One of the democratic peace puzzles is the question of whether and to what extent the democracy → peace relationship underestimates the possibility that peace precedes democracy: the reversed causal arrow hypothesis. From a war making–state making perspective, democratization needs to be viewed as a partial function of external threat and domestic power concentration. All three variables are found to be interrelated as predicted and related in turn to the external conflict behavior of major powers from 1816 to 1992. These monadic findings, however, do not appear to negate the dyadic relationship between democratization and selectively reduced conflict behavior. In sum, there is substantial support for the reversed causal arrow hypothesis, but it does not render the regime type → conflict behavior relationships spurious. Rather, it enriches the understanding of the context in which democratization has emerged to have some effect on international politics.
Almond, G. A. (1990). A discipline divided: Schools and sects in political science. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Arat, Z. (1988). Democracy and economic development: Modernization theory revisited. Comparative Politics, 21, 21-36.
3.
Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review, 89, 634-647.
4.
Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1996). Nuisance vs. substance: Specifying and estimating time-series cross-section models. In J. Freeman (Ed.), Political analysis (Vol. 6, pp. 1-36). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
5.
Beck, N., Katz, J. N., & Tucker, R. (1998). Takingtime seriously: Time-series cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 1260-1288.
6.
Bennett, D. S. (1998). Integrating and testing models of rivalry termination. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 1200-1232.
7.
Bennett, D. S., & Nordstrom, T. (2000). Foreign policy substitutability and internal economic problems in enduring rivalries. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 44, 33-61.
8.
Burkhart, R. E., & Lewis-Beck, M. S. (1994). Comparative democracy: The economic development thesis. American Political Science Review, 88, 903-910.
9.
Chan, S. (1997). In search of democratic peace: Problems and promise. Mershon International Studies Review, 4, 59-91.
10.
Colaresi, Michael, & William R. Thompson. (2003). The economic development-democratization relationship: Does the outside world matter?Comparative Political Studies, 36, 381-403.
11.
Crescenzi, M. J., & Enterline, A. J. (1999). Ripples from the waves? A systemic, time-series analysis of democracy, democratization, and interstate war. Journal of Peace Research, 36, 75-94.
12.
Cutright, P. (1963). National political development: Measurement and analysis. American Sociological Review, 28, 253-264.
13.
Cutright, P., & Wiley, J. A. (1969). Modernization and political representation: 1927-1966. Studies in Comparative International Development, 5, 23-44.
14.
Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15.
Doyle, M. W. (1997). Ways of war and peace: Realism, liberalism, and socialism. New York: Norton.
16.
Finer, S. E. (1975). State and nation building in Europe: The role of the military. In C. Tilly (Ed.), The formation of national states in Western Europe (pp. 84-163). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
Gasiorowski, M. J. (1988). Economic dependence and political democracy: A cross-national study. Comparative Political Studies, 20, 489-515.
18.
Gasiorowski, M. J. (1995). Economic crisis and political regime change: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review, 89, 882-897.
19.
Gasiorowski, M. J., & Power, T. J. (1998). The structural determinants of democratic consolidation: Evidence from the Third World. Comparative Political Studies, 31, 740-771.
20.
Gates, S., Knutsen, T. L., & Moses, J. W. (1996). Democracy and peace: A more skeptical view. Journal of Peace Research, 33, 1-10.
21.
Gleditsch, N. P., & Hegre, H. (1997). Peace and democracy: Three levels of analysis. Journal of Conflict Research, 41, 283-310.
22.
Gleditsch, K., & Ward, M. D. (2000). War and peace in space and time: The role of democratization. International Studies Quarterly, 44, 1-29.
23.
Gurr, T. R. (1988). War, revolution and the growth of the coercive state. Comparative Political Studies, 21, 45-65.
24.
Hadenius, A. (1992). Democracy and development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Hintze, O. (1975). The historical essays of Otto Hintze (Felix Gilbert, Ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
Huntington, S. P. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
27.
Huntington, S. P. (1996). Democracy for the long haul. Journal of Democracy, 7, 3-13.
28.
Jackman, R. (1973). On the relations of economic development to democratic performance. American Journal of Political Science, 17, 611-621.
29.
Jaggers, K., & Gurr, T. (1995). Transitions to democracy: Tracking democracy’s third wave with the Polity III data. Journal of Peace Research, 32, 469-482.
30.
James, P., Solberg, E., & Wolfson, M. (1999). An identified systemic model of the democracy-peace nexus. Defence and Peace Economics, 10, 1-37.
31.
James, P., Solberg, E., & Wolfson, M. (2000). Democracy and peace: A reply to Oneal and Russett. Defence and Peace Economics, 11, 215-229.
32.
Jones, D. M., Bremer, S. A., & Singer, J. D. (1996). Militarized interstate disputes, 1816-1992: Rationale, coding rules, and empirical patterns. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 15, 163-213.
33.
Layne, C. (1994). Kant or cant: The myth of the democratic peace. International Security, 19,5-49.
34.
Leblang, D. A. (1997). Political democracy and economic growth: Pooled cross-sectional and time-series evidence. British Journal of Political Science, 27, 453-472.
35.
Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites for democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53, 69-105.
36.
Lipset, S. M. (1994). The social requisites of democracy revisited. American Sociological Review, 59, 1-22.
37.
Londegran, J. B., & Poole, K. T. (1996). Does high income promote democracy?World Politics, 49, 1-30.
38.
Mann, M. (1993). The sources of social power (Vol. 2). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Maoz, Z. (1996). Domestic sources of globalchange. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
40.
Maoz, Z. (1998). Realist and cultural critiques of the democraticpeace: A theoretical and empirical re-assessment. International Interactions, 24, 3-89.
41.
Markoff, J. (1996). Waves of democracy: Social movements and political change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.
42.
Midlarsky, M. I. (1995). Environmental influences on democracy: Aridity, warfare and a reversal of the causal arrow. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 39, 224-262.
43.
Mitchell, S.McLaughlin, Gates, S., & Hegre, H. (1999). Evolution in democracy-war dynamics. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 43, 771-792.
44.
Modelski, G., & Perry, G., III. (1991). Democratization in long perspective. Technological Fore-casting and Social Change, 39, 23-34.
45.
Moore, B. (1966). Social origins of dictatorship and democracy: Lord and peasant in the making of the modern world. Boston: Beacon.
46.
Mousseau, M., & Shi, Y. (1999). A test for reverse causality in the democratic peace relationship. Journal of Peace Research, 36, 639-663.
47.
Oneal, J. R., & Russett, B. (1999). The Kantian peace: Assessing the pacific benefits of democracy, interdependence, and international organizations, 1885-1992. World Politics, 52, 1-37.
48.
Oneal, J. R., & Russett, B. (2000). Why “an identified systemic analysis of the democracy-peace nexus” does not persuade. Defence and Peace Economics, 11, 197-214.
49.
Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M., Cheibub, J. A., & Limongi, F. (1996). What makes democracy endure?Journal of Democracy, 7, 39-55.
50.
Przeworski, A., & Limongi, F. (1997). Modernization: Theories and facts. World Politics, 49, 155-183.
51.
Rasler, K., & Thompson, W. R. (1983). Global war, public debts, and the long cycle. World Politics, 35, 489-516.
52.
Rasler, K., & Thompson, W. R. (1985). War making and state making: Government expenditures, tax revenues, and global wars. American Political Science Review, 79, 491-507.
53.
Rasler, K., & Thompson, W. R. (1989). War and state making: The shaping of the global powers. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
54.
Rasler, K., & Thompson, W. R. (2001). Rivalries and the democratic peace in the major power subsystem. Journal of Peace Research, 38, 657-683.
55.
Ray, J. L. (1995). Democracy and international conflict: An evaluation of the democratic peace proposition. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
56.
Reiter, D. (2001). Does peace nurture democracy?Journal of Politics, 63, 935-948.
57.
Remmer, K. L. (1990). Democracy and economic crisis: The Latin American experience. World Politics, 42, 315-335.
58.
Rueschemeyer, D., Stephens, E. H., & Stephens, J. D. (1992). Capitalist development and democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59.
Russett, B. (1993). Grasping the democratic peace: Principles for a post-Cold War world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
60.
Russett, B., & Oneal, J. (2001). Triangulating peace: Democracy, interdependence, and international organizations. New York: Norton.
61.
Russett, B., & Starr, H. (2000). From democratic peace to Kantian peace: Democracy and conflict in the international system. In M. Midlarsky (Ed.), Handbook of war studies II (pp. 93-128). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
62.
Rustow, D. W. (1970). Transition to democracy: Toward a dynamicmodel. Comparative Politics, 8, 337-364.
63.
Small, M., & Singer, J. D. (1982). Resort to arms: International and civil wars. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
64.
Starr, H. (1991). Democratic dominoes: Diffusion approaches to the spread of democracy in the international system. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35, 356-381.
65.
Thompson, W. R. (1996). Democracy and peace: Putting the cart before the horse?International Organization, 50, 141-174.
66.
Thompson, W. R. (2001). Identifying rivals and rivalries in world politics. International Studies Quarterly, 45, 557-586.
67.
Thompson, W. R., & Rasler, K. (1999). War, the military revolution(s) controversy, and army expansion: A test of the two explanations of historical influences on European state making. Comparative Political Studies, 32, 3-31.
68.
Thompson, W. R., & Tucker, R. (1997). A tale of two democratic peace critiques. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41, 428-454.
69.
Tilly, C. (1975). Reflections on the history of European state-making. In C. Tilly (Ed.), The formation of national states in Western Europe (pp. 3-83). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
70.
Tilly, C. (1990). Coercion, capital and European states, AD 990-1990. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
71.
Tucker, R. (1999). BTSC: A binary time-series cross-section data analysis utility, Version 403 [Computer software]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
72.
Vanhanen, T. (1997). Prospects of democracy: A study of 172 countries. London: Routledge.
73.
White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817-838.
