Abstract
Perforations of saphenous venous grafts during coronary angioplasty are rare and potentially lethal. The objective of this clinical case report is to highlight this unusual complication and necessary treatment. A 76-year-old woman, 3 months after coronary artery bypass grafting (left internal mammary artery to left anterior descendant artery, saphenous vein graft to obtuse marginal, saphenous vein graft to right coronary artery), demonstrated typical signs of acute coronary syndrome. Coronary angiogram revealed, inter alia, two critical lesions in saphenous vein graft to right coronary artery. Percutaneous coronary intervention was performed with placement of two drug-eluting stents, complicated by a vessel rupture and heavy extravasation of contrast. A polyurethane-covered stent was then deployed and successfully sealed the vascular wall. In a computed tomography of the chest, a mediastinal haematoma near the heart base and right heart margin was found. Subsequently, this intrathoracic bleeding caused external impression on saphenous vein graft to right coronary artery, leading to near occlusion of the vessel with recurrence of chest pain and ST-segment elevation in inferior wall electrocardiogram leads. Immediate coronary angiography and drug-eluting stent implantation was performed. During, further, in-hospital follow-up, patient was free of chest pain; computed tomography scan performed after 10 days revealed regression of haematoma. Clinicians must remain alert to the potential of life-threatening complications associated with saphenous venous graft angioplasty, as their recognition is critical to institution of prompt, appropriate therapy.
Keywords
Introduction
Saphenous venous graft (SVG) perforations during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are rare, potentially lethal complications.1,2 Overestimating of angioplasty balloon diameter, severely calcified and degenerated vessels are main risk factors of a graft rupture. Depending of perforation type, treatment with a prolonged balloon inflation and/or conventional/covered stent implantation should be performed.3,4
Case report
We present a case of 76-year-old woman with history of hypertension and hyperlipidemia who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting 3 months prior to admission, which consisted of left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to left anterior descendant artery (LAD) graft and SVGs to obtuse marginal (OM) and right coronary artery (RCA). Patient presented with acute, typical chest pain. Initial 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) revealed ST-segment depression in leads II, III, aVF, V5 and V6. Serum troponin T levels rise was diagnostic for non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. Coronary angiogram (CA) showed 20% stenosis in left main (LM), relevant lesions in LAD with indirect features of LIMA patency, occlusion of circumflex artery (CX) and RCA at implantation site. Among grafts, there were two critical lesions in SVG-RCA (Figure 1a), three relevant stenoses in SVG-Cx and also one in LIMA-LAD, with lesions present in all implantation sites. PCI with drug-eluting stent (DES; Biotronik Orsiro) placement was performed in both lesions of SVG-RCA: first one in near-anastomosis area (2.75 × 15 mm/14 bar), followed with the procedure in proximal area (4.0 × 30 mm/14 bar). Then, a rupture and heavy extravasation of contrast at proximal lesion was noted (Figure 1b), qualified as Ellis Type III, with subsequent deployment of polyurethane-covered stent (Biotronik Papyrus 3.5 mm/18 atm) and successful sealing of vascular wall (Figure 1c). Patient was hemodynamically stable; echocardiography revealed no signs of hemopericardium. Prompt ECG-guided chest computed tomography (CT) displayed mediastinal haematoma near the heart base, surrounding large vessels and right heart margin, sparing pleura and pericardium (Figure 1d) No extra contrast during CT imaging was administered. After 3 h, patient presented with pain recurrence with ST-segment elevation in inferior wall leads. Another immediate CA revealed near occlusion of SVG-RCA distally to covered stent (Figure 1e), which required DES implantation (3.5 × 26 mm/14 atm) (Figure 1f). Antimicrobial treatment was started. Patient was free of chest pain during in-hospital follow-up. CT scan performed after 10 days revealed regression of non-contrasting haematoma, and was treated conservatively.

(a) Baseline view of saphenous vein graft to right coronary artery, with two critical lesions (broad arrows), in proximal and distal, implantation part. (b) Massive extravasation of arterial blood into mediastinum after perforation in proximal segment (c) repaired with polyureathane-covered stent with no contrast leak observed. (d) Chest CT scan presenting spread of contrasting blood into mediastinal space (dotted circle); covered stent’s section pointed with dotted arrow. € External pressure from extravasated blood to distal SVG part resulting in near closure of the vessel; (f) treated with PCI with final result depicted.
Discussion
In this case, an intrathoracic bleeding with further external compression on SVG, resulting in ST-segment elevation, is of particular interest. Absence of hemopericardium, as presented in transthoracic echocardiography and CT scan, was probable due to several reasons: extrapericardial course of affected SVG or pericardial adhesions limiting spreading of blood with possible patent pericardiotomial gap. 5 On the contrary, mediastinal space lying posteriorly and superiorly, in the absence of natural boundaries, acts as area of lowest resistance. Nevertheless, high-volumed extravasation embraced also further part of the graft itself.
Another relevant issue concerns early failure of bypass grafts. Despite a well-known fact that saphenous grafts are prone to degeneration due to arterial flow pressure and neointimal proliferation, in this clinical scenario, the manifestation of accelerated graft dysfunction contributed in acute myocardial infarction and subsequent, life-threatening complication.
Footnotes
Acknowledgements
Our institution does not require ethical approval for reporting individual cases or case series.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient(s) for their anonymized information to be published in this article.
