Existing research, social movements, nongovernmental organizations, and many national governments herald democracy as a, or perhaps the, resolution to state repression. Interestingly, very little attention has been given to the topic of when democracies kill their citizens for political reasons. Drawing upon insights derived from research in three countries (the United States, India, and Northern Ireland), I focus on three strategies that democratic governments use to facilitate their use of violent repressive behavior. These highlight not only areas for subsequent investigation as the world turns to political democracy as the dominant form of regime type but also have implications for those calling for democratic governments as well. Indeed, it may be useful to develop a new phrase as everyone’s political dreams/aspirations come true: ‘Caveat Civis’ – citizens beware.
AgrawalGGonsalvesC (2005) Dalits and the Law. New Delhi: Human Rights Law Network.
2.
ConradC RMooreWH (2010) What Stops the Torture?American Journal of Political Science54(2): 459-476.
3.
CareyS (2009) Protest, Repression and Political Regimes: An Empirical Analysis of Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa. New York: Routledge.
4.
CunninghamD (2004) There’s Something Happening Here: The New Left, the Klan, and FBI Counterintelligence. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.
DavenportC (1995) Multi-dimensional threat perception and state repression: An inquiry into why states apply negative sanctions. American Journal of Political Science39(3): 683–713.
6.
DavenportC (1996) ‘Constitutional promises’ and repressive reality: A cross-national time-series investigation of why political and civil liberties are suppressed. Journal of Politics58(3): 627–654.
7.
DavenportC (1997) From ballots to bullets: An empirical assessment of how national elections influence state uses of political repression. Electoral Studies16(4): 517–540.
8.
DavenportC (1999) Human Rights and the Democratic Proposition. Journal of Conflict Resolution43(1): 92–116.
9.
DavenportC (2004) The promise of democratic pacification: An empirical assessment. International Studies Quarterly48(3): 539–560.
10.
DavenportC (2007a) State Repression and the Domestic Democratic Peace. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
DavenportC (2007b) Licensing repression: Dissent, threats and state repression in the United States. Minnesota Journal of International Law16(2): 311–333.
12.
DavenportC (2009) Media Bias, Perspective and State Repression: The Black Panther Party. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
DavenportC (2012) To Kill a Movement: Mobilization, Repression and Demobilization of the Republic of New Africa.
14.
DavenportCArmstrongDAII (2004) Democracy and the violation of human rights: A statistical analysis from 1976–1996. American Journal of Political Science48(3): 538–554.
DeshpandeA (2000) Recasting economic inequality. Review of Social Economy58(3): 381–399.
17.
DeutschRMagowanV (1975) Northern Ireland 1968–1974: A Chronology of Events. Belfast: Blackstaff Press.
18.
EarlJ (2003) Tanks, tear gas and taxes: Toward a theory of movement repression. Sociological Theory21(1): 44–68.
19.
FeinH (1995) More murder in the middle – Life-integrity violations and democracy in the world, 1987. Human Rights Quarterly17(1): 170–191.
20.
FoucaultM (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Vintage Press.
21.
GamsonWA (1975) The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
22.
GoldsteinRJ (1978) Political Repression in Modern America : From 1870 to the Present. Cambridge: Schenkman.
23.
GoldsteinR J (2000) Political Repression in Modern America: From 1870 to the Present. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Pub. Co.
24.
HegreHEllingsenTGatesSGleditschNP (2001) Toward a democratic civil peace? Democracy, political change and civil war, 1916–1992. American Political Science Review95: 33–48.
25.
HibbsDA (1973) Mass Political Violence: A Cross-National Causal Analysis. New York: Wiley.
26.
HorowitzDL (2001) The Deadly Ethnic Riot. Berkeley: University of California Press.
27.
KeithLC (2002) Constitutional provisions for individual human rights (1977–1996): Are they more than mere ‘Window Dressing?’Political Research Quarterly55(1): 111–143.
28.
McKittrickDKeltersSFeeneyBThorntonC (1999) Lost Lives: The Stories of the Men, Women and Children who Died as a Result of the Northern Ireland Troubles. Edinburgh: Mainstream Publishing.
29.
MyersMKrainM (1997) Democracy and civil war: A note on the democratic peace proposition. International Interactions23(1): 109–118.
O’HearnD (2009) Repression and solidary cultures of resistance: Irish political prisoners on protest. American Journal of Sociology115(2): 491–526.
32.
OliverP (2008) Repression and crime control: Why social movements scholars should pay attention to mass incarceration rates as a form of repression. Mobilization13: 1–24.
33.
PoeSTateCN (1994) Repression of human rights to personal integrity in the 1980s – A global analysis. American Political Science Review88(4): 853–872.
34.
PoeSTateCNKeithLC (1999) Repression of the human right to personal integrity revisited: A global cross-national study covering the years 1976–1993. International Studies Quarterly43(2): 291–313.
35.
RichardsD (1999) Perilous proxy: Human rights and the presence of national elections. Social Science Quarterly80(4): 648–665.
36.
RummelRJ (1984) Libertarianism, violence within states, and the polarity principle. Comparative Politics16(4): 443–462.
37.
RummelRJ (1997) Power Kills. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
38.
SouleSDavenportC (2009) Velvet glove, iron fist and even hand: Protest policing in the United States, 1960–1990. Mobilization14(1): 1–22.
39.
SuttonM (1994) Bear in Mind these Dead . . . An Index of Deaths from the Conflict in Ireland 1969–1993. Belfast: Beyond the Pale Publications.
40.
TillyC (1978) From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, PA: Addison-Wesley.
41.
TillyC (1998) Where do rights come from? In: SkocpolT (ed.) Democracy, Revolution and History. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
42.
TillyC (2000) Processes and mechanisms of democratization. Sociological Theory18: 1–16.
43.
TillyC (2004) Contention and Democracy in Europe, 1650–2000. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44.
TillyC (2005) Repression, mobilization, and explanation. In: DavenportCJohnstonHMuellerC (eds) Repression and Mobilization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
WhiteRWhiteT (1995) Violence and the liberal state: The case of Northern Ireland 1969–1972. Journal of Conflict Resolution39(2): 330–352.
47.
WilkinsonSI (2004) Votes and Violence: Ethnic Competition and Ethnic Riots in India. New York: Cambridge University Press.
48.
ZangerSC (2000) A global analysis of the effect of political regime changes on life integrity violations, 1977–1993. Journal of Peace Research37(2): 213–233.
49.
ZangerSC (2009) Protest, Repression and Political Regimes: An Empirical Analysis of Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa. New York: Routledge.
50.
ZiegenhagenE (1986) The Regulation of Political Conflict. New York: Praeger.
