Can Information Tell a Story? Can Story Attributes of Short Travel Videos Stimulate Impulsive Travel Intention?

Abstract

Short videos have contributed to the rapid advancement of the tourism industry and have benefited destinations due to travel recommendations. Taking potential tourists watching short travel videos as the research object, with the help of narrative transportation theory, this study explored the influence mechanism of story attributes (i.e., authenticity and educability) of short travel videos on impulsive travel intention. Consequently, educability positively influences concentration and impulsive travel intention. Concentration has a partial mediating effect between authenticity or educability and impulsive travel intention. Public health risk perception moderates the effect of authenticity on concentration. The study contributes to how tourism destinations can utilize tourism short videos to stimulate potential tourists’ impulsive travel intentions.

Keywords

narrative transportation theory authenticity educability concentration impulsive travel intention

Introduction

Short video apps, such as TikTok, have brought about significant changes in the tourism industry, becoming a practical means for consumers to gather travel information, customize travel arrangements, and exchange travel tales (Wang, Cui, et al., 2022; H. Zhou et al., 2024). Short videos have boosted the rapid development of tourism: Chongqing and Chengdu have become “online celebrity cities” (Yang et al., 2022). Potential tourists can get words and pictures presented remotely from the short videos (Liao et al., 2020). Thus, potential tourists are stimulated by the proximity of short videos to the real world to shape the destination image and change their behavior (Du et al., 2020), which greatly affects their travel intention (Adeloye et al., 2021) and the impulse to mimic (Le & Hancer, 2021). Short travel videos have attracted increasing attention due to their appeal to potential tourists’ travel intentions (Y. Zhou & Jiao, 2024).

How to make short travel videos stand out to attract potential tourists and promote their travel intention, with the rapid advancement of tourism, is worth studying. Story marketing emerges as the predominant strategy for delivering prosocial messages (E. Kim et al., 2024), demonstrating notably positive effects on tourism engagement and behavioral intentions (Li, 2014). Storytelling is conducive to conveying destination identity, attributes, and other relevant information, which is convenient for maintaining tourist satisfaction and loyalty (Ben Youssef et al., 2018), and significantly affects consumer psychology (e.g., subjective well-being (Su et al., 2023)) and marketing (Woodside et al., 2008). Studies have found that storytelling in travel writing can arouse readers’ empathy and behavioral intention (Akgün et al., 2015), which can also become a powerful co-creative behavior in tourism (Pera, 2014). Short travel videos mostly tell tourists about destinations in a storytelling way, attracting many potential tourists and improving their travel intentions (Han et al., 2022; Wang, Cui, et al., 2022; Zhou, Liu, et al., 2022).

One significant kind of travel intention is impulsive travel intention, which describes visitors’ sudden, intense, instantaneous, and compulsive aspirations to travel (Yao et al., 2021). The story marketing of short travel videos may influence impulsive travel intention positively. Intention is necessary and sufficient for behavior. Labti and Belkadi (2022) ascertained that the purchase intention of online travel agencies is a prerequisite for purchase behavior; Sun and Guo (2022) disclosed that use intention could be transformed into the use behavior of a digital museum. Thus, impulsive travel intention may be a requirement for tourists’ travel behavior. Unfortunately, despite the importance of impulsive travel intention, little research has been done on encouraging impulsive travel intention from the story attributes of short travel videos.

Specifically, little research has revealed the process by which storytelling induces impulsive travel intention. Authenticity and educability hold paramount significance in the realm of storytelling, authenticity given that narratives ought to be firmly anchored in authentic historical and cultural milieus (Luo et al., 2023), and educability comprises destination comprehension, knowledge need satisfaction, and social cultural connotation deciphering (Jo et al., 2022). S. H. Kim et al. (2020) claimed that stories can be discussed from two perspectives: authenticity and educability in medical tourism, and positively impact medical tourists’ trust. Subsequently, it has been re-validated in tourism fields: Luo et al. (2023) found that authenticity and educability of tourism storytelling positively influence tourists’ sense of place and their support behavior for tourism. Therefore, this study focuses on the influence process of short travel videos’ story attributes, including authenticity and educability, on impulsive travel intention.

To unpack the psychological mechanisms through which story attributes of short travel videos influence impulsive travel intention, we introduce one key mediator: concentration, and one key moderator: public health risk perception. Flow experience serves as a pivotal foundational element in the psychological response to tourism (Zhang et al., 2025). Concentration is an important component of flow theory (Koufaris, 2002) and a fundamental and indispensable trait of the flow experience, which is characterized by a profound state of immersion (Lu et al., 2022). Given that flow experience has mediated the effect of mental activity on belonging (Hsu, 2020), the mediating role of concentration is further explored in this study. Additionally, public concern and terror have arisen from public health risks (Luo & Lam, 2020), causing individuals to exercise caution when going out (Liu, Cao, et al., 2022). The majority of individuals engage with short travel videos as a means to satiate their innate desire to “explore the vast expanse of the world.” Consequently, the information included in short travel videos for potential tourists is crucial to comprehending the high-quality travel experience of video blogs (He et al., 2021). Considering the devastating consequences of the public health risk (Surina et al., 2021), and perceived risk moderated the effect of physical crowding on destination attractiveness (Yin et al., 2020). This study further probed the moderating effect of public health risk on the relationship between authenticity, educability, and concentration.

Literature Review and Hypotheses

Narrative Transportation Theory

Green and Brock (2000) proposed narrative transportation theory, emphasizing that when individuals are drawn in by a story or are immersed in a narrative world, they may partially or fully demonstrate how stories have influenced their worldview of the real world. Individuals who enter the state of “narrative transportation” will not touch on some information of the real world, as they experience the virtual world described by the story. When individuals emerge from the “transportation state” and revert to the real world, their genuine attitudes and beliefs have been changed (Gerrig, 1993). Narrative transportation theory has been mostly employed in marketing (Cao et al., 2021; Razzaq et al., 2024; Tzeng et al., 2023) and is beginning to be studied in the tourism field. C. S. Zhu et al. (2024) disclosed why vividness, narrative transportation, and sense of presence can affect visiting other AR destinations in heritage tourism using narrative transportation and presence theory. C. Zhu et al. (2023) explained the interaction between authenticity, narrative transportation, and tourist behaviors in AR tourism. Irimias et al. (2021) examined how media consumption influences the desire to escape, immerse oneself in a new environment, and travel.

Building upon this foundation, the efficacy of a story in inducing narrative transportation is contingent upon its specific attributes. For travel narratives in particular, which often aim to provide a credible preview and deep understanding of a destination, authenticity and educability emerge as two critically persuasive dimensions. Authenticity and educability hold paramount significance in the realm of storytelling, authenticity given that narratives ought to be firmly anchored in authentic historical and cultural milieus (Luo et al., 2023), and educability comprises destination comprehension, knowledge need satisfaction, and social cultural connotation deciphering (Jo et al., 2022). Together, these dimensions are theorized to powerfully facilitate the state of narrative transportation in the context of short-form travel media. Thus, this study adopts the story attributes (i.e., authenticity and educability) of short travel videos as the media expression because this can induce tourists’ state and intention change.

Impulsive Travel Intention

There is much research on travel intentions, particularly studies on the influences of travel motivation (Wang, Lin, et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020), travel risk (Shekari & Azizi, 2022), and travel restriction (Wang, Lai, et al., 2022) on travel intention. Research on travel intention is relatively common, but a few scholars have studied impulsive travel intention. The number of tourists who travel on impulse is increasing, and any information about a trip, such as a television program or an enticing package of services, can drive impulsive decisions (Zalatan, 2016). They want to enjoy a spontaneous travel experience, so that they may make only a basic plan in advance or even no plan at all (Kah & Lee, 2014). Impulsive travel intention can lead to impulsive buying, which can increase corporate profits and enhance the consumption experience (Chang et al., 2014). Consequently, it is necessary to study tourists’ impulsive travel intentions.

The Relationship Between Authenticity and Concentration, Impulsive Travel Intention

The idea of authenticity in the context of tourism was articulated by MacCannell (1973), which is the source or essence of an object and can be used as a sensation (Yi et al., 2018), and has gradually emerged as a focal concern within the tourism sector (Jiang & Fan, 2026; Yi et al., 2025; Zheng et al., 2026). In particular, authenticity is a key attribute of a story (S. H. Kim et al., 2020) and the key to telling a powerful story (Faber, 2014), which is linked to positive emotions and pleasant behavior (Smallenbroek et al., 2016). Authenticity also constitutes a critical dimension in short travel videos marketing, significantly influencing individuals’ attitudinal responses (e.g., concentration; Yin, Qu, et al., 2023) toward such content (Wu & Lai, 2024). Concentration is when one’s attention is concentrated on something, and other things are not recognized as occurring, which is an important part of flow theory (Koufaris, 2002). Authenticity contributes to the pleasant experiences of tourists (Özdemir & Seyitoğlu, 2017), which can directly enhance the flow experience (Wei et al., 2021). Chong et al. (2025) ascertained that destination brand authenticity positively affects audience flow states by watching short travel videos. Zhang et al. (2021) explained that authenticity can create flow experiences in live-action performances. Dilek and Kulakoglu Dilek (2018) disclosed that authenticity is as important as flow in escaping the secret room game. Consequently, we hypothesize that the authenticity of the story in short travel videos might positively affect an individual’s concentration on them. Considering narrative transportation theory, the absorption and transportation of stories require the concentration of images, emotions, and attention. The authenticity of short travel videos is the transportation of stories, and concentration is a manifestation of attention. Thus, this study contends that the authenticity of short travel videos can increase potential tourists’ concentration. The study proposes the following hypotheses:

H1a: Authenticity positively influences concentration.

Sudden, strong, immediate, and irresistible desires to travel are called impulsive travel intention (Yao et al., 2021), which belongs to the behavioral intention. Studies have indicated that authenticity has a positive influence on behavioral intention. Zhang et al. (2024) demonstrated that perceived authenticity significantly influences real-world pro-environmental behavior. Sinha et al. (2024) explained that authenticity is impacting behavior intention prominently. Ouyang et al. (2024) indicated that authenticity positively influences tourists’ revisiting intention. C. Zhu et al. (2022) disclosed that the object and existence authenticity of the tourist destination influence travel intention. As a pivotal dimension of short travel videos marketing, authenticity significantly shapes tourists’ attitudinal responses (e.g., eWOM; Yin, Qu, et al., 2023) toward destinations (Wu & Lai, 2024). Considering narrative transportation theory, when individuals return from the story world to the real world, their attitudes and beliefs have changed. The authenticity of short travel videos is the transportation of stories, and the impulsive travel intention is the change in individuals’ attitudes. This study assumes that the authenticity of short travel videos can enhance the potential tourists’ impulsive travel intention. Thus, this study draws the following hypotheses:

H1b: Authenticity positively influences impulsive travel intention.

The Relationship Between Educability and Concentration, Impulsive Travel Intention

Educability is often mentioned in the education realm (S. H. Kim et al., 2020), but it is rarely discussed in the tourism field. Educability is defined as viewers gaining knowledge, information, and facts by watching short videos in this study. Lin et al. (2024) discovered that the flow experience is positively impacted by the educability of dark tourism storytelling. Kirchgasler (2018) disclosed that the educability of individual quality can improve students’ performance. Stone and Petrick (2013) emphasized the educational benefits of domestic tourism. Considering narrative transportation theory, the absorption and transportation of stories require the concentration of images, emotions, and attention. The educability of short travel videos is the transportation of stories, and the concentration is a manifestation of attention. This study assumes that the educability of short travel videos can increase potential tourists’ concentration. Thus, this study raises the following hypothesis:

H2a: Educability positively influences concentration.

Educability refers to the benefits obtained by the viewer, which can bring value for potential tourists and can be used to support ongoing action (Ruhanen & Bowles, 2019), while the perceived value will increase impulsive buying behavior (Um et al., 2022). Considering narrative transportation theory, when individuals return from the story world to the real world, their attitudes and beliefs have changed. The educability of short travel videos is the transportation of stories, and the impulsive travel intention is the change in individuals’ attitudes. This study assumes that the educability of short travel videos can enhance the potential tourists’ impulsive travel intention. Hence, this study proposes the following hypothesis:

H2b: Educability positively influences impulsive travel intention.

The Relationship Between Concentration and Impulsive Travel Intention

Concentration refers to the degree of attention potential tourists pay when watching short travel videos (Koufaris, 2002). Concentration positively changes consumer behavior in an online environment (Morales-Solana et al., 2022). Yin, Huang, et al. (2023) disclosed that concentration positively influences consumers’ purchase intentions in livestream shopping. Concentration is a fundamental and indispensable trait of the flow experience (Lu et al., 2022). Flow experiences can enhance the willingness of members of an online travel community to engage in transactions (Wu & Chang, 2005) or directly increase their repurchase intention (Liu et al., 2015). Tsai (2020) affirmed that the flow experience has positive influences on tourists’ intentions and behavior. Jeon et al. (2018) discovered that the flow experience of homestay websites significantly improves customers’ return visits or purchase intentions. Considering narrative transportation theory, when individual attention is fully gathered in the story, the scene of the story produces an immersive mental representation; when the individual from the story world returns to the real world, the individual’s attitudes and beliefs have changed. Concentration is a form of attention focusing, and impulsive travel intention is a change in individual attitude. This study assumes that concentration can improve the potential tourists’ impulsive travel intention. Consequently, this study’s drawing hypothesis is as follows:

H3: Concentration positively influences impulsive travel intention.

The Mediating Effect of Concentration

Authenticity can positively affect behavioral intention through the mediating effect (Girish & Lee, 2019). Specifically, authenticity can also influence tourists’ revisiting intentions directly or indirectly via memory tourism experience and place attachment (Zhou, Chen, et al., 2022). Additionally, the Flow experience has had a mediating effect (Liu & Sun, 2024; Liu, Zhang, et al., 2022). For example, flow experience (i.e., concentration) once played a mediating role between tourists’ memory and behavioral intention (Ding & Hung, 2021) and also between psychological activities and a sense of belonging (Hsu, 2020). This study speculates that concentration mediates the effect of authenticity on impulsive travel intention. Considering narrative transportation theory, individuals are attracted to the story or into a narrative world, which is likely to show that the story affects individuals’ perceptions of the real world. The authenticity of short travel videos is the performance of story transportation, the concentration is the attention to the narrative world, and the impulsive travel intention is changing the individuals’ attitude. The study suggests that the authenticity of short travel videos can improve potential tourists’ concentration and promote their impulsive travel intention. Consequently, this study proposes the following hypothesis:

H4a: Concentration mediates the effect of authenticity on impulsive travel intention.

Lin et al. (2024) ascertained the mediating effect of flow experience between educability and behavioral intentions. Considering narrative transportation theory, individuals are attracted to the story or into a narrative world, which is likely to show that the story affects individuals’ perceptions of the real world. The educability of short travel videos is the performance of story transportation, the concentration is the attention to the narrative world, and the impulsive travel intention is changing the individuals’ attitude. The study suggests that the educability of short travel videos can improve potential tourists’ concentration and promote their impulsive travel intention. Consequently, this study proposes the following hypothesis:

H4b: Concentration mediates the effect of educability on impulsive travel intention.

The Moderating Effect of Public Health Risk Perception

Risk perception is defined as the public’s cognitive and psychological reaction to circumstances in which they feel endangered (Setbon et al., 2005). Individuals’ physical and mental health has been seriously impacted by public health risk (Surina et al., 2021). The health belief model posits that individuals are more likely to engage in preventive behaviors when they perceive a high likelihood of contracting a disease (perceived susceptibility) and anticipate severe negative consequences from the disease (perceived severity; Huang et al., 2020). Risk perception and preventive behavior are positively connected (C. W. Kim & Song, 2017), which is the basic principle of behavior change (Morowatishaifabad et al., 2015). The impact of perceived risk on user behavior has been empirically validated across diverse online environments (D. J. Kim et al., 2008). Due to the large number of deaths caused by public health risks, the perceived risk of public health negatively affects travel intention (Wang, Xue, et al., 2020). Consequently, when individuals perceive a relatively high level of public health risk, they may not devote as much attention to the short travel videos they come across. Perceived risk has been proven to play a moderating role between physical crowding and destination attractiveness (Yin et al., 2020). This study posits that the efficacy of short travel videos in capturing viewer attention diminishes when potential tourists perceive elevated public health risk, leading to a consequent reduction in concentration. Thus, this study proposes the following hypotheses:

H5a: Public health risk perception moderates the effect of authenticity on concentration.

H5b: Public health risk perception moderates the effect of educability on concentration.

Summarily, we have constructed a structural framework for the five variables’ relationships based on the nine hypothetical relationships in the previous section, as shown in Figure 1. Under the framework, the core of this study focuses on: (a) how the story attributes (i.e., authenticity and educability) of short travel videos affect impulsive travel intention in virtual tourism scenarios; (b) the impact of public health risk perception moderates the effect of story attributes (i.e., authenticity and educability) on concentration.

Figure 1.

Theoretical model.

Method

Research Objects

This study focuses on potential tourists within China who are aged 18 or above and have viewed tourism-related content in the form of short videos on TikTok. TikTok, launched by ByteDance on September 20, 2016, is a short video community platform that has become one of the most popular social media networks in China (Zulli & Zulli, 2022). Short video-sharing platforms such as TikTok serve as important channels for users to obtain tourism information and share travel experiences (Basch et al., 2021; Tan et al., 2021). Moreover, exposure to travel short videos can increase destination attractiveness and trigger travel intentions (Lu & Lu, 2019). Consequently, taking viewers of short tourism videos on TikTok as the research subjects enables a direct examination of the influence mechanism of authenticity and educability of short videos on impulsive travel intention.

To mitigate potential bias inherent in single-video analyses (Fang et al., 2023; Wu & Lai, 2024), two short travel videos were selected, which respectively depicted urban landscapes and natural landscapes, thereby ensuring contextual diversity. Four tourism scholars were engaged as expert evaluators to review a pool of short travel videos, from which they selected two suitable for the research objectives. The two chosen videos are the Wuhan urban-landscape video and the Zizhu Mountain natural-landscape video created by Fang Qi Kiki, a leading Douyin travel content creator with over 20 million followers (Wu & Lai, 2025). The Wuhan video is 62 s long that garnering 132,000 likes and 7,000 shares; the Zizhu Mountain video is 61 s long with 495,000 likes and 39,000 shares.

Measurement

This study used a self-report questionnaire for data collection, which was designed using a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree) to represent different strengths of agreement, respectively. Additionally, the back-translation procedure was referred to during the design process to ensure the validity and reliability of the questionnaire (Jia et al., 2024). The questionnaire had two main parts: the measurement items on the five variables and the demographic information measures. The authenticity and educability of the variable were referenced from the scale of S. H. Kim et al. (2020), with four and three questions, respectively. Concentration was referenced to the scale of Moon and Kim (2001), consisting of three items; impulsive travel intention was referenced to the scale of Beatty and Elizabeth Ferrell (1998), also with three items; and public health risk perception was referenced to the scale of Lin and Lagoe (2013), consisting of three items. The measurement approach has undergone redevelopment and refinement, aligning with current research. The question items for all variables are reported in detail in Table 2.

To guarantee the content validity of the survey, a preliminary study was carried out on June 3, 2022, preceding the formal data collection phase. During this pilot phase, four tourism specialists were enlisted to evaluate the survey questions. Their input led to several revisions of the questionnaire items. The pilot test involved 30 tourists who had viewed short travel videos on TikTok; they expressed no concerns or questions about the questionnaire, thereby affirming its clarity and ease of understanding. Consequently, the pilot study effectively verified the survey’s validity and its appropriateness for the intended respondent group (Lai & Hitchcock, 2015).

Data Collection

This study employed a sampling approach that combines purposive sampling with convenience sampling to obtain the research samples. This study distributed the questionnaire through the Wenjuanxing platform (https://www.wjx.cn/; Yin & Ni, 2021), a well-known survey internet platform founded in 2006 (Ning et al., 2020). Additionally, questionnaire links were disseminated via QQ, WeChat, Sina Weibo, and other channels from June 9 to July 15, 2022. The online questionnaire’s introductory page featured a short travel video produced by the prominent travel influencer Fang Qi Kiki. This study screened viewers of short travel videos who were over the age of 18 to guarantee the quality of the online questionnaire. The collected questionnaires were carefully reviewed, and this study counted questionnaires from the same IP address only once. Moreover, completing the questionnaire repeatedly or for an extended time (e.g., more than 30 min or less than 3 min) was viewed as invalid to enhance questionnaire quality and eliminate abnormal behavior. 329 validly completed questionnaires were then collected for this investigation. Table 1 contains the sample’s demographic profile.

Table 1.

Sample Demographics (N = 329).

Demographic		Frequency	Percentage	Demographic		Frequency	Percentage
Gender	Male	205	62.3	Occupation	Institution staff	14	4.3
Gender	Female	124	37.7		Enterprise employees	142	43.2
Age	18–30	185	56.2		Teachers	16	4.95
	31–40	112	34.0		Students	81	24.6
	41–50	20	6.1		Civil servants	14	4.3
	51–60	5	1.5		Freelancers	43	13.1
	≥60	7	2.1		Unemployed people	9	2.7
Monthly income (RMB)	≤2,500	74	22.5		Others	10	3.0
	2,501–5,000	54	16.4	Education	Junior high school and below	4	1.2
	5,001–7,500	90	27.4		Senior high school	23	7.0
	7,501–10,000	63	19.2		College degree	248	75.4
	≥1,0001	48	14.6		Post-graduate and above	54	16.4

Results, Findings, and Analysis

Good quality of data guarantees the credibility of results. Thus, a series of checks was conducted in this study. The first was checking the integrity and normal distribution of the data using SPSS 23.0 software. The analysis revealed that the dataset had no outliers or missing data; the kurtosis and skewness indicators were within the range suggested by scholars, initially indicating the data to be of good quality.

Common Method Variance

Common method variance discloses artificial covariance between predictor and effector variables due to factors such as a shared data source or evaluator, the same measurement environment, the item context, and the characteristics of the items (Williams & Brown, 1994). Therefore, we employed the single-factor test to examine the common method bias. Exploratory factor analysis in SPSS 23.0, using principal component analysis and selecting unrotated factor analysis, yielded a cumulative explained variance of 42.411% for the first factor of this study, which is below the 50% criterion (Podsakoff et al., 2003), indicating that the common method bias is still within acceptable limits.

Measurement Model

Reliability Analysis

The reliability of each dataset dimension is assessed using SPSS 23.0 to guarantee excellent internal consistency in each dimension. After testing, Cronbach’s alpha in each dimension ranged from .783 to .842 (Table 2), and the Corrected Item-Total Correlation was more than .5. Consequently, the data dependability can be deemed to be good, allowing for analysis of the subsequent phase.

Table 2.

The Result of Confirmatory Factor Analysis (N = 329).

Variables/Items	Std. Estimate	T-value	Alpha	CR	AVE
Authenticity (AUT)			.814	0.815	0.524
The blogger’s storytelling in short travel videos was specialized.	0.694
The blogger’s storytelling in short travel videos was unique and special.	0.722	11.456
The blogger’s storytelling in short travel videos was original.	0.754	12.049
The blogger’s storytelling in short travel videos included enough evidence.	0.726	11.875
Educability (EDU)			.806	0.808	0.583
The blogger’s storytelling in short travel videos satisfied my intellectual needs.	0.783
The blogger’s storytelling in short travel videos was informative.	0.739	13.553
The blogger’s storytelling in short travel videos offered knowledge.	0.769	13.965
Concentration (CON)			.810	0.810	0.588
I do not notice the passage of time when watching short travel videos	0.764
I do not notice what is going on around me when watching short travel videos	0.739	12.608
I often forget what I am doing when watching short travel videos	0.797	13.497
Impulsive travel intention (ITI)			.842	0.843	0.642
I have an impulse to travel to this place	0.833
I would give priority to this place if I were to travel	0.812	16.195
I’ll find out more about this place	0.758	15.029
Public health risk perception (PHRP)			.783	0.792	0.560
I am at risk of being infected with public health risks	0.704
I would be worried about getting infected with public health risks	0.764	10.545
I think the public health risk is serious	0.774	10.801

Note. CR = construct reliability; AVE = average variance extracted. The T-values for the first item of each construct are missing because they were fixed as reference indicators for scale setting in the CFA model.

Validity Analysis

This study used Amos 24.0 to validate the quality of the dataset and tested the reliability and validity of each variable through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). All indicators were found to be at a satisfactory level. First, the model fit of the measurement models all met the standard (Table 3-CFA). Second, the CR of the variables all exceeded 0.7, and the AVE of the variables was all greater than 0.5, which also met the standard (Horng et al., 2013). Third, the factor loading of the items for each variable reached 0.7 (except for one item of authenticity, which was 0.694, slightly below 0.7), which met the standard (Table 2).

Table 3.

Results of the Model Fit Measures.

Index	χ ²	df	χ ²/df	RMSEA	GFI	AGFI	CFI	IFI
CFA	133.326	94	1.418	0.0360	0.951	0.929	0.984	0.984
Structural model	86.221	59	1.461	0.038	0.961	0.94	0.987	0.987
Fitted value			<3.0	<0.05	>0.9	>0.9	>0.9	>0.9

This study adopted the discriminant validity validation method, indicating that the square root of AVE of each variable exceeded its correlation coefficient with the other variables (Diamantopoulos, 1994). As can be seen from Table 4, the discriminant validity was satisfactory.

Table 4.

The Discriminant Validity.

Constructs	AVE	AUT	EDU	CON	PHRP	ITI
AUT	0.524	0.724
EDU	0.583	0.722**	0.764
CON	0.588	0.558**	0.557**	0.767
PHRP	0.560	0.633**	0.662**	0.643**	0.748
ITI	0.642	0.125*	0.193**	0.253**	0.158**	0.802

Note. Bold font = Square-root of AVE; AUT = Authenticity; EDU = Educability; CON = Concentration; ITI = Impulsive travel intention; PHRP = Public health risk perception. **p < .01; *p < .05.

Structural Equation Model

The maximum likelihood method of Amos 24.0 was used to test the hypothesis. The model fit of this study largely met the standards (Table 3-structural model). As shown in Table 5 and Figure 2, authenticity positively influencing concentration or impulsive travel intention wasn’t significant, rejecting H1a and H1b; educability had significant and positive effects on concentration and impulsive travel intention, proving H2a and H2b; concentration positively and significantly impacted impulsive travel intention, supporting H3.

Table 5.

Structure Parameter Estimates.

Hypothesis path	Estimate	Std.	S.E.	T	p	Result
H1a AUT → CON	0.458	0.352	0.245	1.872	.061	Not support
H1b AUT → ITI	0.172	0.118	0.227	0.756	.450	Not support
H2a EDU → CON	0.350	0.377	0.175	2.001	.045	Support
H2b EDU → ITI	0.432	0.413	0.166	2.602	.009	Support
H3 CON → ITI	0.459	0.409	0.085	5.377	***	Support

Note. AUT = Authenticity; EDU = Educability; CON = Concentration; ITI = Impulsive travel intention.

***

p < .001.

Figure 2.

Results.

The Mediating Effect of Concentration

The bootstrap method (bootstrap = 5,000) was used to measure the mediating effects of concentration on authenticity and impulsive travel intention, as well as on educability and impulsive travel intention. If the 95% confidence interval of the indirect effect does not include 0, it indicates a significant mediating effect. This method, which does not rely on the significance of path coefficients, is currently the recommended approach for testing mediating effects (Hayes, 2018). The results indicated that concentration mediated the effect of authenticity on impulsive travel intention, as well as the effect of educability on impulsive travel intention. Thus, H4a and H4b were supported (Table 6).

Table 6.

Mediating Effect.

Path			Percentile 95% CI		Bias-corrected percentile 95% CI		Result
Path	Effects		Lower	Upper	Lower	Upper	Result
AUT → CON → ITI	Direct effects	0.441	0.195	0.649	0.206	0.656	Support
	Indirect effects	0.324	0.166	0.535	0.169	0.537
	Total effects	0.765	0.681	0.842	0.676	0.838
EDU → CON → ITI	Direct effects	0.509	0.274	0.678	0.292	0.689	Support
	Indirect effects	0.292	0.156	0.492	0.156	0.491
	Total effects	0.800	0.719	0.865	0.719	0.865

Note. AUT = Authenticity; EDU = Educability; CON = Concentration; ITI = Impulsive travel intention.

The Moderating Effect of Public Health Risk Perception

The process was used to test the moderating effect of public health risk perception on the effect of authenticity or educability on concentration. The results (Table 7) demonstrated that public health risk perception significantly and negatively moderates the effect of authenticity on concentration (Model 2-AUT × PHRP, |t| = |−2.420| > 1.96), whereas public health risk perception hasn’t significantly moderated the effect of educability on concentration (Model 4-EDU × PHRP, |t| = |−1.023| < 1.96). Thus, H5a was supported, and H5b was rejected. Following the procedure described by Aiken and West (1991), this study plotted the slope of H5a (Figure 3), from which it is known that the authenticity of short travel videos has a greater positive correlation with their concentration when public health risk perceptions are lower rather than higher.

Table 7.

Moderating Effect.

	Concentration (CON)
	Model 1		Model 2		Model 3		Model 4
Dependent variables	Coef.	t	Coef.	t	Coef.	t	Coef.	t
Interrupt	1.130	2.333	1.097	2.281	1.345	2.799	1.369	2.847
Control variables
Gender	−0.078	−0.743	−0.073	−0.705	−0.119	−1.134	−0.117	−1.116
Age	−0.065	−1.031	−0.059	−0.947	−0.034	−0.536	−0.034	−0.535
Education	0.049	0.526	0.032	0.346	0.222	2.372	0.213	2.264
Occupation	−0.004	−0.133	−0.006	−0.232	0.002	0.085	0.003	0.096
Income per month	0.066	1.652	0.066	1.665	0.022	0.531	0.020	0.481
Public health risk perception (PHRP)	0.140	3.849	0.167	4.414	0.106	2.855	0.110	2.946
Independent variable
Authenticity (AUT)	0.628	11.521	0.620	11.432
Educability (EDU)					0.557	11.277	0.556	11.252
Moderator
AUT × PHRP			−0.090	−2.420
EDU × PHRP							−0.031	−1.023
Model statistics
R ²	.354		.366		.346		.348
R ² adj.	.340		.350		.332		.332
F	25.167		5.856		24.293		1.045

Figure 3.

Moderating effect of public health risk perception.

Conclusion Remarks

Conclusion and Discussion

With the help of narrative transmission theory, this study focused on the theoretical model of story attributes (i.e., authenticity and educability), concentration, impulsive travel intention, and public health risk perception. Consequently, we have drawn the following research conclusions.

First, we indicated that authenticity insignificantly influences concentration and impulsive travel intention (i.e., rejecting H1a and H1b). The positive relationship between authenticity (C. Zhu et al., 2022) and travel intention has been previously confirmed. This may be because while potential tourists are aware of authenticity when watching short travel videos, the reality is not necessarily attractive (Q. Zhou et al., 2018). This perception of authenticity is often overshadowed by the platform’s entertainment value and editing techniques, thereby weakening its effect on enhancing potential tourists’ concentration and impulsive travel intention. Thus, authenticity has no significant positive impact on concentration and impulsive travel intention.

Second, educability significantly and positively influences concentration and impulsive travel intention (i.e., supporting H2a and H2b). This conclusion is analogous to the findings of Jo et al. (2022) that educability exerts a significant positive impact on brand value. When potential tourists perceive the video content as having educational value, they will proactively allocate more attention to ensure accurate capture of the information. Educability can also enhance the potential tourists’ cognitive depth regarding the destination, prompting them to develop an immediate urge to “experience it firsthand” within a short period.

Third, concentration significantly and positively influences impulsive travel intention (i.e., supporting H3). When potential tourists are highly engaged with the video content, information regarding the attractiveness and uniqueness of the tourist destination may undergo deeper cognitive processing, thereby triggering an immediate urge to “experience it right away” (Hyde, 2008).

Fourth, authenticity or educability influences impulsive travel intention by mediating the effect of concentration (i.e., supporting H4a and H4b). This finding didn’t align with Girish and Lee (2019), in which authenticity was found to directly influence tourists’ travel intentions, and this might be because concentration is an important mediating variable. This study focuses on TikTok short videos (≤60 s), where information is presented in a highly fragmented manner and the potential tourists’ attentional resources are limited. Consequently, concentration becomes a critical threshold determining whether information is adequately processed. When potential tourists exhibit sufficient concentration with the videos, can authentic or educable information be better internalized, thereby influencing impulsive travel intention.

Finally, public health risk perception moderates the effect of authenticity on concentration, but it does not moderate the effect of educability on concentration (i.e., supporting H5a and rejecting H5b). The difference in these results may stem from the fact that authenticity is more emotionally driven and thus exhibits greater volatility, whereas educability is more cognitively driven and relatively stable. When tourists’ public health risk perception is lower, their authenticity has a stronger influence on concentration, but the effect of educability on concentration is not affected. This finding confirmed that short travel videos are more appealing to those with low public health risk perception because they are less worried about public health risks.

Theoretical Contribution

First, narrative transportation theory is frequently employed in the media industries of news advertising (Shen et al., 2014), health education (Murphy et al., 2013), and entertainment (Glaser et al., 2012). This research innovatively applies narrative transportation theory in the tourism field, which will expand the application field of narrative transportation theory and provide a new research perspective.

Second, the application scope of the above theoretical conclusions in the context of new media tourism marketing will be expanded. The narrative transportation theory connects the virtual scene of short travel videos with the travel intention in the real world and further explores the impact of virtual scenes on the real world.

Third, this study indicated that the story attributes of short travel videos (i.e., authenticity and educability) can influence impulsive travel intention both directly and indirectly through the mediating effect of concentration. This will help clarify the black box of story attributes of short travel videos influencing impulsive travel intention and promoting the advancement of tourism destinations.

Practical Implications

First, authenticity refers to whether the content of short travel videos is real. Although it has no direct impact on concentration or impulsive travel intention, it has a significant impact on concentration under the moderation of public health risk perception. This may be because the public pays more attention to the authenticity of tourist destinations under the influence of the public health risk perception. Thus, tourist attractions should pay special attention to the publicity of public health risk prevention measures. Authenticity also has an impact on impulsive travel intention through the mediating effect of concentration. Consequently, short travel videos should be sufficiently attractive to tourists to make them focus on the short travel videos, thus generating impulsive travel intention.

Second, educability significantly and positively impacts concentration and impulsive travel intention, and educability affects impulsive travel intention through concentration. Thus, if tourism enterprises want to promote tourism destinations with the help of short travel videos, they should try their best to ensure the educational value of the content narrated by bloggers in short travel videos.

Limitations and Future Study Research

This study explored the influence mechanism of story attributes (i.e., authenticity and educability) of short travel videos on impulsive travel intention. Because storytelling has two properties, story and tell, but this study probed only the two dimensions of the story attribute (i.e., authenticity and educability), the future can be further explored on the three dimensions of the tell attribute: descriptive, emotionality, and interesting. Furthermore, this study only probed the moderating effects of public health risk perception on authenticity or educability and concentration, so the moderating effect of authenticity or educability and impulsive travel intention, as well as other moderating factors, can be further explored in the future. Additionally, this study has certain limitations in sample selection. In the future, a combination of online and offline data could be employed to cover potential tourists from a wider range of video platforms, and more attention should be paid to achieving gender balance. These measures are expected to enhance the generalizability of the research results.

Footnotes

ORCID iDs

Yanxin Kang

Xingqin Qu

Xing Wang

Xinwei Su

Niantao Jiao

Funding

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was supported by Education Research in the Humanities and Social Sciences Youth Fund Projects in China (Grant No. 21YJCZH052) and from the Research and Innovation Platform of Liming Vocational University (LMPT202105).

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting this study's findings will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

References

Adeloye

Makurumidze

Sarfo

(2021). User-generated videos and tourists’ intention to visit. Anatolia, 33(4), 658–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/13032917.2021.1986082

Aiken

L. S.

West

S. G.

(1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage publications.

Akgün

A. E.

Keskin

Ayar

Erdoğan

(2015). The influence of storytelling approach in travel writings on readers’ empathy and travel intentions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207, 577–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.129

Basch

C. H.

Meleo-Erwin

Fera

Jaime

Basch

C. E.

(2021). A global pandemic in the time of viral memes: COVID-19 vaccine misinformation and disinformation on TikTok. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 17(8), 2373–2377. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2021.1894896

Beatty

S. E.

Elizabeth Ferrell

(1998). Impulse buying: Modeling its precursors. Journal of Retailing, 74(2), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-4359(99)80092-x

Ben Youssef

Leicht

Marongiu

. (2018). Storytelling in the context of destination marketing: An analysis of conceptualisations and impact measurement. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 27(8), 696–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254x.2018.1464498

Cao

X. Y.

Z. R.

Liu

J. J.

(2021). How the destination short video affects the customers’ attitude: The role of narrative transportation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 62, Article 102672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102672

Chang

Stansbie

Rood

A. S.

(2014). Impulsive consumption in the experiential context. Current Issues in Tourism, 17(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2012.749843

Chong

S. E.

Lim

X. J.

Cheah

J. H.

Tee

K. K.

(2025). From screen to scene: Exploring factors influencing flow state and actual destination visitation tendencies in short travel videos. Current Issues in Tourism, 28(22), 3563–3582. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2024.2400183

10.

Diamantopoulos

(1994). Modelling with LISREL: A guide for the uninitiated. Journal of Marketing Management, 10(1–3), 105–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257x.1994.9964263

11.

Dilek

S. E.

Kulakoglu Dilek

(2018). Real-life escape rooms as a new recreational attraction: The case of Turkey. Anatolia, 29(4), 495–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/13032917.2018.1439760

12.

Ding

H.-M.

Hung

K.-P.

(2021). The antecedents of visitors’ flow experience and its influence on memory and behavioral intentions in the music festival context. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 19, Article 100551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100551

13.

Liechty

Santos

C. A.

Park

(2020). ‘I want to record and share my wonderful journey’: Chinese Millennials’ production and sharing of short-form travel videos on TikTok or Douyin. Current Issues in Tourism, 25(21), 3412–3424. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2020.1810212

14.

Faber

(2014). Storytelling in business: The authentic and fluent organization. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 29(2), 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651914560532

15.

Fang

Xie

Huang

Zhang

(2023). How do short-form travel videos trigger travel inspiration? Identifying and validating the driving factors. Tourism Management Perspectives, 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2023.101128

16.

Gerrig

R. J.

(1993). Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/org/10.2307/3684839

17.

Girish

V. G.

Lee

C.-K.

(2019). Authenticity and its relationship with theory of planned behaviour: Case of Camino de Santiago walk in Spain. Current Issues in Tourism, 23(13), 1593–1597. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2019.1676207

18.

Glaser

Garsoffky

Schwan

(2012). What do we learn from docutainment? Processing hybrid television documentaries. Learning and Instruction, 22(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.05.006

19.

Green

M. C.

Brock

T. C.

(2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.701

20.

Han

Zhang

Law

Zhang

(2022). Seeing destinations through short-form videos: Implications for leveraging audience involvement to increase travel intention. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1024286. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1024286

21.

Hayes

A. F.

(2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

22.

Chen

(2021). Travel vlogging practice and its impacts on tourist experiences. Current Issues in Tourism, 25(15), 2518–2533. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2021.1971166

23.

Horng

J.-S.

M.-L.

Teng

C.-C.

Hsiao

H.-L.

Liu

C.-H.

(2013). Development and validation of the low-carbon literacy scale among practitioners in the Taiwanese tourism industry. Tourism Management, 35, 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.08.001

24.

Hsu

C.-L.

(2020). How vloggers embrace their viewers: Focusing on the roles of para-social interactions and flow experience. Telematics and Informatics, 49, Article 101364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101364

25.

Huang

X. Y.

Dai

S. S.

H. G.

(2020). Predicting tourists’ health risk preventative behaviour and travelling satisfaction in Tibet: Combining the theory of planned behaviour and health belief model. Tourism Management Perspectives, 33, Article 100589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2019.100589

26.

Hyde

K. F.

(2008). Information processing and touring planning theory. Annals of Tourism Research, 35(3), 712–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2008.05.001

27.

Irimias

Mitev

A. Z.

Michalkó

(2021). Narrative transportation and travel: The mediating role of escapism and immersion. Tourism Management Perspectives, 38, Article 100793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2021.100793

28.

Jeon

M. M.

Lee

Jeong

(2018). E-social influence and customers’ behavioral intentions on a bed and breakfast website. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 27(3), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2017.1367346

29.

Jia

Wen

Fan

D. X. F.

Liu

(2024). Role reversal in adult child-aging parent family travel. Annals of Tourism Research, 106, Article 103751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2024.103751

30.

Jiang

X. Y.

Fan

X. J.

(2026). Examining the effects of presence and authenticity on Visitor’s well-being in CAVE VR museum: A mixed methods study. Tourism Management, 113, Article 105291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2025.105291

31.

Cha

J. B.

Kim

(2022). The effects of tourism storytelling on tourism destination brand value, lovemarks and relationship strength in South Korea. Sustainability, 14(24), Article 16495. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416495

32.

Kah

J. A.

Lee

S. H.

(2014). Beyond adoption of travel technology: Its application to unplanned travel behaviors. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 31(6), 667–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2014.888968

33.

Kim

C. W.

Song

H. R.

(2017). Structural relationships among public’s risk characteristics, trust, risk perception and preventive behavioral intention - The case of MERS in Korea. Crisis and Emergency Management, 13(6), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.14251/crisisonomy.2017.13.6.85

34.

Kim

D. J.

Ferrin

D. L.

Rao

H. R.

(2008). A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decision Support Systems, 44(2), 544–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2007.07.001

35.

Kim

Xie

Hong

J. W.

Kim

H. M.

(2024). Prosocial campaigns with virtual influencers: Stories, messages, and beyond. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 41(11), 6956–6967. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2387399

36.

Kim

S. H.

Song

M. K.

Shim

(2020). Storytelling by medical tourism agents and its effect on trust and behavioral intention. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 37(6), 679–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2020.1795046

37.

Kirchgasler

(2018). True grit? Making a scientific object and pedagogical tool. American Educational Research Journal, 55(4), 693–720. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217752244

38.

Koufaris

(2002). Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.2.205.83

39.

Labti

Belkadi

E.-z.

(2022). Modeling travelers behavior using FSQCA. In Abraham

Gandhi

Hanne

Hong

T.-P.

Nogueira Rios

Ding

(Eds.), Intelligent systems design and applications (pp. 657–666). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96308-8_61

40.

Lai

I. K. W.

Hitchcock

(2015). Importance-performance analysis in tourism: A framework for researchers. Tourism Management, 48, 242–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.11.008

41.

L. H.

Hancer

(2021). Using social learning theory in examining YouTube viewers’ desire to imitate travel vloggers. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 12(3), 512–532. https://doi.org/10.1108/jhtt-08-2020-0200

42.

Y.-M.

(2014). Effects of story marketing and travel involvement on tourist behavioral intention in the tourism industry. Sustainability, 6(12), 9387–9397. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6129387

43.

Liao

S.-S.

Lin

C.-Y.

Chuang

Y.-J.

Xie

X.-Z.

(2020). The role of social capital for short-video platform users’ travel intentions: SEM and FSQCA findings. Sustainability, 12(9), Article 3871. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093871

44.

Lin

C. A.

Lagoe

(2013). Effects of news media and interpersonal interactions on H1N1 risk perception and vaccination intent. Communication Research Reports, 30(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2012.762907

45.

Lin

Zhang

S. Y.

Yhang

W. J.

(2024). Storytelling in dark tourism: The role of flow experience and national identity. SAGE Open, 14(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241257159

46.

Liu

Cao

Pei

(2022). Impact of COVID-19 on adolescent travel behavior. Journal of Transport & Health, 24, Article 101326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2021.101326

47.

Liu

X. L.

Zhang

Chen

(2022). The effects of tourism e-commerce live streaming features on consumer purchase intention: The mediating roles of flow experience and trust. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 995129. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.995129

48.

Liu

Guan

Yang

(2015). Online customer experience and its relationship to repurchase intention: An empirical case of online travel agencies in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 21(10), 1085–1099. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2015.1094495

49.

Liu

Sun

(2024). Tourism e-commerce live streaming: The effects of live streamer authenticity on purchase intention. Tourism Review, 79(5), 1147–1165. https://doi.org/10.1108/Tr-04-2023-0245

50.

(2019). Fifteen seconds of fame: A qualitative study of douyin, a short video sharing mobile application in China. In Meiselwitz

(Eds.), Social computing and social media. Design, human behavior and analytics (pp. 233–244). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21902-4_17

51.

Y. H.

Zhang

H. L.

Xiao

Liu

P. X.

Zhuang

(2022). Flow in soundscape: The conceptualization of soundscape flow experience and its relationship with soundscape perception and behaviour intention in tourism destinations. Current Issues in Tourism, 25(13), 2090–2108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2021.1922363

52.

Luo

C. Y.

Tsai

C. H.

Chen

M. H.

(2023). From stage to a sense of place: The power of tourism performing arts storytelling for sustainable tourism growth. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 40(8), 728–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2023.2293012

53.

Luo

J. M.

Lam

C. F.

(2020). Travel anxiety, risk attitude and travel intentions towards “travel bubble” destinations in Hong Kong: Effect of the fear of COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), Article 7859. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217859

54.

MacCannell

(1973). Staged authenticity: Arrangements of social space in tourist settings. American Journal of Sociology, 79(3), 589–603. https://doi.org/10.1086/225585

55.

Moon

J.-W.

Kim

Y.-G.

(2001). Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web context. Information & Management, 38(4), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-7206(00)00061-6

56.

Morales-Solana

Esteban-Millat

Cotas

A. A.

(2022). Experiences in consumer flow in online supermarkets. Electronic Commerce Research, 22(4), 1195–1226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-021-09460-5

57.

Morowatishaifabad

M. A.

Zare Sakhvidi

M. J.

Gholianavval

Masoudi Boroujeni

Alavijeh

M. M.

(2015). Predictors of hepatitis B preventive behavioral intentions in healthcare workers. Safety and Health at Work, 6(2), 139–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2014.12.001

58.

Murphy

S. T.

Frank

L. B.

Chatterjee

J. S.

Baezconde-Garbanati

(2013). Narrative versus non-narrative: The role of identification, transportation and emotion in reducing health disparities. The Journal of Communication, 63(1), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12007

59.

Ning

Niu

Yang

Liu

Ning

Liang

Liu

Hao

Gao

Liu

(2020). The impacts of knowledge, risk perception, emotion and information on citizens’ protective behaviors during the outbreak of COVID-19: A Cross-sectional study in China. BMC Public Health, 20(1), Article 1751. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09892-y

60.

Ouyang

L. X.

Zhang

Zhu

S. C.

Liu

(2024). Digital technology in tourism dance performance: Exploring the influence of tourists’ flow Experience and meaningful experience on revisit intention. IEEE Access, 12, 46347–46361. https://doi.org/10.1109/Access.2024.3382291

61.

Özdemir

Seyitoğlu

(2017). A conceptual study of gastronomical quests of tourists: Authenticity or safety and comfort? Tourism Management Perspectives, 23, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2017.03.010

62.

Pera

(2014). Empowering the new traveller: Storytelling as a co-creative behaviour in tourism. Current Issues in Tourism, 20(4), 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2014.982520

63.

Podsakoff

P. M.

MacKenzie

S. B.

Lee

J.-Y.

Podsakoff

N. P.

(2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

64.

Razzaq

Shao

Quach

(2024). Meme marketing effectiveness: A moderated-mediation model. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 78, Article 103702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103702

65.

Ruhanen

Bowles

(2019). Student perspectives of responsible tourism behaviour: The role of tourism education. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 32(4), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2019.1688160

66.

Setbon

Raude

Fischler

Flahault

(2005). Risk perception of the “mad cow disease” in France: Determinants and consequences. Risk Analysis, 25(4), 813–826. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00634.x

67.

Shekari

Azizi

(2022). Exploring the factors affecting travel intention during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural analysis. Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 15(3), 613–632. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijms.2021.323223.674547

68.

Shen

Ahern

Baker

(2014). Stories that Count. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 91(1), 98–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699013514414

69.

Sinha

Dhingra

Sehrawat

Jain

Himanshu . (2024). Customers’ intention to use virtual reality in tourism: A comprehensive analysis of influencing factors. Tourism Review, 80(3), 742–766. https://doi.org/10.1108/Tr-07-2023-0488

70.

Smallenbroek

Zelenski

J. M.

Whelan

D. C.

(2016). Authenticity as a eudaimonic construct: The relationships among authenticity, values, and valence. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(2), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1187198

71.

Stone

M. J.

Petrick

J. F.

(2013). The educational benefits of travel experiences. Journal of Travel Research, 52(6), 731–744. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287513500588

72.

L. J.

Pan

Wen

Phau

(2023). Effects of tourism experiences on tourists’ subjective well-being through recollection and storytelling. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 29(4), 479–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/13567667221101414

73.

Sun

Guo

(2022). A new destination on the palm? The moderating effect of travel anxiety on digital tourism behavior in extended UTAUT2 and TTF models. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 965655. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.965655

74.

Surina

Martinsone

Perepjolkina

Kolesnikova

Vainik

Ruza

Vrublevska

Smirnova

Fountoulakis

K. N.

Rancans

(2021). Factors related to COVID-19 preventive behaviors: A structural equation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 676521. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.676521

75.

Tan

R. Y.

Pua

A. E.

Wong

L. L.

Yap

K. Y.-L.

(2021). Assessing the quality of COVID-19 vaccine videos on video-sharing platforms. Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy, 2, Article 100035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsop.2021.100035

76.

Tsai

L. L.

(2020). Factors affecting intention to revisit an environmental event: The moderating role of enduring involvement. Journal of Convention & Event Tourism, 22(1), 61–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/15470148.2020.1816519

77.

Tzeng

S.-Y.

Huang

(2023). Danmaku’s effects on viewing experience and destination food image in food-themed documentaries. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 55, 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2023.02.010

78.

Chung

Stienmetz

(2022). Factors affecting consumers’ impulsive buying behavior in tourism mobile commerce using SEM and fsQCA. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 29(2), 256–274, Article 13567667221090991. https://doi.org/10.1177/13567667221090991

79.

Wang

Cui

Zhang

Shen

(2022). Exploring short video apps users’ travel behavior intention: Empirical analysis based on SVA-TAM model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 912177. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.912177

80.

Wang

Xue

Wang

(2020). The mechanism of tourism risk perception in severe epidemic—The antecedent effect of place image depicted in anti-epidemic music videos and the moderating effect of visiting history. Sustainability, 12(13), Article 5454. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135454

81.

Wang

Lai

I. K.

Wong

J. W.

(2022). An exploratory study of pandemic-restricted travel-A new form of travel pattern on the during- and post-COVID-19 era. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(7), Article 4149. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074149

82.

Wang

Lin

Y.-J.

Lin

B.-S.

(2020). The factors that affect usage intentions and travel intentions of travel-related WeChat official accounts. Sustainability, 12(15), Article 6108. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156108

83.

Wei

Yang

Liu

C.-H.

(2021). “Can intelligence make you happy?” The influence of tourists’ cultural sustainability and intelligence on their flow experience. Sustainability, 13(22), Article 12457. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212457

84.

Williams

L. J.

Brown

B. K.

(1994). Method variance in organizational behavior and human resources research: Effects on correlations, path coefficients, and hypothesis testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57(2), 185–209. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1011

85.

Woodside

A. G.

Sood

Miller

K. E.

(2008). When consumers and brands talk: Storytelling theory and research in psychology and marketing. Psychology and Marketing, 25(2), 97–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20203

86.

J. J.

Chang

Y. S.

(2005). Towards understanding members’ interactivity, trust, and flow in online travel community. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(7), 937–954. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570510616120

87.

Lai

I. K. W.

(2025). The distinctiveness of short travel videos makes audiences proud to forward them. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 63, 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2025.04.004

88.

X. H.

Lai

I. K. W.

(2024). How the creativity and authenticity of destination short videos influence audiences’ attitudes toward videos and destinations: The mediating role of emotions and the moderating role of parasocial interaction with Internet celebrities. Current Issues in Tourism, 27(15), 2428–2447. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2023.2229483

89.

Yang

Zhang

Liu

Hua

(2022). Destination endorsers raising on short-form travel videos: Self-image construction and endorsement effect measurement. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 52, 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.06.003

90.

Yao

Jia

Hou

(2021). Impulsive travel intention induced by sharing conspicuous travel experience on social media: A moderated mediation analysis. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 49, 431–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.10.012

91.

Jiang

(2018). Authenticity and loyalty at heritage sites: The moderation effect of postmodern authenticity. Tourism Management, 67, 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.01.013

92.

X. L.

X. X.

Lin

B. N.

Zhang

G. Y.

Jiang

Zhang

(2025). Investigating the impact of tourists’ perceived authenticity and aesthetics on word-of-mouth in cultural heritage sites. Tourism Management, 111, Article 105167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2025.105167

93.

Yin

Cheng

Y. H.

Y. S.

(2020). Tourists perceived crowding and destination attractiveness: The moderating effects of perceived risk and experience quality. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 18, Article 100489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100489

94.

Yin

(2021). COVID-19 event strength, psychological safety, and avoidance coping behaviors for employees in the tourism industry. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 47, 431–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.04.017

95.

Yin

(2023). The marketing of destination distinctiveness: The power of tourism short videos with enjoyability and authenticity. Current Issues in Tourism, 27(14), 2217–2229. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2023.2242559

96.

Yin

J. L.

Huang

Y. H.

Z. Z.

(2023). Explore the feeling of presence and purchase intention in livestream shopping: A flow-based model. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 18(1), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer18010013

97.

Zalatan

(2016). Tourist typology: An ex ante approach. Tourism Economics, 10(3), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.5367/0000000041895030

98.

Zhang

S.-N.

Y.-Q.

Liu

C.-H.

Ruan

W.-Q.

(2021). Does live performance play a critical role in building destination brand equity—A mixed-method study of “Impression Dahongpao”. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59, Article 102392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102392

99.

Zhang

S.-N.

Zeng

A.-J.

Ruan

W.-Q.

Y.-Q.

Zhou

(2025). How different destination brand personalities choose the right tourism short video ads? Journal of Vacation Marketing, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/13567667251366690

100.

Zhang

Liu

C.-H.

Shen

(2020). The effect of novelty on travel intention: The mediating effect of brand equity and travel motivation. Management Decision, 59(6), 1271–1290. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-09-2018-1055

101.

Zhang

Niu

Feng

(2024). Does using a green gaming system make people more environmentally friendly? Computers in Human Behavior, 161, Article 108392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108392

102.

Zheng

X. Y.

Zhu

B. W.

Wang

K. Y.

Tzeng

G. H.

Xiong

(2026). Decoding authenticity judgments in ethnic restaurants: A hybrid approach for bridging cultural gatekeeper and adventurer perspectives. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 132, Article 104390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2025.104390

103.

Zhou

Chen

(2022). Research on the effect of authenticity on revisit intention in heritage tourism. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 883380. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.883380

104.

Zhou

Sun

Zhu

Ito

(2024). ‘Are ad endorsements really annoying?’ The impact of advertising in short-form tourism videos on tourists’ information processing. Current Issues in Tourism, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2024.2371029

105.

Zhou

Zhang

(2018). Is all authenticity accepted by tourists and residents? The concept, dimensions and formation mechanism of negative authenticity. Tourism Management, 67, 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.12.024

106.

Zhou

Jiao

(2024). Investigating the effect of tourism short video background music congruence on viewers’ travel intention. Current Issues in Tourism, 28(9), 1496–1512. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2024.2343082

107.

Zhou

Liu

Sun

(2022). The effects of perception of video image and online word of mouth on tourists’ travel intentions: Based on the behaviors of short video platform users. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 984240. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.984240

108.

Zhu

Hoc Nang Fong

Gao

Buhalis

Shang

(2022). How does celebrity involvement influence travel intention? The case of promoting Chengdu on TikTok. Information Technology & Tourism, 24, 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-022-00233-w

109.

Zhu

M. U.

Hall

C. M.

Ngan

H. F. B.

Peralta

R. L.

(2023). How to use augmented reality to promote a destination? The mediating role of augmented reality attachment. International Journal of Tourism Research, 26(1), Article e2603. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2603

110.

Zhu

C. S.

Hall

C. M.

Fong

L. H. N.

Liu

C. Y. N.

Koupaei

S. N.

(2024). Vividness, narrative transportation, and sense of presence in destination marketing: Empirical evidence from augmented reality tourism. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 30(10), 1354–1366. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2024.2383218

111.

Zulli

D. J.

(2022). Extending the Internet meme: Conceptualizing technological mimesis and imitation publics on the TikTok platform. New Media & Society, 24(8), 1872–1890, Article 1461444820983603. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820983603