From armed-building occupations to fisticuffs between protesters and police at otherwise peaceful demonstrations, protest violence is an essential part of the politics of protest. In this article, I argue that state capacity is central to understanding why some protests are violent. In particular, this article explores two facets of state capacity—coercive capacity and state authority—arguing that where the state is treated as a relevant authority, the likelihood that protesters will employ violent tactics decreases. Using original data on Mexican protest events, I demonstrate that higher levels of state authority reduce violent protest but that increased coercive capacity, especially where state authority is weak, is associated with a greater likelihood of protest violence. This article contributes to our understanding of the influence of state capacity on protest violence and suggests that attentiveness to subnational variations in state capacity can help us better understand the violence.
Academic from Morelos. 2009. Research Interview, February 23. Interview by Heather Sullivan. Morelos, Mexico.
2.
Activist from Morelos. 2009. Research Interview, February 17. Interview by Heather Sullivan. Morelos, Mexico.
3.
AlmeidaPaul. 2008. Waves of Protest: Popular Struggle in El Salvador, 1925-2005. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
4.
AlmeidaPaul D.2003. “Opportunity Organizations and Threat-induced Contention: Protest Waves in Authoritarian Settings.” American Journal of Sociology109 (2): 345–400.
5.
ArceMoisés. 2010. “Parties and Social Protest in Latin America’s Neoliberal Era.” Party Politics16 (5): 669–86.
6.
ArceMoisésMangonnetJorge. 2013. “Competitiveness, Partisanship, and Subnational Protest in Argentina.” Comparative Political Studies46 (8): 895–919.
7.
ArceMoisésRiceRoberta. 2009. “Societal Protest in Post-stabilization Bolivia.” Latin American Research Review44 (1): 88–101.
8.
AuyeroJavier. 2001. “Glocal Riots.” International Sociology16 (1): 33–53.
9.
AuyeroJavier. 2003. “Relational Riot: Austerity and Corruption Protest in the Neoliberal Era.” Social Movement Studies2 (2): 117–45.
10.
AuyeroJavier. 2010. “Clandestine Connections: The Political and Relational Makings of Collective Violence.” In Violent Democracies in Latin America, edited by AriasEnrique DesmondGoldsteinDaniel M., 108–32. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
11.
BBC News. 2014. “Mexican Anti-Riot Police Sent to Guerrero after Clashes.” October 14, 2014.
12.
BormannNils-ChristianGolderMatt. 2013. “Democratic Electoral Systems around the World, 1946-2011.” Electoral Studies32 (2): 360–69.
BrockettCharles D.2005. Political Movements and Violence in Central America. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
15.
CarlsenLaura. 2008. “Armoring NAFTA: The Battleground for Mexico’s Future.” NACLA Report on the Americas41 (5): 17–22.
16.
CentenoMiguel Angel. 2002. Blood and Debt: War and the Nation-state in Latin America. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
17.
ChenowethEricaStephanMaria J.. 2011. Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict. New York: Columbia University Press.
18.
CollierPaulElliottV. L.HegreHavardHoefflerAnkeReynal-QuerolMartaSambanisNicholas. 2003. Breaking the Conflict Trap: Civil War and Development Policy. Washington, DC: World Bank.
DavenportChristian. 1995. “Multi-dimensional Threat Perception and State Repression: An Inquiry into Why States Apply Negative Sanctions.” American Journal of Political Science39 (3): 683–713.
21.
DavenportChristian. 2007. State Repression and the Domestic Democratic Peace. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Della PortaDonatella. 1995. Social Movements, Political Violence, and the State: A Comparative Analysis of Italy and Germany. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Della PortaDonatellaReiterHerbert. eds. 1998. Policing Protest: The Control of Mass Demonstrations in Western Democracies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
24.
Della PortaDonatellaTarrowSidney. 1986. “Unwanted Children: Political Violence and the Cycle of Protest in Italy, 1966–1973.” European Journal of Political Research14 (5-6): 607–32.
25.
Díaz-CayerosAlberto. 2004. “Decentralization, Democratization, and Federalism in Mexico.” In Dilemmas of Political Change in Mexico, edited by MiddlebrookKevin J., 198–234. San Diego: Center for US–Mexican Studies, University of California.
26.
EarlJenniferMartinAndrewMcCarthyJohn D.SouleSarah A.. 2004. “The Use of Newspaper Data in the Study of Collective Action.” Annual Review of Sociology30:65–80.
27.
EisingerPeter K.1973. “The Conditions of Protest Behavior in American Cities.” The American Political Science Review67 (1): 11–28.
28.
FearonJames D.LaitinDavid D.. 2003. “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War.” The American Political Science Review97 (1): 75–90.
29.
FeinHelen. 1995. “More Murder in the Middle: Life-integrity Violations and Democracy in the World, 1987.” Human Rights Quarterly17 (1): 170–91.
FranzosiRoberto. 2004. From Words to Numbers: Narrative, Data, and Social Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Gallagher CunninghamKathleenBeaulieuEmily. 2010. “Dissent, Repression, and Inconsistency.” In Rethinking Violence: States and Non-state Actors in Conflict, edited by ChenowethEricaLawrenceAdria, 173–96. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
GamsonWilliam A.1975. The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
34.
GibsonEdward L.2005. “Boundary Control: Subnational Authoritarianism in Democratic Countries.” World Politics58 (1): 101–32.
35.
GilbrethChrisOteroGerardo. 2001. “Democratization in Mexico: The Zapatista Uprising and Civil Society.” Latin American Perspectives28 (4): 7–29.
36.
GillhamPatrickNoakesJohn. 2007. ““More Than a March in a Circle”: Transgressive Protests and the Limits of Negotiated Management.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly12 (4): 341–57.
37.
GiraudyAgustina. 2009. Subnational Undemocratic Regime Continuity after Democratization: Argentina and Mexico in Comparative Perspective. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
38.
GiraudyAgustina. 2010. “The Politics of Subnational Undemocratic Regime Reproduction in Argentina and Mexico.” Journal of Politics in Latin America2 (2): 53–84.
39.
GoodwinJeff. 2001. No Other Way Out: States and Revolutionary Movements, 1945-1991. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
40.
GoodwinJeffJasperJamesPollettaFrancesca. 2000. “The Return of the Repressed: The Fall and Rise of Emotions in Social Movement Theory.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly5 (1): 65–83.
41.
GoodwinJeffSkocpolTheda. 1989. “Explaining Revolutions in the Contemporary Third World.” Politics & Society17 (4): 489–509.
42.
GurrTed Robert. 1970. Why Men Rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43.
GurrTed Robert. 1979. “Political Protest and Rebellion in the 1960s: The United States in World Perspective.” In Violence in America: Historical & Comparative Perspectives, edited by GrahamHugh DavisGurrTed Robert, 49–76. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
44.
HahnHarlanFeaginJoe R.. 1973. “Perspectives on Collective Violence: A Critical Review.” In Violence as Politics: A Series of Original Essays, edited by HirschHerbertPerryDavid C., 125–55. New York: Harper & Row.
45.
HainesHerbert H.1984. “Black Radicalization and the Funding of Civil Rights: 1957-1970.” Social Problems32 (1): 31–43.
46.
HarbersImke. 2015. “Taxation and the Unequal Reach of the State: Mapping State Capacity in Ecuador.” Governance28 (3): 373–91.
47.
HerbstJeffrey Ira. 2000. States and Power in Africa: Comparative Lessons in Authority and Control. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
48.
Huamaní OberGiselle. 2012. “Dilemmas of Developing a State Infrastructure for Peace in the Case of Peru.” Journal of Peacebuilding & Development7 (3): 75–80.
InclanMaria de la Luz. 2008. “From the ¡Ya Basta! to the Caracoles: Zapatista Mobilization under Transitional Conditions.” American Journal of Sociology113 (5): 1316–50.
KlesnerJoseph L.2005. “Electoral Competition and the New Party System in Mexico.” Latin American Politics and Society47 (2): 103–42.
54.
KoopmansRuudOlzakSusan. 2004. “Discursive Opportunities and the Evolution of Right-wing Violence in Germany.” The American Journal of Sociology110 (1): 198–230.
LichbachMark Irving. 1987. “Deterrence or Escalation? The Puzzle of Aggregate Studies of Repression and Dissent.” Journal of Conflict Resolution31 (2): 266–97.
58.
LichbachMark Irving. 1989. “An Evaluation of “Does Economic Inequality Breed Political Conflict?” Studies.” World Politics41 (4): 431–70.
59.
LipsetSeymour Martin. 1960. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics, 1st ed. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
60.
MagaloniBeatrizZepedaGuillermo. 2004. “Democratization, Judicial and Law Enforcement Instutions, and the Rule of Law in Mexico.” In Dilemmas of Political Change in Mexico, edited by MiddlebrookKevin J., 168–97. San Diego: Center for US–Mexican Studies, University of California.
61.
MainAlexander. 2014. “The U.S. Re-militarization of Central America and Mexico.” NACLA Report on the Americas47 (2): 65–70.
62.
McAdamDougTarrowSidneyTillyCharles. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
63.
McPhailClarkMcCarthyJohn D.. 2005. “Protest Mobilization, Protest Repression, and Their Interaction.” In Repression and Mobilization, edited by DavenportChristianJohnstonHankMuellerCarol McClurg, 3–32. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
64.
MigdalJoel S.1988. Strong Societies and Weak States: State-society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
65.
MorenoMenaAscenciónJoséArballo MezaRosa Amelia. 2003. “Experiencias en Políticas Públicas de las ONGs en Baja California.” Estudios Fronterizos4:73–103.
66.
MorenoMenaAscensiónJoséNiño ContrerasLya. 2013. “Una Mirada hacia las Organizaciones Civiles de Apoyo al Migrante en Baja California y Sonora.” Región y Sociedad25:61–96.
67.
MurilloMaria VictoriaRonconiLucas. 2004. “Teachers’ Strikes in Argentina: Partisan Alignments and Public-sector Labor Relations.” Studies in Comparative International Development39 (1): 77–98.
O’BrienKevin J.LiLianjiang. 2006. Rightful Resistance in Rural China. New York: Cambridge University Press.
70.
Oaxacan Activist. 2009. Research Interview, March 17. Interview by Heather Sullivan. Oaxaca, Mexico.
71.
Oaxacan Journalist. 2009. Research Interview, January 29. Interview by Heather Sullivan. Oaxaca, Mexico.
72.
Oaxacan Party Activist. 2009. Research Interview, January 30. Interview by Heather Sullivan. Oaxaca, Mexico.
73.
OberschallAnthony. 1968. “The Los Angeles Riot of August 1965.” Social Problems15 (3): 322–41.
74.
OberschallAnthony. 1973. Social Conflict and Social Movements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
75.
ParedesMaritzade laPuenteLorena. 2017. “The Social Construction of a Public Problem: The Role of the Ombudsman in Building Institutions for Extractive Conflict.” In Resource Booms and Institutional Pathways: The Case of Extractive Industry in Peru, edited by DargentEduardoCarlos OrihuelaJoséParedesMaritzaUlfeMaría Eugenia, 119-51. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
76.
PivenFrances Fox. 2012. “Protest Movements and Violence.” In Violent Protest, Contentious Politics, and the Neoliberal State, edited by SeferiadesSeraphimJohnstonHank, 19–28. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
77.
PivenFrances FoxClowardRichard A.. 1979. Poor People’s Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail. New York: Vintage Books.
78.
PoeSteven C.Neal TateC.KeithLinda Camp. 1999. “Repression of the Human Right to Personal Integrity Revisited: A Global Cross-national Study Covering the Years 1976-1993.” International Studies Quarterly43 (2): 291–313.
79.
RaslerKaren. 1996. “Concessions, Repression, and Political Protest in the Iranian Revolution.” American Sociological Review61 (1): 132–52.
80.
ReamesBenjamin Nelson. 2007. “A Profile of Police Forces in Mexico.” In Reforming the Administration of Justice in Mexico, edited by CorneliusWayne A.ShirkDavid A., 117–32. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
81.
RíosViridianaShirkDavid A.. 2011. Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis through 2010. Ed. Trans-Border Institute. San Diego, CA: Joan B. Kroc School of Peace Studies, University of San Diego.
SeferiadesSeraphimJohnstonHank, eds. 2012. Violent Protest, Contentious Politics, and the Neoliberal State. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
86.
SilverAllan. 1967. “The Demand for Order in Civil Society: A Review of Some Themes in the History of Urban Crime, Police, and Riot.” In The Police: Six Sociological Essays, edited by DavidJ., 1–24. New York: Wiley.
87.
SkocpolTheda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
88.
SnowDavidCressDanielDowneyLiamJonesAndrew. 1998. “Disrupting the “Quotidian:” Reconceptualizing the Relationship between Breakdown and the Emergence of Collective Action.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly3 (1): 1–22.
89.
SoiferHillel David. 2015. State Building in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
90.
TarrowSidney. 1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
91.
ThiesCameron G.2010. “Of Rulers, Rebels, and Revenue: State Capacity, Civil War Onset, and Primary Commodities.” Journal of Peace Research47 (3): 321–32.
92.
TillyCharles. 1979. “Collective Violence in European Perspective.” In Violence in America: Historical & Comparative Perspectives, edited by GrahamHugh DavisGurrTed Robert, 83–118. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
93.
TillyCharles. 1985. “War Making and State Making as Organized Crime.” In Bringing the State Back In, edited by EvansPeter B.RueschemeyerDietrichSkocpolTheda, 169–91. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
94.
TillyCharles. 2003. The Politics of Collective Violence. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
95.
TillyCharles. 2004. Contention and Democracy in Europe, 1650-2000. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
96.
TillyCharles. 2006. Regimes and Repertoires. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
97.
TillyCharlesWoodLesley J.. 2003. “Contentious Connections in Great Britain, 1828-34.” In Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action, edited by DianiMarioMcAdamDoug, 147–72. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
98.
TrejoGuillermo. 2012. Popular Movements in Autocracies: Religion, Repression, and Indigenous Collective Action in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.
99.
TrevizoDolores. 2011. Rural Protest and the Making of Democracy in Mexico, 1968-2000. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
100.
TylerTom R.2006. Why People Obey the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
101.
UildriksNiels A.2010. Mexico’s Unrule of Law: Implementing Human Rights in Police and Judicial Reform under Democratization. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
102.
US National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. 1968. Report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. Washington, DC: US Government.
103.
WaddingtonDavidKingMike. 2005. “The Disorderly Crowd: From Classical Psychological Reductionism to Socio-contextual Theory—The Impact on Public Order Policing Strategies.” The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice44 (5): 490–503.
104.
WoodElisabeth Jean. 2003. Insurgent Collective Action and Civil War in El Salvador. New York: Cambridge University Press.
105.
ZamoscLeon. 2013. “Popular Impeachments: Ecuador in Comparative Perspective.” In Shifting Frontiers of Citizenship: The Latin American Experience, edited by SznajderMarioRonigerLuisFormentCarlos, 237–66. Boston, MA: Brill.
106.
ZepedaLecuonaGuillermo. 2010. “Mexican Police and the Criminal Justice System.” In Police and Public Security in Mexico, edited by DonnellyRobert A.ShirkDavid A., 39–63. San Diego, CA: University Readers.
107.
ZepedaLecuonaGuillermo. 2012. Seguridad y Justicia Penal en los Estados: 25 Indicadores de Nuestra Debilidad Institucional. Mexico City: México Evalúa.
108.
ZwermanGildaSteinhoffPatricia. 2005. “When Activists Ask for Trouble: State-dissident Interactions and the New Left Cycle of Resistance in the United States and Japan.” In Repression and Mobilization, edited by DavenportChristianJohnstonHankMuellerCarol McClurg, 85–107. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
