Writing is an integral part of social studies; however, teaching writing in both disciplinary and culturally sustaining ways to build students’ repertoires is complex work for new teachers. This multiple case study investigates the writing-related identities of six secondary social studies teacher candidates (TCs) in a yearlong, university-based teacher education program. It operationalizes the Dynamic Systems Model of Role Identity (DSMRI) to illustrate relationships within and across TCs’ past, present, and emerging writing-related role identities (e.g., elementary school student, emerging social studies teacher). Our analysis identified four patterns and three tensions within and across TCs’ writing-related role identities; these may serve as both resources and obstacles for developing TCs’ social studies teacher role identities around cultivating students’ disciplinary and culturally sustaining repertoires of writing. An important implication for this work lies in designing social studies methods instruction that supports TCs to explore their writing-related identity systems and negotiate tensions between their role identities and the kinds of disciplinary and culturally sustaining writing instruction they hope to enact with their future students.
AchugarM.CarpenterB. D. (2012). Developing disciplinary literacy in a multilingual history classroom. Linguistics and Education, 23(3), 262–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2012.05.003
ApplebeeA. N.LangerJ. A. (2011). A snapshot of writing instruction in middle schools and high schools. English Journal, 100(6), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.58680/ej201116413
4.
Baker-BellA. (2020). Linguistic justice: Black language, literacy, identity, and pedagogy. Routledge.
5.
BeckS. W.del CalvoA. O. (2023). Using dialogic writing assessment to support the development of historical literacy. Literacy, 57(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12309
6.
BomerR.LandC. L.RubinJ. C.Van DikeL. M. (2019). Constructs of teaching writing in research about literacy teacher education. Journal of Literacy Research, 51(2), 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X19833783
7.
BuseyC. L.WatersS. (2016). Who are we? The demographic and professional identity of social studies teacher educators. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 40(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2015.07.001
8.
ConradJ.ReismanA.JayL.PattersonT.EismanJ. I.KaplanA.ChanW. (2022). To what ends? Analyzing teacher candidates’ goals and perceptions of student talk in social studies discussions. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 47(2), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2022.01.003
9.
CreminT.LockeT. (Eds.). (2017). Writer identity and the teaching and learning of writing. Routledge.
del CalvoA. O.BeckS. W. (2023). Dialogic writing assessment in the history classroom. In K. L. Wright & T. S. Hodges (Eds.), Assessing disciplinary writing in both research and practice (pp. 227–251). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-8262-9.ch008
13.
de los RíosC. V. (2020). Writing oneself into the curriculum: Reflections on photovoice journaling in an ethnic studies course. Written Communication, 37(4), 487–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088320938794
14.
EismanJ. I.AniT.PattersonT. J.KaplanA.ReismanA.ConradJ.Del CalvoA. (2025). Classroom strategies for navigating emotions during controversial discussions. Theory Into Practice, 64(2), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2025.2453355
15.
FitchettP. G. (2010). A profile of twenty-first century secondary social studies teachers. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 34(2), 229–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/235227982010034002004
16.
FloresN.RosaJ. (2015). Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harvard Educational Review, 85(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.85.2.149
GarnerJ. K.KaplanA. (2019). A complex dynamic systems perspective on teacher learning and identity formation: An instrumental case. Teachers and Teaching, 25(1), 7–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1533811
GrahamS.CaoY.KimY.-S. G.LeeJ.TateT.CollinsP.ChoM.MoonY.ChungH. Q.OlsonC. B. (2024). Effective writing instruction for students in grades 6 to 12: A best evidence meta-analysis. Reading and Writing, 38(4), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10539-2
21.
GutiérrezK. D.Baquedano-LópezP.TejedaC. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6(4), 286–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039909524733
22.
GutiérrezK. D.RogoffB. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032005019
23.
HansenM.QuinteroD. (2017, July 7). The state of the nation’s social studies educators. The Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-state-of-the-nations-social-studies-educators/
24.
HathcockS. J.GarnerJ. K.KaplanA. (2020). Examining micro-change within and among science teachers’ identities: A multiple case study. Science Education, 104(5), 827–856. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21577
25.
HinchmanK. A.O’BrienD. G. (2019). Disciplinary literacy: From infusion to hybridity. Journal of Literacy Research, 51(4), 525–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X19876986
26.
HopeK. (2020). When memories make a difference: Multimodal literacy narratives for preservice ela methods students. Teaching/Writing: The Journal of Writing Teacher Education, 8(1). https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/wte/vol8/iss1/3
27.
IngersollR.MerrillE.StuckeyD.CollinsG.HarrisonB. (2021). The demographic transformation of the teaching force in the United States. Education Sciences, 11(5), 234. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050234
28.
JayL. P. (2025). Social studies teacher education and the legacy of PCK: Exploring situated theories of preservice teacher development. The Teacher Educator, 60(1), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2024.2420217
KaplanA.GarnerJ. K. (2017). A complex dynamic systems perspective on identity and its development: The dynamic systems model of role identity. Developmental Psychology, 53(11), 2036–2051. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000339
31.
KaplanA.GarnerJ. K. (2020). Steps for applying the complex dynamical systems approach in educational research: A guide for the perplexed scholar. The Journal of Experimental Education, 88(3), 486–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2020.1745738
32.
KaplanA.SinaiM.FlumH. (2014). Design-based interventions for promoting students’ identity exploration within the school curriculum. In S. A. Karabenick & T. C. Urdan (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (vol. 18, pp. 243–291). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0749-742320140000018007
33.
KiuharaS. A.GrahamS.HawkenL. S. (2009). Teaching writing to high school students: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 136–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013097
34.
KlineS.KangG. (2022). Reflect, reimagine, revisit: A framework for centering critical writing pedagogy. Language Arts, 99(5), 300–311. https://doi.org/10.58680/la202231790
35.
KlineS. M.KangG.IkpezeC. H.SmetanaL.MyersJ.RaskauskasJ.ScalesR.TracyK. N.WallA. (2021). A multistate study of dominant discourses in teacher candidates’ memories of writing. Teacher Education Quarterly, 48(1), 79–100.
36.
KohnenA. M.CaprinoK.CraneS.TownsendJ. S. (2019). Where is the writing teacher? Preservice teachers’ perspectives on the teaching of writing. Writing & Pedagogy, 11(2), 285–310. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.37278
37.
LortieD. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. University of Chicago Press.
38.
LuC.ObenchainK.ZhangY. (2024). Exploring teachers’ inclination towards adopting inquiry-based learning in social studies: Insights from teacher professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104628
39.
ManfraM. M.BolickC. M. (Eds.). (2017). The wiley handbook of social studies research. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.
MojeE. B. (2007). Developing socially just subject-matter instruction: A review of the literature on disciplinary literacy teaching. Review of Research in Education, 31(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07300046001
42.
MojeE. B. (2008). Foregrounding the disciplines in secondary literacy teaching and learning: A call for change. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(2), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.52.2.1
43.
MojeE. B. (2015). Doing and teaching disciplinary literacy with adolescent learners: A social and cultural enterprise. Harvard Educational Review, 85(2), 254–278. https://doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.85.2.254
44.
Monte-SanoC. (2010). Disciplinary literacy in history: An exploration of the historical nature of adolescents’ writing. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(4), 539–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2010.481014
45.
Monte-SanoC. (2012). What makes a good history essay? Assessing historical aspects of argumentative writing. Social Education, 76(6), 294–298.
46.
Monte-SanoC.De La PazS. (2012). Using writing tasks to elicit adolescents’ historical reasoning. Journal of Literacy Research, 44(3), 273–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X12450445
47.
Monte-SanoC.De La PazS.FeltonM.PiantedosiK. W.YeeL. S.CareyR. L. (2017). Learning to teach disciplinary literacy across diverse eighth-grade history classrooms within a district-university partnership. Teacher Education Quarterly, 44(4), 98–124. https://www.jstor.org/stable/90014091
48.
Monte-SanoC.HarrisK. (2012). Recitation and reasoning in novice history teachers’ use of writing. Elementary School Journal, 113(1), 105–130. https://doi.org/10.1086/666388
49.
MuhammadG. (2020). Cultivating genius: A four-layered framework for culturally and historically responsive literacy. Scholastic, Incorporated.
50.
National Center for Educational Statistics. (2012). Schools and staffing survey (SASS), Public School Teacher Data File, 2011–2012, Table 209.50. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
NokesJ. D.Kesler-LundA. (2019). Historians’ social literacies. The History Teacher, 52(3), 369–410.
54.
ParisD. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12441244
55.
PattersonT.BridgelalI.KaplanA. (2022). Becoming a social studies teacher: An integrative systems perspective on identity content, structure, and processes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103899
56.
RonfeldtM.GrossmanP. (2008). Becoming a professional: Experimenting with possible selves in professional preparation. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(3), 41–60.
57.
RubinB. C. (2012). Making citizens: Transforming civic learning for diverse social studies classrooms. Routledge.
58.
SachsJ. (2005). Teacher education and the development of professional identity: Learning to be a teacher. In DenicoloP.KompfM. (Eds.), Connecting policy and practice (1st ed., pp. 5–21). Routledge.
59.
SaldañaJ. (Ed.). (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research. Oxford University Press.
60.
SmithA. (2018). Waves of theory building in writing and its development, and their implications for instruction, assessment, and curriculum. In AlvermannD. E.UnrauN. J.SailorsM.RuddellR. B. (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of literacy (7th ed., pp. 65–83). Routledge.
WhitneyA. E. (2009). Writer, teacher, person: Tensions between personal and professional writing in a national writing project summer institute. English Education, 41(3), 235–258. https://doi.org/10.58680/ee20097109
63.
WineburgS. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Temple University Press.
64.
WissingerD. R.De La PazS. (2016). Effects of critical discussions on middle school students’ written historical arguments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000043
65.
WoodardR. (2015). The dialogic interplay of writing and teaching writing: Teacher-writers’ talk and textual practices across contexts. Research in the Teaching of English, 50(1), 35–59. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte201527425
66.
WoodardR.VaughanA.MachadoE. (2017). Exploring culturally sustaining writing pedagogy in urban classrooms. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 66(1), 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/2381336917719440
67.
YinR. K. (2018). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 6). Sage.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
