Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Can foreign aid be used to promote democracy in Asia? Because liberalization is costly for the autocratic recipients, they can be expected to resist donor pressure to reform politically. The recipients who have the strategic and commercial attributes that donors value should have an easier time getting aid offers and hence leverage against donors who seek liberalization. By contrast, the recipients who lack such attributes have less leverage. This group of “secondary” recipients can be nudged towards political liberalization. I test this argument using foreign aid from AidData and regime-type information from Polity IV. The evidence bares out the argument even after correcting for the threat of reverse causality. I conclude with policy prescriptions for effective aid allocation.

Keywords

democratization donor pressure recipient salience

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achen

(2002) Towards a new political methodology: Microfoundations and ART. Annual Review of Political Science 5: 423–450.

Agence France-Presse (AFP) (2006) US cuts off millions in military aid. 29 September. Available at: http://nationmultimedia.com/2006/09/29/headlines/headlines_30014950.php (accessed 14 March 2015).

Agence France-Presse (AFP) (2012) World Bank encouraged on Myanmar. 22 February. Available at: https://sg.news.yahoo.com/world-bank-encouraged-myanmar-001611844.html (accessed 2 June 2015).

Atkinson

(2014) Aid in Taiwan’s foreign policy: Putting Ma Ying-jeou’s aid reforms in historical perspective. The Pacific Review 27(3) 409–431.

Bader

Faust

(2014) Foreign aid, democratization, and autocratic survival. International Studies Review 16: 575–595.

Bakernov

(2012) Obama, in an emerging Myanmar, vows support. New York Times, 18 November. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/19/world/asia/obama-heads-to-myanmar-as-it-promises-more-reforms.html?_r=0 (accessed 2 January 2016).

Bandow

(2015) Playing the ‘great game’ between U.S. and China in Burma. CATO Institute, 1 December. Available at: http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/playing-great-game-between-us-china-burma (accessed 3 January 2016).

Barbieri

Keshk

(2012) Correlates of War Project Trade Data Set Codebook, Version 3.0. Available at: http://correlatesofwar.org (accessed 27 January 2015).

Bell

(2015) The China Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

10.

Bermeo

(2016) Aid is not oil: Donor utility, heterogeneous aid, and the aid-democratization relationship. International Organization 70(1): 1–32.

11.

Brambor

Clark

Golder

(2006) Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis 14(1): 63–82.

12.

British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) (2006) US imposes sanctions on Thailand. 28 September. Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/5390284.stm (accessed 14 March 2015).

13.

British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) (2012a) Burma’s Aung san Suu Kyi takes part in key by-elections. 31 March. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-17571989 (accessed 31 March 2012).

14.

British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) (2012b) World Bank to lend to Burma for first time in 25 years. 2 November. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-20176841 (accessed 11 April 2012).

15.

British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) (2015a) Timeline: Reforms in Myanmar. 8 July. Available at: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-16546688 (accessed 3 January 2016).

16.

British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) (2015b) Myanmar election: Suu Kyi’s NLD wins landslide victory. 13 November. Available at: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-34805806 (accessed 2 January 2016).

17.

Bueno de Mesquita

(1981) The War Trap. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

18.

Bueno de Mesquita

Smith

(2009) A political economy of aid. International Organization 63(2): 309–340.

19.

Bueno de Mesquita

Smith

(2015) Competition and Collaboration in Aid-for-Policy Deals. Working paper, New York University Alexander Hamilton Center for Political Economy.

20.

Burnside

Dollar

(2000) Aid, policies and growth. American Economic Review 90(4): 847–868.

21.

Carothers

(2015) Democracy aid at 25: Time to choose. Journal of Democracy 26(1): 59–73.

22.

Chanlett-Avery

(2009) Political turmoil in Thailand and U.S. interests. Congressional Research Service Report. Available at: http://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R40605.pdf (accessed 14 March 2015).

23.

Chanlett-Avery

Dolven

(2014) Thailand: Background and U.S. relations. Congressional Research Service Report. Available at: http://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL32593.pdf (accessed 14 March 2015).

24.

Crispin

(2009) When allies drift apart. Asian Times, 14 February. Available at: http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/KB14Ae01.html (accessed 14 March 2015).

25.

Diamond

(2015) Facing up to the democratic recession. Journal of Democracy 26(1): 141–155.

26.

Dunning

(2004) Conditioning the effects of aid: Cold War politics, donor credibility, and democracy in Africa. International Organization 58(2): 409–423.

27.

Feenstra

Inklaar

Timmer

(2013) The Next Generation of the Penn World Table. Groningen Growth and Development Centre. Available at: http://www.ggdc.net/pwt/ (accessed 21 February 2015).

28.

Fleck

Kilby

(2006) How do political changes influence US bilateral aid allocations? Evidence from panel data. Review of Development Economics 10(2): 210–223.

29.

Fukuyama

(2015) Why is democracy performing so poorly? Journal of Democracy 26(1): 11–20.

30.

Gartzke

D-J

Tucker

(1999) The Similarity of UN Policy Positions, 1946–96, Version 1.17. Available at: http://www.vanderbilt.edu/∼rtucker/data/affinity/un/similar (accessed 22 March 2002).

31.

Hempel

(1966) Philosophy of Natural Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

32.

James

Naya

Meier

(1989) Asian Development: Economic Success and Policy Lessons. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

33.

Lancaster

(2006) Foreign Aid: Diplomacy, Development, Domestic Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

34.

Levitsky

Way

(2010) Competitive Authoritarianism Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. New York, US: Cambridge University Press.

35.

Lintner

(2011) Burma delivers its first rebuff to China. Yale Global, 11 October. Available at: yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/Burma-delivers-its-first-rebuff-china (accessed 4 August 2012).

36.

McCawley

(1998) Development assistance in Asia in the 1990s. Asian-Pacific Economic Literature 12(1): 41–50.

37.

Marshall

Jaggers

(2014) Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2013. The Polity IV dataset. Available at: http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscrdata.html (accessed 16 February 2015).

38.

Mayer

Zignago

(2011) Notes on CEPII’s distances measures: The GeoDist database. Working Papers 2011–25, CEPII research center. Available at: http://www.cepii.fr/anglaisgraph/bdd/distances.htm (accessed 2 August 2013).

39.

Nanuam

Jikkham

(2015) Thailand, China bolster military ties as US relations splinter. Bangkok Post, 6 February. Available at: http://www.bangkokpost.com/news/security/468332/thailand-china-bolster-military-ties-as-us-relations-splinter (accessed 14 March 2015).

40.

Nathan

(2015) China’s challenge. Journal of Democracy 26(1): 156–170.

41.

OECD (2009) International Good Practice Principles for Country-Led Division of Labour and Complementarity. Working Party on Aid Effectiveness. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/dac/effectiveness/43408412.pdf (accessed 25 October 2015).

42.

Parameswaran P (2015) US-Thailand relations and Cobra Gold 2015: What’s really going on? The Diplomat, 5 February. Available at: http://thediplomat.com/2015/02/u-s-thailand-relations-and-cobra-gold-2015-whats-really-going-on/ (accessed 14 March 2015).

43.

Przeworski

Alvarez

Cheibub

. (2000) Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

44.

Ray

(2003) Explaining conflict and war: What should be controlled for? Conflict Management and Peace Science 20(2): 21–31.

45.

Sawitta Lefevre

(2014) Thai army delegation visits China amid Western reproach of coup. Reuters, 11 June. Available at: http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/06/11/us-thailand-politics-china-idUSKBN0EM0FO20140611 (accessed 14 March 2015).

46.

Schulberg

(2014) The military coup in Thailand is putting the U.S. in an awkward position. The New Republic, 23 May. Available at: http://www.newrepublic.com/article/117894/thailand-coup-foreign-assistance-act-put-us-awkward-position (accessed 14 March 2015).

47.

Slavin

(2014) US, Thai officials planning Cobra Gold exercise despite May coup. Stars and Stripes, 10 October. Available at: http://www.stripes.com/news/pacific/thailand/us-thai-officials-planning-cobra-gold-exercise-despite-may-coup-1.307643 (accessed 14 March 2015).

48.

Soesastro

(2004) Sustaining East Asia’s Economic Dynamism: How Aid Worked. CSIS Economics Working Paper Series WPE084, Centre for Strategic and International Studies, Jakarta, Indonesia.

49.

Stromseth

(2012) The new face of foreign aid in Asia. The Asia Foundation, 24 October. Available at: http://asiafoundation.org/in-asia/2012/10/24/the-new-face-of-foreign-aid-in-asia/ (accessed 25 October 2015).

50.

Sun

(2012) China’s strategic misjudgement on Myanmar. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 31(1): 73–96.

51.

Sun

(2014) China, Myanmar face Myitsone dam truths. Asian Times, 19 February. Available at: http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/SEA-01-190214.html (accessed 2 January 2016).

52.

Tan

(2015) Liberalization at the Margins. Working paper, New York University Alexander Hamilton Center for Political Economy.

53.

Tierney

Nielson

Hawkins

. (2011) More dollars than sense: Refining our knowledge of development finance using Aiddata. World Development 39(11): 1891–1906.

54.

US Department of State (2015) US relations with Burma. Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, 18 December. Available at: http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/35910.htm (accessed 2 January 2016).

55.

Wright

(2009) How foreign aid can foster democratization in authoritarian regimes. American Journal of Political Science 53(3): 552–571.

Aid and democracy promotion in Asia

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References