This research investigated whether the psychoacoustics of simultaneous masking, which are integral to a model-checking-based method, previously developed for detecting perceivability problems in alarm configurations, could predict when IEC 60601-1-8-compliant medical alarm sounds are audible.
Background
The tonal nature of sounds prescribed by IEC 60601-1-8 makes them potentially susceptible to simultaneous masking: where concurrent sounds render one or more inaudible due to human sensory limitations. No work has experimentally assessed whether the psychoacoustics of simultaneous masking accurately predict IEC 60601-1-8 alarm perceivability.
Method
In two signal detection experiments, 28 nursing students judged whether alarm sounds were present in collections of concurrently sounding standard-compliant tones. The first experiment used alarm sounds with single-frequency (primary harmonic) tones. The second experiment’s sounds included the additional, standard-required frequencies (often called subharmonics). T tests compared miss, false alarm, sensitivity, and bias measures between masking and nonmasking conditions and between the two experiments.
Results
Miss rates were significantly higher and sensitivity was significantly lower for the masking condition than for the nonmasking one. There were no significant differences between the measures of the two experiments.
Conclusion
These results validate the predictions of the psychoacoustics of simultaneous masking for medical alarms and the masking detection capabilities of our method that relies on them. The results also show that masking of an alarm’s primary harmonic is sufficient to make an alarm sound indistinguishable.
Application
Findings have profound implications for medical alarm design, the international standard, and masking detection methods.
BegaultD. R.GodfroyM.SandorA.HoldenK. (2007). Auditory alarm design for NASA CEV applications. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Auditory Display (pp. 131–138). Montreal, Québec, Canada.
4.
BlissJ. P. (2003). Investigation of alarm-related accidents and incidents in aviation. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 13, 249–268.
5.
BlissJ. P.ActonS. A. (2003). Alarm mistrust in automobiles: How collision alarm reliability affects driving. Applied Ergonomics, 34, 499–509.
6.
BoltonM. L.EdworthyJ. R.BoydA. D. (2018). A formal analysis of masking between reserved alarm sounds of the IEC 60601-1-8 international medical alarm standard. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 62, 523–527. doi:10.1177/1541931218621119
7.
BoltonM. L.EdworthyJ. R.BoydA. D.WeiJ.ZhengX. (2018). A computationally efficient formal method for discovering simultaneous masking in medical alarms. Applied Acoustics, 141, 403–415.
8.
BoltonM. L.HasanainB.BoydA. D.EdworthyJ. R. (2016). Using model checking to detect masking in IEC 60601-1-8-compliant alarm configurations. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 60, 636–640. doi:10.1177/1541931213601146
9.
BosiM.GoldbergR. E. (2003). Introduction to digital audio coding and standards. New York, NY: Springer.
10.
BrandenburgK.BosiM. (1997). Overview of MPEG audio: Current and future standards for low bit-rate audio coding. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 45(1/2), 4–21.
11.
BrandenburgK.StollG. (1994). ISO/MPEG-1 audio: A generic standard for coding of high-quality digital audio. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 42, 780–792.
12.
ClarkeE. M.GrumbergO.PeledD. A. (1999). Model checking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
CousineauD.O’BrienF. (2014). Error bars in within-subject designs: A comment on Baguley (2012). Behavior Research Methods, 46, 1149–1151.
14.
DonaldsonW. (1992). Measuring recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 275–277.
EdworthyJ. (2013). Medical audible alarms: A review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 20, 584–589.
18.
EdworthyJ.HellierE. (2005). Fewer but better auditory alarms will improve patient safety. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 14, 212–215.
19.
EdworthyJ.HellierE. (2006). Alarms and human behaviour: Implications for medical alarms. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 97(1), 12–17.
20.
EdworthyJ.McNeerR. R.BennettC. L.DudarykR.McDougallS. J.SchlesingerJ. J.. . . OsbornD. (2018). Getting better hospital alarm sounds into a global standard. Ergonomics in Design, 26(4), 4–13.
21.
EdworthyJ.MeredithC. S. (1994). Cognitive psychology and the design of alarm sounds. Medical Engineering & Physics, 16, 445–449.
22.
FastlH.ZwickerE. (2006). Psychoacoustics: Facts and models (Vol. 22). New York, NY: Springer.
23.
GreenD. M. (1967). Additivity of masking. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 41, 1517–1525.
24.
HasanainB.BoydA.BoltonM. L. (2014). An approach to model checking the perceptual interactions of medical alarms. Proceedings of the International Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics, 58, 822–826. doi:10.1177/1541931214581173
25.
HasanainB.BoydA.BoltonM. L. (2016). Using model checking to detect simultaneous masking in medical alarms. IEEE Transactions on Human-machine Systems, 46, 174–185.
26.
HasanainB.BoydA. D.EdworthyJ.BoltonM. L. (2017). A formal approach to discovering simultaneous additive masking between auditory medical alarms. Applied Ergonomics, 58, 500–514.
27.
HumesL. E.JesteadtW. (1989). Models of the additivity of masking. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 1285–1294.
28.
IEC 60601-1-8:2006/AMD1:2012. (2012). Medical electrical equipment—Part 1-8: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance—Collateral standard: General requirements, tests and guidance for alarm systems in medical electrical equipment and medical electrical systems. Geneva, Switzerland: International Electrotechnical Commission.
29.
The Joint Commission. (2013a, April). Medical device alarm safety in hospitals. Sentinel Event Alert, 50, 1–3.
30.
The Joint Commission. (2013b, July). NPSG.06.01.01: Improve the safety of clinical alarm systems. Joint Commission Perspectives, 33, 1–4.
31.
KonkaniA.OakleyB.BauldT. J. (2012). Reducing hospital noise: A review of medical device alarm management. Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology, 46, 478–487.
32.
LacherezP.SeahE.SandersonP. (2007). Overlapping melodic alarms are almost indiscriminable. Human Factors, 49, 637–645.
33.
LevitinD. J. (2006). This is your brain on music: The science of a human obsession. New York, NY: Penguin.
34.
MacmillanN. A.CreelmanC. D. (1990). Response bias: Characteristics of detection theory, threshold theory, and “nonparametric” indexes. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 401–413.
35.
McNicolD. (2005). A primer of signal detection theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36.
MeredithC.EdworthyJ. R. (1995). Are there too many alarms in the intensive care unit? An overview of the problems. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 21, 15–20.
37.
MomtahanK.HetuR.TansleyB. (1993). Audibility and identification of auditory alarms in the operating room and intensive care unit. Ergonomics, 36, 1159–1176.
38.
PattersonR. D. (1982). Guidelines for auditory warning systems on civil aircraft. London, England: Civil Aviation Authority.
39.
PattersonR. D.MayfieldT. F. (1990). Auditory warning sounds in the work environment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 327, 485–492.
PollackI.NormanD. A. (1964). A non-parametric analysis of recognition experiments. Psychonomic Science, 1, 125–126.
42.
RothenbergD. H. (2009). Alarm management for process control: A best-practice guide for design, implementation, and use of industrial alarm systems. New York, NY: Momentum Press.
43.
SchroederM. R.AtalB. S.HallJ. (1979). Optimizing digital speech coders by exploiting masking properties of the human ear. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66, 1647–1652.
44.
SeeJ. E.WarmJ. S.DemberW. N.HoweS. R. (1997). Vigilance and signal detection theory: An empirical evaluation of five measures of response bias. Human Factors, 39, 14–29.
45.
SnodgrassJ. G.CorwinJ. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34–50.
46.
SteadW. W.LinH. S. (Eds.). (2009). Computational technology for effective health care: Immediate steps and strategic directions. Atlanta, GA: National Academies Press.
ToorO.RyanT.RichardM. (2008). Auditory masking potential of common operating room sounds: A psychoacoustic analysis. In Anesthesiology (Vol. 109, p. A1207). Park Ridge, IL: American Society of Anesthesiologists.
50.
VasseurD. A.YodzisP. (2004). The color of environmental noise. Ecology, 85, 1146–1152.
WolfmanG. J.MillerD. L.VolanthA. J. (1996). An application of auditory alarm research in the design of warning sounds for an integrated tower air traffic control computer system. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 40, 1002–1006. doi:10.1177/154193129604001910
53.
YouY. (2010). Audio coding: Theory and applications. New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.
54.
ZwickerE.FeldtkellerR. (1967). Das ohr als nachrichtenempfänger [The ear as a communication receiver]. Stuttgart, Germany: Hirzel Verlag.
