This literature review examines the state of usability testing in medical device design, focusing on techniques and instruments used for assessing user-centered design. The analysis includes 30 studies from various fields, such as telemedicine, assistive technology, and healthcare devices. The review discusses different UX analysis techniques, their benefits and their drawbacks. Usability testing is critical in healthcare equipment design, utilizing various approaches and metrics. However, the analysis also highlights significant obstacles that need to be addressed, such as the need for more rigorous testing procedures and the application of user-centered design concepts. Overall, the review underscores the importance of usability testing in creating user-friendly, secure, and efficient medical equipment that benefits both patients and medical professionals.
AlotaibiY. K.FedericoF. (2017). The impact of health information technology on patient safety. Saudi Medical Journal, 38(12), 1173-1180. https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2017.12.20631
2.
AshJ. S.BergM.CoieraE. (2004). Some Unintended Consequences of Information Technology in Health Care: The Nature of Patient Care Information System-related Errors. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 11(2), 104-112. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M1471
3.
AsuquoD. E.OluwadeD.AdepojuA. S. (2009). A User-Centered Approach to Website Usability Evaluation.
4.
BastienC., & (2010). Usability testing: A review of some methodological and technical aspects of the method. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 79(4), e18-e23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.12.004
5.
BitkinaO. V.KimH. K.ParkJ. (2020). Usability and user experience of medical devices: An overview of the current state, analysis methodologies, and future challenges. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 76, 102932.
6.
BligårdL. O.OsvalderA. L. (2013). Enhanced cognitive walkthrough: Development of the cognitive walkthrough method to better predict, identify, and present usability problems. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2013, 9-9.
7.
CarayonP.HoonakkerP. (2019). Human Factors and Usability for Health Information Technology: Old and New Challenges. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 28(1), 71-77.https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1677907
8.
ChaniaudN.MétayerN.MegalakakiO.Loup-EscandeE. (2020). Effect of prior health knowledge on the usability of two home medical devices:Usability study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(9), e17983.
9.
ChongI.ChaJ.PengF.YuD. (2019, September). Usability of a Home-Use Blood Pressure Monitor System: An Evaluation of the Device and Instructional Materials. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care (Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 147-151). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
10.
CifterA. S. (2017). Blood pressure monitor usability problems detected through human factors evaluation. Ergonomics in Design, 25(3), 11-19.
11.
DanielsJ.FelsS.KushnirukA.LimJ.AnserminoJ. M. (2007). A framework for evaluating usability of clinical monitoring technology. Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 21, 323-330
12.
FairbanksR. J.CaplanS. H.BishopP. A.MarksA. M.ShahM. N. (2007). Usability study of two common defibrillators reveals hazards. Annals of emergency medicine, 50(4), 424-432.
13.
FungC. H.IgodanU.AlessiC.MartinJ. L.DzierzewskiJ. M.JosephsonK.KramerB. J. (2015). Human factors/usability barriers to home medical devices among individuals with disabling conditions: in-depth interviews with positive airway pressure device users. Disability and health journal, 8(1), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.06.002
14.
FurnissD.MasciP.CurzonP.MayerA.BlandfordA. (2014). 7 Themes for guiding situated ergonomic assessments of medical devices: A case study of an inpatient glucometer. Applied ergonomics, 45(6), 1668-1677.
15.
HaleemA. (2022). Medical 4.0 technologies for healthcare: Features, capabilities, and applications. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 2, 12-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2022.04.001
16.
HallbeckM. S.KonecznyS.BüchelD.MaternU. (2008). Ergonomic usability testing of operating room devices. Studies in health technology and informatics, 132, 147-152.
17.
HeinemannL.DrosselD.FreckmannG.KulzerB. (2016). Usability of Medical Devices for Patients With Diabetes Who Are Visually Impaired or Blind. Journal of diabetes science and technology,10(6),1382–1387. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296816666536
18.
KortumP.PeresS. C. (2015). Evaluation of home health care devices: Remote usability assessment. JMIR human factors, 2(1), e4570.
19.
KonduriN.BastosL. G. V.SawyerK.ReciolinoL. F. A. (2017). User experience analysis of an eHealth system for tuberculosis in resource-constrained settings: A nine-country comparison. International journal of medical informatics, 102, 118-129.
20.
KimH. K.HanS. H.ParkJ.ParkJ. (2016). The interaction experiences of visually impaired people with assistive technology: A case study of smartphones. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 55, 22-33.
21.
Lundgrén-LaineH.SalanteräS. (2010). Think-aloud technique and protocol analysis in clinical decision-making research. Qualitative health research, 20(4), 565-575.
22.
MarambaInocencioChatterjeeArunangsuNewmanCraig. “Methods of usability testing in the development of eHealth applications: a scoping review.” International journal of medical informatics126 (2019): 95-104.
23.
MattsonD. C. (2017). Usability evaluation of the digital anger thermometer app. Health Informatics Journal, 23(3), 234-245.
24.
MoreyS. A.Barg-WalkowL. H.RogersW. A. (2017, September). Managing heart failure on the Go: Usability issues with mHealth apps for older adults. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 61, No. 1, pp. 1-5). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
25.
MykityshynA. L.FiskA. D.RogersW. A. (2002). Learning to use a home medical device: Mediating age-related differences with training. Human factors, 44(3), 354-364.
26.
NagykaldiZ. J.JordanM.QuitorianoJ.CiroC. A.MoldJ. W. (2014). User-centered design and usability testing of an innovative health-related quality of life module. Applied clinical informatics, 5(4), 958–970. https://doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2014-08-RA-0067
27.
NarasimhaS.AgnisarmanS.MadathilK. C.GramopadhyeA. K.WelchB.McelligottJ. (2016, September). An investigation of the usability issues of home-based video telemedicine systems with geriatric patients. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 60, No. 1, pp. 1804-1808). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
28.
PorterP.MuirheadF.BrisbaneJ.SchneiderB.ChoveauxJ.BearN.… NeppeC. (2021). Accuracy, clinical utility, and usability of a wireless self-guided fetal heart rate monitor. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 137(4), 673
29.
PosaD.PizzulliA.WagnerP.PernaS.HofmaierS.MatricardiP. M.LauS. (2017). Efficacy and usability of a novel nebulizer targeting both upper and lower airways. Italian Journal of Pediatrics, 43(1), 1-8.
30.
RogersH.Chalil MadathilK.JosephA.McNeeseN.HolmstedtC.HoldenR.McElligottJ. T. (2021). Task, usability, and error analyses of ambulance-based telemedicine for stroke care. IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering, 11(3), 192-208.
31.
SowanA. K.StaggersN.BerndtA.AustinT.ReedC. C.MalsheA.… ChenQ. (2021). Improving the safety, effectiveness, and efficiency of clinical alarm systems: simulation-based usability testing of physiologic monitors. JMIR nursing, 4(1), e20584.
32.
SafiS.ThiessenT.SchmailzlK. J. (2018). Acceptance and Resistance of New Digital Technologies in Medicine: Qualitative Study. JMIR Research Protocols,7(12). https://doi.org/10.2196/11072
33.
TaseA. (2022). Usability challenges in the use of medical devices in the home environment: A systematic review of literature. Applied Ergonomics,103,103769.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103769
34.
TentolourisA.EleftheriadouI.GrigoropoulouP.NikoloudiM.SiamiE.TsilimigrasD. I.TentolourisN. (2018). Accuracy and Usability Evaluation of Six Commercially Available Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems. Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research, 12(6).
WixonD. (2003). Evaluating usability methods: why the current literature fails the practitioner. interactions, 10(4), 28-34.
37.
ZhangJ.PatelV. L.JohnsonT. R.ChungP.TurleyJ. P. (2005). Evaluating and predicting patient safety for medical devices with integral information technology and methodology. Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation,
