutagenicity. Table 7 shows a stark contrast with the results from Table 6. In Table 7, only 1/58 (1.7%) of the total NTP inhalation studies conducted in rats and mice reported an agent that was positive in the Ames assay test and displayed lung tumors in rats only. In addition, this one positive result might be spurious as the maximum exposure dose in mice was only ¼ the maximum dose in rats due to lethality of 1,2-epoxybutane in mice.
6/58 Total NTP inhalation studies conducted in rats and mice are positive in the Ames assay test and show lung tumors in mice only.
NTP: National Toxicology Program.
All six of the chemicals that are positive in the Ames assay test and that cause lung tumors in mice only are direct acting Ames assay mutagens that do not require metabolic activation by hepatic S9 fraction.
aAll physicochemical values are from the Hazardous Substances Database unless otherwise designated.
1/58 Total NTP inhalation studies conducted in rats and mice are positive in the Ames assay test and show lung tumors in rats only.
NTP: National Toxicology Program.
The negative result in mice is confounded by the maximum dose in mice being ¼ the maximum dose in rats.
aAll physicochemical values are from the Hazardous Substances Database unless otherwise designated.
In Table 8, 22/58 (37.9%) total NTP inhalation studies conducted in rats and mice were negative in the Ames assay test and did not show lung tumors in either rats or mice. Since these 22 agents did not show neoplastic changes in the lungs, nonneoplastic changes are not shown for this group of compounds. A number of these agents are either relatively water soluble with log
22/58 Total NTP inhalation studies conducted in rats and mice are negative in the Ames assay test and show lung tumors in neither rats nor mice.
NTP: National Toxicology Program.
aAll physicochemical values are from the Hazardous Substances Database unless otherwise designated.
Table 9 shows that propylene glycol mono-
1/58 Total NTP inhalation studies conducted in rats and mice are positive in the Ames assay test and show lung tumors in neither rats nor mice.
NTP: National Toxicology Program.
aAll physicochemical values are from the Hazardous Substances Database unless otherwise designated.
2/58 Total NTP inhalation studies conducted in rats and mice for compounds lacking Ames assay test data.
NTP: National Toxicology Program.
Table 11 shows 7/58 (12.1%) cases where a compound caused tumors in the rat lung, but not outside the lung. Of the seven compounds, four are metals. The seven compounds are as follows: tetranitromethane, isobutyl nitrite, antimony trioxide, vanadium pentoxide, chromium hexavalent compounds, Trim VX, and molybdenum trioxide. Table 11 shows 15/58 (25.9%) cases where a compound only caused tumors in the mouse lung, but not outside the lung. Of the 15 compounds, seven are metals (46.7%). The 15 compounds are as follows: cobalt metal, tetranitromethane, cobalt sulfate heptahydrate, isobutyl nitrite, antimony trioxide, vanadium pentoxide, chromium hexavalent compounds, bis(chloromethyl)ether, Trim VX, nickel oxide, molybdenum trioxide, ozone, vinylidene chloride, naphthalene, and divinylbenzene-HP. All of the seven compounds that caused tumors in the rat lung, but did not cause tumors at other anatomical sites in the rat, also caused tumors in the mouse lung.
Relative ranking by lung tumor-producing potency of 58 substances tested via inhalation by NTP in rats and mice (cadmium and cadmium compounds; and diesel exhaust particulates omitted for lack of results regarding a particular compound).
NTP: National Toxicology Program.
Clear Evidence > Some Evidence > Equivocal Evidence > No Evidence
aAll physicochemical values are from the Hazardous Substances Database unless otherwise designated.
Further examination of Table 11 shows that in 34/58 (58.6%) of the compounds tested via inhalation, rats did not show a lung tumor but did show a tumor at another anatomical site outside the lung. In every one of these 34 cases, the chemical was not a metal. The 34 chemicals are as follows: 1,3-butadiene, trichloroethylene, cumene, dichloromethane, isoprene, nitromethane, chloroprene, 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane, nitrobenzene, chloroethane, naphthalene, ethylbenzene, CIMSTAR, divinylbenzene-HP, allyl glycidyl ether, propylene glycol mono-
In contrast with the results for rats, only 10/58 (17.2%) of the compounds tested via inhalation displayed a pattern of no lung tumors in mice, but presentation of tumors at other sites outside the lung. The 10 chemicals are as follows: propylene glycol mono-
In Table 11, each of the 58 compounds for which data were available were ranked in descending order of their potential to induce lung tumors in the lungs of rats and mice. Two out of three substances ranked at the highest level of rodent pulmonary tumorigenicity were metals. The compound ranked at the second highest level of pulmonary tumorigenicity to rodent lung was a metal. One of the two compounds ranked at the third highest level of pulmonary tumorigenicity to rodent lung was a metal. In addition, the compound ranked at the fourth highest level of pulmonary tumorigenicity to rodent lung was also a metal. Therefore, 5/7 of the most potent compounds for inducing tumors in the lungs of rats and mice were metals.
Table 11 also compares the concordance between rats and mice for each of the 58 compounds tested via the inhalation route to induce tumors at organ sites outside the lung. For 26/58 (44.8%) compounds, both rats and mice showed development of another tumor type outside of the lung. That is, there were 26 cases of positive concordance for development of tumors outside the lung when tested by the inhalation route. Herein follows the unusual result from Table 11. For 16/58 (27.6%) compounds, rats showed tumors outside the lungs while similarly tested mice did not show tumors outside the lungs. In contrast, there is a not a single case where mice showed a tumor outside the lungs while a similarly tested rat did not show a tumor outside the lungs—0/58 compounds.
The entire list of the 10 compounds negative in mouse lung, but positive at other sites, is contained within the list of 34 compounds negative in rat lung but positive at other sites.
In Table 11, there were seven compounds (7/58, 12.1%) which produced neither lung tumors nor tumors at other anatomical sites in either rats or mice. These seven completely negative compounds are as follows: diethylamine, isobutyraldehyde,
In Table 11, indium phosphide was the only compound that produced lung tumors in male and female rats, male and female mice, and at other anatomical sites in both rats and mice. Indium phosphide ranked as the most clearly tumorigenic compound to rodent lung of the 58 tested to date via inhalation by NTP.
Conclusion
For the 58 compounds tested via inhalation by NTP, there is a high degree of discordance between rats and mice in the susceptibility to develop lung tumors. The causation of tumors at anatomical sites outside the lung via the inhalation route is also discordant in rats and mice. This high degree of discordance in the results of two-year inhalation assays suggests that different mechanisms of carcinogenesis might play lesser or greater roles in the development of pulmonary tumors in the two species. In cases where the results from two-year inhalation studies are concordant for lung tumors, the concordant agent might be of special concern to human risk assessment.
Footnotes
Declaration of conflicting interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
