Students process information in two modes: cognitive and experiential. Case studies and stories are generally used as tools for experiential information processing. This article uses memes as an instructional tool to deliver information for experiential information processing in a public speaking course. The effectiveness of memes as an instructional tool is assessed through a questionnaire in terms of their overall effectiveness and its memorability, concreteness, and course orientation. The findings suggest that memes can be used effectively as instructional tools like stories to make the students understand, discuss, and engage with course content.
BaoW. (2020). COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking university. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113-115. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191
2.
BaptistK. W.NassarF. (2009). Social justice agency in the landscape architecture studio: An action research approach. Art, Design and Communication in Higher Education, 7(2): 91-103.
3.
BiniG.RobuttiO. (2019a, February). Meanings in mathematics: Using Internet memes and augmented reality to promote mathematical discourse [Conference session]. Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (No. 4). Freudenthal Group, Freudenthal Institute, ERME, Utrecht, Netherlands. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02422152
4.
BiniG. G.RobuttiO. (2019b, April). Thinking inside the post: Investigating the didactical use of mathematical internet memes [Conference session]. PME & YANDEX. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME), Moscow, Russia. https://www.igpme.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/PMEYandex2019Final.pdf
5.
BolkanS. (2017). Instructor clarity, generative processes, and mastery goals: Examining the effects of signaling on student learning. Communication Education, 66(4), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2017.1313438
6.
BolkanS.GoodboyA. K.KromkaS. M. (2019). Student assessment of narrative: telling stories in the classroom. Communication Education, 69(1), 48–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2019.1622751
7.
BolkanS.GoodboyA. K.KelseyD. (2016). Instructor clarity and student motivation: Academic performance as a product of students’ ability and motivation to process instructional material. Communication Education, 65, 129-148. doi:10.1080/03634523.2015.1079329
BrownJ. D. (2020). What do you meme, professor? An experiment using “memes” in pharmacy education. Pharmacy, 8(4), 202-218.
10.
BrubakerP. J.ChurchS. H.HansenJ.PelhamS.OstlerA. (2018). One does not simply meme about organizations: Exploring the content creation strategies of user-generated memes on Imgur. Public Relations Review, 44(5), 741-751.
11.
DavisonP. (2012). The language of internet memes. In MandibergM. (Ed.), The social media reader (pp. 120–134). New York University Press.
12.
DornischM.SperlingR. A.ZeruthJ. A. (2011). The effects of levels of elaboration on learners’ strategic processing of text. Instructional Science, 39, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9111-z
13.
DoughertyB. K. (2002). Comic relief: Using political cartoons in the classroom. International Studies Perspectives, 3(3), 258-270. https://doi.org/10.1111/1528-3577.00095
14.
EbrahimiO. V.PallesenS.KenterR. M.NordgreenT. (2019). Psychological interventions for the fear of public speaking: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 488.
15.
EngelR.MurphyP. R.FiskC. (2014). Economics memes: How to use memes to teach and learn economics. The Journal of Economic Education, 45(1), 75-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2014.859965
16.
EpsteinS. (2003). Cognitive-experiential self-theory of personality. In MillonT.LernerM. J. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 5. Personality and social psychology (pp. 159-184). John Wiley & Sons.
EvansJ. S. B. T.StanovichK. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223-241. doi:10.1177/1745691612460685
19.
GettingsP. E.MeluchA. L. (2021). “This happens in the real world?”: Perceptions of student-developed workplace case studies. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 84(4), 318-338. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906211023781
20.
GreenM. C.BrockT. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701
21.
Guy WambaN. (2011). Developing an alternative epistemology of practice: Teachers’ action research as critical pedagogy. Action Research, 9, 162-178.
22.
Hernandez-SerranoJ.JonassenD. H. (2003). The effects of case libraries on problem solving. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(1), 103-114. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0266-4909.2002.00010.x
23.
HsuC. K. J. (2018). The “borrowed interest” appeal: Brands riding the wave of popular events and memes in the digital age. Journal of Brand Strategy, 7(3), 258-270.
24.
Humphries-MardirosianG. H.Irvine BelsonS.LewisY. P. (2009). Arts-based teaching: A pedagogy of imagination and a conduit to a socially just education. Current Issues in Education12, 1-21.
25.
JonassenD. H.Hernandez-SerranoJ. (2002). Case-based reasoning and instructional design: Using stories to support problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50, 65-77. doi:10.1007/BF02504994
26.
KnightM. (2021a). Creating authentic learning experiences in the business and professional communication classroom. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 84(2), 87-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906211015320
27.
KnightM. (2021b). Promoting accessibility in the Zoom era. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 84(4), 291-293. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906211060072
28.
KnightM. (2021c). Using authentic materials to drive pedagogy: The example of discourse maps. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 84(1), 3-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490621996061
29.
MadhavarajanK.SelvamalarJ. (2018). Memes in language learning. Bodhi International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts, & Sciences, 2(2), 82-84.
30.
Mendez-RegueraA.CabreraM. V. L. (2020). Engaging my gen Z class: Teaching with memes. Medical Science Educator, 30, 1357-1358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-020-01078-w
MilnerR. M. (2016). The world made meme: Public conversations and participatory media. MIT Press.
33.
NorrisP.EpsteinS. (2011). An experiential thinking style: Its facets and relations with objective and subjective criterion measures. Journal of Personality, 79, 1043-1079. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00718.x
34.
O’BrienR. (2001). An overview of the methodological approach of action research. Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa.
35.
OlsonL. C.FinneganC. A.HopeD. S. (2008). Visual rhetoric in communication: Continuing questions and contemporary issues. In OlsonL. C.FinneganC. A.HopeD. S. (Eds.), Visual rhetoric: A reader in communication and visual culture (pp. 5-17). Sage Publications.
36.
OzgungorS.GuthrieJ. T. (2004). Interactions among elaborative interrogation, knowledge, and interest in the process of constructing knowledge from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 437-43. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.437
PaulusT. M.HorvitzB.ShiM. (2006). “Isn’t it just like our situation?” Engagement and learning in an online story-based environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54, 355-385. doi:10.1007/s11423-006-9604-2
39.
ReidJ. (2021). Transmedia education in a CLIL paradigm: An investigation into bicultural learning. In GilardiF.LamC. (Eds.), Transmedia in Asia and the Pacific. Palgrave Series in Asia and Pacific Studies (pp. 259-280). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7857-1_12
40.
SadoskiM. (2001). Resolving the effects of concreteness on interest, comprehension, and learning important ideas from text. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 263-281. doi:10.1023/A:1016675822931
41.
SadoksiM.PaivoA. (2013). Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing. Routledge.
42.
SchankR. C. (1999). Dynamic memory revisited. Cambridge University Press.
43.
SharmaD. (2021a). A business communication assessment tool based on workplace assessment processes and service-learning. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 84(2), 89-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490621997902
SharmaD. (2022a). Developing self-efficacy in public speaking using video and digital oratory on YouTube. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906221133066
46.
SharmaD. (2022b). Making meaningful connections and learning workplace-like business writing through LinkedIn and blogging. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 85(3), 298-318.
47.
SharmaD. (2022c). Teaching professional use of social media through a Service-Learning business communication project. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 85(4), 395-419. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906221074687
48.
SharmaD. (2022d). Using developmental bibliotherapy design to improve self-management skills of post-graduate students. Journal of Poetry Therapy, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08893675.2022.2115696
49.
SharmaD.MeenaR. (2022). Impact of COVID-19 on TV advertisements: Informational, transformational & narrative analyses of post-COVID-19 TV advertisements. Journal of Marketing Communications, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2022.2098518
50.
SharmaD.PankajP. (2022). Panic-gogy in the COVID-19 pandemic: Developing online teaching self-efficacy by management faculty. International Journal of Management in Education, 16(6), 613-635. 10.1504/IJMIE.2022.10050055
51.
StringerE. T. (2008). Action research in education. Pearson Prentice Hall.
52.
TillforsM.FurmarkT. (2007). Social phobia in Swedish university students: Prevalence, subgroups and avoidant behavior. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 42(1), 79-86. doi: 10.1007/s00127-006-0143-2
53.
UnderwoodS. M.KararoA. T. (2020). Using memes in the classroom as a final exam review activity. Journal of Chemical Education, 97, 1381-1386.
54.
WellsD. D. (2018). You all made dank memes: Using Internet memes to promote critical thinking. Journal of Political Science Education, 14(2), 240-248. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2017.1406363
