The role of the United Nations (UN) in response to the developments in the Arab world should be viewed in the context of the larger trends of thought and action in the world organization in promoting democracy as a norm during the past nearly two decades. The norm of establishing accountability as against impunity has found wide acceptance to define the relationship between the rulers and the ruled in the new century. Against this background, the great expectations about the UN as a powerful transformational tool toward democratization had received a setback with tempering experiences in responding to developments in Egypt, Libya, Syria, and Yemen since 2011. While the UN remained a bystander in Egypt in the wake of a coup against President Mohammed Morsi in 2013, it is striking that UN actions in Libya had cascading effect on its failure to act in Syria, which in turn produced a sense of fatigue in dealing with the situation in Yemen. In Libya’s case, the UN authorized military intervention did more harm than good to the cause of civilian protection and establishment of peaceful transition, but in Syria’s case, the military and political developments took place outside in the region and between major powers because of the diplomatic deadlock in the Security Council. Yemen comes out as a humanitarian nightmare, because of the exploitation of internal tribal suspicions by the regional geopolitical interests, which primarily spoiled all prospects of a promising role of the UN in providing a democratic framework of constitutional governance. The UN was unfortunately unable to exploit the opportunities thrown up by the Arab Spring as shown by its experiences in Libya, Syria, and Yemen.
Acharya, A. (2002). Redefining the dilemmas of humanitarian intervention. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 56(3), 373–381.
2.
Adams, S. (2015). Failure to protect: Syria and the UN Security Council. New York: Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect.
3.
Akpinar, P. (2016). The limits of mediation in Arab Spring: The case of Syria. Third World Quarterly, 37(12), 2288–2303.
4.
Annan, K. (2005). In larger freedom: Towards development, security and human rights for all (Report of the Secretary-General). New York: United Nations.
5.
Bartu, P. (2014). Libya’s political transition: The challenges of mediation. New York: International Peace Institute.
General Assembly. (2011). Responsibility while protecting: Elements for the development and promotion of the concept, Annex to the letter dated 9 November 2011 from the Permanent Representative of Brazil to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General. UN Doc. A/66/51.
12.
Gowan, R. (2012). “Less bound to the desk”: Ban Ki-moon, the UN, and preventive diplomacy. Global Governance, 18(4), 387–404.
13.
Hassan, A. F. (2015). Media, revolution and politics in Egypt: The story of an uprising. London: I.B. Tauris.
IDRC. (2001). The responsibility to protect: Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. Ottawa: International Development Research Center.
16.
Joyner, C. C. (1999). The United Nations and democracy. Global Governance, 5(3), 333–357.
17.
Koubaa, M. S. (2012). Democratic transition in Tunisia: A rewarding path. Security & Human Rights, 23(3), 223–226.
18.
Lundgren, M. (2016). Mediation in Syria: Initiatives, strategies, and obstacles, 2011–2016. Contemporary Security Policy, 37(2), 273–288.
19.
Mancini, F., & Vericat, J. (2016). UN mediation in Libya, Syria and Yemen. New York: International Peace Institute.
20.
Martin, I. (2015). The United Nations’ role in the first year of the transition. In P.Cole & B.McQuinn (Eds), The Libyan revolution and its aftermath (pp. 127–152). London: Hurst Publishers.
21.
Medzirhorsky, J., Popovic, M., & Jenne, E. K. (2017). Rhetoric of civil conflict management: United Nations Security Council debates over the Syrian civil war. Research & Politics, 4(2), 1–10.
22.
Murthy, C. S. R. (2007). New phase in UN reforms: Establishment of the peacebuilding commission and the human rights council. International Studies, 44(1), 39–56.
23.
Murthy, C. S. R., & Kurtz, G. (2016). International responsibility as solidarity: The impact of the world summit negotiations on the R2P trajectory. Global Society, 30(1), 38–53.
24.
Office of Coordinator for Humanitarian Assistance, Financial Tracking Service, Syria Humanitarian Response Plan. Retrieved 31 December 2017, from https://fts.unocha.org/appeals/526/summary
25.
Orkaby, A. (2017). Yemen’s humanitarian nightmare: The real roots of the conflict. Foreign Affairs, 96(6), 93–101.
Rushton, S. (2008). The UN Secretary-General and norm entrepreneurship: Boutros Boutros-Ghali and democracy promotion. Global Governance, 14(1), 95–110.
30.
Sanyal, P. (2015). Egypt: Presidential elections, 2014. Contemporary Review of the Middle East, 2(3), 289–307.
31.
Sarkin, J. (2016). The rise and fall (and the supposed rise again) of the responsibility to protect (R2P) as a norm of international law: R2P in the human rights language. In Brett O.Bannon (Ed.), Reassessing the responsibility to protect: Conceptual and operational challenges (pp. 51–73). New York: Routledge.
Szmolka, I. (2015). Exclusionary and non-consensual transitions versus inclusive and consensual democratization: The cases of Egypt and Tunisia. Arab Studies Quarterly, 37(1), 73–95.
34.
Therien, J. -P., & Dumontier, M. B. (2009). The United Nations and global democracy: From discourse to deeds. Cooperation and Conflict: Journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, 44(4), 355–377.
35.
Tourinho, M., Stuenkel, O., & Brockmeier, S. (2016). “Responsibility while protecting”: Reforming R2P implementation. Global Society, 30(1), 134–150.
Voeten, E. (2005). The political origins of the UN Security Council’s ability to legitimize the use of force. International Organization, 59(3), 527–557.
41.
Zambakari, C. (2016). The misguided and mismanaged intervention in Libya: Consequences for peace. Africa Security Review, 25(1), 44–62.
