When police officers harm civilians, police leadership almost invariably makes a public statement about the incident, and these communications usually address issues of public mistrust in the police. In addressing public mistrust, political pressures may motivate police leadership to avoid acknowledging the role of police in creating that distrust. The study reported in this article examines the consequences of avoiding versus acknowledging responsibility for the role of police in creating mistrust, along with issuing an apology or not issuing an apology, in public statements. How do these various kinds of gestures shape public cooperation with police? This study reports on an experiment designed to answer that question, with our analysis focusing on the impact of these various kinds of statements on the people who are least likely to trust police. The evidence suggests that police leaders should combine acknowledgement of responsibility for the mistrust with an apology if they want to enlist the cooperation of people who are least likely to trust the police.
AlexanderMichelle. 2010. The New Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New York, NY: New Press.
2.
AltmanAlex. 22December2014. Why New York cops turned their backs on Mayor de Blasio. Time.
3.
BellMonica C.2016. Police reform and the dismantling of legal estrangement. Yale Law Journal126:2054–2150.
4.
BorJacobVenkataramaniAtheendar S.WilliamsDavid R.TsaiAlexander C.2018. Police killings and their spillover effects on the mental health of black Americans: A population-based, quasi-experimental study. Lancet392 (10144): 302–10.
5.
BradfordBen. 2014. Policing and social identity: Procedural justice, inclusion and cooperation between police and public. Policing and Society24 (1): 22–43.
6.
ChangCindy. 27September2018. LAPD hands out annual awards for bravery and “preservation of life.”Los Angeles Times.
7.
DesmondMatthewPapachristosAndrew V.KirkDavid S.2016. Police violence and citizen crime reporting in the black community. American Sociological Review81 (5): 857–76.
8.
DhamiMandeep K.2017. An empirical note on perceptions of partial apologies. Oñati Socio-Legal Series7:408–20.
9.
FaganJeffreyGellerAmandaDaviesGarthWestValerie. 2009. Street stops and broken windows revisited: The demography and logic of proactive policing in a safe and changing city. Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 09-203, Columbia University, New York, NY.
10.
FaulFranzErdfelderEdgarBuchnerAxelLangAlbert-Georg. 2009. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods41:1149–60.
GillCharlotteWeisburdDavidTelepCody W.VitterZoeBennettTrevor. 2014. Community-oriented policing to reduce crime, disorder and fear and increase satisfaction and legitimacy among citizens: A systematic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology10 (4): 399–428.
JacksonJonathanBradfordBenStankoBetsyHohlKatrin. 2012. Just authority? Trust in the police in England and Wales. New York, NY: Routledge.
18.
JusticeBenjaminMearesTracey L.2014. How the criminal justice system educates citizens. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science651:159–77.
19.
KendiIbram X.2016. Stamped from the beginning: The definitive history of racist ideas in America. New York, NY: Random House.
20.
LitmanLeibRobinsonJonathanAbberbockTzvi. 2017. TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods49 (2): 433–42.
21.
MearesTracey L.2009. The legitimacy of police among young African-American men. Marquette Law Review92 (4): 651–66.
22.
MungerFrank W.SeronCarroll. 2017. Race, law, and inequality, 50 years after the civil rights era. Annual Review of Law and Social Science13:331–50.
23.
O’BrienThomas C.TylerTom R.2020. Authorities and communities: Can authorities shape cooperation with communities on a group level?Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. Advance online publication. Available from https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000202.
24.
O’BrienThomas C.TylerTom R.2019. Rebuilding trust between police & communities through procedural justice & reconciliation. Behavioral Science & Policy5 (1): 35–50.
25.
O’BrienThomas C.TylerTom R.MearesTracey L.2019. A community level model of authority: Building popular legitimacy with reconciliatory gestures and participation. Regulation & Governance. Available from https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12264.
26.
PaluckElizabeth L.2009. Reducing intergroup prejudice and conflict using the media: A field experiment in Rwanda. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology96 (3): 574–87.
RobbennoltJennifer K.2003. Apologies and legal settlement: An empirical examination. Michigan Law Review102 (3): 460–516.
29.
ShnabelNuritNadlerArie. 2015. The role of agency and morality in reconciliation processes: The perspective of the needs-based model. Current Directions in Psychological Science24 (6): 477–83.
30.
SkoganWesley G.2006. Police and community in Chicago: A tale of three cities. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
31.
TrinknerRickGoffPhillip Atiba. 2016. The color of safety: The psychology of race & policing. In The Sage handbook of global policing, eds. BradfordBenJaureguiBeatriceLoaderIanSteinbergJonny, 61–81. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
32.
TrinknerRickKerrisonErin M.GoffPhillip Atiba. 2019. The force of fear: Police stereotype threat, self-legitimacy, and support for excessive force. Law and Human Behavior43 (5): 421–35.
33.
TrinknerRickTylerTom R.GoffPhilip Atiba. 2016. Justice from within: The relations between a procedurally just organizational climate and police organizational efficiency, endorsement of democratic policing, and officer well-being. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law22 (2): 158–72.
34.
TylerTom R.2005. Policing in black and white: Ethnic group differences in trust and confidence in the police. Police Quarterly8 (3): 322–42.
35.
TylerTom R.2016. From harm reduction to community engagement: Redefining the goals of American policing in the twenty-first century. Northwestern University Law Review111 (6): 1537–65.
36.
TylerTom R.FaganJeffrey. 2008. Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities?Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law6:231–67.
37.
TylerTom R.FaganJeffreyGellerAmanda. 2014. Street stops and police legitimacy: Teachable moments in young urban men’s legal socialization. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies11 (4): 751–85.
38.
TylerTom R.HuoYuen. 2002. Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
39.
TylerTom R.JacksonJonathan. 2014. Popular legitimacy and the exercise of legal authority: Motivating compliance, cooperation, and engagement. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law20 (1): 78–95.
40.
VoightRobCampNicholas P.PrabhakaranVinodkumarHamiltonWilliam L.HeteyRebecca C.GriffithsCamilla M.JurgensDavidJurafskyDanEberhardtJennifer L.2017. Language from police body camera footage shows racial disparities in officer respect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114 (25): 6521–26.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
