Based on the evidence from cross-sectional studies, there is an ongoing debate whether personality traits and personality functioning are redundant (e.g., because these constructs are strongly correlated). However, some questions regarding their overlap can only be addressed using longitudinal data. In this Registered Report, we examined the (co)development of the Big Five personality traits and personality functioning using longitudinal data from individuals who had recently experienced a negative life event (N = 1,151). Personality functioning was less rank-order stable than conscientiousness and less mean-level stable than all Big Five traits except neuroticism. Furthermore, the developmental trajectory of the level of personality functioning was particularly similar to the developmental trajectory of neuroticism. Our results show that personality functioning and most Big Five personality traits differ in their longitudinal development in the context of negative life events and suggest the need for a clearer distinction between personality functioning and neuroticism.
AckeretN.RöthlinP.AllemandM.KriegerT.BergerT.ZnojH.KenttäG.BirrerD.HorvathS. (2022). Six-month stability of individual differences in sports coaches’ burnout, self-compassion and social support. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 61, Article 102207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102207
2.
AllportG. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. Psychology. Holt Rinehart & Winston.
AnusicI.SchimmackU. (2016). Stability and change of personality traits, self-esteem, and well-being: Introducing the meta-analytic stability and change model of retest correlations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(5), 766–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000066
5.
Barchi-Ferreira BelA. M.OsórioF. L. (2020). The Personality Inventory for DSM-5: Psychometric evidence of validity and reliability-updates. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 28(4), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1097/HRP.0000000000000261
6.
BastiaansenL.HopwoodC. J.van den BroeckJ.RossiG.SchotteC.de FruytF. (2016). The twofold diagnosis of personality disorder: How do personality dysfunction and pathological traits increment each other at successive levels of the trait hierarchy?Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 7(3), 280–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000149
7.
BenderD. S.MoreyL. C.SkodolA. E. (2011). Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM-5, part I: A review of theory and methods. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(4), 332–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.583808
8.
BleidornW.HopwoodC. J.BackM. D.DenissenJ. J.HenneckeM.JokelaM.KandlerC.LucasR. E.LuhmannM.OrthU.RobertsB. W.WagnerJ.WrzusC.ZimmermannJ. (2020). Longitudinal experience–wide association studies—A framework for studying personality change. European Journal of Personality, 34(3), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2247
9.
BleidornW.HopwoodC. J.LucasR. E. (2018). Life events and personality trait change. Journal of Personality, 86(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12286
10.
BleidornW.SchwabaT.ZhengA.HopwoodC. J.SosaS. S.RobertsB. W.BrileyD. A. (2022). Personality stability and change: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 148(7–8), 588–619. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000365
11.
BorghuisJ.DenissenJ. J. A.OberskiD.SijtsmaK.MeeusW. H. J.BranjeS.KootH. M.BleidornW. (2017). Big Five personality stability, change, and codevelopment across adolescence and early adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(4), 641–657. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000138
12.
ChowP. I.RobertsB. W. (2014). Examining the relationship between changes in personality and changes in depression. Journal of Research in Personality, 51, 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.04.007
13.
ClarkL. A.RoE. (2014). Three-pronged assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder and its consequences: Personality functioning, pathological traits, and psychosocial disability. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000063
ConwayC. C.BoudreauxM.OltmannsT. F. (2018). Dynamic associations between borderline personality disorder and stressful life events over five years in older adults. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9(6), 521–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000281
16.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (1992). The Five-Factor Model of personality and its relevance to personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 6(4), 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.1992.6.4.343
17.
FassbenderI.HaehnerP.BueckerS.LuhmannM. (2022). Perceived characteristics of life events—Short-term changes in prosociality and empathy?European Journal of Personality, 36(4), 529–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070211031762
18.
FergussonD. M.HorwoodL. J.LawtonJ. M. (1989). The relationships between neuroticism and depressive symptoms. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 24(6), 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01788029
19.
FreilichC. D.KruegerR. F.HobbsK. A.HopwoodC. J.ZimmermannJ. (2023). The DSM-5 maladaptive trait model for personality disorders. In KruegerR. F.BlaneyP. H. (Eds.), Oxford textbook of psychopathology (4th ed., pp. 604–627). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med-psych/9780197542521.003.0026
20.
FunderD. C.OzerD. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202
21.
HaehnerP.BleidornW.HopwoodC. J. (2023). Examining individual differences in personality trait changes after negative life events. European Journal of Personality. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070231156840
22.
HaehnerP.KritzlerS.FassbenderI.LuhmannM. (2022). Stability and change of perceived characteristics of major life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(6), 1098–1116. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000394
HopwoodC. J.FoxS.BenderS. D.ZimmermannJ. (2022). The core self/other dimension of personality functioning. In MihuraJ. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of personality and psychopathology assessment (2nd ed.). Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190092689.013.5
25.
HopwoodC. J.GoodE. W.MoreyL. C. (2018). Validity of the DSM-5 levels of personality functioning scale-self report. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(6), 650–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1420660
26.
HopwoodC. J.MaloneJ. C.AnsellE. B.SanislowC. A.GriloC. M.McGlashanT. H.PintoA.MarkowitzJ. C.SheaM. T.SkodolA. E.GundersonJ. G.ZanariniM. C.MoreyL. C. (2011). Personality assessment in DSM-5: Empirical support for rating severity, style, and traits. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25(3), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2011.25.3.305
27.
HopwoodC. J.WrightA. G. C.AnsellE. B.PincusA. L. (2013). The interpersonal core of personality pathology. Journal of Personality Disorders, 27(3), 270–295. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2013.27.3.270
28.
IsiordiaM.FerrerE. (2018). Curve of factors model: A latent growth modeling approach for educational research. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78(2), 203–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164416677143
29.
JohansenM. S.Normann-EideE.Normann-EideT.Klungs YrO.KvarsteinE.WilbergT. (2016). Relationship between affect consciousness and personality functioning in patients with personality disorders: A prospective study. Journal of Personality Disorders, 30(5), 633–652. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2015_29_220
KiselicaA. M.WebberT.BornovalovaM. A. (2014). Stability and change in distress tolerance and its prospective relationship with borderline personality features: A short-term longitudinal study. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5(3), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000076
32.
LawsonK. M.RobinsR. W. (2021). Sibling constructs: What are they, why do they matter, and how should you handle them?Personality and Social Psychology Review, 25(4), 344–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683211047101
33.
LittleT. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. Methodology in the social sciences. The Guilford Press.
34.
LovibondS. H.LovibondP. F. (1995). Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales (2nd ed.). Psychology Foundation.
35.
LucasR. E. (2023). Why the cross-lagged panel model is almost never the right choice. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459231158378
36.
LuhmannM.HofmannW.EidM.LucasR. E. (2012). Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 592–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025948
37.
LuhmannM.OrthU.SpechtJ.KandlerC.LucasR. E. (2014). Studying changes in life circumstances and personality: It’s about time. European Journal of Personality, 28(3), 256–266. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1951
38.
McCabeG. A.OltmannsJ. R.WidigerT. A. (2021). Criterion A scales: Convergent, discriminant, and structural relationships. Assessment, 28(3), 813–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120947160
39.
MillerJ. D.SleepC.LynamD. R. (2018). DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorder: Testing the trait perspective captured in Criterion B. Current Opinion in Psychology, 21, 50–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.09.012
40.
MoreyL. C. (2017). Development and initial evaluation of a self-report form of the DSM-5 Level of Personality Functioning Scale. Psychological Assessment, 29(10), 1302–1308. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000450
41.
MoreyL. C.GoodE. W.HopwoodC. J. (2022). Global personality dysfunction and the relationship of pathological and normal trait domains in the DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders. Journal of Personality, 90(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12560
42.
MulayA. L.CainN. M.WaughM. H.HopwoodC. J.AdlerJ. M.GarciaD. J.KurtzJ. E.LengerK. A.SkadbergR. (2018). Personality constructs and paradigms in the Alternative DSM-5 Model of Personality Disorder. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(6), 593–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1477787
43.
MundM.NestlerS. (2019). Beyond the cross-lagged panel model: Next-generation statistical tools for analyzing interdependencies across the life course. Advances in Life Course Research, 41, Article 100249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2018.10.002
44.
NilgesP.EssauC. (2015). Die Depressions-Angst-Stress-Skalen: Der DASS - ein Screeningverfahren nicht nur für Schmerzpatienten [The Depression-Anxiety-Stress Scales: The DASS - a screening measure not only for pain patients]. Schmerz, 29(6), 649–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-015-0019-z
45.
NoordhofA.KamphuisJ. H.SellbomM.EigenhuisA.BagbyR. M. (2018). Change in self-reported personality during major depressive disorder treatment: A reanalysis of treatment studies from a demoralization perspective. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9(1), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000238
46.
NuzumH.ShapiroJ. L.ClarkL. A. (2019). Affect, behavior, and cognition in personality and functioning: An item-content approach to clarifying empirical overlap. Psychological Assessment, 31(7), 905–912. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000712
47.
OlaruG.AllemandM. (2022). Correlated personality change across time and age. European Journal of Personality, 36(5), 729–749. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070211014054
48.
OltmannsJ. R.WidigerT. A. (2016). Self-pathology, the five-factor model, and bloated specific factors: A cautionary tale. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125(3), 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000144
49.
OrmelJ.RieseH.RosmalenJ. G. M. (2012). Interpreting neuroticism scores across the adult life course: Immutable or experience-dependent set points of negative affect?Clinical Psychology Review, 32(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.10.004
50.
OrthU.ClarkD. A.DonnellanM. B.RobinsR. W. (2021). Testing prospective effects in longitudinal research: Comparing seven competing cross-lagged models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(4), 1013–1034. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000358
51.
OrthU.MeierL. L.BühlerJ. L.DappL. C.KraussS.MesserliD.RobinsR. W. (2022). Effect size guidelines for cross-lagged effects. Psychological Methods. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000499
52.
PutnickD. L.BornsteinM. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review: DR, 41, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
53.
RammstedtB.DannerD.SotoC. J.JohnO. P. (2018). Validation of the short and extra-short forms of the Big Five Inventory-2 (BFI-2) and their German adaptations. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 36(1), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000481
54.
RingwaldW. R.HopwoodC. J.PilkonisP. A.WrightA. G. C. (2021). Dynamic features of affect and interpersonal behavior in relation to general and specific personality pathology. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 12(4), 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000469
55.
RobertsB. W.DelVecchioW. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.126.1.3
56.
RocheM. J. (2018). Examining the alternative model for personality disorder in daily life: Evidence for incremental validity. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9(6), 574–583. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000295
57.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
58.
SharpC.WallK. (2021). DSM-5 level of personality functioning: Refocusing personality disorder on what it means to be human. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 17, 313–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-105402
59.
SleepC. E.LynamD. R. (2022). The problems with Criterion A: A comment on Morey et al. (2022). Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 13(4), 325–327. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000585
60.
SleepC. E.LynamD. R.WidigerT. A.CroweM. L.MillerJ. D. (2019). An evaluation of DSM-5 Section III personality disorder Criterion A (impairment) in accounting for psychopathology. Psychological Assessment, 31(10), 1181–1191. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000620
61.
SleepC. E.WeissB.LynamD. R.MillerJ. D. (2020). The DSM-5 Section III Personality Disorder Criterion A in relation to both pathological and general personality traits. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 11(3), 202–212. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000383
62.
SotoC. J.JohnO. P. (2017). Short and extra-short forms of the Big Five Inventory–2: The BFI-2-S and BFI-2-XS. Journal of Research in Personality, 68, 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.02.004
63.
SpitzerC.MüllerS.KerberA.HutsebautJ.BrählerE.ZimmermannJ. (2021). Die deutsche Version der Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF): Faktorenstruktur, konvergente Validität und Normwerte in der Allgemeinbevölkerung [The German version of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF): Factor structure, convergent validity, and norm values in the general public]. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 71(7), 284–293. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1343-2396
64.
StrickerJ.JakobL.KöhlerD.PietrowskyR. (2022). Six-month stability and predictive validity of the personality inventory for ICD-11. BMC Psychology, 10, Article 270. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-00979-2
65.
WeekersL. C.HutsebautJ.KamphuisJ. H. (2019). The Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0: Update of a brief instrument for assessing level of personality functioning. Personality and Mental Health, 13(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1434
66.
WiltJ.RevelleW. (2015). Affect, behavior, cognition, and desire in the Big Five: An analysis of item content and structure. European Journal of Personality, 29(4), 478–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2002
67.
World Health Organization. (2019). ICD-11: International classification of diseases (11th ed.). https://icd.who.int/
68.
WrightA. G. C.HopwoodC. J.SkodolA. E.MoreyL. C. (2016). Longitudinal validation of general and specific structural features of personality pathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125(8), 1120–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000165
69.
ZieglerM.KemperC. J.KruyenP. (2014). Short scales – Five misunderstandings and ways to overcome them. Journal of Individual Differences, 35(4), 185–189. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000148
70.
ZimmermannJ.BöhnkeJ. R.EschstruthR.MathewsA.WenzelK.LeisingD. (2015). The latent structure of personality functioning: Investigating criterion a from the alternative model for personality disorders in DSM-5. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124(3), 532–548. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000059
71.
ZimmermannJ.KerberA.RekK.HopwoodC. J.KruegerR. F. (2019). A brief but comprehensive review of research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders. Current Psychiatry Reports, 21(9), Article 92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-019-1079-z
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
