Street interactions between the police and protesters can serve as a barometer of state–society conflict. This article seeks to examine the way in which the police respond to anti-government protests, and how these responses influence the politics of legitimacy at stake. Through the examination of protest policing in Thailand’s decade-long political conflicts, which reached the zenith in 2013–2014, I will show that police responses to these protests were a mixture of three approaches: accommodative, restrictive and hands-off. At least four factors influenced the interplay of these methods: (i) the police’s tactical improvement, which however faces structural challenges; (ii) a history of police politicization; (iii) extreme characteristics of the protests; and (iv) the nature of conflict over governmental legitimacy contributing to public mistrust in the police. The Thai case illustrates that handling anti-government protests necessitates political sensitivity and creativity. Otherwise, the government and especially the police can run the risk of further damaging public trust and institutional legitimacy.
Arendt, H. (1970). On Violence. London & New York: Harcourt Inc.
2.
Arisa, R. (2012). Police and politics: Political games of the police reform in Thailand (Unpublished dissertation thesis). Institute for Political Science, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
3.
Askew, M. (2010). Confrontation and crisis in Thailand, 2008–2010. In M.Askew (Ed.), Legitimacy and crisis in Thailand (pp. 31–81). Chiang Mai, Thailand: Silkworm.
4.
Axelsen, K. (1995). Problems of punitive damages for political protest and civil disobedience. Environmental Law, 25(2), 495–511.
5.
Baker, C. (2000). Thailand’s assembly of the poor: Background, drama, reaction. South East Asia Research, 8(1), 5–29.
6.
Ball, D., & Mathieson, D.S. (2007). Militia Redux, or sor, and the revival of paramilitary in Thailand. Chiang Mai, Thailand: White Lotus.
ChairatC. (2011). Aesthetics and people’s politics. Bangkok, Thailand: Faculty of Political Science, Thammasat University.
16.
ChaiwatS. (2003). Living weapons? Critical perspectives on violence. Bangkok, Thailand: Fah Diew Kan Publishing.
17.
Chambers, P. (2009). In the shadow of the soldier’s boot: Assessing civil-military relations in Thailand. In M.Askew (Ed.), Legitimacy crisis in Thailand (pp. 235–272). Bangkok, Thailand: Prajadhipok’s Institute.
18.
Chambers, P. (2016). The resilience of monarchised military in Thailand. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 46(3), 425–444.
19.
Charnvit, K. (2000). Historical documentation of October 14, 1973. Bangkok, Thailand: Saitharn.
20.
Chenoweth, E., & Stephan, M.J. (2011). Why civil resistance works: The strategic logic of nonviolent conflict. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
21.
Churchill, W., & Vander, J. (1990). Agents of repression: The FBI’s secret wars against the Black Panther Party and the American Indian Movement. Boston, MA: South End Press.
22.
Connors, M., & Hewison, K. (2008). Introduction: Thailand and the ‘good coup’. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 38(1), 1–10.
23.
Curtis, T.J. (1973). A brief history of USOM support to the Thai National Police Department. Bangkok, Thailand: Office of Public Safety, Agency for International Development.
24.
Davenport, C. (2005). Introduction: Repression and mobilization: Insights from political science and sociology. In C.Davenport, C.Mueller, & H.Johnston (Eds), Repression and mobilization (pp. vii–xx). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
25.
de La Boétie, E. ([1552] 1975). The politics of obedience: The discourse of voluntary servitude (Harry Kurz, Trans.). New York, NY: Free Life Editions.
26.
della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (1999). Social movements: An introduction. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publisher.
27.
della Porta, D., Peterson, A., & Reiter, H. (Eds). (2006). The policing of transnational protest. Hampshire, England: Ashgate.
28.
della Porta, D., & Reiter, H. (1998). Introduction: The policing of protest in western democracies. In D.della Porta & H.Reiter (Eds), Policing protest: The control of mass demonstrations in western democracies (pp. 10–27). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
29.
Earl, J. (2003). Tanks, tear, gas, and taxes: Toward a theory of movement repression. Sociological Theory, 2(1), 4–68.
30.
Engler, M., & Engler, P. (2016). This is an uprising: How nonviolent revolt is shaping the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Nation Books.
31.
Erickson Nepstad, S. (2011). Nonviolent revolutions: Civil resistance in the late 20th century. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
32.
Ferguson, Niall. (2014). The great degeneration: How institutions decay and economies die. London, UK: Penguin Books.
33.
Fernandez, L. (2008). Policing dissent: Social control and the anti-globalization movement. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
34.
Fineman, D. (1997). A special relationship: The United States and military government in Thailand, 1947–1958. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
35.
Fukuyama, F. (2011). The origins of political order: From prehuman times to the French revolution. London, UK: Profile Books.
36.
Fukuyama, F. (2014). Political order and political decay. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Goldsmith, A. (2005). Police reform and the problem of trust. Theoretical Criminology, 9(4), 443–470.
41.
Greenawalt, K. (1989). Conflicts of law and morality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
42.
Haanstad, E.J. (2008). Constructing order through chaos: A state ethnography of the Thai police (Unpublished dissertation thesis). University of Wisconsin-Madison, The United States.
43.
Haberkon, T. (2011). Revolution interrupted: Farmers, students, law, and violence in Northern Thailand. Madison: Wisconsin University Press.
44.
Harris, R.N. (1971). The police academy: A psycho-structural analysis (Unpublished thesis dissertation). Tufts University, United States.
45.
Hasisi, B. (2008). Police, politics, and culture in a deeply divided society. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 98(3), 1119–1145.
46.
Herzfeld, M. (2002). The absent presence: Discourses of crypto-colonialism. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 101(4), 899–926.
47.
Hess, D., & Martin, B. (2006). Repression, backfire, and the theory of transformative events. Mobilization: An International Journal, 1(2), 249–267.
48.
Hewison, K. (2014). Thailand: The lesson of protest. Asian Studies: Journal of Critical Perspectives on Asia, 54(1), 1–15.
Jackson, J., & Bradford, B. (2010). What is trust and confidence in the police?Policing: A Journal for Policy and Practice, 4(3), 241–248.
54.
JanjiraS. (2013). If you use nonviolence, I will respond with nonviolence: A nonviolent conflict in the case of the 2007 Pattani Protest, Southern Thailand. In R.DuMont, T.Hastings, & E.Noma (Eds), Conflict transformation: New voices, new directions (pp. 52–65). Jefferson: McFarland.
55.
JanjiraS. (2015a). Humor and nonviolent struggle in Serbia. New York, NY: Syracuse University Press.
56.
JanjiraS. (2015b). Articulation of legitimacy: A theoretical note on confrontational and nonconfrontational approaches to protest policing. Asian Journal of Peacebuilding, 3(1), 103–119.
JularatD. (2016). Red barrels: Historical reconstruction and haunted memories in Thailand. Bangkok, Thailand: Thammasat University Press.
59.
KasianT. (2006). Toppling Thaksin. The New Left Review, 39(May–June), 6–37.
60.
Kislenko, A. (2004). Not so silent partner: Thailand’s role in cover operations, counter-insurgency, and the wars in Indochina. The Journal of Conflict Studies, 24(1). Retrieved 9 February 2017, from http://journals.hil.unb.ca/index.php/jcs/article/view/292/465
61.
Klare, M.T., & Arnson, C. (1977). Supplying repression: U.S. support for authoritarian regimes abroad. Washington, DC: Institute for Policy Studies.
62.
Kowalewski, D. (2003). Vigilantism. In W.Heitmeyer & J.Hagan (Eds), International handbook of violence research (pp. 339–349). Dordrecht, The Netherlands and Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
63.
KrisanaphongP. (2014). Police reform perspectives. Rangsit Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(1), 35–42.
64.
KrisanaphongP., & Glendinning, T. (2013). Police reform in Thailand post-2006. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 23, 71–84.
65.
Kuzmarov, J. (2012). Modernizing repression: Police training and national building in the American century. MA: University of Massachusetts.
66.
Lassak, M., & Pye, O. (2016). Social movements, state power and party networks in the Kingdom of Thailand. In S.Fadaee (Ed.), Understanding southern social movements (pp. 186–202). London, UK: Routledge.
Lim, S. (2016). Siam’s new detectives: Visualizing crime and conspiracy in modern Thailand. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
69.
Lobe, T. (1977). United States national security policy and aid to the Thailand police. Denver, CO: University of Denver, Graduate School of International Studies.
Martin, B. (2007). Justice ignited: The dynamics of backfire. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
77.
Marx, G.T. (1979). External efforts to damage or facilitate social movements: Some patterns, explanations, outcomes, and complications. In M.N.Zald & J.D.McCarthy (Eds), The dynamics of social movements: Resource mobilization, social control and tactics (pp. 94–125). Cambridge, UK: Winthrop.
McAdam, D., McCarthy, J., & Zald, M. (Eds). (1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
105.
McCargo, D. (2005). Network monarchy and legitimacy crises in Thailand. The Pacific Review, 18(4), 499–519.
106.
McCargo, D. (2015). Thailand in 2014: The trouble with magic swords. Southeast Asian Affairs, 335–358.
107.
McPhail, C., & McCarthy, J.D. (2005). Protest mobilization, protest repression, and their interaction. In C.Davenport, C.Mueller, & H.Johnston (Eds), Repression and mobilization (pp. 3–32). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
108.
Meares, T.L. (2000). Norms, legitimacy, and law enforcement. Oregon Law Review, 79(2), 391–415.
109.
Mérieau, E. (2016). Thailand’s deep state, royal power and the constitutional court (1997–2015). Journal of Contemporary Asia, 46(3), 445–466.
110.
Missingham, B.D. (2003). The assembly of the poor in Thailand: From local struggles to national protest movement. Bangkok, Thailand: Silkworms Book.
111.
Montesano, M.J. (2010). Four Thai pathologies, late 2009. In M.Askew (Ed.), Legitimacy and crisis in Thailand (pp. 273–297). Chaing Mai, Thailand: Silkworm.
PasukP. (1999). Civilising the state: State, civil society and politics in Thailand. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Center for Asian Studies Amsterdam.
116.
PasukP., & Baker, C. (2008). Thaksin’s populism. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 38(1), 62–83.
117.
PaungthongP. (2010). Operations of the war on drugs in Thailand. In ChaiwatS. (Ed.), Hidden and sought violence (pp. 105–152). Bangkok, Thailand: Matichon Publishing.
118.
PavinC. (2014). Good coup gone bad: Thailand’s political development since Thaksin’s downfall. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
119.
PhongsaphatP. (2004). New thinking, new action: Thai police in Thaksin era. Bangkok, Thailand: Bangkok Publishing.
PrajakK. (2005). The cultural politics of student and intellectual movements before October 1973 uprising. Bangkok, Thailand: Thammasat University Press.
123.
PrajakK. (2016). Thailand’s failed 2014 election: The anti-election movement, violence and democratic breakdown. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 46(3), 476–485.
124.
PrapasP. (1998). Street politics: 99 days of the assembly of the poor and a history of street protest in Thailand. Bangkok, Thailand: Text Publishing and Research Centre.
PueyU. (1977). Violence and the military coup in Thailand. Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 9(3), 4–12.
127.
Redekop, V.N., & Fare, S. (2010). Beyond control: A mutual respect approach to protest crowd–police relations. London, UK: Bloombury Academic.
128.
Reisig, D.M. (2009). Procedural justice, police legitimacy, and helping the police fight crime: Results from a survey of Jamaican adolescents. Police Quarterly, 12(1), 42–62.
129.
Royal Thai Government Gazette. (2008, iss. 125, sec. 39, February27). Internal Security Act 2008.
Sayigh, Y. (2011). Policing the people, building the state: Authoritarian transformation in the West Bank and Gaza (The Carnegie Papers). Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment of International Peace.
132.
Schweingruber, D. (2000). Mob sociology and escalated force: Sociology’s contribution in repressive police tactics. The Sociological Quarterly, 41(3), 374–389.
133.
Sheptycki, J. (2001). Reflections on policing divided societies. Policing and Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy, 11(3–4), 235–241.
134.
Sluka, J.A. (Ed.). (2000). Death squad: The anthropology of state terror. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
SunanS. (2014). The end of the devil Thaksin. Bangkok, Thailand: Barn pra athit.
137.
Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law and Society Review, 37(3), 513–548.
138.
SuparaJ. (2004). The nets of resistance. Nonthaburi, Thailand: Campaigns for Alternative Industrial Network (CAIN).
The Information Center for Victims of the 2010 Crackdown. (2012). Truth is the way for justice: Chronology and impact of protest crackdown between April and May 2010. Bangkok, Thailand: Fah Diew Kan.
141.
Thai Royal Police Office. (2009). Crowd Control Manual. Bangkok, Thailand: The Royal Thai Police Headquarters.
142.
ThongchaiW. (2002). Remembering/silencing the traumatic past. In S.Tanabe & C. F.Keyes (Eds), Cultural crisis and social memory (pp. 243–286). London, UK: Routledge.
143.
ThongchaiW. (2008). Toppling democracy. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 38(1), 11–37.
Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. New York, NY: Random House.
146.
Tønnesson, S., & Bjarnegård, E. (2015). Why so much conflict in Thailand. Thammasat Review, 18(1), 132–161.
147.
Truth for Reconciliation Commission of Thailand. (2011). The report by the Truth for Reconciliation Commission of Thailand (TRCT), July 2010–July 2011. Bangkok, Thailand: Government House.
148.
Tyler, T.R. (2004). Enhancing police legitimacy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593(May), 84–99.
149.
Tyler, T.R. (2008). Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities?Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 231–275.
150.
UchaneC. (2011). The origin of Red Shirts as counter-movement. Fah Diew Kan, 9(3), 90–106.
151.
Vitale, A. (2005). From negotiated management to command and control: How the New York Police Department Polices protests. Policing and Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy, 15(3), 291–295.
152.
WaadR. (2011). Crisis 19. Bangkok, Thailand: Sri Panya Publishing.
153.
Waddington, P.J.A. (1994). Policing South Africa: The view from Boipatong. Policing & Society, 4(1), 83–95.
154.
Waddington, P.J.A. (1998). Controlling protest in contemporary historical and comparative perspective. In D.della Porta & H.Reiter (Eds), Policing protest: The control of mass demonstrations in western democracies (pp. 117–143). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
155.
Wahlström, M. (2011). The making of protest and protest policing: Negotiation, knowledge, space, and narrative. Gothenburg, Sweden: University of Gothenburg.
156.
Walker, A. (2012). Thailand’s Political Peasants: Power in the Modern Rural Economy. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.
157.
Weitzer, R. (1985). Policing a Divided Society: Obstacles to Normalization in Northern Ireland. Social Problems, 33(1), 41–55.
158.
Weitzer, R.J. (1995). Policing under fire: Conflict and police-community relations in Northern Ireland. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
159.
Wood, L. (2015). Uncooperative movements, militarized policing, and the social movement society. In H.Ramos & K.Rodgers (Eds), Protest and politics: The promise of social movement societies (pp. 138–154). Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
