Abstract
With literature serving as a means to convey cultural norms and values across generations, the relationship between culture and literature is intricate and expansive; therefore, translation plays a crucial role in broadening cultural understanding, especially in a globalized world. However, the translation process faces challenges in preserving cultural perspectives due to inherent cultural and linguistic disparities. This paper focuses on the challenges faced in translating Achebe’s Things Fall Apart into Chinese and emphasizes the need for a holistic framework—Eco-Translatology, which considers the ecological perspective, the translator’s selection and adaptation, and the textual environment, to address the challenges encountered in translation. By adopting a multi-dimensional perspective incorporating linguistic, communicative, cultural, esthetic, and rhetorical dimensions, the study explores practical ways to bridge cultural, linguistic, communicative, and esthetic gaps, offering fresh insights and perspectives for translators working on English-Chinese translations, providing a more comprehensive understanding of the translational challenges and proposing practical solutions in the translation of cultural elements.
Keywords
Introduction
The complex intertwining between culture and literature has been long and encompassing (Saroukhil et al., 2018). Thus, literature has been used as a tool to broaden the concept of culture further. Intrinsically. Literature is a medium to project and transfer norms and values, either orally or written, from one generation to another. A prevalent method through which literature serves this purpose is through translation (Sun, 2022).
In a globalized world, translation is a fundamental tool that serves many purposes. Translating informational, scientific, cultural, and literary texts helps create clear communication and cultural exchange, even when the languages and cultures are distinct (Köksal & Yürük, 2017). Translation entails a text’s reproduction, exchange, and transfer from the Source Language to the Target Language (Palumbo, 2009). Cultural translation is “a translation in which the content of the message is changed to conform to the receptor culture in some way, and/or in which information is introduced which is not linguistically implicit in the original” (Nida & Taber, 1974 p. 199). Evidently, the cultural translation of various literary texts has enabled readers of other nationalities, races, and ethnicities to understand other people’s cultural norms, values, and ways of life. For instance, translating Things Fall Apart’s literary text (abbreviated as TFA in this paper) into Mandarin allows Chinese readers to understand African culture’s norms, values, and richness.
However, significant challenges are still faced in projecting and preserving crucial cultural perspectives during translation due to inherent cultural and linguistic disparities. These existing cultural and linguistic differences cause problems in translation, so it becomes crucial that translators find cultural equivalents to convey the meaning to the target audience (Al-Adba, 2022). The concept of culture-specific items or phenomena “that is present in culture X but not present (in the same way) in culture Y” (Nord, 2018, p. 34). These culture-specific items with no equivalents available in the target language and culture often serve as impediments and hindrances to the translator in providing a powerful context for these kinds of cultural exchange that rapid globalization requires. Consequently, most translators adopt principles, methods, and strategies to overcome such challenging tasks, making their translational task simpler and more comprehensive to Target-text (TT) readers.
Achebe’s Things Fall Apart (1958) is an African novel about Okonkwo, the tragic hero and lead character facing his struggles and the impact of British colonialism on Igbo society. Through the narrative, Achebe describes the richness and complexities of Igbo culture and society, articulating an insider’s sense of the African experience. It is a seminal African novel celebrated for its portrayal of African life and traditions, one of the few books in West African school curricula and enjoying popularity around the world as it has been translated into different languages such as 这个世界土崩瓦解了 (Zhe ge Shijie Tou Beng Wajie le, abbreviated as ZSTBW in this paper) in Chinese.
Previous literature on Things Fall Apart has been explored and examined from various perspectives, such as literary (Altintas, 2015; Arbaoui, 2018; Dlnya, 2021; Rashid, 2018), linguistics (Abua Ebim, 2021; Livina Nkeiruka & Otagburuagu, 2022; Purnomosasi et al., 2021), and Translation (Arenberg, 2016; Ayoola, 2021; Babaii & Rashed, 2017; Mary, 2018; Mkhize, 2000; Moruwawon, 2012; Paziraie, 2012). The translation of Things Fall Apart into 61 languages has led researchers to explore and investigate the various translations of different languages, such as English, French, German, Yoruba, Swedish, Swahili, Xhosa, and other languages except for Chinese. Meanwhile, it is also noticeable that most previous literature primarily focused on using theories such as the Critical Discourse Analysis (Abua Ebim, 2021), Functional Approach (Purnomosasi et al., 2021), Foreignization and Polysystem (Arenberg, 2016), and Van Leeuwen model (Babaii & Rashed, 2017), within-to-within approach (Ayoola, 2021) to analyze challenges and problems in the translation of Things Fall Apart. However, those prior studies had shortcomings since their prognostics might be myopic and focus primarily on linguistic equivalence or communicative effectiveness.
The utilization of Eco-Translatology as a theoretical framework becomes crucial in addressing the need for a holistic approach that supports translational activities from an ecological perspective. Eco-Translatology, introduced by Hu Gengsheng in 2001, is widely employed in various texts (Amenador & Wang, 2022; Bo, 2014; Ganggui & Hongguo, 2022; W. Guo, 2021; C. Guo & Liu, 2022; Jun, 2020; Li et al., 2022; Ma, 2014; Qianting, 2020; X. Xu & Zhou, 2015; Yu, 2017; Zeng, 2019; Zhou & Zhang, 2019), interpreting the translation process by considering the text, its environment, and the translator’s selection and adaptation. With the increasing concern about climate change and its disastrous effect on contemporary human life and society, which was a result of industrialization, various scientists and ecologists from multiple fields of study, such as ecology, anthropology, and a host of others (Hu, 2020), have clamored for the need for Eco-environmental, Eco-protection, and Eco-friendliness. This Ecological movement has rapidly integrated into other disciplinary fields, such as social sciences and humanities, leading to new areas of study like Ecocriticism, Ecolinguistics, and Eco-Translatology.
Eco-Translatology is a new paradigm of translation that combines ecology and translation. It is a translation theory propounded by a Chinese scholar, Gengshen Hu to strike a new path in the field of translation. Eco-Translatology, as a field of translation, interprets translation activities from the ecological perspective. According to Hu (2020), Eco-Translatology is the “holistic study of investigating the interaction and interrelation between textual ecology, translation-community, ecology, and translation-environment ecology and cross-discipline aimed at a synthetic description of translation activities from an ecological perspective” (p. 15). Various scholars used Eco-Translatology as a framework for examining translation texts from different perspectives, such as feminism (Yu, 2017), Geotourism (Li et al., 2022), documentary (Yang, 2019; Zhou & Zhang, 2019), Literary texts (W. Guo, 2021; Junyang, 2022), Food (C. Guo & Liu, 2022; L. Xu & Huang, 2023) Chinese-English Translation of Public Signs (Amenador & Wang, 2022; Ganggui & Hongguo, 2022; Ma, 2014; Zeng, 2019), Animation (Qianting, 2020) Advertisement (Bo, 2014), and a host of others.
Eco-Translatology, embodying the philosophical concept of “harmony and balance,” has come up with many new ideas and research focuses of translation studies like translational eco-environment and the translator’s adaptation and selection to address various concerns in translation, such as translation process and strategies. The principle of multi-dimensional transformation and multi-dimensional selections is a theoretical perspective of Eco-Translatology classified into linguistics, communicative, and cultural dimensions (Hu, 2020). However, aside from the proposed well-known three dimensions, the addition of esthetics and rhetorical dimensions in this study add more to the existing dimensions and illustrate the textual transplant from the Source-Text (ST) ecology to the TT Eco-environment.
Since Eco-Translatology focuses on the coordination and maintenance of balance and harmony of the textual ecology, the translator, through selective adaptation and adaptive selection, is saddled with the responsibility of maintaining the ST ecological elements during transplanting through adaptive selection enhancing the survival in TT ecological environment. This implies that the translator is required to scrutinize and examine the language, the transmission and interpretation of cultural connotations of source and target languages, and the realization of bilingual/communicative intention. The linguistic adaptive transformation entails the transformation during the transplanting process at the various linguistic levels, such as the vocabulary, sentences, and syntactic structure. The cultural dimension involves the translator’s adaptation of the ST cultural elements while transplanting them into the TT ecology to ensure balance, harmony, and textual survival in the TT environment. The esthetic dimension entails the translator’s adaptation and selection of the ST environmental elements maintaining the beauty and style in the TT ecology to create an artistic effect on the TT readers. The rhetorical dimension refers to the translator’s adaptation and selection of the ST ecological elements, such as the style, tone, and impact of the ST elements in the TT ecology, considering the translator’s use of rhetorical strategies and techniques. On the other hand, the communicative dimension involves a translator ensuring the transformation of the author’s intention or purpose is transmitted and effectively communicated to the TT readers.
With literature serving as a means to convey cultural norms and values across generations, the relationship between culture and literature is intricate and expansive; therefore, translation plays a crucial role in broadening cultural understanding, especially in a globalized world. However, the translation process faces challenges in preserving cultural perspectives due to inherent cultural and linguistic disparities. Therefore, by utilizing the Eco-Translatology framework, which considers the ecological perspective, the translator’s selection and adaptation, and the textual environment, the aim of the study focuses on the challenges faced in translating Achebe’s Things Fall Apart into Chinese and to analyze how the translator successfully navigates through the linguistics, cultural, communicative and other barriers during the process of translation.
Research Methodology
This study did not utilize any numerical or quantitative data but adopted the interpretive approach of qualitative research, which is particularly suitable for attaining a profound and comprehensive understanding of the research objectives (Wang et al., 2019). Therefore, this study analyzes Gao’s Chinese translation of Things Fall Apart using the Multi-dimensional perspective of Eco-Translatology.
Data Collection
The source text is Achebe’s Things Fall Apart, written in 1954, one of the most well-known significant texts in the history of African literature. To gather data for the analysis, the researchers conducted a meticulous and in-depth close reading of Achebe’s Things Fall Apart and its translation Zhe ge Shijie Tou Beng Wajie le to identify instances of translation challenges and selective adaptations made by the translator during the process of rendering the work into Chinese. By focusing on specific linguistic, cultural, communicative, esthetic, and rhetorical dimensions, the researchers aimed to uncover the intricacies and complexities of the translation process.
Results and Discussion
In This Section, Numerous Instances of the Samples Collected Are
analyzed to highlight the translation challenges and selective adaptations made by the translator during the transplanting process into Chinese, focusing on linguistic, cultural, communicative, esthetic, and rhetorical dimensions.
Linguistics Dimension
The linguistic dimension involves the linguistic transformation of the ST lingual form into the TT environment during the transplanting process. The translator must be creative and skilled during the transplantation process, scrutinizing the language form at various levels and aspects to enhance quality transformation.
ZSTWB and TFA have different language forms and structures. The ZSTWB language form is paratactic, while TFA is hypotactic. The translator transforms the language form and structure to conform to the TL ecological system. Paratactic languages do not require conjunctions to create a meaningful relationship with other elements, as opposed to Hypotactic languages, which are concerned with the integrity of the sentence structure. During transplanting, the translator should creatively adjust the sentence structure and improve the language content to enhance vividness and clarity for TT readers.
Example 1
In Example 1 above, ZSTBW expresses the fierceness of the wrestling competition that makes everyone absorbed in watching it and not wanting to miss even a bit of it. The translator uses the idiom
Example 2
TFA: “Umuofia Kwenu,” he bellowed a fifth time, and the crowd yelled in answer. And then suddenly like one possessed he shot out his left hand and pointed in the direction of Mbaino and said through gleaming white teeth firmly clenched: “Those sons of wild animals have dared to murder a daughter of Umuofia.”
ZSTWB:
In ZSTWB, the translator used the Target language structure, which is paratactic. The adaptive selection of the paratactic structure makes the TT sentence stylish and meaningfully connected without using conjunctions, unlike TFA, which uses the conjunctions “and” in linking up with other sentence elements. This is clearly illustrated in ZSTBW and TFA where the TFA subject of the sentence “Darkness held a vague terror for those people” is placed at the object position in ZSTBW “……
Example 3
TFA: The total effect was gay and brisk, but if one picked out the flute as it went up and down and then broken up into short snatches, one saw that there was sorrow and grief there.
ZSTWB:
Chinese are prone to use four-character idioms to convey meanings and express feelings, while in English use simple words or the “adjective +and +adjective” structure. In the above case, the translator transplants “gay,”“brisk,”“go up and down,” and “broken up into short snatches” as
Cultural Dimension
The transformation of the cultural dimension involves transplanting and analyzing the ST and the TT cultural elements. The translator should consider “the obstacles caused by the cultural differences and striving for balance and harmony between the cultural ecologies of the two languages to guarantee the smooth realization of information exchange” (Hu, 2020, p. 163). This means that in the transformation process, the translator should avoid distortion of content and nature and strike a balance between the cultural elements of ST and TT ecology. This strategy “gives the reader a concept with which he/she can identify something” (Baker, 1993, p. 31). In ZSTBW, the translator used the extending substitution technique (Hu, 2020) to evade some transplantation problems relating to cultural differences between the Igbo and the Chinese culture.
Example 4
TFA: The crowd then shouted with anger and thirst for blood.
ZSTBW:
In example 4, both the TFA and ZSTBW express strong emotions, specifically anger and a thirst for blood, which, to some extent, reflects aggression and a desire for violence within the crowd. The use of the term “the crowd” and
Example 5
TFA: The sickness was an abomination to the earth.
ZSTBW:
On the one hand, the ST ecology conveys a sense of condemnation toward the sickness and its impact on the earth. To selectively adapt this sentiment taking into consideration the TT ecological culture, the translator adaptively selects the term
Communicative Dimension
Transplanting from the ST ecology to the TT ecology through the adaptive change of both language ecologies must express clarity, balance, and communicative intentions. The transformation occurs at the communication level, where the translator is expected to transform the linguistic and cultural elements to reflect the communicative intent of the ST ecology in terms of thoughts. The effectiveness of the communicative dimension enables TT readers to have a vivid imagination and natural sense of actions and emotional feelings expressed by the author in the original work.
Example 6
In the example above, the translator was able to transplant the ST into the TT ecology but failed to successfully keep the ST ecology alive in the TT during the transplanting process. The translator’s opting for the literal translation of the ST “
Transplanting the term “feast” to
Example 7
ZSTWB:
The proverbial expression “
Example 8
As Hu points out that to balance the ecology of the source language and the ecology of the target language, the translator has to make “selective adaptation” and “adaptive selection,” creatively “add,”“annotate,”“supplement information,” or “cut down,” or “add more details,” and so on (Hu, 2020). Here, the word “Kola nut” in TFA translated into
Esthetics Dimension
This transformation occurs at the esthetic level, where the translator is expected to transform and maintain the ecological elements of the ST ecology’s creativity, style, and beauty in the TT ecological environment to enable the TT readers/audiences to have a vivid imagination painted in the TL environment. The preservation of the esthetic qualities of the ST ecology when transplanted into the TT ecological environment is a challenging task for a translator, but to ensure the survival of the ST ecology in the TT ecology and to maintain balance and harmony, the translator has to keep the textual life by making it understandable to the TT readers.
Example 9
The TFA and ZSTWB create vivid visual imagery to depict the darkness of the night. The TFA describes it as “impenetrably dark,” highlighting the dearth of light. The Chinese version retains the same imagery, using the phrase
Furthermore, the TFA contrasts the dark nights with the absence of the moon throughout the evening, rendering the nights as black as charcoal. The contrast is maintained by ZSTWB, which emphasizes the darkness of the nights when the moon rises only
Rhetoric Dimension
Example 10
ZSTWB:
The use of rhetorical elements such as metaphors and smiles is prominent in both TFA and ZSTWB. These elements help contribute to the vivid and evocative descriptions of the scorching heat and the impending thunderstorm. In TFA, the sun is metaphorically described as “gathering strength till it seemed to breathe a breath of fire on the earth.” This metaphorical description of the sun as breathing fire enhances the heat’s intensity, creating a visual and sensory image for the readers. In ZSTWB, the translator adaptively maintains the essence and spirit of the metaphors conveying the same imagery and emotional impact in the TT ecological environment. The metaphor of the sun
Example 11
The ST ecology evokes a sense of anger and intensity through phrases like “an angry, metallic, and thirsty clap.” The translator successfully retains this emotional tone in the TT ecology, describing the thunder as
At the same time, the simile “Palm trees swayed as the wind combed their leaves into flying crests like strange and fantastic coiffure” creatively compares the movement of palm tree leaves to a fantastic hairstyle, giving a touch of whimsy to the scene. While in ZSTWB, the translator’s simile
Through the adaptive selection of rhetorical elements such as metaphor and smile, the translator successfully adapts and maintains the beauty and creativity of ST ecology in the TT environment, allowing the TT readers to experience the same evocative imagery and emotions conveyed in the ST. The adaptive use of figurative language enhances the rhetorical dimension of the text and strengthens the impact of the descriptions.
Conclusion
To address the challenges in translating Things Fall Apart, this study proposes applying the multi-dimensional transformation perspective of Eco-Translatology, explicitly focusing on linguistics, culture, esthetics, rhetoric, and communication. Linguistic transformation involves adjusting language form and structure to conform to the target language, while cultural transformation requires adapting cultural elements to ensure balance and harmony. The esthetic transformation aims to maintain the beauty and style of the text, while communicative transformation focuses on effectively conveying the author’s intention to the target readers. Through examples and analysis, this study demonstrates how the multi-dimensional perspective of Eco-Translatology can be applied to bridge cultural, linguistic, communicative, rhetorical, and esthetic difficulties in translating Things Fall Apart from English to Chinese. By considering the ecological aspects of the textual ecology and its translational environment, translators can make informed selections and adaptations to enhance balance and harmony and the survival of the ST ecology in the TT environment. In a word, applying the multi-dimensional perspective, translators can navigate translation’s linguistic, cultural, esthetic, rhetorical, and communicative aspects to ensure the successful transplantation of a text from one environment to another, thus facilitating meaningful cultural exchange and understanding and contributing to a more interconnected and diverse global literary landscape.
Footnotes
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
This research was supported and funded by the Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University Technology Innovation Team Research Project (XNKJTD-020)
Ethical Statement
The research conducted in this study is solely based on the analysis of two literary texts, Achebe’s Things Fall Apart and its Chinese translation Zhe ge Shijie Tou Beng Wajie le. No individuals or communities were subjected to any form of experimentation, coercion, or manipulation during this research. The sole focus of our investigation was to analyze and interpret literary texts to gain insights and knowledge for academic purposes.
