Assessing the current state of quality improvement training in urology in the UK: Findings from the General Medical Council 2018 trainee survey

Abstract

Objective:

The General Medical Council (GMC) of the UK has identified the need to support doctors through education in safety and quality improvement (QI) methods. This study reports findings from the GMC annual survey of 2018 from urology trainees regarding the state of QI training and their training needs.

Material and methods:

We designed a set of four questions to assess how QI methods are being taught nationally, and inserted them in the 2018 annual GMC trainee survey for urology. This is a cross-sectional study assessing the current state of QI training and mentoring received by trainees, and their self-assessed ability and confidence in completing a QI project as part of training requirements. Data were statistically analysed in Stata 15 stratified by Local Education Training Boards (LETBs)/Deanery and by specialty trainee level (ST3–7).

Results:

In total, 270 responses were received from urology trainees. Data showed significant variation across the country. Responses from ST3–7 trainees ranged from 5–20% on completing more than three QI projects, while 7–58% replied that they had done none. Across all ST grades, 40% of trainees stated they had not undertaken QI, whereas 0–27% reported they had not received any mentoring on QI to date. There was significant variation across training regions too: 11–74% of trainees answered that they have received training in QI methods, and 58–100% responded that they were confident in undertaking QI projects. Across all LETBs, 1–3% responded that they uploaded projects on national websites for dissemination; finally, a range of 0–18% stated they had completed more than three projects.

Conclusion:

This is the first national snapshot of QI training for the entire urology specialty in the UK. The study demonstrates wide variation in QI training and activity undertaken by trainees, and shows a lack of systematic implementation of QI education across training regions.

Level of evidence:

Keywords

Quality improvement quantitative research cross-sectional study survey urology trainees education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Institute of Medicine. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000.

Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001.

Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education A. ACGME common program requirements (residency), https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/CPRResidency2019.pdf (2018, accessed 30 August 2019).

Association of American Medical Colleges. Teaching for Quality: Integrating Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Across the Continuum of Medical Education: An Expert Report. 2013.

Malangoni

Shiffer

The American Board of Surgery Maintenance of Certification Program: the first 10 years. Bull Am Coll Surg 2015; 100: 15–19.

Choudry

Stewart

Woodhead

The Royal College of Physician’s Quality Improvement Hub - how can it help physicians to improve patient care?

Future Hosp J 2016; 3: 211–216.

General Medical Council (GMC). Your supporting information – quality improvement activity, https://www.gmc-uk.org/registration-and-licensing/managing-your-registration/revalidation/guidance-on-supporting-information-for-appraisal-and-revalidation/your-supporting-information—quality-improvement-activity (accessed 30 August 2019).

Promoting excellence: standards for medical education and training . London: General Medical Council, 2016.

The Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership. Measuring and improving our healthcare services, https://www.hqip.org.uk/about-us/#.Xb11X5r7Qgw (accessed 2 November 2019).

10.

Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Building capacity and capability for improvement: embedding quality improvement skills in NHS providers. London: NHS Improvement, 2017.

11.

Wong

Etchells

Kuper

, et al. Teaching quality improvement and patient safety to trainees: a systematic review. Acad Med 2010; 85: 1425–1439.

12.

Kirkman

Sevdalis

Arora

, et al. The outcomes of recent patient safety education interventions for trainee physicians and medical students: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2015; 5: e007705.

13.

Liao

Kachalia

Providing educational content and context for training the next generation of physicians in quality improvement. Acad Med 2015; 90: 1241–1245.

14.

Kelz

Sellers

Reinke

, et al. Quality in-training initiative–a solution to the need for education in quality improvement: results from a survey of program directors. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 217: 1126–1132.e1–5.

15.

Bowe

SN.

Quality improvement in otolaryngology residency: survey of program directors. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 154: 349–354.

16.

Ziemba

Matlaga

Tessier

CD.

Educational resources for resident training in quality improvement: a national survey of urology residency program directors. Urol Pract 2018; 5: 398–404.

17.

Massagli

Zumsteg

Osorio

MB.

Quality improvement education in residency training: a review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2018; 97: 673–678.

18.

General Medical Council (GMC). National training surveys, https://www.gmc-uk.org/education/how-we-quality-assure/national-training-surveys.

19.

StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC, 2017.

20.

Mann

Craig

Moses

JM.

Quality improvement educational practices in pediatric residency programs: survey of pediatric program directors. Acad Pediatr 2014; 14: 23–28.

21.

Craig

Garfunkel

Baldwin

, et al. Pediatric resident education in quality improvement (QI): a national survey. Acad Pediatr 2014; 14: 54–61.

22.

Windish

Reed

Boonyasai

, et al. Methodological rigor of quality improvement curricula for physician trainees: a systematic review and recommendations for change. Acad Med 2009; 84: 1677–1692.

23.

Davis

Johnson

, et al. Aligning academic continuing medical education with quality improvement: a model for the 21st century. Acad Med 2013; 88: 1437–1441.

24.

Eccles

Grimshaw

Campbell

, et al. Research designs for studies evaluating the effectiveness of change and improvement strategies. Qual Saf Health Care 2003; 12: 47–52.

25.

Ogrinc

Armstrong

Dolansky

, et al. SQUIRE-EDU (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence in Education): publication guidelines for educational improvement. Acad Med 2019; 94: 1461–1470.

26.

Lipstein

Kronman

Richmond

, et al. Addressing core competencies through hospital quality improvement activities: attitudes and engagement. J Grad Med Educ 2011; 3: 315–319.

27.

Spraker

Nyflot

Hendrickson

, et al. A survey of residents’ experience with patient safety and quality improvement concepts in radiation oncology. Pract Radiat Oncol 2017; 7: e253–e259.

28.

Goldman

Kuper

Wong

BM.

How theory can inform our understanding of experiential learning in quality improvement education. Acad Med 2018; 93: 1784–1790.

29.

Till

Banerjee

McKimm

Supporting the engagement of doctors in training in quality improvement and patient safety. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2015; 76: 166–169.

30.

Lane-Fall

Davis

Clapp

, et al. What every graduating resident needs to know about quality improvement and patient safety: a content analysis of 26 sets of ACGME milestones. Acad Med 2018; 93: 904–910.

31.

Coyle

Mercer

Murphy-Cullen

, et al. Effectiveness of a graduate medical education program for improving medical event reporting attitude and behavior. Qual Saf Health Care 2005; 14: 383–388.

32.

Daniel

Casey

Jr Levine

, et al. Taking a unified approach to teaching and implementing quality improvements across multiple residency programs: the Atlantic Health experience. Acad Med 2009; 84: 1788–1795.

33.

Pallari

Khadjesari

Biyani

, et al. Pilot implementation and evaluation of a national quality improvement taught curriculum for urology residents: lessons from the United Kingdom. Am J Surg 2020; 219: 269–277.