This embedded case study investigates the nature of authorship in a secondary English Language Arts classroom by examining two adolescents’ writing identities and experiences writing across genres. Using rhetorical genre theory, the study illustrates how composition and notions of authorship in this context were strongly informed by conversations—both with peers and the teacher. An additional finding was that students wrote themselves into different genre identities as they composed poetry, editorials, and memoirs, drawing on different authorial stances and sources of knowledge. Finally, this analysis documents robust learning about the nature of writing, including transferring rhetorical strategies across contexts and purposes, skills often called for in education policy as well as career and college writing, not documented in secondary schools. Implications for teaching include valuing relationship-building conversations, offering students multiple genre positions across secondary writing experiences, and considering ways to build upon writers’ self-described and socially constructed identities as successful writers.
AnthonyA. (2013). Las hocionas: Three locas with big mouths and even bigger brains. San Francisco, CA: Kórima Press.
2.
ApplebeeA. N.LangerJ. A. (2011). EJ Extra: A snapshot of writing instruction in middle schools and high schools. English Journal, 100, 14–27.
3.
BakhtinM. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination (HolquistM., Ed. and EmersonC.HolquistM., Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
4.
BawarshiA. (2003). Genre and the invention of the writer: Reconsidering the place of invention in composition. Logan: Utah State University Press.
5.
BickerstaffS. (2012). “I am the rock goddess of lyrics:” Writerly identities of adolescents returning to school. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56, 56–66.
6.
BomerR. (2011). Building adolescent literacy in today’s English classrooms. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
7.
BrandtD. (2015). The rise of writing: Redefining mass literacy. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BrauerL.ClarkC. T. (2008). The trouble is English: Reframing English studies in secondary schools. English Education, 40, 293–313.
9.
BrooksM. D. (2015). “It’s like a script”: Long-term English learners’ experiences with and ideas about academic reading. Research in the Teaching of English, 49, 383–406.
10.
CanagarajahA. S. (2013). Negotiating translingual literacy: An enactment. Research in the Teaching of English, 48, 40.
11.
CaraballoL. (2017). Students’ critical meta-awareness in a figured world of achievement: Toward a culturally sustaining stance in curriculum, pedagogy, and research. Urban Education, 52, 585–609.
12.
DaviesB.HarréR. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20, 43–63.
13.
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I.ShawL. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
EmigJ. A. (1971). The composing processes of twelfth graders. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
15.
FierrosC. O.Delgado BernalD. (2016). Vamos a platicar: The contours of pláticas as Chicana/Latina feminist methodology. Chicana/Latina Studies, 15, 98–120.
16.
FisherM. T. (2003). Open mics and open minds: Spoken word poetry in African Diaspora Participatory Literacy Communities. Harvard Educational Review, 73, 362.
17.
Flores-DueñasL. (1999). Plática as critical instruction: Talking with bilingual students about their reading. Educational Considerations, 26, 44–49.
18.
FoucaultM. (1969). What is an author (HurleyR., Trans.). In FaubionJ. D. (Ed.), Aesthetics, method, and epistemology (1st ed., pp. 205–222). New York, NY: The New Press.
JacksonP. W. (1986). The practice of teaching. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
21.
JefferyJ. V.WilcoxK. (2014). “How do I do it if I don’t like writing?”: Adolescents’ stances toward writing across disciplines. Reading & Writing, 27, 1095–1117.
22.
JocsonK. M. (2006). “There’s a better word”: Urban youth rewriting their social worlds through poetry. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49, 700–707.
23.
JohnsonL. (2017). Writing the self: Black queer youth challenge heteronormative being in an after-school writing club. Research in the Teaching of English, 52, 13–33.
24.
KiuharaS. A.GrahamS.HawkenL. S. (2009). Teaching writing to high school students: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 136–160.
25.
LammersJ. C.MarshV. L. (2018). “A writer more than a child”: A longitudinal study examining adolescent writer identity. Written Communication, 35, 89–114.
26.
MarshV. L. (2018). Portal and gatekeeper: How peer feedback functions in a high school writing class. Research in the Teaching of English, 53, 149–172.
27.
MertensD. M. (2009). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
28.
MojeE. B.LukeA. (2009). Literacy and identity: Examining the metaphors in history and contemporary research. Reading Research Quarterly, 44, 415–437.
29.
MuhammadG. E. (2015). Searching for full vision: Writing representations of African American adolescent girls. Research in the Teaching of English, 49, 224–247.
30.
MurilloL. A. (2010). Local literacies as counter-hegemonic practices deconstructing anti-Spanish ideologies in the Rio Grande Valley. In JiménezR. T.RiskoV. J.HundleyM. K.RoweD. W. (Eds.), Yearbook of the national reading conference (Vol. 59). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.
31.
MurilloL. A.SchallJ. M. (2016). “They didn’t teach us well”: Mexican-origin students speak out about their readiness for college literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 60, 315–323.
NewellG. E.Van Der HeideJ.OlsenA. W. (2014). High school English language arts teachers’ argumentative epistemologies for teaching writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 49, 95–119.
34.
PajaresF.JohnsonM. J.UsherE. L. (2007). Sources of writing self-efficacy beliefs of elementary, middle, and high school students. Research in the Teaching of English, 42, 104–120.
35.
RoozenK. (2009). “Fan fic-ing” English studies: A case study exploring the interplay of vernacular literacies and disciplinary engagement. Research in the Teaching of English, 44, 136–169.
36.
RosenblattL. M. (1994). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
37.
ScherffLPiazzaC. (2005). The more things change, the more they stay the same: A survey of high school students’ writing experiences. Research in the Teaching of English, 39, 271–304.
38.
SchunnC.GodleyA.DeMartinoS. (2016). The reliability and validity of peer review of writing in high school AP English classes. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 60, 13–23.
39.
SkerrettA. (2012). “We hatched in this class”: Repositioning of identity in and beyond a reading classroom. The High School Journal, 95, 62–75.
40.
SkerrettA.BomerR. (2013). Recruiting languages and lifeworlds for border-crossing compositions. Research in the Teaching of English, 47, 313–337.
41.
SommersN. (1980). Revision Strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers. College Composition and Communication, 31, 378–388.
42.
VanDerHeideJ. (2017). Classroom talk as writing instruction for learning to make writing moves in literary arguments. Reading Research Quarterly, 53, 323–344.
43.
VetterA. (2010). Positioning students as readers and writers through talk in a high school English classroom. English Education, 43, 33–64.
44.
WahleithnerJ. M. (2018). Five portraits of teachers’ experiences teaching writing: Negotiating knowledge, student need, and policy. Teachers College Record, 120, 1–60.
45.
WhitneyA. E. (2011). In search of the authentic English classroom: Facing the schoolishness of school. English Education, 44, 51–62.
46.
WhitneyA. E.RidgemanM.MasquelierG. (2011). Beyond “Is This OK?”: High school writers building understandings of genre. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54, 525–533.
47.
WieselE.MauriacF. (1982). Night(S. Rodway, Trans.). New York, NY: Bantam Books.
48.
WilliamsonT. (2017). Avoiding the gaze of the test: High-stakes literacy policy implementation. Texas Education Review, 5, 66–90.
49.
WilliamsonT. (2018). Discourses and enactments of English language arts in a secondary English department (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations. doi:10.15781/T29C6SK5G
50.
YanceyK.RobertsonL.TaczakK. (2014). Writing across contexts: Transfer, composition, and sites of writing. Logan: Utah State University Press.
51.
YinR. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
52.
YoonH. (2013). Rewriting the curricular script: Teachers and children translating writing practices in a kindergarten classroom. Research in the Teaching of English, 48, 148–174.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
