We analyze an understudied mode of democratization in which the acquiescence of an autocratic regime’s foreign ally, or patron, is pivotal to the success of a democratic movement. Although a democratic patron may prefer having democracy in its dependent allies, regime change threatens the economic and security benefits associated with the alliance. We formalize this dilemma through a repeated principal-agent model and demonstrate that the critical dimension is the patron’s beliefs about the potential democracy’s policies rather than its value for democracy or the alliance goods. Patron support hinges on democratic movement signaling of its capacity to rule, popular support, and commitment to preserving the alliance. To test our theory, we analyze twenty-five democratic openings in American cold war clients, followed by case studies of US-aided democratization episodes in the Philippines and South Korea. We conclude with an analysis of the recent Egyptian revolution.
AdelmanJonathan, ed. 1986. Superpowers and Revolution. New York: Praeger.
2.
AdesnikDavidMcFaulMichael. 2006. “Engaging Autocratic Allies to Promote Democracy.”The Washington Quarterly29 (2): 7–26.
3.
BanksArthur S.1976. Cross-National Time Series, 1815–1973. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
4.
BeckThorstenClarkeGeorgeGroffAlbertoKeeferPhilipWalshPatrick. 2001. “New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions.”World Bank Economic Review15 (1): 165–76.
5.
BeissingerMark R.2007. “Structure and Example in Modular Political Phenomena: The Diffusion of Bulldozer/Rose/Orange/Tulip Revolutions.”Perspectives on Politics5 (2): 259–76.
6.
BellinEva. 2004. “The Robustness of Authoritarianism in the Middle East: Exceptionalism in Comparative Perspective.”Comparative Politics36 (2): 139–57.
7.
BercovitchJacob. 1991. “Superpowers and Client States: Analysing Relations and Patterns of Influence.” In Superpowers and Client States in the Middle East: The Imbalance of Influence (pp. 9-32), edited by EfratMosheBercovitchJacob. London: Routledge.
8.
BermeoNancy. 1997. “Myths of Moderation: Confrontation and Conflict during Democratic Transitions.”Comparative Politics29 (3): 305–22.
9.
BobClifford. 2005. The Marketing of Rebellion: Insurgents, Media, and International Activism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
BonnerRaymond. 1987. Waltzing with a Dictator: The Marcoses and the Making of American Policy. New York: Times Books.
11.
BrattonMichaelWalleNicolas van de. 1997. Democratic Experiments in Africa: Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
BrownleeJason. 2007. Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
BruceBueno de MesquitaDownsGeorge. 2006. “Intervention and Democracy.”International Organization60 (4): 627–49.
14.
BruceBueno de MesquitaSmithAlastair. 2007. “Foreign Aid and Policy Concessions.”Journal of Conflict Resolution51: 251–84.
15.
BunceValerie. 1985. “The Empire Strikes Back: The Evolution of the Eastern Bloc from a Soviet Asset to a Soviet Liability.”International Organization39 (1): 1–46.
16.
BurtonSandra. 1989. Impossible Dream: The Marcoses, the Aquinos, and the Unfinished Revolution. New York: Warner Books.
17.
CarothersThomas. 1999. Aiding Democracy Abroad: The Learning Curve. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
18.
CheibubJosé AntonioGandhiJenniferVreelandJames Raymond. 2010. “Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited.” Public Choice143: 67–101.
19.
CooleyAlexander. 2008. Base Politics: Democratic Change and the U.S. Military Overseas. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
20.
DolanRonald E.2003. “Philippines: A Country Study.” In The Philippines: Current Issues and Historical Background (pp. 29-228), edited by CalitHarry S., 29--228. New York: Nova Science.
21.
DunningThad. 2004. “Conditioning the Effects of Aid: Cold War Politics, Donor Credibility, and Democracy in Africa.”International Organization58 (2): 409–23.
22.
FahimKareemLandlerMarkShadidAnthony. 2011. “West Backs Gradual Egyptian Transition.” New York Times, February 5.
23.
FearonJames D.1997. “Signaling Foreign Policy Interests: Tying Hands Versus Sinking Costs.”Journal of Conflict Resolution41:68–90.
24.
FowlerJames. 1999. “The United States and South Korean Democratization.”Political Science Quarterly114 (2): 265–88.
25.
FullerGraham. 2005. “Islamists and Democracy.” In Uncharted Journey: Promoting Democracy in the Middle East, edited by CarothersThomasOttawayMarina, 37–56. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
26.
GasiorowskiMark J.1990. U.S. Foreign Policy and the Shah: Building a Client State in Iran. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
27.
GaviousAriehMizrahiShlomo. 2003. “A Signaling Model of Peaceful Political Change.”Social Choice and Welfare20 (1): 119–36.
28.
GhoshBobby. 2011. “The Revolutionaries.”Time, February 14.
29.
GinkelJohnSmithAlastair. 1999. “So You Say You Want a Revolution: A Game Theoretic Explanation of Revolution in Repressive Regimes.”Journal of Conflict Resolution43: 291–316.
30.
GleditschKristen S.2002. “Expanded Trade and GDP Data.”Journal of Conflict Resolution46: 712–24.
31.
BleditschKristen S.WardMichael D.. 2006. “Diffusion and the International Context of Democratization.”International Organization60 (4): 911–33.
32.
GleysteenWilliam H., Jr. 1999. Massive Entanglement, Marginal Influence: Carter and Korea in Crisis. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
33.
HanSung-Joo. 1980. “South Korea and the United States: The Alliance Survives.”Asian Survey20 (11): 1075–86.
34.
Han, Sung-Joo. 1989. “South Korea: Politics in Transition.” In Democracy in Developing Countries, Volume 3: Asia, edited by DiamondLarryLinzJuan J.LipsetSeymour M., 267–304. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
35.
HegreHåvardEllingsenTanjaGatesScottGleditschNils Petter. 2001. “Toward a Democratic Civil Peace? Democracy, Political Change, and Civil War, 1816–1992.” American Political Science Review95 (1): 33–48.
36.
HestonAlanSummersRobertAtenBettina. 2008. Penn World Tables, Version 6.2. Center for International Comparisons, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
37.
HumphreysMacartan. 2005. “Natural Resources, Conflict, and Conflict Resolution.”Journal of Conflict Resolution49: 508–37.
38.
HuntingtonSamuel. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
39.
IgnatiusDavid. 2011. “The Arab Revolution Grows Up.”Washington Post, February 2.
40.
JohnsonBryan. 1987. The Four Days of Courage: The Untold Story of the People who Brought Marcos Down. New York: Free Press.
41.
JonesSethOlikerOlgaChalkPeterChristine FairC.LalRollieDobbinsJames. 2006. Securing Tyrants or Fostering Reform: U.S. Internal Security Assistance to Repressive and Transitioning Regimes. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
42.
KaneTim. 2006. U.S. Troop Deployment DatasetAccessed July 21, 2009, http://www.heritage.org.
43.
KeeferPhilip. 2005. Database of Political Institutions: Changes and Variable Definitions. Washington, DC: Development Research Group, World Bank.
44.
KhanMuqtedar. 2003. “Prospects for Muslim Democracy: The Role of U.S. Policy.”Middle East Policy10 (3): 79–89.
45.
KimJinwung. 1989. “Recent Anti-Americanism in South Korea: The Causes.”Asian Survey29 (8): 749–63.
46.
KinzerStephen. 2006. Overthrow: America’s Century of Regime Change from Hawaii to Iraq. New York: Times Books.
47.
KirkpatrickDavidCowellAlan. 2011. “Egyptians Defy Crackdown with New Mass Protests.”New York Times, February 4.
48.
KomisarLucy. 1987. Corazon Aquino: The Story of a Revolution. New York: George Braziller.
49.
KrasnerStephen. 1978. Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials Investments and U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50.
KuranTimur. 1991. “Now Out of Never: The Element of Surprise in the East European Revolution of 1989.”World Politics44 (1): 7–48.
51.
LakeDavid A.2009. Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
52.
LandlerMarkCooperHeleneKirkpatrickDavid. 2011. “A Diplomatic Scramble as an Ally is Pushed to the Exit.”New York Times, February 1.
53.
LeeJunhan. 2000. “Political Protest and Democratization in South Korea.”Democratization7 (3): 181–202.
54.
LeedsBrett Ashley. 2003. “Alliance Reliability in Times of War: Explaining State Decisions to Violate Treaties.”International Organization57 (4): 801–27.
55.
LevitskyStevenWayLucan. 2002. “The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism.”Journal of Democracy13 (2): 51–65.
56.
Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan Way. 2005. “International Linkage and Democratization.”Journal of Democracy16 (3): 20–34.
57.
LichbachMark. 1995. The Rebel’s Dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
58.
LipsonCharles. 2003. Reliable Partners: How Democracies Have Made a Separate Peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
59.
LohmannSusanne. 1993. “A Signaling Model of Informative and Manipulative Political Action.”American Political Science Review87 (2): 319–33.
60.
Lohmann, Susanne1994. “The Dynamic of Informational Cascades: The Monday Demonstrations in Leipzig, East Germany, 1989–1991.”World Politics47 (1): 42–101.
61.
MainwaringScott. 2008. “Coding U.S. Foreign Policy Toward Authoritarian and Democratic Regimes in Latin America, 1900–2007, 173-192).”Working paper, Kellogg Institute for International Studies, University of Notre Dame Ottaway.
62.
MarshallMonty G.JaggersKeith. 2005. POLITY IV PROJECT: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2003. College Park: Integrated Network for Societal Conflict Research, University of Maryland.
63.
MartinLisa. 2000. Democratic Commitments: Legislatures and International Cooperation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
64.
MeernikJamesKruegerEric L.PoeSteven C.. 1998. “Testing Models of U.S. Foreign Policy: Foreign Aid During and After the Cold War.”Journal of Politics60 (1): 63–85.
65.
MinierJenny A.2003. “Democrats, Dictators, and Demonstrators.”Economic Inquiry41 (2): 224–33.
66.
MullerEdward. 1985. “Dependent Economic Development, Aid Dependence on the United States, and Democratic Breakdown in the Third World.”International Studies Quarterly29 (4): 445–69.
OberdorferDon. 2001. The Two Koreas: A Contemporary History. New York, NY: Basic Books.
69.
O’DonnellGuillermoSchmitterPhilippe C.. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
70.
OttawayMarina. 2005. “The Problem of Credibility.” In Uncharted Journey: Promoting Democracy in the Middle East, edited by CarothersThomasOttawayMarina. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
71.
PastorRobert. 1987. Condemned to Repetition: The United States and Nicaragua. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
72.
PetersenPhillip. 1991. “Scandinavia and the ‘Finlandization’ of Soviet Security.”Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science38 (1): 60–70.
73.
PrzeworskiAdam. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
74.
RatnerEly. 2009. “Reaping What You Sow: Democratic Transitions and Foreign Policy Realignments.”Journal of Conflict Resolution53: 390–418.
75.
ReidRobert H.GuerreroEileen. 1995. Corazon Aquino and the Brushfire Revolution. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
76.
RiceCondoleezzaFryMichael. 1986. “The Hungarian Crisis of 1956: The Soviet Decision.” In Superpowers and Revolution, edited by AdelmanJonathan, 181-199. New York: Praeger.
77.
SchmitzDavid. 2006. The United States and Right-Wing Dictatorships, 1965–1989. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
78.
ShorrockTim. 1986. “The Struggle for Democracy in South Korea in the 1980s and the Rise of Anti-Americanism.” Third World Quarterly8 (4): 1195–218.
SiversonRandolphStarrHarvey. 1994. “Regime Change and the Restructuring of Alliances.”American Journal of Political Science38 (1): 145–61.
81.
SmithTony. 1994. America’s Mission: The United States and the Worldwide Struggle for Democracy in the Twentieth Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
82.
StueckWilliam. 1998. “Democratization in Korea: The United States Role, 1980 and 1987.”International Journal of Korean Studies2 (1): 1–25.
83.
WeinertMatthew. 2007. Democratic Sovereignty: Authority, Legitimacy, and State in a Globalizing Age. New York: University College London.
84.
WestadOdd Arne. 2005. The Global Cold War: Third World Interventions and the Making of Our Times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
85.
WhiteheadLaurence. 1986. “International Aspects on Democratization.” In Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives, edited by O’DonnellGuillermoSchmitterPhilippeWhiteheadLaurence, 3–46. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
86.
Whitehead, Laurence. 1996. “Three International Dimensions of Democratization.” In The International Dimensions of Democratization: Europe and the Americas, edited by WhiteheadLaurence, 3-25. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
87.
WittesTamara Cofman. 2008. Freedom’s Unsteady March: America’s Role in Building Arab Democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
YeoAndrew. 2006. “Signaling Democracy: Patron-Client Relations and Democratization in South Korea and Poland.”Journal of East Asian Studies6 (2): 259–87.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
