Microfinance,Political Factors,and Motivation Can All Help to Enhance Women’s Entrepreneurship and Empowerment to Eliminate Poverty in Sindh Pakistan

Abstract

Sustainable development of women’s entrepreneurship (WE) and women empowerment (WEMP), and poverty reduction (PR), are significant challenges, particularly in developing countries like Pakistan. Hence the purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between women’s entrepreneurship (WE), women empowerment (WEMP), and poverty reduction (PR) through green microfinance (MF), motivation (MOTI), and political factors (PF) in Pakistan’s Sindh Province. Based on the study nature, data were collected from women who were doing their businesses in the Sindh Province of Pakistan. There were 300 questionnaires given in total, with 225 of them returned. A total of 220 questionnaires were included and others were excluded due to incomplete questions. To test the study model and hypothesis, we analyzed data in Smart PLS-V4 with structure equation model techniques to meet the study objectives. The study’s findings reveal a beneficial association between green microfinance and poverty reduction, women’s entrepreneurship, and empowerment. A study also identified political elements that have a good impact on poverty reduction through women’s entrepreneurship and empowerment. Furthermore, when women are driven, it has beneficial impacts on women’s entrepreneurship and empowerment, which helps to decrease poverty. This study suggests that reducing poverty and strengthening women’s entrepreneurship and empowerment are linked to political considerations, motivation, and institutional finance facilities. Furthermore, women’s entrepreneurship and empowerment are key elements to decrease poverty in Pakistan.

Plain Language Summary

This research examined microfinance, political variables, and motivation to enhance women entrepreneurs and empowerment to alleviate poverty in Sindh Pakistan. The study’s findings supported all hypotheses. Microfinance, political issues, and motivation favorably affect women’s entrepreneurship, and empowerment and alleviate poverty. Entrepreneurial women with stronger motivation can be more successful. Motivated women’s work can be better to enhance women’s business and economic success to alleviate poverty. This shows that microfinance variables are interconnected and must be examined. Microfinance, political factors, and motivation affect women’s entrepreneurship and empowerment is rising rapidly to decrease the ratio of poverty through women’s empowerment. Women’s entrepreneurship addresses entrepreneurship and women’s status in society thus it could be fruitful to cut the poverty. This study applies entrepreneurship’s desire for accomplishment theory to microfinance, political considerations, motivation, and women’s entrepreneurship. Motivation improves microfinance’s effect on women’s entrepreneurship and empowerment, while the WE and WEMP play a beneficial role in economic growth to cut poverty. Furthermore, the study revealed family income and standard of life increased to alleviate the poverty ratio in Sindh province of Pakistan. Sindh government should support women’s entrepreneurship and empowerment to enhance economic growth to minimize the poverty ratio through microfinance, political factors, and motivation which could enhance the business system and economic growth system to cut the poverty in Sindh Pakistan.

Keywords

women entrepreneurship and empowerment poverty alleviation political factors motivation microfinance

Introduction

Societies seeking widespread development should create chances for women’s growth and prosperity through female entrepreneurship (Ziyae et al., 2021). About half of the population is female globally; there is a greater discrepancy in women’s social position, particularly in the Asian continent (Agarwal & Lenka, 2018). Consequently, a report by the World Bank 2017 shows that growing trends of women entrepreneurship worldwide, there is a dearth of research and practice on female entrepreneurship, particularly in the context of Pakistan (Umar et al., 2022). Based on the World Economic Forum’s-2018 gender gap report, Pakistan ranks 146th out of 149 nations in terms of women’s economic involvement and opportunities (Umar et al., 2022). Government support for women’s entrepreneurship is positively related to economic growth (H. Y. Ali et al., 2019). Government benefits and families have evolved into a system that moves away from the traditional family unit, allowing women to achieve economic independence (Adetiloye et al., 2020). It has been shown that women are a source of entrepreneurial talent and a development tool (Solesvik et al., 2019). The majority of microfinance programs focus on empowering women (Shah & Arif, 2021). Aside from that, despite the development of the 21st century, the position of women in Pakistan is still under consideration (Yousfani et al., 2019). Poverty reduction and employment creation are at the core of the country’s development goals (Al-Shami et al., 2013). Many Microfinance Institutions are now establishing microfinance programs with higher interest rates for women. The Pakistani government established a Microfinance Institution in 2001 (Nawaz et al., 2021). Microfinance is rising as an effective tool for reducing poverty. In growing countries, many governments collaborate with NGO’s have applied programs to empower women economically and socially. Poor people are excluded from the formal monetary system throughout the world. This considers poverty a critical development concern and illustrates why poverty has become an issue, but rather how women are motivated to start enterprises to reduce poverty (Sharma, 2008). Finance is required by businesses for working capital as well as to invest in future growth. Consequently, it is critical to ensure that financial markets work for companies to sustain their economy (Hendratmi & Sukmaningrum, 2018). In Pakistan, micro and small businesses might serve as an appropriate beginning point for developing women’s potential entrepreneurs (Hendratmi & Sukmaningrum, 2018). Microfinance has a significant impact on domestic growth (GDP), and growth has a substantial relationship with microfinance (Sultan & Masih, 2016).

In Pakistan, poverty reduction has been a significant issue that has primarily affected rural areas (Shirazi & Khan, 2009). Pakistan Poverty Alleviation Fund (PPAF) is another initiative the Pakistani government took to promote women entrepreneurs. Several international initiatives support, develop and grow women entrepreneurs in Pakistan by providing financial and technical assistance (Anwar & Rashid, 2012). The World Bank is the primary contributor to the PPAF, which provides microfinance to women entrepreneurs in Pakistan. The World Bank collaborates with its partners on several projects to give financial assistance to women entrepreneurs. It also assists them in obtaining entry into profitable industries (Anwar & Rashid, 2012).

More and more researchers have focused on sustainable women’s entrepreneurship (SWE) in recent years due to the growing number of female entrepreneurs contributing to economic growth (Sajjad et al., 2020). Pakistan needs to reduce inequalities to sustainable women entrepreneurship. In terms of women’s economic activity and opportunities, Pakistan was ranked 132nd out of 134 countries. The position of women in Pakistan is not consistent because of the relationship between sexual orientation and various forms of discrimination in society (A. Khan et al., 2021). Women are forbidden from participating in additional social activities (Zeb et al., 2022). The study “The Relationship between Culture and Entrepreneurship: The Role of Trust” demonstrates that the impact of culture on productive entrepreneurship is intricate. Individualism has a good impact on successful entrepreneurship, whereas power distance and uncertainty avoidance have a negative impact (Kara & Dheer, 2023).

Furthermore, In Pakistan, overall entrepreneurial motivation is low, and women’s entrepreneurial pursuit is even lower, at 3.43%, four times lower than their male partners. Modern social arrangements have made it easier for women to step out of their homes and into public spaces worldwide (Raheem, 2013). However, there are still a few barriers that limit the growth of women in Pakistan. The factors are as follows.

Females are restricted and forbidden from making decisions that might potentially ruin the family’s reputation (Roomi & Harrison, 2010).

A woman’s primary role is to stay at home and take care of her house and children (Goheer & Penksa, 2011).

According to (Roomi & Parrott, 2008), the two most important variables influencing Muslim women’s professional positions are Hijab and Izzat.

Women are forbidden from participating in additional social activities (Zeb et al., 2022).

Although many developing nations, such as Pakistan, agree that women have difficulty getting credit for their startups, the rate at which women contribute to the economy in the private industry is dramatically different from that of their male peers (A. Khan et al., 2021). Hence this study aims to develop a model that helps to enhance women’s entrepreneurship and empowerment to decrease the poverty ratio in Sindh Pakistan. Also, this study research question and model may be helpful to other regions and developing nations too. Hence the study seeks answers to the following research questions:

RQ-1: Does microfinance have any connection to reducing poverty?

RQ-2: Is microfinance connected to women’s empowerment, women’s entrepreneurship, or both?

RQ-3: Is there a connection between political considerations, women’s empowerment, and entrepreneurship?

RQ-4: Is there a connection between women’s empowerment, entrepreneurship, and motivation?

RQ-5: Does the empowerment of women and entrepreneurs contribute to the reduction of poverty?

Background and Hypothesis Development

Microfinance Institutions (MFIs)

The author MFIs serve as a conduit for the distribution of financial assistance to millions of people living in poverty, particularly women (Moser et al., 2016). Being over 50% of the population, women carry out a variety of tasks that are crucial to the nation’s economic development and should not be overlooked (Jehan et al., 2020). However, women in remote parts of developing nations are unable to raise their social standing, and their aspirations to start and grow their enterprises are hampered by the lack of equitable employment possibilities. In contrast, financial institutions, government agencies, additional interested parties, and their friends and family provide support to women in industrialized nations (Khalil et al., 2018; Tasos et al., 2020). On the other hand, women in the country experience criticism more severely, and the viability of their entrepreneurial endeavors is jeopardized by an absence of assistance from regulatory bodies and banking systems. Despite Pakistan’s abundance of microfinance institutions, most of them cater to men compared to women. Nevertheless, women in Indian Punjab are given preferential treatment when it comes to obtaining fast bank loan authorization and monetary support for launching their businesses. Assume that women in every nation are given equal possibilities to launch their businesses. In that scenario, consumers will surely raise their social standing on an individual basis, support the nation’s economic development, and eventually end impoverishment on the national scale (Hameed et al., 2022). Consequently, we put up the following hypothesis:

H-1: There exists a correlation between green microfinance institutions (MFIs) and the reduction of poverty.

The Relation Between Microfinance and Women Entrepreneurship

A link between microfinance and the growth of women’s entrepreneurship was found in the study by (Thaher et al., 2021). If microfinance provides loans to women, women can use microloans to get the equipment needed to establish a small company and work for themselves. Women can start businesses with microfinance. It boosts their self-esteem, prestige, and decision-making power, promoting gender equality (Loomba, 2014) Moreover (Kibet et al., 2015), microfinance positively influences women’s entrepreneurial growth, and improved government policies are needed to strengthen Small and Medium Enterprises and provide simple access to microloans. Authors demonstrated that microfinance had a significant role in income generation and that women with high incomes and assets were more empowered than women with fewer incomes and assets (Dutta & Banerjee, 2018). Hence the hypotheses can be proposed:

H-2: Green Microfinance is helpful to play the role of enhancing women’s empowerment.

H-3: Green microfinance can help to enhance women’s entrepreneurship.

The Relation Between Political Factors and Women Entrepreneurship

Entrepreneurship and economic growth benefit from government assistance (Acs et al., 2004; Gohar & Abrar, 2016; Hernández, 2010; Kumar & Liu, 2005). Political ties and company investment are moderated by anti-corruption policies (Yu et al., 2019). These external environmental factors may increase risk and cause significant business loss. These can affect the outcome. Businesses must prepare for local and global political outcomes. Politics also affect business. Businesses grow in stable political and commercial systems (Hamed, 1995; Zhou, 2014). Government policies supporting entrepreneurship determine a nation’s entrepreneurial success. Small enterprises benefit from government, political, and traditional backing (Yusuf, 1995). Government initiatives encourage entrepreneurs to invest in enterprises and build their firms (Tende, 2014). The alternative opinion is that the government encourages entrepreneurial culture (Zhang & Lai, 2014) and that a politically connected entrepreneur may succeed in a weaker institutional framework (Ge et al., 2017). Consequently, hypotheses can be proposed;

H-4: Political factors have a beneficial influence on the phenomenon of Women’s Entrepreneurship.

H-5: Political factors provide a beneficial influence on women’s empowerment.

The Relation Between Motivation and Women Entrepreneurship

Motivation may be stated as a variable that helps people to perform better. The author earlier (Johnson, 1990) defines entrepreneurial motivation as a desire or propensity to arrange and manage groups of people or ideas to start their own business as fast as possible. (Chaudhary & Sharma, 2012), highly motivated people are more productive than less motivated. Entrepreneurial drive may be lowered when the economy’s outlook worsens (Galindo-Martín et al., 2023). Motivation may be related to a sense of achievement that makes women satisfied, resulting in increased performance. A highly motivated woman tries to show that she is responsible for her business. Women who run successful companies will add value to the country. A motivated woman makes a deliberate attempt to reach her objectives in the most efficient way possible (Owusu, 2012). Women who are motivated are more likely to improve their work performance to have economic growth. As a result, efforts can be made to improve work performance by only boosting motivation. The previous study shows that entrepreneurial motivation and the decision to become an entrepreneur have a strong and positive relationship (Collins et al., 2004). Hence the hypotheses can be proposed;

H-6: Motivation positively influences Women’s Entrepreneurship.

H-7: Motivation positively influences Women’s Empowerment.

Women Entrepreneurship and Poverty Reduction

In today’s world, inflationary is always rising, each person must make sure they are providing for loved ones financially in order to maintain a high level of life (Faridi et al., 2022; Raiysat & Younas, 2019). Women make up about half of the global population, and they continually strive to improve their families’ and the overall social and economic conditions in every nation. Equal possibilities to raise their social standing, start their own enterprises, and make financial contributions are also desired by Pakistani women (S. N. Khan et al., 2019; Razzaq et al., 2019). More and more job opportunities are made available to other women when women create their own businesses, giving them an opportunity to support their families, elevate their status, and escape poverty (Shaheen et al., 2018). Women in Bangladesh and India receive financial assistance in the form of microloans, which enable them to start their own enterprises, generate income from them, and contribute to the economy (Abdullahi et al., 2021). Therefore, we put up the following theory:

H-8: There is a link between women’s entrepreneurship and poverty decrease.

Women’s Empowerment and Poverty Reduction

In poverty reduction, empowerment boosts the resources and skills that enable the poor to manage, negotiate, authority, and hold responsible the institutions that serve them (Narayan, 2002). In contrast to conventional anti-poverty initiatives, an empowering approach acknowledges the disadvantaged as essential development partners (Narayan-Parker, 2005) and lessens injustice through improved distribution of material assets and skills. According to the information that is currently available, vocational education and monetary services are not traditional, and gender-based layout may have more positive economic effects for women (Buvinić & O’Donnell, 2019). According to the empowerment principle, reducing poverty and empowering women are strongly related. Empowerment may alleviate economic and consumption poverty, according to an increasing amount of research (Alsop et al., 2006). In a low-income household, supporting women may empower the whole family. (Gu & Nie, 2021) Demonstrates the beneficial contributions made by empowered women, who raise their standard of living and household income while lowering poverty. Therefore, we put up the following theory (Figure 1).

H-9: The reduction of poverty is positively impacted by women’s empowerment.

Figure 1.

Hypothetical model.

Methods

In this study, we used a cross-sectional descriptive design. The study survey was performed in Sindh Province of Pakistan. This province is the second largest, populated, literate, and economically productive area compared to other provinces. The research was randomly conducted among microfinance banks and women entrepreneurs in the urban area.

Sampling

This study’s population consisted of women who were entrepreneurs in urban areas in the Sindh province of Pakistan. Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS 2023) reports, that Pakistan’s overall population in 2023 is (241,499,431), whereas Sindh province’s total population reached 23.06% (55,696,147), with a total female population of 11.04% (26,677,501). These females are classified into two categories: urban and rural 5.131% (12,393,405) and urban 5.914% (14,284,096). Besides, the list of women entrepreneurs is not registered in the Sindh province of Pakistan. Hence we used non-probability sampling techniques of convenience sampling, a sample of 221 women from various cities in Sindh, Pakistan, was drawn. Furthermore, a sample size of at least 200 observations is needed to get reliable fit measures with structural equation modeling (Tennessen et al., 2012; Wu & Zumbo, 2008). The sample size of the current study is suitable for structure equation modeling, as suggested by the authors. The characteristic of the respondents is shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Respondent’s Characteristic.

Characteristics	Frequency (N = 220)	Percentage (100%)
Age (years)
20–29	65	29.5
30–39	103	46.8
40–50	43	19.5
50 and above	10	4.5
Education
Matric or Intermediate	33	15.0
Bachelor	107	48.6
Master	74	33.6
Ph.D	7	3.1
Marital status
Single	56	25.4
Married	153	69.5
Widow	12	5.4
Credit information (source loan)
Bank	120	54.5
Credit institution	71	32.2
NGO	20	9.0
None	10	4.5
Source preference (loan)
Low-interest rate	146	66.3
Less formalities	65	29.5
None	10	4.5

Data Collection

Data were collected by using a survey questionnaire in person. The questionnaires were adopted from the previous studies. In most cases, respondents are asked to fill out and return questionnaires that are delivered in person. The total number of questionnaires delivered was 300 of which 225 were returned. A total of 221 questionnaires were examined while others questionnaires were eliminated owing to incomplete questionnaires. The questionnaire was based on the seven Likert skills (LS) strongly disagree (SD) to strongly agree (SA). The data collecting time took 4 months from July 2023 to October 2023.

Description of the Research Questionnaire

The present study was based on a survey questionnaire. The survey questionnaire was adopted from the previous authors. Microfinance: Microfinance is an independent variable, evaluated through the seven-item questionnaire adopted from a past study (Atahau et al., 2020; Yae, 2019). Political Factor: Government support is an independent variable, evaluated through a six-item questionnaire adopted from a past study by (Zeb et al., 2019). Motivation: Motivation is evaluated through the five-item questionnaire adopted from a past study by (Zhouqiaoqin et al., 2013).Women Entrepreneurship: Women entrepreneurship is a dependent variable, evaluated through the nine-item questionnaire adapted from a past study by (R. U. Khan et al., 2021; S. N. Khan et al., 2022). Women’s empowerment was measured using five items (Atahau et al., 2020). Poverty reduction was measured using three items (Alkire & Foster, 2011).

Analysis

We used Mart-PLS-4 for structural equation modeling. Smart PLSM (Hair et al., 2021) software evaluated the data and established the significance levels for loadings, weights, and path coefficients using a bootstrapping approach. The measurement model’s validity and reliability are evaluated first, per their recommendation, and then the structural relations stated within are evaluated (Hair et al., 2014).

Results

This survey exclusively comprises female respondents. Table 1 presents the demographic attributes of the participants. The majority of participants fell between the age ranges of 30 and 39 years old. Furthermore, the majority of the respondents had obtained a bachelor’s degree. The vast majority of respondents were married in terms of their marital status. In addition, the most favorable responses about loans and funding came from banks that prioritized customer happiness through cheap interest rates, rather than focusing solely on formalities.

Measurement Model

PLS-SEM analysis begins with measurement model evaluation. The goal is to assess how well the questions suit the hypothetical idea (Ab Hamid et al., 2017). We used the reflective measurement model to evaluate item reliability (indicator reliability), internal consistency (Cronbach alpha and composite reliability), latent variable reliability, construct validity (loading and cross-loading), convergent validity (average variance extracted), and discriminant validity (Fornell-Larcker criterion, cross-loading, HTMT criterion; Hair et al., 2014).

Construct Validity and Reliability

A study by (Hair et al., 2017) reports that the test’s construct validity results will help individuals grasp quality measurements. Before assessing model connections, measurement models must be valid and reliable. This research evaluates the model’s constructs for reliability and validity. Validity and reliability are assessed using outer loadings, AVE, discriminant validity, composite reliability, and Cronbach’s values. Cronbach alpha and composite reliability are the most used methods for assessing internal consistency (Ab Hamid et al., 2017). Table 2 reveals that no measurement items were deleted because their outer loading values exceeded 0.70 in the present study. The study results show all the parameters are valid. Such as (Hair et al., 2017) report that the Convergent validity exists when the CR, AVE, and outer loadings exceed 0.50, 0.70, and 0.60, respectively. Convergent validity assesses the consistency of concept indicators. When AVE, CR, and outer loadings are 0 to 1, it is established. Convergent validity requires an AVE value greater than 0.50 (Hair et al., 2017). All of the CR, AVE, and Outer Loadings values are within acceptable parameters in this study.

Table 2.

Constrict Reliability and Validity.

Items	F. Loading	Reliability (rho_c)	Alpha	T statistics	EVE	VIF
Green microfinance		.872	.904		.612
GMF1	.764			19.477		1.675
GMF2	.757			17.509		1.745
GMF3	.706			15.488		1.636
GMF4	.823			23.212		2.252
GMF5	.781			18.005		2.286
GMF6	.853			30.997		2.919
Motivation		.846	.890		.619
MOT1	.822			20.378		2.808
MOT2	.759			21.320		2.446
MOT3	.722			14.044		1.540
MOT4	.810			24.593		2.159
MOT5	.817			23.451		2.053
Political factors		.870	.903		.609
PF1	.706			15.842		1.576
PF2	.818			27.335		2.129
PF3	.837			31.985		2.383
PF4	.804			22.759		2.067
PF5	.775			20.439		1.856
PF6	.732			14.243		1.634
Poverty reduction		.884	.928		.812
PR1	.907			65.413		2.690
PR2	.888			44.204		2.237
PR3	.907			48.636		2.711
Women entrepreneurship		.925	.939		.657
WE1	.806			26.638		2.667
WE2	.835			27.357		2.692
WE3	.802			24.009		2.633
WE4	.765			20.655		2.255
WE5	.787			24.484		2.312
WE6	.823			32.468		2.975
WE7	.831			31.969		3.041
WE8	.835			34.493		2.882
Women empowerment		.845	.891		.622
WEMP1	.829			26.779		2.179
WEMP2	.855			29.488		2.784
WEMP3	.825			30.345		2.292
WEMP4	.696			10.796		1.401
WEMP5	.724			16.483		1.479

Discriminant Validity – Fornell-Larcker Criterion

The (Fornell & Larcker, 1981) criteria are often used to quantify the model’s latent variables’ shared variance. This criterion may be used to evaluate the measurement model’s convergent validity using AVE and CR. Discriminant validity is measured using Fornell-Larcker and cross-loading. Table 3 shows that off-diagonal values for each construct are less than the square roots of AVE values, meeting the Fornell-Larcker criterion.

Table 3.

Discriminant Validity (Fornell-Larcker Criterion).

Items	GMF	MOT	PF	PR	WE	WEMP
GMF	0.782
MOT	0.656	0.787
PF	0.502	0.532	0.780
PR	0.581	0.690	0.569	0.901
WE	0.647	0.648	0.601	0.703	0.811
WEMP	0.643	0.721	0.602	0.669	0.722	0.788

Note. GMF = green microfinance; PF = political factors; MOT = motivation; WE = women entrepreneurship; WEMP = women empowerment; PR = poverty reduction.

Discriminant Validity – Heterotrait-Monotrait Ratio (HTMT)

HTMT correlation ratio measures discriminant validity. The structural model’s discriminant validity ensures that each construct evaluates a separate topic. Authors (Gold et al., 2001) explain the HTMT value should be less than 0.90 to establish discriminant validity. If the HTMT value is more than 0.90, it is argued that discriminant validity is lacking. Table 4 shows the HTMT ratio for all structures is less than 0.90 which funding shows the discriminant validity is valid.

Table 4.

Discriminant Validity Heterotrait-Monotrait Ratio (HTMT).

Items	GMF	MOT	PF	PR	WE
GMF
MOT	0.763
PF	0.577	0.618
PR	0.658	0.795	0.647
WE	0.716	0.730	0.670	0.776
WEMP	0.743	0.851	0.697	0.772	0.814

Coefficient of Determination (R2)

Table 5 displays the overall effect size and variability caused by independent variables, as well as the model’s prediction accuracy as measured by R2. PR R2 is 0.557, showing that the PR accounts for 57% of the variation. Also, WE R2 is 0.563, indicating that 56% of women are entrepreneurs, and WEMP R2 is 0.614, indicating that 61% can be increased with the GMF, PF, and MOT programs. It demonstrates that green microfinance, political issues, and motivation are the most important aspects in promoting women’s business and empowerment, as well as alleviating poverty in Sindh Province Pakistan.

Table 5.

Coefficient of Determination (R2).

Coefficient of Determination	R-square	R-square adjusted
PR	.557	.551
WE	.563	.557
WEMP	.614	.609

Structural Relationships and Hypothesis Testing

Table 6 presents research in which all hypotheses are supported. The study found that GMF had a favorable impact on PR (β = .130, t = 2.111, p-value .035), supporting hypothesis H1. H2 GMF -> WE (β = .312, t = 4.939, p-value .000) is significant, while H3 GMF -> WEMP (β = .230, t = 4.429, p-value > .000) is also supported. We evaluated hypothesis 4 that motivation affects women’s entrepreneurship and found that MOT -> WE had a significant positive impact (β = .288, t = 3.968, and p-value > .000). Our hypothesis (H5) suggests that motivation improves women’s empowerment (β = .434, t = 6.409, p-value > .000). Furthermore, H6 and H7 investigated if political factors had a favorable impact on women’s entrepreneurship and empowerment. The study found a positive link (β = .292, t = 6.258, and p-value > .000) between political factors and WE, as well as a positive relationship (β = .256, t = 5.243, and p-value > .000) between WE and WEMP. Alongside that in our study we H8 and H9 that women entrepreneurship and women empowerment can elevate poverty. The result show positively significant WE -> PR, (β = .409, t = 4.885, and p-value > .000) and WEMP -> PR, (β = .291, t = 3.223, and p-value > .001). Therefore, all of the hypotheses are accepted. The outcomes are shown in Table 5. Microfinance, Political factors, and motivation were found to have significant, highly positive, and direct effects on women’s entrepreneurship and empowerment. Similarly, women’s entrepreneurship and empowerment positively influenced elevated poverty.

Table 6.

Hypothesis Description (Boat Trapping).

Direct effect		Path coefficient	T statistics	p Values	Conclusion
H1.	GMF -> PR	0.130	2.111	.035	Supported
H2.	GMF -> WE	0.312	4.939	.000	Supported
H3.	GMF -> WEMP	0.230	4.429	.000	Supported
H4.	MOT -> WE	0.288	3.968	.000	Supported
H5.	MOT -> WEMP	0.434	6.409	.000	Supported
H6.	PF -> WE	0.292	6.258	.000	Supported
H7.	PF -> WEMP	0.256	5.243	.000	Supported
H8.	WE -> PR	0.409	4.885	.000	Supported
H9.	WEMP -> PR	0.291	3.223	.001	Supported
Indirect effect
GMF -> WEMP -> PR		0.067	2.623	.009	Supported
MOT-> WEMP -> PR		0.126	2.607	.009	Supported
PF -> WEMP -> PR		0.074	2.876	.004	Supported
GMF -> WE -> PR		0.128	3.722	.000	Supported
MOT -> WE -> PR		0.118	2.732	.006	Supported
PF -> WE -> PR		0.119	3.423	.001	Supported
Total effect
GMF -> PR		0.324	5.469	.000	Supported
GMF -> WE		0.312	4.939	.000	Supported
GMF -> WEMP		0.230	4.429	.000	Supported
MOT -> PR		0.244	4.481	.000	Supported
MOT -> WE		0.288	3.968	.000	Supported
MOT -> WEMP		0.434	6.409	.000	Supported
PF -> PR		0.194	5.894	.000	Supported
PF -> WE		0.292	6.258	.000	Supported
PF -> WEMP		0.256	5.243	.000	Supported
WE -> PR		0.409	4.885	.000	Supported
WEMP -> PR		0.291	3.223	.001	Supported

Figure 2 depicts the pattern of interactions. It demonstrates that when women entrepreneurs and women’s empowerment have substantial support from the GMF, MOT, and PF, their chances of success increase, hence elevating poverty. Women who are strongly motivated to become entrepreneurs are more likely to seek microfinance loans to start and grow their businesses.

Figure 2.

Structure equation model (boat trapping).

Discussion

The majority of poor women in the global South receive services from microfinance institutions, and the majority of quantitative assessments of these initiatives show that women’s economic, social, and political empowerment is a direct result of having access to credit (Dowla, 2006; Ito, 2003; Padia, 2005; Rajivan, 2005). The current study examined the influence of microfinance, motivation, and political factors on women’s entrepreneurship and empowerment, and their potential to alleviate poverty in Sindh, Pakistan. The research established a correlation between microfinance and the promotion of women’s entrepreneurship (Thaher et al., 2021). Women’s entrepreneurship addresses women’s standing and entrepreneurship in society. Microfinance has a notable influence on domestic economic growth, namely on the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Furthermore, there exists a large correlation between growth and microfinance (Sultan & Masih, 2016). Besides, microfinance variables have a favorable effect on female entrepreneurs (Ekpe et al., 2010). Microfinance provides financial services to individuals who are financially disadvantaged and unable to access traditional banking services such as bank accounts, personal loans, or bank loans. Women have greater opportunities to develop firms when they have access to loans. However, the primary challenge in Pakistan when it comes to starting a business is the lack of financial resources. Women have the ability to initiate entrepreneurial ventures through the utilization of microfinance. It enhances their self-confidence, status, and authority, hence fostering gender parity (Loomba, 2014).

Besides, Political considerations affect women’s entrepreneurship. Government assistance for women’s entrepreneurship boosts the economy (H. Y. Ali et al., 2019). The majority of Pakistan’s rural areas are home to a feudal system that devalues women and denies them the rights guaranteed by the law and the global teachings of Islam (Baig et al., 2018). Women in Sindh generally have a difficult time using their constitutionally guaranteed rights to exercise political influence. The state’s governmental entities must solve this for Sindhi women to participate fully in politics (Memon & Idris, 2018). While women are involved in the Sindh political cabinet thus they may raise their voices for women’s rights likely equal opportunity in all things. Furthermore, Women can become economically independent cheers of government incentives and families’ shift away from traditional families (Adetiloye et al., 2020). Research shows that women are entrepreneurial talent and development tools (Solesvik et al., 2019). Respondents perceive that the government assists women entrepreneurs. The Pakistani government provides financial and emotional support to encourage women entrepreneurs. Government aid plays a beneficial role in fostering entrepreneurship and promoting economic progress (Acs et al., 2004; Gohar & Abrar, 2016; Hernández, 2010; Kumar & Liu, 2005).

Also, motivation (MOT) profoundly affected women’s entrepreneurship. Authors (Chaudhary & Sharma, 2012) state that motivation is an internal factor that energizes employees to act in a certain way. Also, there is a significant and positive correlation between entrepreneurial motivation and the choice to become an entrepreneur (Collins et al., 2004). An ambitious lady strategically pursues her goals with optimal efficiency (Owusu, 2012). Individuals can be intrinsically motivated if they show determination when faced with difficulties and problems, and they will spend more time and attention on completing tasks. Motivation improves professional skills. Motivated people use supervisor feedback to improve. Women’s motivation affects how hard people strive to improve, which helps businesses succeed. This shows that highly motivated people work better. The present study’s findings are consistent with a previous study conducted (A. Y. S. Ali & Mahamud, 2013). Their study found that motivated women start and expand enterprises. Motivating women boosts their performance, which boosts productivity and corporate success. Motivation positively affects women’s entrepreneurship in Pakistan.

Furthermore, in Pakistan, the promotion of women’s entrepreneurship and empowerment aims to alleviate the burden of poverty. The poor situation of women’s financial insertion is caused by several things, including a lack of financial education, entry barriers to formal financial institutions, socio-social obstacles, awareness of finance mobilization, and restricted loan availability, particularly in Sindh’s rural areas (Shakoor et al., 2021). Pakistani women also desire equitable possibilities to elevate their societal standing, develop their enterprises, and make financial contributions (S. N. Khan et al., 2019; Razzaq et al., 2019). When women initiate a company start-up, they generate an increasing number of job prospects for other women, thus paving the way for them to sustain their families, enhance their social standing, and eliminate poverty (Shaheen et al., 2018). Multiple studies indicate that empowerment has the potential to decrease both income and consumption poverty (Alsop et al., 2006). Poverty reduction and employment creation are the key objectives of the country’s development goals, as stated in (Al-Shami et al., 2013). Empirical evidence from a study suggests that women who are empowered make a good impact by augmenting their household income and standard of living, while simultaneously alleviating poverty (Gu & Nie, 2021).

Conclusion

This research examined microfinance, political variables, and motivation to enhance women entrepreneurs and empowerment to alleviate poverty in Sindh Pakistan. The study’s findings supported all hypotheses. Microfinance, political issues, and motivation favorably affect women’s entrepreneurship and empowerment and elevate poverty. Entrepreneurial women with stronger motivation can be more successful. Motivated women’s work can be better to enhance women’s business and economic success to elevate poverty. This shows that microfinance variables are interconnected and must be examined. Microfinance, political factors, and motivation affect women’s entrepreneurship and empowerment is rising rapidly to decrease the ratio of poverty through women’s empowerment. Women’s entrepreneurship addresses entrepreneurship and women’s status in society thus it could be fruitful to cut the poverty. This study applies entrepreneurship’s desire for accomplishment theory to microfinance, political considerations, motivation, and women’s entrepreneurship. Motivation improves microfinance’s effect on women’s entrepreneurship and empowerment, while the WE and WEMP play a beneficial role in economic growth to cut poverty. Furthermore, the study revealed family income and standard of life increased to alleviate the poverty ratio in Sindh province of Pakistan. Sindh government should support women’s entrepreneurship and empowerment to enhance economic growth to minimize the poverty ratio through microfinance, political factors, and motivation which could enhance the business system and economic growth system to cut the poverty in Sindh Pakistan. Furthermore, future studies promoting the culture of women entrepreneurship and comparing between rural and urban regions may be fruitful for organizations, states, and nations.

Implications

First, microfinance’s ability to empower women entrepreneurs can boost economic development; women are vital to local economies, and when they succeed, it helps the national economy, reduces poverty, and maybe even makes communities more resilient. This is just one of many implications for political factors, motivations, and the impact of microfinance on women entrepreneurs and their ability to lift themselves out of poverty. Secondly, advancing gender equality requires a strong emphasis on women’s empowerment and entrepreneurship. Empowering women and ensuring equitable chances in entrepreneurship can create larger societal transformation, as highlighted by the United Nations sustainable development goals (SDGs). Thirdly, women’s empowerment and entrepreneurship can also bring about social transformation. Worldwide, a culture of inclusivity and empowerment is being promoted when more and more women become entrepreneurs and achieve financial independence. This is because women who do so question traditional gender conventions and social roles, which in turn may cause societal attitudes toward women’s talents and rights to evolve. The fourth consideration is the backing of political figures the importance of laws and governance that promote women entrepreneurs is highlighted by how political considerations intersect with this endeavor. When women have greater economic independence, they are more likely to participate in cabinet-level political processes, fight for equal rights, and shape policy on a regional, national, and international level. Fifth, since women make up half of the population, their success as entrepreneurs can boost microfinance sectors. When more women take part in the economy and prove they can repay loans, financial institutions may be more inclined to invest in companies run by women, which is good for the economy as a whole. Furthermore, empowering women may encourage them to invest in education for themselves and their families, thus generating a cycle of empowerment that will benefit future generations in terms of literacy, skill development, economic engagement, and poverty alleviation. Lastly, governments worldwide can benefit from studying how microfinance, political considerations, and motivation affect women entrepreneurs and poverty. Creating a framework that fosters women’s entrepreneurship and empowerment requires focused tactics that consider these characteristics. The global impact of microfinance, political issues, and motivation on women entrepreneurs and their empowerment shows how economic growth, social equality, and sustainable development are linked. Supporting women entrepreneurs may change societies as a whole.

Limitations

The research has some limitations as it examines the impact of microfinance political variables and incentives on women entrepreneurs and their empowerment to alleviate poverty. First, the study was conducted in the Sindh province of Pakistan, which makes it possible to apply them to other areas of Pakistan or regions with differing socioeconomic conditions. Second, data collection methods such as qualitative interviews may add new themes to get results. Third, changes in local or international political climates, as well as modifications in microfinance legislation, may have an impact on women entrepreneurs and poverty reduction efforts. Fourth, macroeconomic factor analysis may fail to account for larger economic variables such as inflation or market fluctuations, which may impact women’s entrepreneurial success regardless of microfinance or political setting. Fifth, male-dominated customs and community support systems may not be adequately investigated, limiting our understanding of how they affect women’s empowerment. Six, political instability and banking policy changes may not adequately explain how these events impact women’s entrepreneurship. Last but not least, the absence of longitudinal research can maximize the value of our understanding of the long-term effects of microfinance and political issues on women’s empowerment, which can be considered major changes with time.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the enormous support offered by the National Natural Science Foundation of China; and Jiangsu Outstanding Postdoctoral Program; and thank them for their participation and the reviewers for their suggestions.

ORCID iD

Saifullah

Ethical Considerations

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Research Ethics Committee School of Management Jiangsu University China.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was obtained from all study participants.

Author Contributions

Each Author has a significant contribution to this study. The (S) developed the research concept, and wrote the initial draft; (ZM) Funding Sourced and revised paper; (ML) revised and funding sourced; (MQM) collected data and analyzed data; Finally, all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study is financed by the Jiangsu Outstanding Postdoctoral Program (2022ZB642) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China grant number (71974082).

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data for the study is available and will be supplied upon request.

References

Ab Hamid

Sami

Sidek

M. M

. (2017). Discriminant validity assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 890, Article 012163.

Abdullahi

Othman

A. H. A.

Kassim

(2021). Financial inclusion enhancement through the adoption of Islamic microfinance in Nigeria. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 37(3), 486–505.

Acs

Z. J.

Audretsch

D. B.

Braunerhjelm

Carlsson

(2004). The missing link: The knowledge filter and entrepreneurship in endogenous growth. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=667944

Adetiloye

K. A.

Adegboye

F. B.

Akinjare

V. A.

(2020). Sustainable financial access for female entrepreneurs in the micro, small and medium enterprises sector in Nigeria. Cogent Social Sciences, 6(1), Article 1823600.

Agarwal

Lenka

(2018). Why research is needed in women entrepreneurship in India: A viewpoint. International Journal of Social Economics, 45(7), 1042–1057.

Ali

A. Y. S.

Mahamud

H. A.

(2013). Motivational factors and performance of women entrepreneurs in Somalia. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(17), 47–53.

Ali

H. Y.

Khan

M. K.

Asrar-ul-Haq

(2019). Factors affecting the performance of women entrepreneurs in SMEs: A case study of Punjab, Pakistan. Journal for International Business and Entrepreneurship Development, 12(1), 67–82.

Alkire

Foster

(2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 476–487.

Al-Shami

S. A.

Heino

Che Salmah

Abu Hassan

Suhaila

Madrus

M. R.

(2013). Drivers of beta diversity of macroinvertebrate communities in tropical forest streams. Freshwater Biology, 58(6), 1126–1137.

10.

Alsop

Bertelsen

M. F.

Holland

(2006). Empowerment in practice: From analysis to implementation. World Bank Publications.

11.

Anwar

M. U.

Rashid

A. G.

(2012). Female entrepreneurs–a review of the literature and proposed conceptual framework [Conference session]. Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Business Management. https://prettymonstersite.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/journal1-1.pdf

12.

Atahau

A. D. R.

Huruta

A. D.

Lee

C.-W.

(2020). Rural microfinance sustainability: Does local wisdom driven-governance work? Journal of Cleaner Production, 267, Article 122153.

13.

Baig

I. A.

Batool

Ali

Baig

S. A.

Hashim

Zia-ur-Rehman

(2018). Impact of women empowerment on rural development in Southern Punjab, Pakistan. Quality & Quantity, 52, 1861–1872.

14.

Buvinić

O’Donnell

(2019). Gender matters in economic empowerment interventions: A research review. The World Bank Research Observer, 34(2), 309–346.

15.

Chaudhary

Sharma

(2012). Impact of employee motivation on performance (productivity) in private organization. International Journal of Business Trends and Technology, 2(4), 29–35.

16.

Collins

C. J.

Hanges

P. J.

Locke

E. A.

(2004). The relationship of achievement motivation to entrepreneurial behavior: A meta-analysis. Human Performance, 17(1), 95–117.

17.

Dowla

(2006). In credit we trust: Building social capital by Grameen Bank in Bangladesh. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(1), 102–122.

18.

Dutta

Banerjee

(2018). Does microfinance impede sustainable entrepreneurial initiatives among women borrowers? Evidence from rural Bangladesh. Journal of Rural Studies, 60, 70–81.

19.

Ekpe

Mat

N. B.

Razak

R. C.

(2010). The effect of microfinance factors on women entrepreneurs’ performance in Nigeria: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 1(2), 255–263.

20.

Faridi

M. Z.

Nawaz

Bibi

(2022). Islamic microfinance and women entrepreneurial success: Mediating role of human capital. Journal of Accounting and Finance in Emerging Economies, 8(1), 1–12.

21.

Fornell

Larcker

D. F.

(1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Sage.

22.

Galindo-Martín

M.-A.

Castaño-Martínez

M.-S.

Méndez-Picazo

M.-T.

(2023). Fear of failure, entrepreneurial passion and entrepreneurial motivation. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 19(4), 1835–1853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-023-00908-8

23.

Stanley

L. J.

Eddleston

Kellermanns

F. W.

(2017). Institutional deterioration and entrepreneurial investment: The role of political connections. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(4), 405–419.

24.

Gohar

Abrar

(2016). Embedded or constrained informal institutional influences on women entrepreneurship development in Pukhtoon culture. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2), 80–90.

25.

Goheer

Penksa

(2011). Scoping study for gender-intelligent economic growth work of USAID, Pakistan. https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pnadq827.pdf

26.

Gold

A. H.

Malhotra

Segars

A. H.

(2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185–214.

27.

Nie

F.-y.

(2021). Does empowering women benefit poverty reduction? Evidence from a multi-component program in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 20(4), 1092–1106.

28.

Hair

J. F.

Jr. Hult

G. T. M.

Ringle

C. M.

Sarstedt

Danks

N. P.

Ray

(2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer Nature.

29.

Hair

J. F.

Hult

G. T. M.

Ringle

C. M.

Sarstedt

Thiele

K. O.

(2017). Mirror, mirror on the wall: A comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45, 616–632.

30.

Hair

J. F.

Jr. Sarstedt

Hopkins

L. G.

Kuppelwieser

(2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121.

31.

Hamed

A. B.

(1995). The personal networks of small firm entrepreneurs in Malaysia: An exploratory study. University of Glasgow.

32.

Hameed

W. U.

Haseeb

Iqbal

Mihardjo

L. W.

Jermsittiparsert

(2022). Environmental disaster and women self-sustainability—A survey study on microfinance female clientele in Pakistan. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 27(3), 3599–3622.

33.

Hendratmi

Sukmaningrum

P. S.

(2018). Role of government support and incubator organization to success behaviour of woman entrepreneur: Indonesia Women Entrepreneur Association. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 17, 105–115.

34.

Hernández

J. G. V.

(2010). The role of government in enhancing entrepreneurship of small and medium enterprises for economic growth. Revista Da Micro E Pequena Empresa, 4(3), 40–52.

35.

Ito

(2003). Microfinance and social capital: Does social capital help create good practice? Development in Practice, 13(4), 322–332.

36.

Jehan

Iqbal

Sadiqa

B. A.

Urooge

(2020). Microfinance and women empowerment: A case study of Khushali Bank microfinance Pakistan. Ilkogretim Online-Elementary Education Online, 19(3), 3458–3468.

37.

Johnson

B. R.

(1990). Toward a multidimensional model of entrepreneurship: The case of achievement motivation and the entrepreneur. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14(3), 39–54.

38.

Kara

Dheer

R. J. S.

(2023). The relationship between culture and entrepreneurship: The role of trust. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 19(4), 1803–1833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-023-00901-1

39.

Khalil

Asad

Khan

(2018). Management motives behind the revaluation of fixed assets for sustainability of entrepreneurial companies. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 22, 1–9.

40.

Khan

Jawed

Qidwai

(2021). Women and protest politics in Pakistan. Gender & Development, 29(2–3), 391–410.

41.

Khan

R. U.

Salamzadeh

Shah

S. Z. A.

Hussain

(2021). Factors affecting women entrepreneurs’ success: A study of small-and medium-sized enterprises in emerging market of Pakistan. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 10(1), 1–21.

42.

Khan

S. N.

Anjum

Baig

F. J.

Afzal

C. M.

Asghar

R. N.

(2022). Role of microfinance on women entrepreneurship leads to decrease in poverty: Evidence from the rural area of South Punjab. Competitive Social Science Research Journal, 3(1), 147–160.

43.

Khan

S. N.

Hussain

R. I.

Maqbool

M. Q.

Ali

E. I. E.

Numan

(2019). The mediating role of innovation between corporate governance and organizational performance: Moderating role of innovative culture in Pakistan textile sector. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), Article 1631018.

44.

Kibet

K. D.

Achesa

Omwono

(2015). Effects of microfinance credit on the performance of small and medium enterprises in Uasin Gishu County, Kenya. International Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship Research, 3(7), 57–78.

45.

Kumar

Liu

(2005). Impact of globalisation on entrepreneurial enterprises in the world markets. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 2(1), 46–64.

46.

Loomba

(2014). Role of microfinance in women empowerment in India. Mudakappa Gundappa.

47.

Memon

F. A.

Idris

(2018). Women empowerment and its role in Pakistan politics (A case study of Sindh). Government: Research Journal of Political Science, 7(7), 121.

48.

Moser

Barbosa

Gonzalez

(2016). Green microfinance: A new frontier to inclusive financial services. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 56, 242–250.

49.

Narayan

(2002). Bonds and bridges: Social capital and poverty. In Francois

(Ed.), Social capital and economic development (pp. 58–81). Edward Elgar Publishing.

50.

Narayan-Parker

(2005). Measuring empowerment: Cross-disciplinary perspectives. World Bank Publications.

51.

Nawaz

Sheikh

M. R.

Shahid

M. S.

(2021). Relationship between microfinance and sustainable women entrepreneurial performance: The mediating role of social capital. NUML International Journal of Business & Management, 16(1), 70–88.

52.

Owusu

(2012). Effects of motivation on employee performance: A case study of Ghana commercial bank, Kumasi zone [Unpublished MBA thesis, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science, Kumasi, Ghana].

53.

Padia

(2005). Social mobilization and micro-credit for women’s empowerment: A study of the Dhan Foundation. In Burra

Deshmukh-Ranadive

Murthy

R. K.

(Eds.), Micro-credit, poverty and empowerment: Linking the triad (pp. 161–199). Sage.

54.

Pakistan Bureau of Statisti (PBS ). (2023). Population census, 7th population and housing census - detailed results. https://www.pbs.gov.pk/sites/default/files/population/2023/tables/table_1_sindh_province.pdf

55.

Raheem

(2013). Factors affecting women entrepreneurs business performance in Pakistan. Journal of Managerial Sciences, 11(4), 11–23.

56.

Raiysat

Younas

(2019). Role of microfinance banks in provision of credit for poverty reduction in Pakistan. In Yasser

Q. R.

(Ed.), Handbook of research on rural sociology and community mobilization for sustainable growth (pp. 132–145). IGI Global.

57.

Rajivan

(2005). Micro-credit and women’s empowerment: A case study of SHARE Micro-Finance Limited. In Burra

Deshmukh-Ranadive

Murthy

R. K.

(Eds.), Microcredit, poverty and empowerment: Linking the triad (pp. 116–160). Sage.

58.

Razzaq

Maqbool

Hameed

W. U.

(2019). Factors effecting the elasticity of micro credit demand in southern Punjab, Pakistan. International Journal of Social Sciences and Economic Review, 1(2), 46–53.

59.

Roomi

M. A.

Harrison

(2010). Behind the veil: Women-only entrepreneurship training in Pakistan. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 2(2), 150–172.

60.

Roomi

M. A.

Parrott

(2008). Barriers to development and progression of women entrepreneurs in Pakistan. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 17(1), 59–72.

61.

Sajjad

Khan

Z. A.

Ullah

Hussain

Ullah

Lee

M. Y.

Baik

S. W.

(2020). A novel CNN-GRU-based hybrid approach for short-term residential load forecasting. IEEE Access, 8, 143759–143768.

62.

Shah

Arif

(2021). The impact of microcredit on poverty alleviation: A study of Shaheed Benazirabad District, Pakistan. International Journal of Business Reflections, 2(1), 100–119.

63.

Shaheen

Hussain

Mujtaba

(2018). Role of microfinance in economic empowerment of women in Lahore, Pakistan: A study of Akhuwat supported women clients. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 8(2), 337–343.

64.

Shakoor

Asad

Hassan

(2021). Women empowerment through financial independence (a case study of rural areas of Sindh). Pakistan Journal of Applied Social Sciences, 12(2), 1–12.

65.

Sharma

J. R.

(2008). Practices of male labor migration from the hills of Nepal to India in development discourses: Which pathology? Gender, Technology and Development, 12(3), 303–323.

66.

Shirazi

N. S.

Khan

A. U.

(2009). Role of Pakistan poverty alleviation fund’s micro credit in poverty alleviation: A case of Pakistan. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 47(2), 215–228.

67.

Solesvik

Iakovleva

Trifilova

(2019). Motivation of female entrepreneurs: A cross-national study. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 26(5), 684–705.

68.

Sultan

Masih

(2016). Does microfinance affect economic growth? Evidence from Bangladesh based on ARDL approach (MPRA Paper 72123). University Library of Munich, Germany.

69.

Tasos

Amjad

M. I.

Awan

M. S.

Waqas

(2020). Poverty alleviation and microfinance for the economy of Pakistan: A case study of Khushhali Bank in Sargodha. Economies, 8(3), Article 63.

70.

Tende

(2014). Government initiatives toward entrepreneurship development in Nigeria. Global Journal of Business Research, 8(1), 109–120.

71.

Tennessen

J. A.

Bigham

A. W.

O’connor

T. D.

Kenny

E. E.

Gravel

McGee

Liu

Jun

Kang

H. M.

Jordan

Leal

S. M.

Gabriel

Rieder

M. J.

Abecasis

Altshuler

Nickerson

D. A.

Boerwinkle

, …on behalf of the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project. (2012). Evolution and functional impact of rare coding variation from deep sequencing of human exomes. Science, 337(6090), 64–69.

72.

Thaher

L. M.

Radieah

N. M.

Wan Norhaniza

W. H.

(2021). Factors affecting women micro and small-sized enterprises’ success: A case study in Jordan. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(5), 727–739.

73.

Umar

Ali

S. A.

Sial

M. H.

(2022). Exploring women entrepreneurship prospects, challenges, and barriers in Pakistan. International Journal of E-Entrepreneurship and Innovation (IJEEI), 12(1), 1–17.

74.

A. D.

Zumbo

B. D.

(2008). Understanding and using mediators and moderators. Social Indicators Research, 87, 367–392.

75.

Yae

(2019). Effect of microfinance loans on borrowerrs of Zin Min Htin Company. Meral Portal.

76.

Yousfani

Aslam

Mahar

Kazi

(2019). The impact of microfinance on growth of women entrepreneurship in Pakistan. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Business and Economics, 7(1), 133–152.

77.

Guo

Lettic

Barnes

S. J.

(2019). Regional anti-corruption effort, political connections and firm innovation effort: Evidence from China. Bulletin of Economic Research, 71(1), 18–32.

78.

Yusuf

(1995). Critical success factors for small business: Perceptions of South Pacific entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business Management, 33(2), 68.

79.

Zeb

Jan

Ihsan

Shah

F. A.

(2019). Political factors and women’s entrepreneurial performance. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS), 13(1), 165–179.

80.

Zeb

Sethi

Raza

Khan

M. K. U.

Khan

M. J.

(2022). Women behind the veil: The mediating role of empowerment on the relationship between social system and performance of rural women in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Indian Journal of Economics and Business, 21(3), 71–91.

81.

Zhang

Lai

(2014, June 14–15). Analysis on influencing factors of entrepreneurial environment of college students based on PEST model [Conference session]. 3rd International Conference on Science and Social Research (ICSSR 2014), Tianjin, China.

82.

Zhou

(2014). Regional institutional development, political connections, and entrepreneurial performance in China’s transition economy. Small Business Economics, 43(1), 161–181.

83.

Zhouqiaoqin

Kumah

(2013). Factors that influence the success of women entrepreneurs in China: A survey of women entrepreneurs in Beijing. Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 18(3), 83–91.

84.

Ziyae

Sadeghi

Shahamat Nejad

Tajpour

(2021). A framework of urban entrepreneurship for women breadwinners. Foresight, 23(5), 597–609.