The Alternative Model of Personality Disorders distinguishes between the severity of personality dysfunction (Criterion A) and individual differences in personality disorder expression (Criterion B). Several Criterion A measures exist, but few studies have compared these measures with each other. Moreover, debates about whether the constructs of Criteria A and B are redundant (i.e., weak incremental validity) should be framed around how different Criterion A measures perform relative to others. This study of 204 undergraduate students evaluated multiple measures of Criterion A. These measures were strongly correlated with Criterion B, but evidenced incremental validity (39% of outcomes, 5% average additional variance explained) with outcomes of psychopathology and interpersonal impairments, and less consistent incremental validity with suicidality, aggression, and mental health utilization. We discuss how these results inform the construct of Criterion A relative to Criterion B and evaluate strengths/weaknesses of Criterion A measures.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.).
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
3.
BachB.HutsebautJ. (2018). Level of Personality Functioning Scale–Brief Form 2.0: Utility in capturing personality problems in psychiatric outpatients and incarcerated addicts. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(6), 660–670.
4.
BachB.SellbomM.SimonsenE. (2018). Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in clinical versus nonclinical individuals: Generalizability of psychometric features. Journal of Assessment, 25, 815–825.
5.
BenderD. S.MoreyL. C.SkodolA. E. (2011). Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM-5, part I: A review of theory and methods. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 332–346.
6.
BenderD. S.SkodolA. E.FirstM. B.OldhamJ. M. (2018). Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (SCID-5-AMPD) Module I Level of Personality Functioning Scale. APPI.
7.
BerghuisH.HutsebautJ.KaasenbroodA.De SaegerH.IngenhovenT. (2013). Semi-structured interview for personality functioning DSM-5 (STiP-5). Trimbos Institute.
8.
BerghuisH.KamphuisJ. H.VerheulR. (2012). Core features of personality disorder: Differentiating general personality dysfunctioning from personality traits. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 704–716.
9.
BlitonC. F.RocheM. J.PincusA. L.DueberD. (in press). Examining the structure and validity of self-report measures of DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorder Criterion A. Journal of Personality Disorders.
10.
Buer ChristensenT.EikenaesI.HummelenB.PedersenG.NysæterT.-E.BenderD. S.SkodolA. E.SelvikS. G. (2020). Level of personality functioning as a predictor of psychosocial functioning—Concurrent validity of criterion A. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 11(2), 79–90.
11.
DowgwilloE.RocheM.PincusA. (2018). Examining the interpersonal nature of Criterion A of the DSM–5 Section III Alternative Model for Personality Disorders using bootstrapped confidence intervals for the interpersonal circumplex. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(6), 581–592.
12.
FewL. R.MillerJ. D.RothbaumA. O.MellerS.MaplesJ.TerryD. P.CollinsB.MacKillopJ. (2013). Examination of the Section III DSM-5 diagnostic system for personality disorders in an outpatient clinical sample. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122(4), 1057–1069.
13.
GamacheD.SavardC. (2019, October17). Assessing incremental validity of Criterion A and B from the DSM-5 Alternative model for personality disorders using a new self-report measure of Criterion A [Conference session]. Conference paper presented at the International Society for the Study of Personality Disorders congress, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
14.
GamacheD.SavardC.LeclercP.CôtéA. (2019). Introducing a short self-report for the assessment of DSM–5 level of personality functioning for personality disorders: The Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 10(5), 438–447.
15.
HarknessA. R.ReynoldsS. M.LilienfeldS. O. (2014). A review of systems for psychology and psychiatry: Adaptive systems, Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5), and the DSM-5. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 121–139.
16.
HeilandA. M.VeilleuxJ. C. (in press). Severity of personality dysfunction predicts affect and self-efficacy in daily life. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment.
17.
HelleA. C.TrullT. J.WidigerT. A.Mullins-SweattS. N. (2017). Utilizing interview and self-report assessment of the Five-Factor Model to examine convergence with the alternative model for personality disorders. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 8(3), 247–254.
18.
HemmatiA.MoreyL. C.McCredieM. N.RezaeiF.NazariA.RahmanaF. (2020). Validation of the Persian translation of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale–Self-Report (LPFS-SR): Comparison of college students and patients with personality disorders. Journal of Psychopathology Behavioral Assessment, 42, 546–559.
19.
HentschelA. G.PukropR. (2014). The essential features of personality disorder in DSM-5: The relationship between criteria A and B. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 202(5), 412–418.
20.
HopwoodC. J.GoodE.MoreyL. C. (2018). Validity of the DSM–5 Levels of Personality Functioning Scale–Self Report. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(6), 650–659.
21.
HopwoodC. J.PincusA. L.DeMoorR. M.KoonceE. A. (2008). Psychometric characteristics of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems–Short Circumplex (IIP–SC) with college students. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90(6), 615–618.
22.
HopwoodC. J.ThomasK. M.MarkonK. E.WrightA. G.KruegerR. F. (2012). DSM-5 personality traits and DSM-IV personality disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121(2), 424–432.
23.
HummelenB.BraekenJ.Buer ChristensenT.NysaeterT. E.Germans SelvikS.WaltherK.PedersenG.EikenaesI.PaapM. C. (2021). A psychometric analysis of the structured clinical interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders Module I (SCID-5-AMPD-I): Level of Personality Functioning Scale. Assessment, 28, 1320–1333.
24.
HuprichS. K.NelsonS. M.MeehanK. B.SiefertC. J.HaggertyG.SextonJ.DauphinV. B.MacalusoM.JacksonJ.ZackulaR.BaadeL. (2018). Introduction of the DSM-5 levels of Personality Functioning Questionnaire. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9, 553–563.
25.
HutsebautJ.BerghuisH.De SaegerH.KaasenbroodA.IngenhovenT. (2014). Semi-Structured Interview for Personality functioning DSM–5 (STiP 5.1). Trimbos Institute.
26.
HutsebautJ.KamphuisJ. H.FeenstraD. J.WeekersL. C.De SaegerH. (2017). Assessing DSM–5-oriented level of personality functioning: Development and psychometric evaluation of the semi-structured interview for Personality Functioning DSM–5 (STiP-5.1). Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 8(1), 94–101.
27.
KampeL.ZimmermannJ.BenderD.CaligorE.BorowskiA.EhrenthalJ. C.BeneckeC.Hörz-SagstetterS. (2018). Comparison of the structured DSM–5 clinical interview for the Level of Personality Functioning Scale with the structured interview of personality organization. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(6), 642–649.
28.
KruegerR. F. (2013). Personality disorders are the vanguard of the post-DSM-5.0 era. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4(4), 355–362.
29.
KruegerR. F.DerringerJ.MarkonK. E.WatsonD.SkodolA. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42(9), 1879–1890.
30.
LeeI. A.PreacherK. J. (2013). Calculation for the test of the difference between two dependent correlations with one variable in common [Computer software]. http://quantpsy.org
31.
LockeB. D.McAleaveyA. A.ZhaoY.LeiP.-W.HayesJ. A.CastonguayL. G.LiH.TateR.LinY.-C. (2012). Development and initial validation of the counseling center assessment of psychological symptoms–34. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 45(3), 151–169.
32.
McCabeG. A.OltmannsJ. R.WidigerT. A. (2021). Criterion A scales: Convergent, discriminant, and structural relationships. Journal of Assessment, 28, 813–828.
33.
MilinkovicM. S.TiliopoulosN. (2020). A systematic review of the clinical utility of the DSM-5 Section III Alternative Model of Personality Disorder. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 11, 377–397.
34.
MoreyL. C. (2017). Development and initial evaluation of a self-report form of the DSM–5 Level of Personality Functioning Scale. Psychological Assessment, 29, 1302–1308.
35.
MoreyL. C. (2019). Thoughts on the assessment of the DSM–5 alternative model for personality disorders: Comment on Sleep et al. (2019). Psychological Assessment, 31, 1192–1199.
36.
MoreyL. C.BenderD. S.SkodolA. E. (2013). Validating the proposed diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th edition, severity indicator for personality disorder. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 201, 729–735.
37.
MoreyL. C.GoodE. W.HopwoodC. J. (2020). Global personality dysfunction and the relationship of pathological and normal trait domains in the DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders. Journal of Personality. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12560
38.
MulayA. L.CainN. M.WaughM. H.HopwoodC. J.AdlerJ. M.GarciaD. J.KurtzJ. E.LengerK. A.SkadbergR. (2018). Personality constructs and paradigms in the Alternative 35 DSM-5 Model of Personality Disorder. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100, 593–602.
39.
O’ConnorB. P. (2002). The search for dimensional structure differences between normality and abnormality: A statistical review of published data on personality and psychopathology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 962–982.
40.
PincusA. L.RocheM. J. (2019). Paradigms of personality assessment and level of personality functioning (Criterion A) in the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders. In HopwoodC. J.MulayA. L.WaughM. H. (Eds.), The DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders: Integrating multiple paradigms of personality assessment (pp. 48–59). Routledge.
41.
RingwaldW. R.HopwoodC. J.PilkonisP. A.WrightA. G. C. (2021). Dynamic features of affect and interpersonal behavior in relation to general and specific personality pathology. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 12(4), 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000469
42.
RocheM. J. (2018). Examining the alternative model for personality disorder in daily life: Evidence for incremental validity. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9, 574–583.
43.
RocheM. J.JacobsonN. C.PhillipsJ. J. (2018). Expanding the validity of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale observer report and self-report versions across psychodynamic and interpersonal paradigms. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(6), 571–580.
44.
RocheM. J.JacobsonN. C.PincusA. L. (2016). Using repeated daily assessments to uncover oscillating patterns and temporally-dynamic triggers in structures of psychopathology: Applications to the DSM-5 alternative model of personality disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125, 1090–1102.
45.
SaulsmanL. M.PageA. C. (2004). The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1055–1085.
46.
SiefertC. J.SextonJ.MeehanK.NelsonS.HaggertyG.DauphinB.HuprichS. (2020). Development of a short form for the DSM–5 Levels of Personality Functioning Questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment, 102, 516–526.
47.
SleepC. E.WeissB.LynamD. R.MillerJ. D. (2020). The DSM–5 section III personality disorder criterion a in relation to both pathological and general personality traits. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 11(3), 202–212.
48.
SoldzS.BudmanS.DembyA.MerryJ. (1995). A short form of the inventory of interpersonal problems circumplex scales. Assessment, 2, 53–63.
49.
SteigerJ. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87(2), 245–251.
50.
SuzukiT.SamuelD. B.PahlenS.KruegerR. F. (2015). DSM-5 alternative personality disorder model traits as maladaptive extreme variants of the five-factor model: An item-response theory analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124(2), 343–354.
51.
Van den BroeckJ.BastiaansenL.RossiG.DierckxE.De ClercqB.HofmansJ. (2014). Hierarchical structure of maladaptive personality traits in older adults: Joint factor analysis of the PID-5 and the DAPPBQ. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 198–211.
52.
WaughM. H.McClainC. M.MariottiE. C.MulayA. L.DeVoreE. N.LengerK. A.RussellA. N.FlorimbioA. R.LewisK. C.RidenourJ. M.BeeversL. G. (2021). Comparative content analysis of self-report scales for level of personality functioning. Journal of Personality Assessment, 103, 161–173.
53.
WeekersL. C.HutsebautJ.KamphuisJ. H. (2019). The Level of Personality Functioning Scale–Brief Form 2.0: Update of a brief instrument for assessing level of personality functioning. Personality and Mental Health, 13(1), 3–14.
54.
WeekersL. C.VerhoeffS. C. E.KamphuisJ. H.HutsebautJ. (2021). Assessing Criterion A in adolescents using the Semistructured Interview for Personality Functioning DSM–5. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 12(4), 312–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000454
55.
WestS. G.FinchJ. F.CurranP. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56–75). SAGE.
56.
WidigerT. A.BachB.ChmielewskiM.ClarkL. A.DeYoungC.HopwoodC. J.ThomasK. M. (2019). Criterion A of the AMPD in HiTOP. Journal of Personality Assessment, 7, 77–92.
57.
World Health Organization. (2020). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (11th ed.). https://icd.who.int/
58.
WrightA. G. C.SimmsL. J. (2014). On the structure of personality disorder traits: Conjoint analyses of the CAT-PD, PID-5, and NEO-PI-3 trait models. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5, 43–54.
59.
WrightA. G. C.SimmsL. J. (2015). A metastructural model of mental disorders and pathological personality traits. Journal of Psychological Medicine, 45, 2309–2319.
60.
ZettlM.TaubnerS.HutsebautJ.VolkertJ. (2019). Psychometric Evaluation of the German Version of the Semi-Structured Interview for Personality Functioning DSM-5 (STiP-5.1). Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 69(12), 499–504.
61.
ZimmermannJ.BeneckeC.BenderD. S.SkodolA. E.SchauenburgH.CierpkaM.LeisingD. (2014). Assessing DSM–5 Level of Personality Functioning From Videotaped Clinical Interviews: A Pilot Study with untrained and clinically inexperienced students. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(4), 397–409.
62.
ZimmermannJ.KerberA.RekK.HopwoodC. J.KruegerR. F. (2019). A brief but comprehensive review of research on the alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders. Current Psychiatry Reports, 21(9), 92.
63.
ZimmermannJ.MüllerS.BachB.HutsebautJ.HummelenB.FischerF. (2020). A common metric for self-reported severity of personality disorder. Psychopathology, 53, 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1159/000507377
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
