How does vote choice and partisanship affect institutional trust in Taiwan? While the literature tackles institutional trust in democracies, analyses often focus on only one time period with aggregate measures of trust. Data from two waves from the Asian Barometer finds evidence consistent with losers’ consent of trust in electoral institutions corresponding with party support and vote choice, factors that remain after controlling for trust in non-electoral institutions and generalized trust. However, these factors do not seem to affect overall satisfaction with democracy, suggesting the public differentiates between support for the ideal of democracy and its constituent parts.
AchenCHWangTY (2019) Declining voter turnout in Taiwan: A generational effect?Electoral Studies58: 113–124.
2.
AlmondGAVerbaS (1963) The Civic Culture. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
AndersonCJBlaisABowlerS, et al. (2005) Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
AndersonCJGuilloryCA (1997) Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy.American Political Science Review91(1): 66–81.
5.
AndersonCJTverdovaYV (2001) Winners, losers, and attitudes about government in contemporary democracies. International Political Science Review22: 321–338.
6.
AndrainCFSmithJT (2006) Political Democracy, Trust, and Social Justice: A Comparative Overview. London: UPNE.
7.
BolDGianiMBlaisA, et al. (2021) The effect of COVID-19 lockdowns on political support: Some good news for democracy?European Journal of Political Research60(2): 497–505.
8.
CampbellR (2015) Winners, losers and the grand coalition: Political satisfaction in the Federal Republic of Germany. International Political Science Review36(2): 168–184.
9.
CaoLDaiM (2006) Confidence in the police: Where does Taiwan rank in the world?Asian Journal of Criminology1: 71–84.
10.
CatterbergG (2003) Evaluations, referents of support, and political action in new democracies. International Journal of Comparative Sociology44(3): 173–198.
11.
ChangECC (2013) A comparative analysis of how corruption erodes institutional trust.Taiwan Journal of Democracy9(1): 73–92.
12.
ChangW-C (2021) Media use, political trust, and attitude toward direct democracy: Empirical evidence from Taiwan.Online Information Review46(4): 733–753.
13.
ChangY-T (2009) Election losers and democratic consolidation: The election losers’ attitudes toward democratic ruling party in the Taiwan 2004 presidential election. Taiwan Democracy Quarterly6(1): 41–72. [In Chinese].
14.
ChengT-JLiaoD-C (2006) Testing the immune system of a newly born democracy: The 2004 presidential election in Taiwan.Taiwan Journal of Democracy2(1): 81–101.
15.
ChristensenTLægreidP (2005) Trust in government: The relative importance of service satisfaction, political factors, and demography. Public Performance and Management Review28(4): 487–511.
16.
CitrinJ (1974) Comment: The political relevance of trust in government.American Political Science Review68(3): 973–988.
17.
ClarkNPetersonR (2020) Exploring nonvoting and electoral integrity in the 2016 presidential election.Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties30(4): 401–421.
18.
DahlbergSLindeJ (2018) Socialization or experience? Institutional trust and satisfaction with democracy among emigrants in different institutional settings.Journal of Politics80(4): 1389–1393.
19.
DaltonRJ (2004) Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
DaltonRJWeldonSA (2005) Public images of political parties: A necessary evil?West European Politics28(5): 931–951.
21.
DassonnevilleRHoogheM (2017) Voter turnout decline and stratification: Quasi-experimental and comparative evidence of a growing educational gap. Politics37(2): 184–200.
22.
DelheyJNewtonK (2005) Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: Global pattern or Nordic exceptionalism?European Sociological Review12(4): 311–327.
23.
DelheyJNewtonKWelzelC (2011) How general is trust in “most people”? Solving the radius of trust problem. American Sociological Review76(5): 786–807.
24.
DiamondLMorlinoL (2005) Assessing the Quality of Democracy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
GershtensonJLadewigJPlaneDL (2006) Parties, institutional control, and trust in government.Social Science Quarterly87(4): 882–902.
30.
GovierT (1998) Dilemmas of Trust. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
31.
GronlundKSetalaM (2012) In honest officials we trust: Institutional confidence in Europe.American Review of Public Administration42(5): 523–542.
32.
HardinR (1999) Do we want trust in government? In: WarrenME (ed.) Democracy & Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 22–41.
33.
HetheringtonMJRudolphTJ (2008) Priming, performance, and the dynamics of political trust. The Journal of Politics70(2): 498–512.
34.
HoogheMKernA (2017) The tipping point between stability and decline: Trends in voter turnout, 1950–1980–2012. European Political Science16(4): 535–552.
35.
HsiaoY-CYuEC-H (2020) Polarization perception and support for democracy: The case of Taiwan.Journal of Asian and African Studies55(8): 1143–1162.
36.
HuangK-PLeeF-YLinT-M (2013) Partisanship and institutional trust a comparative analysis of emerging democracies in East Asia.Taiwan Journal of Democracy9(1): 47–71.
37.
HuangSH (2011) Constructing a typology of popular attitudes to democracy: An analysis after the second party alternation in Taiwan. Journal of Electoral Studies18(1): 1–34. [In Chinese].
38.
HungC-Y (2015) Tradition meets pluralism: The receding Confucian values in the Taiwanese citizenship curriculum.Asia Pacific Journal of Education35(2): 176–190.
39.
IkedaKI (2013) Social and political trust in East and Southeast Asia. Taiwan Journal of Democracy9(1): 13–45.
40.
International Idea (n.d.) Voter turnout database: Taiwan Available at: https://www.idea.int/data-tools/country-view/290/40(accessed 5 January 2024).
41.
JiangAWangZZhangTH (2022) Radicalizing and conservatizing: Ageing effects on political trust in Asia, 2001–2016.Social Indicators Research162: 665–681.
42.
JiangAZhangTH (2021) Political freedom, news consumption, and patterns of political trust: Evidence from east and Southeast Asia, 2011–2016.Political Science73(3): 250–269.
43.
JohnsonCBartelsB (2010) Sensationalism and sobriety: Differential media exposure and attitudes toward American courts. Public Opinion Quarterly74: 260–285.
44.
JouW (2009) Political support from election losers in Asian democracies.Taiwan Journal of Democracy5(20): 145–175.
45.
KahnemanDWakkerPPSarinR (1997) Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility.Quarterly Journal of Economics112(2): 375–406.
46.
KerrN (2013) Popular evaluations of election quality in Africa: Evidence from Nigeria. Electoral Studies32(4): 819–837.
47.
KimS (2010) Public trust in government in Japan and South Korea: Does the rise of critical citizens matter?Public Administration Review70(5): 801–810.
48.
KolczynkaMSadowskiI (2023) Seeing the world through party-tinted glasses: Performance evaluations and winner status in shaping political trust under high polarization.Acta Politica58: 380–400.
49.
KostelkaFBlaisA (2021) The generational and institutional sources of the global decline in voter turnout. World Politics73(4): 629–667.
50.
LaiY-LCaoLZhaoJ (2010) The impact of political entity on confidence in legal authorities: A comparison between China and Taiwan. Journal of Criminal Justice38: 934–941.
51.
LeviMStokerL (2000) Political trust and trustworthiness.Annual Review of Political Science3(1): 475–507.
52.
LiL (2016) Reassessing trust in the central government: Evidence from five national surveys.The China Quarterly225: 100–121.
53.
LinT-J (2012) Institutional trust in Taiwan: An analysis on media trust. Soochow Journal of Political Science30(1): 43–79. (in Chinese)
LiuT-A-XJuangW-JYuC (2022) Understanding corruption with perceived corruption: The understudied effect of corruption tolerance. Public Integrity 25(2): 207–219.
56.
MaukM (2022) Stable support for democracy in East and Southeast Asia? Examining citizens’ trust in democratic institutions. East Asia: An International Quarterly39(3): 239–257.
57.
MillerAGoldenbergEErbringL (1979) Type-set politics: Impact of newspapers public confidence. The American Political Science Review73: 67–84.
58.
MishlerWRoseR (1997) Trust, distrust and skepticism: Popular evaluations of civil and political institutions in post-communist societies. The Journal of Politics59(2): 418–451.
59.
MishlerWRoseR (2001) What are the origins of political trust? Testing institutional and cultural theories in post-communist societies. Comparative Political Studies34(1): 30–62.
60.
MoyPPfauM (2000) With Malice Toward All? The Media and Public Confidence in Democratic Institutions. Westport, CT: Praeger.
61.
NadeauRBlaisA (1993) Accepting the election outcome: The effect on participation on losers’ consent.British Journal of Political Science23(4): 553–563.
62.
NadeauRDaoustJ-FDassonnevilleR (2023) Winning, losing, and the quality of democracy. Political Studies71(2): 483–500.
63.
NieminenTMartelinTKoskinenS, et al. (2008) Measurement and socio-demographic variation of social capital in a large population-based survey. Social Indicators Research85: 405–423.
64.
NorrisP (ed.) (1999) Critical Citizens. New York: Oxford University Press.
65.
OffeK (1996) How can we trust our fellow citizens? In: WarrenME (ed.) Democracy & Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.42–87.
PerniaRA (2022) Authoritarian values and institutional trust: Theoretical considerations and evidence from the Philippines.Asian Journal of Comparative Politics7(2): 204–232.
68.
PrzeworskiA (1991) Democracy and the Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69.
PutnamRD (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
70.
RichTS (2015) Losers’ consent or non-voter consent? Satisfaction with democracy in East Asia. Asian Journal of Political Science23(3): 243–259.
71.
RichTS (2023) Policy as a booster shot? The Impact of satisfaction with pandemic policies on presidential evaluations in Taiwan. Journal of Asian and African Studies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096231168057
72.
RichTSBucciL (2017) The influence of incumbency and partisanship on Fenno’s paradox: Evidence from Taiwan’s legislative Yuan. Journal of Asian and African Studies53(4): 497–510.
73.
RichTSHolmesCE (2016) Winning is not everything: Public perceptions of losers and non-voters in South Africa. Acta Politica51(3): 328–345.
74.
RichTSKnightLDahmerA (2021) The lingering effects of losing and nonvoting on institutional trust: An analysis of South Korea. Journal of Asian and African Studies56(2): 395–411.
75.
RosanvallonPGoldhammerA (2008) Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust. Vol. 7. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
76.
RothsteinBStolleD (2008) The state and social capital: An institutional theory of generalized trust.Comparative Politics40(4): 441–459.
77.
RudolphTJEvansJ (2005) Political trust, ideology, and public support for government spending. American Journal of Political Science49(3): 660–671.
78.
SabelCF (1993) Studied trust: Building new forms of cooperation in a volatile economy. Human Relations45: 1133–1170.
79.
ShiT (2001) Cultural values and political trust: A comparison of the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan.Comparative Politics33(4): 401–419.
80.
ShyuH-Y (2010) Trust in institutions and the democratic consolidation in Taiwan. In: LeeW-C (ed.) Taiwan’s Politics in the 21st Century: Changes and Challenges. Singapore: World Scientific, pp. 69–100.
81.
SinghSPKarakoçEBlaisA (2012) Differentiating winners: How elections affect satisfaction with democracy. Electoral Studies31(1): 201–211.
82.
SmithEKMayerA (2018) A social trap for the climate? Collective action, trust and climate change risk perception in 35 countries. Global Environmental Change49: 140–153.
SunIYJouSHouCC,et al. (2014) Public trust in the police in Taiwan: A test of instrumental and expressive models. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology47(1): 123–140.
85.
TanSJTambyahSK (2011) Generalized trust and trust in institutions in Confucian Asia. Social Indicators Research103(3): 357–377.
86.
TavitsM (2008) Representation, corruption, and subjective well-being. Comparative Political Studies41(12): 1607–1630.
87.
TemplemanK (2019) Blessings in disguise: How authoritarian legacies and the China factor have strengthened democracy in Taiwan. International Journal of Taiwan Studies2: 230–263.
88.
TylerTRJacksonJ (2014) Popular legitimacy and the exercise of legal authority: Motivating compliance, cooperation, and engagement. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law20(1): 78–95.
89.
UslanerEM (2002) The Moral Foundations of Trust. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
90.
Van der MeerTHakhverdianA (2017) Political trust as the evaluation of process and performance: A cross-national study of 42 European countries. Political Studies65(1): 81–102.
91.
WagnerAFDuFourMSchneiderF (2003) Satisfaction not guaranteed: Institutions and satisfaction with democracy in Western Europe. CESIFO Working Paper No. 910.
92.
WangT (2002) The legal development of Taiwan in the 20th century: Toward a liberal and democratic country. Pacific Rim of Law & Policy Journal11: 531–554.
93.
WardPRMiller EPearceAR, et al. (2016) Predictors and extent of institutional trust in government, banks, the media, and religious organizations: Evidence from cross-sectional surveys in six Asia-Pacific countries.PloS One11(10): e0164096.
94.
WongTK-YHsiaoH-HMWanP-S (2009) Comparing political trust in Hong Kong and Taiwan: Levels, determinants, and implications.Japanese Journal of Political Science10(2): 147–174.
95.
WongTKWanP-SHsiaoMH-H (2011) The bases of political trust in six Asian societies: Institutional and cultural explanations compared. International Political Science Review32(3): 263–281.
96.
WrightJD (1976) The Dissent of the Governed. New York: Academic Press.
97.
WuC-L (2017) Partisan divergence an public support for the courts of Taiwan.Japanese Journal of Political Science18(1): 139–154.
98.
WuY (2014) The impact of media on public trust in legal authorities in China and Taiwan.Asian Journal of Criminology9: 85–101.
99.
ZhangYBLinM-CNonakaA, et al. (2005) Harmony, hierarchy, and conservatism: A cross-cultural comparison of Confucian values in China, Korea, Japan, and Taiwan. Communication Research Report22: 107–115.
