In this work, we systematically evaluated the reserved alarm sounds of the IEC 60601-1-8 international medical alarm standard to determine when and how they can be totally and partially masked.
Background
IEC 60601-1-8 gives engineers instruction for creating human-perceivable auditory medical alarms. This includes reserved alarm sounds: common types of alarms where each is a tonal melody. Even when this standard is honored, practitioners still fail to hear alarms, causing practitioner nonresponse and, thus, potential patient harm. Simultaneous masking, a condition where one or more alarms is imperceptible in the presence of other concurrently sounding alarms due to limitations of the human sensory system, is partially responsible for this.
Methods
In this research, we use automated proof techniques to determine if masking can occur in a modeled configuration of medical alarms. This allows us to determine when and how reserved alarm sound can mask other reserved alarms and to explore parameters to address discovered problems.
Results
We report the minimum number of other alarm sounds it takes to both totally and partially mask each of the high-, medium-, and low-priority alarm sounds from the standard.
Conclusions
Significant masking problems were found for both the total and partial masking of high-, medium-, and low-priority reserved alarm sounds.
Application
We show that discovered problems can be mitigated by setting alarm volumes to standard values based on priority level and by randomizing the timing of alarm tones.
AmbikairajahE.DavisA. G.WongW. T. K. (1997). Auditory masking and MPEG-1 audio compression. Electronics & Communication Engineering Journal, 9, 165–175.https://doi.org/10.1049/ecej:19970403
2.
BennettC.DudarykR.CrenshawN.EdworthyJ.McNeerR. (2019). Recommendation of new medical alarms based on audibility, identifiability, and detectability in a randomized, simulation-based study. Critical Care Medicine, 47, 1050–1057.https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000003802
3.
BoltonM. L. (2017). Novel developments in formal methods for human factors engineering. InProceedings of the human factors and ergonomics Society annual meeting (Vol. 61, pp.715–717). Sage.https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601664
4.
BoltonM. L.BassE. J. (2009). A method for the formal verification of human interactive systems. InProceedings of the 53rd annual meeting of the human factors and ergonomics Society (Vol. 53, pp.764–768). HFES.https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120905301201
5.
BoltonM. L.BassE. J. (2010). Formally verifying human-automation interaction as part of a system model: Limitations and tradeoffs. Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering, 6, 219–231.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-010-0129-9
6.
BoltonM. L.BassE. J.SiminiceanuR. I. (2012). Generating phenotypical erroneous human behavior to evaluate human-automation interaction using model checking. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70, 888–906.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.05.010
7.
BoltonM. L.BassE. J.SiminiceanuR. I. (2013). Using formal verification to evaluate human–automation interaction in safety critical systems, a review. IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics. Systems, 43, 488–503.
8.
BoltonM. L.EdworthyJ.BoydA. D. (2018). A formal analysis of masking between reserved alarm sounds of the IEC 60601-1-8 international medical alarm standard. InProceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting (Vol. 62, pp.523–527).https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931218621119
9.
BoltonM. L.EdworthyJ.BoydA. D.WeiJ.ZhengX. (2018). A computationally efficient formal method for discovering simultaneous masking in medical alarms. Applied Acoustics, 141, 403–415.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2018.06.012
10.
BoltonM. L.HasanainB.BoydeA. D.EdworthyJ. (2016). Using model checking to detect masking in IEC 60601-1-8-compliant alarm configurations. InProceedings of the human factors and ergonomics Society annual meeting (Vol. 60, pp.636–640).https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601146
11.
BoltonM. L.ZhengX.LiM.EdworthyJ. R.BoydA. D. (2020). An experimental validation of masking in IEC 60601-1-8:2006-compliant alarm sounds. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 62, 954–972.https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819862911
12.
BosiM.GoldbergR. E. (2003). Introduction to digital audio coding and standards. Springer.
13.
BrandenburgK.StollG. (1994). ISO/MPEG-1 audio: A generic standard for coding of high-quality digital audio. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 42, 780–792.
14.
ClarkeE. M.GrumbergO.PeledD. A. (1999). Model checking. MIT Press.
EdworthyJ.HellierE. (2005). Fewer but better auditory alarms will improve patient safety. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 14, 212–215.https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2004.013052
20.
EdworthyJ.HellierE. (2006). Alarms and human behaviour: Implications for medical alarms. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 97, 12–17.https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/ael114
21.
EdworthyJ.McNeerR. R.BennettC. L.DudarykR.McDougallS. J. P.SchlesingerJ. J.BoltonM. L.EdworthyJ. D.VieiraE. O.BoydA. D.ReidS. K. J.RayoM. F.WrightM. C.OsbornD. (2018). Getting alarm sounds into a global standard. Ergonomics in Design, 26, 4–13.
EdworthyJ.ReidS.PeelK.LockS.WilliamsJ.NewburyC.FosterJ.FarringtonM. (2018). The impact of workload on the ability to localize audible alarms. Applied Ergonomics, 72, 88–93.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.05.006
24.
EmersonE. A. (1990). Temporal and modal logic. Invan LeeuwenJ.MeyerA. R.NivatM.PatersonM.PerrinD. (Eds.), Handbook of theoretical computer science (pp.995–1072). MIT Press.
25.
FastlH.ZwickerE. (2006). Psychoacoustics: Facts and models (Vol. 22). Springer.
26.
HasanainB.BoydA. D.BoltonM. L. (2014). An approach to model checking the perceptual interactions of medical alarms. InProceedings of the 2014 international annual meeting of the human factors and ergonomics Society (Vol. 58, pp.822–826). HFES.https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931214581173
27.
HasanainB.BoydA. D.BoltonM. L. (2016). Using model checking to detect simultaneous masking in medical alarms. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 46, 174–185.https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2014.2379661
28.
HasanainB.BoydA. D.EdworthyJ.BoltonM. L. (2017). A formal approach to discovering simultaneous additive masking between auditory medical alarms. Applied Ergonomics, 58, 500–514.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.07.008
29.
IEC 60601-1-8:2006+AMD1:2012. (2012). Medical electrical equipment – part 1-8: general requirements for basic safety and essential performance–collateral standard: general requirements, tests and guidance for alarm systems in medical electrical equipment and medical electrical systems. International Electrotechnical Commission.
30.
KonkaniA.OakleyB.BauldT. J. (2012). Reducing hospital noise: A review of medical device alarm management. Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology, 46, 478–487.https://doi.org/10.2345/0899-8205-46.6.478
31.
LacherezP.SeahE. L.SandersonP. (2007). Overlapping melodic alarms are almost indiscriminable. Human Factors, 49, 637–645.https://doi.org/10.1518/001872007X215719
32.
LutfiR. A. (1983). Additivity of simultaneous masking. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73, 262–267.https://doi.org/10.1121/1.388859
33.
McNeerR. R.HornD. B.BennettC. L.EdworthyJ. R.DudarykR. (2018). Auditory icon alarms are more accurately and quickly identified than current standard melodic alarms in a simulated clinical setting. Anesthesiology, 129, 58–66.https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002234
MomtahanK.HétuR.TansleyB. (1993). Audibility and identification of auditory alarms in the operating room and intensive care unit. Ergonomics, 36, 1159–1176.https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139308967986
36.
PattersonR. D. (1982). Guidelines for auditory warning systems on civil aircraft. civil aviation authority. Civil Aviation Authority.
37.
PattersonR. D.MayfieldT. F. (1990). Auditory warning sounds in the work environment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 327, 485–492.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1990.0091
38.
PhansalkarS.EdworthyJ.HellierE.SegerD. L.SchedlbauerA.AveryA. J.BatesD. W. (2010). A review of human factors principles for the design and implementation of medication safety alerts in clinical information systems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 17, 493–501.https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.2010.005264
ScheerM.BülthoffH. H.ChuangL. L. (2018). Auditory task irrelevance: A basis for inattentional deafness. Human Factors, 60, 428–440.https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720818760919
41.
SteadW. W.LinH. S. (Eds.). (2009). Computational technology for effective health care: Immediate steps and strategic directions. National Academies Press.
42.
The Joint Commission. (2013a). Medical device alarm safety in hospitals. Sentinel Even Alert, 50.
43.
The Joint Commission. (2013b). NPSG.06.01.01: Improve the safety of clinical alarm systems. Joint Commission Perspectives, 33.
44.
ToorO.RyanT.RichardM. (2008). Auditory masking potential of common operating room sounds: A psychoacoustic analysis. InAnesthesiology (Vol. 109, p.A1207). American Society of Anesthesiologists.
