China's continued decline in fertility rates—despite a series of policy relaxations—highlights the importance of individual fertility intentions in shaping demographic outcomes. This study investigates sex differences in fertility intentions and examines the mediating roles of media use and gender role attitudes. Using data from the China General Social Survey (2017–2021), we analyze responses from 11,184 individuals aged 18 to 45. Quasi-Poisson and logistic regression models, combined with a chain mediation approach, reveal that women report significantly lower fertility intentions than men. This disparity is partly explained by women's greater exposure to internet media and their endorsement of more egalitarian gender role attitudes. In contrast, while traditional media use is positively related to fertility intentions, it does not function as a significant mediator. The indirect pathway through internet use and gender role attitudes accounts for 33.33% of the total effect of sex on fertility intentions. Further cohort analysis indicates that the promotion of fertility intention by traditional media use is most evident among the younger generation, while the positive connection between gender role attitudes and fertility intention is also strengthened among the younger generation.
AassveAAdseràAChangPY, et al. (2024) Family ideals in an era of low fertility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences121(6): e2311847121.
2.
AdhikariSLutzWKebedeE (2024) Forecasting Africa’s fertility decline by female education groups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences121(46): e2320247121.
3.
AdseràA (2004) Changing fertility rates in developed countries. The impact of labor market institutions. Journal of Population Economics17(1): 17–43.
4.
AgadjanianV (2001) Negotiating through reproductive change: Gendered social interaction and fertility regulation in Mozambique. Journal of Southern African Studies27(2): 291–309.
5.
AjzenI (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50(2): 179–211.
6.
AjzenIKlobasJ (2013) Fertility intentions: An approach based on the theory of planned behavior. Demographic Research29: 203–232.
7.
AndersonTKohlerHP (2015) Low fertility, socioeconomic development, and gender equity. Population and Development Review41(3): 381–407.
8.
AzizM (2023) Women's double burden in the family between culture and discrimination. Potret Pemikiran27(2): 227–244.
9.
BalboNBillariFCMillsM (2013) Fertility in advanced societies: A review of research. European Journal of Population29(1): 1–38.
10.
Ball-RokeachSJ (1998) A theory of media power and a theory of media use: Different stories, questions, and ways of thinking. Mass Communication and Society1(1-2): 5–40.
11.
Ball-RokeachSJDeFleurML (1976) A dependency model of mass-media effects. Communication Research3(1): 3–21.
12.
BegallKHiekelN (2025) Examining the gender equality–fertility paradox in three nordic countries. Population and Development Review51(2): 858–888.
13.
BerringtonA (2004) Perpetual postponers? Women’s, men’s and couple’s fertility intentions and subsequent fertility behaviour. Population Trends117(Autumn): 9–19.
14.
BhavnaniRRNellisG (2016) Can Government-controlled Media Cause Social Change? Television and Fertility in India. Report, University of Wisconsin, USA, August.
15.
BillariFCGiuntellaOStellaL (2019) Does broadband internet affect fertility?Population Studies73(3): 297–316.
16.
BoydellVMoriRShahrookS, et al. (2023) Low fertility and fertility policies in the Asia-Pacific region. Global Health and Medicine5(5): 271–277.
17.
BranisaBKlasenSZieglerM (2013) Gender inequality in social institutions and gendered development outcomes. World Development45: 252–268.
18.
CaiWXieY (2025) Raising hope: The impact of intergenerational mobility on fertility desire in China. Chinese Journal of Sociology11(3): 297–331.
19.
ChaiXLyuZXuD (2025) An examination of internet use and its association with gender ideology among older adults: Insights from China. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne De Sociologie62(3): 212–232.
20.
ChenW (2023) Changing fertility patterns in China. Chinese Journal of Sociology9(4): 497–521.
21.
ChenZTianX (2025) The relaxation of birth control policies adversely affects women’s income: Evidence from China’s universal two-child policy. China Economic Review90: 102340.
22.
Cohn-SchwartzESchmitzA (2024) From attitudes to social networks: National gender-role attitudes and gender differences in late-life social relationships. Social Networks76: 79–87.
23.
ColleoniERozzaAArvidssonA (2014) Echo chamber or public sphere? Predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in Twitter using big data. Journal of Communication64(2): 317–332.
24.
CraigLMullanK (2010) Parenthood, gender and work–family time in the United States, Australia, Italy, France, and Denmark. Journal of Marriage and Family72(5): 1344–1361.
25.
DanilukJCKoertE (2015) Fertility awareness online: The efficacy of a fertility education website in increasing knowledge and changing fertility beliefs. Human Reproduction30(2): 353–363.
26.
De BruijnBJ (1999) Foundations of demographic theory: Choice, process, context. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Groningen, USA.
27.
Delgado-HerreraMAceves-GómezACReyes-AguilarA (2024) Relationship between gender roles, motherhood beliefs and mental health. PLoS One19(3): e0298750.
28.
DewiRKSuryadarmaDSuryahadiA (2018) The impact of media on behaviour: Evidence from television coverage expansion and declining fertility in Indonesia. Development Policy Review36(S1): O552–O563.
29.
DuHXiaoYZhaoL (2021) Education and gender role attitudes. Journal of Population Economics34(2): 475–513.
30.
EgamiS (2025) Effect of intensive parenting attitude on maternal well-being and self-efficacy among Japanese housewives and part-time working mothers. Psychology International7(2): 47.
31.
ElleströmL (2019) Transmedial Narration: Narratives and Stories in Different Media. Cham: Palgrave Pivot.
32.
FarréL (2013) The role of men in the economic and social development of women: Implications for gender equality. The World Bank Research Observer28(1): 22–51.
33.
FengWGuBCaiY (2016) The end of China’s one-child policy. Studies in Family Planning47(1): 83–86.
34.
FuYRenWLiangZ (2022) Perceived academic stress and depressive symptoms among Chinese adolescents: A moderated mediation analysis of overweight status. Journal of Affective Disorders296: 224–232.
35.
GattaAMattioliFMencariniL, et al. (2022) Employment uncertainty and fertility intentions: Stability or resilience?Population Studies76(3): 387–406.
36.
GeJTianW (2024) Reimagining maternity: A multimodal analysis on the identity construction amongst Chinese “married, child-free” women in Xiaohongshu. Social Semiotics1: 1–24.
37.
GeronimusAT (2003) Damned if you do: Culture, identity, privilege, and teenage childbearing in the United States. Social Science and Medicine57(5): 881–893.
38.
GillespieMMcLaughlinE (2002) Media and the shaping of public attitudes. Criminal Justice Matters49(1): 8–23.
39.
GoldinC (2025) Babies and the macroeconomy. Economica93: 1–26.
40.
GoldsteinMGonzalezPKilicT, et al. (2024) Breadwinners and caregivers: Examining the global relationship between gender norms and economic behavior. Scottish Journal of Political Economy72(2): e12406.
41.
GolovinaKNitscheNBergV, et al. (2024) Birth cohort changes in fertility ideals: Evidence from repeated cross-sectional surveys in Finland. European Sociological Review40(2): 326–341.
42.
GuldiMHerbstCM (2017) Offline effects of online connecting: The impact of broadband diffusion on teen fertility decisions. Journal of Population Economics30(1): 69–91.
43.
HaiderH (2017) Changing gender and social norms, attitudes and behaviours. Report, University of Birmingham, UK, April.
44.
HansonK (2018) The opportunity cost of fertility under the rhetoric of choice. Thesis, Rutgers University, USA.
45.
HayesAF (2022) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-based Approach, 3rd ed.New York: Guilford Publications.
46.
HeYXieY (2023) The shift in ideal family size: Examining the impact of marriage and parenthood. Chinese Journal of Sociology9(4): 553–573.
47.
HornikRMcAnanyE (2001) Diffusion Processes and Fertility Transition: Selected Perspectives. Washington: National Academies Press.
48.
JangIJunMLeeJE (2017) Economic actions or cultural and social decisions? The role of cultural and social values in shaping fertility intention. International Review of Public Administration22(3): 257–275.
49.
JansenT (2025) Remote work and fertility plans: A dual-income household analysis. Report for the Gran Sasso Science Institute. Report no. 2025–06, 8 April. L'Aquila: GSSI.
50.
JayachandranS (2017) Fertility decline and missing women. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics9(1): 118–139.
51.
JingWLiuJMaQ, et al. (2022) Fertility intentions to have a second or third child under China’s three-child policy: A national cross-sectional study. Human Reproduction37(8): 1907–1918.
52.
Johnson-HanksJABachrachCAMorganSP, et al. (2011) Understanding Family Change and Variation: Toward a Theory of Conjunctural Action. Dordrecht: Springer.
53.
JungSBatenJ (2025) Gender equality in Asia and Europe during the 20th century: The role of socialism. Journal of Comparative Economics53(2): 490–510.
54.
KatoT (2018) Associations of gender role attitudes with fertility intentions: A Japanese population-based study on single men and women of reproductive ages. Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare16: 15–22.
55.
KatzEBlumlerJGGurevitchM (1973) Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly37(4): 509–523.
56.
KavasS (2019) The gendered division of housework and fertility intention in Turkey. Genus75(1): 21.
57.
KhoudjaYFleischmannF (2018) Gender ideology and women’s labor market transitions within couples in The Netherlands. Journal of Marriage and Family80(5): 1087–1106.
58.
KimCE (2023) The gendered implications of intensive parenting beliefs for life satisfaction: The case of South Korea. Asian Women39(4): 79–101.
59.
KimbroughAMGuadagnoREMuscanellNL, et al. (2013) Gender differences in mediated communication: Women connect more than do men. Computers in Human Behavior29(3): 896–900.
60.
KnightCRBrintonMC (2017) One egalitarianism or several? Two decades of gender-role attitude change in Europe. American Journal of Sociology122(5): 1485–1532.
61.
KrijnenTVan BauwelS (2021) Gender and Media: Representing, Producing, Consuming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
62.
KuangBBerringtonAChristisonS, et al. (2024) Educational trends in cohort fertility by birth order: A comparison of England and Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. Demographic Research51: 1125–1166.
63.
LaamanenVM (2024) Changes in work and family attitudes over birth cohorts and links to childfree ideals in Finnish women. Master’s Thesis, University of Helsinki, Finland.
64.
Lache’GadsonD (2025) Prevalent themes of messages related to sexual risk behaviors targeting young black women in social media. Doctoral Dissertation, Walden University, USA.
65.
LappegårdTNeyerGVignoliD (2021) Three dimensions of the relationship between gender role attitudes and fertility intentions. Genus77: 15.
66.
LeeH (2025) Digital democracy and gendered narratives: A comparative study of Korean digital political media in 2023 and 2025. Women's Studies in Communication48(4): 511–533.
67.
LesthaegheR (2014) The second demographic transition: A concise overview of its development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences111(51): 18112–18115.
68.
LevyJKDarmstadtGLAshbyC, et al. (2020) Characteristics of successful programmes targeting gender inequality and restrictive gender norms for the health and wellbeing of children, adolescents, and young adults: A systematic review. The Lancet Global Health8(2): e225–e236.
69.
LiJWeiW (2023) Influence of internet use on Chinese rural women’s fertility intention: Evidence from China General Social Survey data. American Journal of Health Behavior47(6): 1192–1201.
70.
LiYJiangQ (2019) Women’s gender role attitudes and fertility intentions of having a second child: Survey findings from Shaanxi province of China. Asian Population Studies15(1): 66–86.
71.
LinYZhangBHuM, et al. (2024) The effect of gradually lifting the two-child policy on demographic changes in China. Health Policy and Planning39(4): 363–371.
72.
LiuPCaoJNieW, et al. (2021) The influence of internet usage frequency on women’s fertility intentions—the mediating effects of gender role attitudes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health18(9): 4784.
73.
LuoW (2023) Current demographic trends in China. Bachelor's Thesis, Metropolia University of Applied Sciences, Finland.
74.
LyuZChaiX (2024) Media influence on intergenerational attitudes toward non-conventional sexual behaviors in contemporary China: Evidence from Chinese General Social Survey. International Journal of Sexual Health36(1): 77–99.
75.
ManzarMS (2024) Media influence: Shaping perceptions and empowering women. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research13(8): 54–61.
76.
MarcusRSomjiA (2024) TTransforming gender norms for women’s economic rights and empowerment. Report for Advancing Learning and Innovation on Gender Norms. 15 January. London: ODI.
77.
MarteletoLJKumarSDonderoM, et al. (2024) Fertility intentions during the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis of individual-and municipality-level determinants. Population and Development Review50(S1): 213–242.
78.
MatysiakASobotkaTVignoliD (2021) The great recession and fertility in Europe: A sub-national analysis. European Journal of Population37(1): 29–64.
79.
MiettinenAGietel-BastenSRotkirchA (2011) Gender equality and fertility intentions revisited: Evidence from Finland. Demographic Research24: 469–496.
80.
MillsMMencariniLTanturriML, et al. (2008) Gender equity and fertility intentions in Italy and The Netherlands. Demographic Research18: 1–26.
81.
MorrellRG (2024) Engaging men for gender equality in the Global South: Perspectives from the UNESCO Maputo Dialogue. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
82.
NiePPengXLuoT (2023) Internet use and fertility behavior among reproductive-age women in China. China Economic Review77: 101903.
83.
NingCWuJYeY, et al. (2022) How media use influences the fertility intentions among Chinese women of reproductive age: A perspective of social trust. Frontiers in Public Health10: 882009.
84.
NovelliMCazzolaAAngeliA, et al. (2021) Fertility intentions in times of rising economic uncertainty: Evidence from Italy from a gender perspective. Social Indicators Research154: 257–284.
85.
OpatunjiFOSowunmiCO (2024) The role of digital health tools in improving contraceptive use among reproductive age women. International Journal of Health and Psychology Research12(1): 18–33.
86.
OsiewalskaBMatysiakA (2025) Two sides of a coin: The relationship between work autonomy and childbearing. Journal of Marriage and Family87(3): 1178–1199.
87.
PandeyS (2025) Media in the Digital Age: Trends, Tools, and Cultural Impact, 1st ed.Bhopal: Academic Guru Publishing House.
88.
PengY (2010) When formal laws and informal norms collide: Lineage networks versus birth control policy in China. American Journal of Sociology116(3): 770–805.
89.
PhilipovD (2008) Family-related gender attitudes. In: HöhnCAvramovDKotowskaIE (eds) People, Population Change and Policies: Demographic Knowledge-Gender-Ageing. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 153–174.
90.
PhilipovD (2011) Theories on fertility intentions: A demographer’s perspective. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research9: 37–45.
91.
PratapAPathakA (2025) From public square to echo chamber: The fragmentation of online discourse. ArXiv e-prints: 2501.18441.
92.
PreacherKJHayesAF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods40(3): 879–891.
93.
QianYLiJ (2020) Separating spheres: Cohort differences in gender attitudes about work and family in China. China Review20(2): 19–52.
94.
SchneiderD (2015) The great recession, fertility, and uncertainty: Evidence from the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family77(5): 1144–1156.
95.
SchroederR (2018) Towards a theory of digital media. Information, Communication and Society21(3): 323–339.
96.
ShardaA (2014) Media and gender stereotyping: The need for media literacy. International Research Journal of Social Sciences3(8): 43–49.
97.
ShiSLiangZZhouH (2022) Gender differences in objective and subjective social reproduction in China: Do educational attainment and social capital matter?Chinese Sociological Review54(3): 278–303.
98.
SinghJPandeyDAP (2024) Societal expectations vs. social networks: An insight into the evolution of conjugal roles in modern families. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice30(3): 2138–2144.
99.
SullivanO (2019) Gender inequality in work–family balance. Nature Human Behaviour3(3): 201–203.
100.
TestaMR (2014) On the positive correlation between education and fertility intentions in Europe: Individual- and country-level evidence. Advances in Life Course Research21: 28–42.
101.
ToishinovaG (2024) Between tradition and progress: Exploring confucian influences on gender representation in South Korean media. Master’s Thesis, Umeå University, Sweden.
102.
TurowJ (2019) Media Today: Mass Communication in a Converging world, 7th ed.New York: Routledge.
103.
TwengeJMMartinGNSpitzbergBH (2019) Trends in US adolescents’ media use, 1976–2016: The rise of digital media, the decline of TV, and the (near) demise of print. Psychology of Popular Media Culture8(4): 329–345.
104.
Van Der HorstM (2024) Gender role attitudes. In: MagginoF (ed.) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Cham: Springer, 2695–2697.
105.
Ver HoefJMBovengPL (2007) Quasi-poisson vs. negative binomial regression: How should we model overdispersed count data?Ecology88(11): 2766–2772.
106.
WangHGuptaSSinghalA, et al. (2022) An artificial intelligence chatbot for young people’s sexual and reproductive health in India (SnehAI): Instrumental case study. Journal of Medical Internet Research24(1): e29969.
107.
WangXNieWLiuP (2021) The internet usage and individual fertility intention: Based on the perspectives of information cost and family intergeneration. Journal of Finance and Economics47(10): 110–124.
108.
WeiHWangQWuY, et al. (2024) More children, more “efficacy”: The relationship between fertility and self-efficacy among the post-80s and post-90 s generations. Reproductive Health21(1): 57.
WuC (2024) Exploring significant factors in Chinese women’s decision-making about birth outside. Master’s Thesis, University of Turku, Finland.
111.
XiangJSunX (2025) Digital insights: Analyzing the reproductive intentions and influencing factors among urban women in China through online platforms. PLoS One20(7): e0327570.
112.
XuJLiLMaXQ, et al. (2023) Fertility intentions, parenting attitudes, and fear of childbirth among college students in China: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology36(1): 65–71.
113.
YangX (2024) The role of social media in shaping fertility intentions among young women in east Asian cultures. Advances in Education, Humanities and Social Science Research9(1): 302–309.
114.
YaoLLiMTaoL, et al. (2025) Negative social media exposure and Chinese unmarried young adult’s fertility intention: The mediating role of fertility anxiety and gender differences. Personality and Individual Differences241: 113192.
115.
YinWYaoYLiF (2014) Evaluation of fertility levels and adjustment of fertility policy: Based on the current situation of the Chinese mainland’s provincial fertility levels. Social Sciences in China35(2): 83–105.
116.
YuJXieY (2022) Is there a Chinese pattern of the second demographic transition?China Population and Development Studies6(3): 237–266.
117.
ZaidiBMorganSP (2017) The second demographic transition theory: A review and appraisal. Annual Review of Sociology43(1): 473–492.
118.
ZengYHeskethT (2016) The effects of China’s universal two-child policy. The Lancet388(10054): 1930–1938.
119.
ZhaiZJinG (2023) China’s family planning policy and fertility transition. Chinese Journal of Sociology9(4): 479–496.
120.
ZhangCWeiLZhuY, et al. (2022) Fertility intentions among young people in the era of China’s three–child policy: A national survey of university students. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth22(1): 37.
121.
ZhangLZhuJ (2024) Can higher education improve egalitarian gender role attitudes? Evidence from China. China Economic Review88: 102311.
122.
ZouWLiuZ (2024) Body politics, reproductive rights, and digital media advocacy within stigmatized contexts: A critical discourse analysis of Weibo discussions on iuds in modern-day China. Journal of Applied Communication Research52(1): 27–46.
