This paper concerns the role played by mainstream economics in the unequal assertion of people’s right to clean water. First of all there is a conflict between satisfying wants and asserting rights. Second there is also a contradiction between aiming at maximizing social utility and ensuring rights. Finally, the market being considered the default regulation institution, the human right to water is hindered because markets are both inefficient in reaching universal coverage and unaccountable.
Arrojo, P.2006. El reto ético da la nueva cultura del água: Funciones, valores y derechos en juego. Barcelona: Ediciones Paidós.
2.
Bontems, P., and G. Rotillon.1998. Économie de l’environnement . Paris: Editions La Découverte
3.
. Chavez, W.2005. Effervescence populaire en Bolivie. Le Monde Diplomatique Mars.
4.
De Groot, R.S.2006. Function analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes . Landscape and Urban Planning75: 175-186.
5.
Dworkin R.1978. Taking rights seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
Gómez, L.S., and P. Terhorst.2005. Cochambamba, Bolivia: Public-collective partnership after the water war. In Reclaiming public water: Achievements, struggles and visions from around the world, ed. B. Balanyá, B. Brennan , O. Hoedeman, S. Kishimoto, and P. Terhorst.http://www.tni.org/books/publicwater.pdf.
7.
Hardin, G.1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science162: 1243-1248.
8.
Harvey, P.2002. Human rights and economic policy discourse: Taking economic and social rights seriously. Columbia Human Rights Law Review33 (2): 363-471.
9.
Henriques, P., M. Branco, R. Fragoso, and M.L. Carvalho.2006. Direito de acesso à água: Princípios económicos para o seu usufruto na agricultura. In Economia com compromisso: Ensaios em memória de José Dias Sena, ed. M. Branco, M. L. Carvalho, and C. Rêgo, 29-55. Évora: Universidade de Évora, Cefag-UE.
10.
Maltz, H.2005. Porto Alegre’s water: Public and for all . In Reclaiming public water: Achievements, struggles and visions from around the world, ed. B. Balanyá , B. Brennan, O. Hoedeman, S. Kishimoto, and P. Terhorst.TNI/ CEO Press Release.
11.
Montemayor, C.A.2005. Possibilities for public water in Manila. In Reclaiming public water: Achievements, struggles and visions from around the world, ed. B. Balanyá, B. Brennan, O. Hoedeman, S. Kishimoto, and P. Terhorst.TNI/CEO Press Release.
12.
Netto, A.2005. Private sector still running after water rights . Asia Times on-line, March 26, available at http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Asian_Economy/GC26Dk01.html .
13.
Offenheiser, R., and S. Holcombe.2003. Challenges and opportunities in implementing a rights-based approach to development: An Oxfam America perspective. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly32 (2): 268-306.
14.
Petrella, R.2004. Désir d’humanité. Le droit de rêver . Bruxelles: Éditions Labor .
15.
Rawls, J.1972. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA : Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
16.
Sen, A.1993. Éthique et économie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
17.
Smith, A.1776. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. On-line edition available at http://socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3113/smith/wealth/wealbk01 .
18.
U.N.2002. Substantive issues arising in the implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights. General comment n° 15. Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, 19-29 November. Available on-line at http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu2/6/gc15.doc.
19.
U.N.1997. Comprehensive assessment of the freshwater resources of the world. New York: Commission on Sustainable Development.
20.
Undp.2006. Human development report. Beyond scarcity: Power, poverty and the global water crisis. Available on-line at http://hdr.undp.org/hdr2006/pdfs.
21.
WHO.2000. The global water supply and sanitation assessment 2000. Geneva.
22.
Wdid.2008. World development indicators database: Facts and statistics. Available on-line at http://www.nationmaster.com.
