Preference of birth attendant gender and associated factors among antenatal care attendants at Debre Markos town public health facilities,Northwest Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study design 2021

Abstract

Objective:

To assess the preference of birth attendant gender and associated factors among antenatal care attendants in Debre Markos town public health facilities, northwest Ethiopia, 2021.

Method:

A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted from 8 January 2021 to 28 February 2021 at Debre Markos town public health facilities. A total of 662 study participants were selected by systematic random sampling technique. Pretested interviewer-administered structured questionnaires were used for data collection. Data were entered using Epi Data version 3.1 and analyzed using SPSS version 25. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression were applied to identify factors associated with birth attendant gender preference. Association was described by the “odd ratio” along with a 95% confidence interval. Finally, a P value < 0.05 in the adjusted analysis was used to declare a significant association.

Result:

In this study, 644 women participated making a response rate of 97.3%. Of the total study participants, 108 (16.8%; 95% confidence interval: 13.8–19.4) preferred male birth attendants, while 232 (36%; 95% confidence interval: 32.5–39.8) preferred female birth attendants. Age (15–24) (adjusted odds ratio = 4.81, 95% confidence interval: 1.79, 12.94), no formal education (adjusted odds ratio = 2.94, 95% confidence interval: 1.32, 6.52), and primary education (adjusted odds ratio = 2.42, 95% confidence interval: 1.07, 5.47) were significantly associated with female birth attendant preference. A lack of formal education (adjusted odds ratio = 0.08; 95% confidence interval: 0.01, 0.68), secondary education (adjusted odds ratio = 0.34; 95% confidence interval: 0.16, 0.71), and history of assisted vaginal delivery (adjusted odds ratio = 3.72; 95% confidence interval: 1.40, 9.87) were significantly associated with a male birth attendant preference.

Conclusion:

A female birth attendant is preferred by almost one-third of pregnant mothers, while one-sixth preferred a male. The clients who were younger in age and lower in educational status were more likely to prefer female birth attendants, whereas those who had a history of assisted vaginal delivery were more likely to prefer male birth attendants. To have a mother in the continuum of care, it is crucial to take her preferences into account when providing services.

Keywords

Gender preference birth attendant pregnant mother Debre Markos Ethiopia

Introduction

About 295,000 women died during and after pregnancy and childbirth in the entire world in 2017. The vast majority of these fatalities (94%) happened in areas with little resources, and the bulk of them could have been avoided.¹ Developing countries account for about 99% of global maternal mortality with sub-Saharan African alone accounts for 66%.²

One of the keys to lowering maternal mortality rates is increasing institutional delivery rates.³ Despite offering free maternity services, few skilled birth attendants are used.^4,5 Low usage of maternal health care services was one of the reasons contributing to the delayed reduction in maternal mortality.⁶

The preference of a birth attendant was one strong barrier to the utilization of maternity services.⁷ The gender of health care providers influenced place of birth because most clients preferred female health care providers while some preferred male health care providers.⁸ Some expectant mothers were not comfortable to be examined by the male health care provider.⁹ Because of the gender of the healthcare provider, a patient may avoid seeking care or seek care at specific facilities.¹⁰ Studies in Nigeria and Afghanistan showed that about 5% and 6% of women refused to deliver in a health facility due to the absence of female health care providers.^11,12

Gender refers to characteristics of women, men, girls, and boys that are socially constructed. This includes norms, behaviors, and roles associated with being women, men, girls, and boys.¹³ In obstetrics and gynecology, where intimate procedures are part of clinical management, the preference of patients for the same gender healthcare provider is very important. Most female clients prefer female obstetrician-gynecologist to male obstetrician-gynecologist.^14,15 According to a different cross-sectional survey conducted in Asian countries, male healthcare providers are preferred by 1.6%–14.2%, whereas female healthcare providers are preferred by 32.3%–90.1%.^16–18

Some women say they prefer male birth attendants because they feel they are treated more respectfully and are more willing to assist them when needed.¹⁹

Women who mentioned they felt shy when the care providers were male were less likely to prefer institutional delivery in Bench Maji zone, Ethiopia.²⁰ A cross-sectional study conducted in Jigjiga, Somali region, indicated that 32.5% of women prefer to give birth at home, of which 30.7% was due to similarity in the gender of a birth attendant.²¹

According to the researcher’s knowledge, there is not much data regarding pregnant mother preference of birth attendant gender in the study area and in Ethiopia at large.

In order to deliver services in accordance with mother preferences and increase service utilization, this study will give baseline data regarding maternal gender preference and identify characteristics related with it.

Materials and methods

Study setting

The study was conducted in Debre Markos town, located in East Gojjam zone, Amhara regional state, Northwest Ethiopia. It is 299 km from Addis Abeba, the capital city of Ethiopia, and 265 km from Bahardar, the capital city of Amhara regional state. According to the population projection of Ethiopia from 2014 to 2017, the total population of the town was estimated to be 92,470, of which about 46,738 were female.

In the town, there is one compressive specialized university hospital and three public health centers. All four public health facilities provide ANC, Labor and delivery, and postpartum care services.

Study design and period

An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted from 08 January 2021 to 28 February 2021.

Source population

All pregnant women who received antenatal care at public health facilities in Debre Markos.

Study population

All pregnant mothers who received ANC service in Debre Markos town public health facilities during the study period were included.

Exclusion criteria

All pregnant mothers who were seriously ill were excluded from the study.

Sample size determination and sampling procedure

The required sample size for this study was calculated by using a power approach, considering factors associated with female gender preference in the previous study.²² The Epi Info version 7 software stat calc was used with the following assumptions: 95% confidence level, Power 80%, and Ratio 1:1. Factors from previous studies, educational status was used, proportion of gender preference among primary education, diploma and above was used as proportion among exposed and unexposed, an adjusted odd ratio was considered, and the sample size became 630. After considering the possible non-response rate of 5%, a total of 662 participants were required to conduct this study. A systematic random sampling technique was used to select study participants visiting public health facilities in Debre Markos town for ANC service. Proportional allocation of study participants to each public health facility based on their previous 3-month client flow was done (Figure 1). Sampling interval was determined by dividing the total study population who to have ANC follow-up during the study period by total sample size, then sampling fraction or $k = x / y = 1601 / 662 = 2.42 \approx 2$ . The first study participant was obtained by lottery method from each health facility independently and the next participant was chosen at a regular interval (every two) for interview by data collectors. Each participant was interviewed after voluntary written informed consent was obtained.

Figure 1.

Schematic presentation of the sampling procedure for assessment of preference of birth attendant gender and associated factor among ANC service attendants in Debre Markos public health facility, Northwest Ethiopia, 2021.

Operational definition

Skilled birth attendants

Skilled birth attendants refers exclusively to health professionals with midwifery skills such as a midwife, doctor, nurse, and others who have been educated and trained to proficiency in the skills needed to manage normal pregnancies, childbirth and the immediate postnatal period, and in the identification, management, and referral of complications in women and newborns.²³

Birth attendant gender preference

Birth attendant gender preference is a gender-based choice of a woman among health professions; either male, female, or no preference for birth attendance. Study participants were asked about which gender they prefer for birth attendance and female, male, and no gender preference options were provided.²¹

Data collection tools and procedure

The questionnaire was developed by reviewing different literature related to the area of study,^{16,17,20,22–27} pretested and commented on by an expert. Structured interviewer-administered questionnaire were used for data collection. The dependent variable was preference of birth attendant gender, whereas independent variables like socio-demographic characteristics, obstetric characteristics, and preference-related characteristics were collected.

Data quality assurance

To ensure data quality, the tool was first prepared in English and translated to the local language (Amharic) and then translated back to English to check the consistency. Data were collected by four BSc Midwifery professionals. An MSc clinical midwifery professional supervised each data collection site. Two-day training was given for data collectors and supervisors about the objective of the study and the confidentiality of information. A pretest was conducted a week before data collection outside of the study area, at Guzamen health center, on 5% (33) of the total sample size, and necessary modification was made.

Statistical Analysis

The data were checked for completeness and consistency, before being coded, cleaned, and entered into Epi Data version 3.1 before being exported to SPSS version 25 for analysis. Tables, figures, and texts were used to summarize the descriptive statistics of the study. The median and interquartile range were used for numerical data. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression were done to identify an association between a predictor variable and gender preference. All variables with a p value of less than 0.25 were included in the final model of multivariable logistic regression to control for confounding variables. The goodness of model fit was tested by Pearson’s and Deviance value.

Multinomial logistic regression was performed. Strength and direction of association were measured by the odd ratio. The adjusted odds ratio along with the 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated by using multivariable analysis to identify factors associated with the outcome variable. A P value of <0.05 was considered to declare a statistically significant association.

Ethical consideration

Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethical Review Board of the University of Gondar college of medicine and health science school of midwifery research ethics committee on behalf Institutional Review board (IRB) of University of Gondar (Ref no: MIDW 18/2013 EC). Written and verbal informed consent was obtained from participants before the study. Written informed consent was obtained from legally authorized representative for minor and those with no formal education.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics

Out of the 662 sample size, 644 participated in the study, making a response rate of 97.3%. The median age of study participants was 27, with an interquartile range of 24–30. Almost two-thirds (412, or 63.9%) of study participants were within the age group of 25–34. Most of the study participants (93.6%) were urban residents. The majority (613, or 95.2%) of study participants were Orthodox Christian religion followers, as shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Socio-demographic characteristics of pregnant mothers attending an antenatal care unit in Debre Markos public health facilities, Ethiopia, 2021 (N = 644).

Variable	Category	Frequency	Percentage (%)
Age	15–24	173	26.9
	25–34	412	63.9
	35–49	59	9.2
Marital status	Single	39	6.1
	Married	542	84.1
	Separated	43	6.7
	Others	20	3.1
Residence	Urban	603	93.6
Residence	Rural	41	6.4
Religion	Orthodox	613	95.2
	Muslim	14	2.2
	Protestant	17	2.6
Educational Status	No formal education	91	14.1
	Primary school (1–8)	94	14.6
	Secondary school (9–12)	197	30.6
	College and above	262	40.7
Occupation of study participant	Housewife	246	38.2
	Merchant	133	20.7
	Government employee	166	25.8
	Non-government employee	37	5.7
	Others	62	9.6
Husband educational status (n = 585)	No formal education	44	7.5
	Primary school (1–8)	81	13.8
	Secondary school (9–12)	154	26.3
	College and above	306	52.4
Husband occupation (n = 585)	Merchant	129	22
	Government employee	242	41.4
	Non-government employee	96	16.4
	Daily laborer	51	8.7
	Farmer	21	3.6
	Other specify	46	7.9
Average monthly income (Ethiopian Birr)	<2500	166	25.8

Obstetric history and service utilization of study participants

Of the total study participants, 586 (91%) pregnancies were planned. Of the total study participants, 373 (57.9%) study participants had given birth, whereas 247 (38.4%) study participants were primigravida. Of the total study participants, 27.6% had four and more ANC visits. Female birth attendants were present for 65 (22.8%) of the mothers who gave birth at a health facility by SVD or with assistance, as opposed to 216 (75.8%), who had male birth attendants. as shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Obstetric history and service utilization of pregnant mothers attending the ANC unit in Debre Markos public health facilities, North West Ethiopia, 2021.

Variable	Category	Frequency	Percentage (%)
Current pregnancy planned (N = 644)	Yes	586	91.0
Current pregnancy planned (N = 644)	No	58	9.0
No ANC visit of current pregnancy (N = 644)	ANC 1	149	23.1
	ANC (2–3)	317	49.2
	ANC ≥ 4	178	27.6
No of delivery (373)	Primi-para (1)	236	63.3
	Multi-para (2–4)	115	30.8
	Grad multi-para ≥ 5	22	5.9
Place of last delivery (n = 373)	Government hospital	245	65.7
	Health center	108	29.0
	Home	22	5.3
Mode of delivery (n = 353)	Spontaneous vaginal delivery	255	72.2
	Assisted vaginal delivery	30	8.5
	Cesarean section	68	19.3
Birth attendant (n = 285)	Male	216	75.8
	Female	65	22.8
	Both	4	1.4
Outcome of your last delivery (n = 373)	Alive	351	94.1
Outcome of your last delivery (n = 373)	Dead	22	5.9

Preference of birth attendant gender among pregnant mothers attending ANC unit at Debre Markos public health facility

A total of 232 (36%; 95% CI: 32.5–39.8) of the study participants choose female birth attendants, while 108 (16.8%; 95% CI: 13.8–19.4) prefer male birth attendants (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Preference of birth attendant gender among pregnant mothers attending ANC unit at Debre Markos public health facilities, North West Ethiopia, 2021 (N = 644).

Women’s reasons for birth attendant gender preference

Among 232 respondents who indicated a preference for female health providers, their main preferential attributes were felt comfort with female health care providers (70.1%), perceived female health care providers to know more about women’s health issues (47.6%), and perceived female midwives were more empathetic (42.8%). On the contrary, those who preferred to be attended by a male midwife, their main preferential attributes were perception that male midwives are more caring (65.7%), feeling of comfort with the male midwife (50.9%), and perception that males are more empathetic (38%) as shown in (Table 3).

Table 3.

Reason for preference of birth attendant gender among pregnant mothers attending the ANC unit at Debre Markos public health facilities, North West Ethiopia, 2021 (N = 644).

Reason of preferring female birth attendants (n = 232)	Frequency	Percentage (%)
Female midwives are more skillful	15	6.6
Female midwives are more empathetic	98	42.8
Females are culturally accepted	51	22.3
Feeling comfort with female midwives	162	70.7
I need privacy during the intimate procedure	39	17.0
Related to religion	20	8.7
Friendly atmosphere with female	73	31.9
Knowledge of women health issues	109	47.6
Female have better communication skill	29	12.7
Perception of safety	8	3.5
Females are courteous	5	2.2
Reason for preferring a male birth attendant from the pregnant mother’s perspective (n = 108)
Male are more skillful	16	14.8
Male are more empathetic	41	38.0
Male are more caring	71	65.7
A feeling of comfort with a male midwife	55	50.9
Friendly atmosphere with male	7	6.5
Male have better communication skill	28	25.9
Perception of safety with male	4	3.7

A factor associated with gender preference

In binary logistic regression, age, residence, educational status of the study participant, and status of pregnancy were associated with female gender preference. However, in multivariable logistic regression, age category and educational status of study participants were associated with female gender preference (Table 4). The educational status of study participants and mode of delivery of the last child were associated with male gender preference (Table 5).

Table 4.

Bivariable and multivariate logistic regression models of factors predicting preference of female birth attendants among pregnant mothers attending the ANC unit at Debre Markos public health facilities, Northwest Ethiopia, 2021 (N = 644).

Variable	Gender preference		COR 95% CI	AOR 95% CI	P value
Variable	Female (%)	No preference(%)	COR 95% CI	AOR 95% CI	P value
Age
15–24	92 (53.2)	61 (35.2)	2.68 (1.38,5.19)	4.81 (1.79,12.94)	0.00
25–34	122 (29.6)	211 (51.2)	1.02 (0.55,1.90)	1.68 (0.72,3.92)	0.22
35–49	18 (30.5)	32 (54.2)	1	1
Residence
Rural	29 (74.4)	6 (15.4)	7.09 (2.89,17.39)	1.76 (0.56,5.56)	0.32
Urban	203 (33.6)	298 (49.3)	1	1
Educational status
No formal education	53 (58.2)	37 (40.7)	3.02 (1.8, 5.08)	2.94 (1.32, 6.52)	0.00
Primary education (1–8)	48 (51.1)	36 (38.3)	2.82 (1.66, 4.78)	2.42 (1.07, 5.47)	0.03
Secondary education (9–12)	70 (35.5)	102 (51.8)	1.45 (0.94,2.23)	0.91 (0.48,3.73)	0.78
College and above	61 (23.3)	129 (49.2)	1	1
Was your pregnancy planned
Yes	198 (33.8)	286 (48.8)	0.36 (0.2,0.66)	0.46 (0.19,1.12)	0.08
No	34 (58.6)	18 (31)	1	1

AOR: adjusted odd ratio; COR: crude odd ratio; CI: confidence interval.

Table 5.

Bivariable and multivariate logistic regression model of factors predicting preference of male birth attendants among pregnant mothers attending ANC unit at Debre Markos public health facilities, Northwest Ethiopia, 2021 (N = 644).

Variable	Gender preference		COR 95% CI	AOR 95%CI	P value
Variable	Male	No preference	COR 95% CI	AOR 95%CI	P value
Educational status
No formal education	1 (1.2)	37 (40.7)	0.04 (0.01,0.36)	0.08 (0.01, 0.68)	0.021
Primary education (1–8)	10 (10.6)	36 (38.3)	0.49 (0.23,1.06)	0.51 (0.18,1.46)	0.216
Secondary education (9–12)	25 (12.7)	102 (51.8)	0.43 (0.26,0.74)	0.34 (0.16, 0.71)	0.004
College and above	72 (27.5)	129 (49.2)	1	1
Mode of delivery
C/s	10 (14.7)	42 (61.8)	0.73 (0.34,1.59)	0.54 (0.22,1.29)	0.087
Assisted vaginal delivery	12 (40)	10 (33.3)	3.71 (1.49,9.21)	3.72 (1.40,9.87)	0.008
Spontaneous vaginal delivery	42 (16.5)	130 (51)	1	1

AOR: adjusted odd ratio; COR: crude odd ratio; CI: confidence interval.

The odds for female gender preference rather than no preference for a client who has no formal education was 2.94 times (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.94, 95% CI: 1.32–6.52) greater than those who have been educated to the level of a diploma and above. The odds of male gender preference rather than no preference was 3.72 times (AOR: 3.72, 95% CI: 1.40–9.87) more likely among mothers who gave birth by assisted vaginal delivery in the last delivery than those who gave birth by SVD.

Discussion

This study was conducted to identify preference of birth attendant gender among pregnant mother came for ANC service at Debre Markos public health facility. The findings of this study revealed that 16.8% (95% CI: 13.8–19.4) of study participants preferred male birth attendants and 36% (95% CI: 32.5–39.8) preferred female birth attendants, whereas 47.2% (95% CI: 43.2–51.1) had no gender preference.

The overall finding of our study indicated that 36% of respondents prefer female birth attendants. This finding was lower than the national study done in Ethiopia in 2015 (48%).²⁸ The reason for the difference may be the scope of the study, as the national study was wider in scope. This study was lower than the study done in Iraq, the United Arab Emirate, and a cross-sectional study done in Syria.^17,24,29 This variation may be due to differences in the study population’s social and cultural background. Unlike those studies, about 95% of our study population were Orthodox Christians, whereas most of the study participants of those study were Muslim populations with very strong cultural and religious ties.^16,30

Findings of our study revealed that the odds of a female birth attendant rather than no preference were nearly five times (4.81) more likely for those in the age category of 15–24 than those in the age category of 35–49. This finding was supported by a study done in Nigeria.²⁵ This may be explained as most of the study participants in this age group were primigravida; therefore, there is a shyness about being exposed to the opposite gender. There is a tendency toward decreased shame as age increase. Another possible explanation may be decreased shame as age increases and the life experience of older women enables them to consider other factors rather than gender.^27,31

According to this study, those with no formal education or only primary education were 2.94 and 2.42 times more likely to choose female birth attendants. This could be explained by the fact that individuals with less education were more likely to adhere to traditional and cultural norms, and that education has resulted in a decline in religious and traditional observance.²⁷

According to our study, male gender preference for the birth attendant was 16.8%, this study was in line with a national study done in Ethiopia on male midwife acceptance (13%).²⁸ However, the finding of our study was greater than the study done in the United Arab Emirates 1.6%,¹⁷ cross-sectional study done in Baghdad 8%.²⁹ This variation may be due to differences in socio-cultural factors as the more religious belief women prefer female birth attendants than males due to modesty.³² The other thing is time variation, as acceptance of male birth attendant increase over time. However, this study was smaller than a study done in Nigeria 30.3%.²⁵ The reason may be the difference in socio-demographic status; as a proportion of those with primary and no formal education was 28.7% in our study, whereas 20.7% in study done in Nigeria.

This study indicated that male birth attendant preference rather than no preference was 99.2% decrease in those with no formal education when compared to those with diploma and above in level of education. Male birth attendant preference rather than no preference was 66% decrease in those with secondary education when compared to those with diploma and above in level of education. This may be explained as those with lower educational status were more prefer same gender birth attendant and feel shy to be examined by opposite gender.

Mode of delivery of previous birth was significantly associated with the preference of gender of birth attendant. Those who gave birth by assisted vaginal delivery were 3.71 times more likely to prefer male birth attendant rather than no preference when compared to those who gave birth by SVD. This can be explained as some females consider male birth attendants to be more competent and physically stronger than female birth attendants and can handle any complication that may occur during labor and delivery.³³

Limitation of the study

The cross-sectional nature of the study was one of limitation, as it cannot clarify the cause–effect relationship between outcome variables and predictive variables.

Conclusion

Nearly half of the pregnant mothers attending ANC at Debre Markos health facility have a preference toward the gender of birth attendant. Pregnant mothers who were young in age and lower in educational status were more likely to prefer female birth attendants. Those with lower educational status was less likely to prefer male birth attendants, whereas those who had history of assisted vaginal delivery were more likely to prefer male birth attendants. In addition to this more caring birth attendants, who have better communication skills, who have a friendly approach with the client, and empathetic were in demand. Considering maternal preference especially in the gender-sensitive area as in obstetrics is important to provide satisfactory health care service.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge data collectors and also thank the study participant for their precious time.

Authors contributions

A.N. and B.A. are involved in the conception of the research idea, design, data obtaining, and interpretation of the finding. All authors drafted the manuscript, and all authors reviewed and contributed content. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Availability of data

All supplemental materials for this article are available from the corresponding authors based on reasonable request.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iDs

Abraham Negash Dechasa

Addisu Sertsu Gerbi

Habtamu Bekele Sime

References

World Health Organization (WHO). Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2017: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. Geneva: WHO, 2019.

World Health Organization (WHO) and UNICEF. Trends in maternal mortality: 1990–2015—estimates from WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division 2015, https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/194254

Moran

Jolivet

Chou

, et al. A common monitoring framework for ending preventable maternal mortality, 2015–2030: phase I of a multi-step process. BMC Pregn Childb 2016; 16(1): 250.

Abdurahmen

Addissie

Molla

Community based cross-sectional study: preferences of place of delivery and birth attendants among women of Hashemene town, Oromia regional state

2012, 2014, https://catalog.ihsn.org/citations/24652

Fekadu

Ambaw

Kidanie

SA.

Facility delivery and postnatal care services use among mothers who attended four or more antenatal care visits in Ethiopia: further analysis of the 2016 demographic and health survey. BMC Pregn Childb 2019; 19(1): 64.

Ghosh

Solomon

Gobeze

, et al. Why are pregnant women and newborns still dying in rural Ethiopia? Afr J Midw Women Health 2012; 6(3): 115–119.

N’Gbichi

Ziraba

Wambui

, et al. “If there are no female nurses to attend to me, I will just go and deliver at home”: a qualitative study in Garissa, Kenya. BMC Pregn Childb 2019; 19(1): 332.

Karanja

Gichuki

Igunza

, et al. Factors influencing deliveries at health facilities in a rural Maasai Community in Magadi sub-County, Kenya. BMC Pregn Childb 2018; 18(1): 5.

Shavai

Chinamasa

Expecting mothers ‘preferences of midwife gender: implication for midwifery deployment. Int J Adv Res Manag Soc Sci 2015; 4(10): 169–183.

10.

Govender

Penn-Kekana

Gender biases and discrimination: a review of health care interpersonal interactions. Glob Public Health 2008; 3(Suppl. 1): 90–103.

11.

Yaya

Amouzou

Ekholuenetale

, et al. Choosing not to give birth at a health facility in Nigeria: where and why? Women Reprod Health 2018; 5(2): 132–143.

12.

Higgins-Steele

Burke

Foshanji

, et al. Barriers associated with care-seeking for institutional delivery among rural women in three provinces in Afghanistan. BMC Pregn Childb 2018; 18(1): 246.

13.

Krieger

Genders, sexes, and health: what are the connections—and why does it matter. Int J Epidemiol 2003; 32(4): 652–657.

14.

Groutz

Gordon

Shimonov

, et al. Do women with pelvic floor disorders prefer to be treated by female urogynecologists? Health Care Women Int 2019; 41: 543–552.

15.

Schnatz

Murphy

O’Sullivan

, et al. Patient choice: comparing criteria for selecting an obstetrician-gynecologist based on image, gender, and professional attributes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197(5): 548.e1–548.e7.

16.

Bal

Yılmaz

Beji

, et al. Muslim women choice for gender of obstetricians and gynecologist in Turkey. J Hum Sci 2014; 11(2): 64–73.

17.

Rizk

El-Zubeir

Al-Dhaheri

, et al. Determinants of women’s choice of their obstetrician and gynecologist provider in the UAE. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005; 84(1): 48–53.

18.

Alyahya

Almohanna

Alyahya

, et al. Does physicians’ gender have any influence on patients’ choice of their treating physicians? J Nat Sci Med 2019; 2(1): 29.

19.

Lusambili

Naanyu

Wade

, et al. Deliver on your own: disrespectful maternity care in rural Kenya. PLoS ONE 2020; 15(1): e0214836.

20.

Ababulgu

Bekuma

TT.

Delivery site preferences and associated factors among married women of child bearing age in Bench Maji Zone, Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci 2016; 26(1): 45–54.

21.

Mohamud

Preference place of delivery, birth attendants and associated factors among women of child bearing age in Jigjiga City, Somali region, Ethiopia: a cross sectional study, 2020, https://www.pubtexto.com/journals/international-journal-of-womens-health-and-gynecology/fulltext/preference-place-of-delivery-birth-attendants-and-associated-factors-among-women-of-child-bearing-age-in-jigjiga-city-somali-regio

22.

Muleta

Pregnant mothers preference of midwife gender for birth attendant and associated factors at health institution in ambo town, Oromia region, Ethiopia. Addis Ababa University, 2018, http://etd.aau.edu.et/handle/123456789/14619

23.

World Health Organization (WHO). Making pregnancy safer: the critical role of the skilled attendant: a joint statement by WHO, ICM and FIGO: World Health Organization, 2004, https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42955

24.

Bashour

Abdulsalam

Syrian women’s preferences for birth attendant and birth place. Birth 2005; 32(1): 20–26.

25.

Bukar

Women’s gender preferences for their obstetrician and gynaecologist at the University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, Maiduguri, Nigeria. Medicine 2012; 5: 6.

26.

Amir

Abokaf

Levy

, et al. Bedouin women’s gender preferences when choosing obstetricians and gynecologists. J Immigr Minor Health 2018; 20(1): 51–58.

27.

Amer-Alshiek

Alshiek

Amir Levy

, et al. Israeli Druze women’s sex preferences when choosing obstetricians and gynecologists. Isr J Health Policy Res 2015; 4: 13.

28.

Ethiopia FAU. Acceptability of male midwives in Ethiopia: findings of a National study, 2015, https://ethiopia.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/resource-pdf/Acceptability%20of%20Male%20Midwives%20in%20Ethiopia%20%28%20April%2015%20%202015%29.pdf

29.

Lafta

RK.

Practitioner gender preference among gynecologic patients in Iraq. Health Care Women Int 2006; 27(2): 125–130.

30.

Ganle

JK.

Why Muslim women in Northern Ghana do not use skilled maternal healthcare services at health facilities: a qualitative study. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 2015; 15: 10.

31.

Yanikkerem

Ozdemir

Bingol

, et al. Women’s attitudes and expectations regarding gynaecological examination. Midwifery 2009; 25(5): 500–508.

32.

Amir

Beri

Yechiely

, et al. Do urology male patients prefer same-gender urologist. Am J Mens Health 2018; 12(5): 1379–1383.

33.

Abdul Halim

Beaineh

Fenianos

, et al. Preferences of Lebanese adults for the gender of their surgeons: a cross-sectional study. East Medit Health J / La Revue Sante Mediterr Orient / Al-Majallah Al-Sihhiyah Li-Sharq Al-Mutawassit 2020; 26(5): 573–579.