Mobile connectivity fosters a 24/7 lifestyle that both benefits and burdens individuals. Digital well-being has emerged as a concept describing how persons balance these benefits and burdens. The concept of digital disconnection describes how people set limits to connectivity. Both concepts are currently studied in two fields of research, each dominated by different strands of theories. One strand is developing in mobile media studies: It uses the media-centric lens of affordances theory to explain how mobile media enable and constrain human action. The other is developing into its own field of “disconnection studies,” and draws on studies of media resistance to explain how the phenomenon of disconnection is inherently tied to the morality of what it means to lead a good (media) life in an increasingly digitized—yet unequal—society. This article offers a theoretical contribution at the intersection of both fields: Following an exploration of what “lack of theory” means in mobile communication and media studies, we argue that theoretical development fruitfully takes place through explorations of overlapping and complementary theoretical notions from adjacent fields. Mobile media and digital disconnection scholars thus benefit from extending a mutual invitation. To illustrate our argument, we formulate five axioms that compromise mobile media affordances with morality, to prepare mobile media studies for a future beyond mobile media.
AgaiM. S. (2024). “I feel like a peasant among goddesses”: Digital disconnection as affect and process among Norwegian youth. In FastK.AlbrisK.KarlsenF.KaunA.LomborgS.SyvertsenT. (Eds.), The digital backlash and the paradoxes of disconnection (pp. 257–274). Nordicom. http://doi.org/10.48335/9789188855961
2.
AlbrisK.FastK., Karlsen, F., Kaun, A., Lomborg, S., & Syvertsen, T. (Eds.). (2024). The digital backlash and the paradoxes of disconnection. Nordicom. http://doi.org/10.48335/9789188855961
3.
AltmaierN.KratelV. A. E.BorchersN. S.ZurstiegeG. (2024). Studying digital disconnection: A mapping review of empirical contributions to disconnection studies. First Monday, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v29i1.13269
4.
BaggerC. (2024). A decade of digital disconnection research in review: Where, what, how, and who? In FastK.AlbrisK.KarlsenF.KaunA.LomborgS.SyvertsenT. (Eds.), The digital backlash and the paradoxes of disconnection (pp. 109–128). https://doi.org/10.48335/9789188855961-6
5.
BarkerM. (1984a). A haunt of fears: The Strange history of the British horror comics campaign. Pluto.
6.
BarkerM. (1984b). Nasty politics or video nastes. In BarkerM. (Ed.), The video nasties: Freedom and censorship in the media (pp. 7–38). Pluto.
7.
BaughanA.ZhangM. R.RaoR.LukoffK.SchaadhardtA.ButlerL. D.HinikerA. (2022). “I don’t even remember what I read”: How design influences dissociation on social Media. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501899
8.
BayerJ. B.CampbellS. W.LingR. (2016). Connection cues: Activating the norms and habits of social connectedness. Communication Theory, 26(2), 128–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12090
9.
BayerJ. B.ReineckeL.Vanden AbeeleM. M. P. (2022). Psychological perspectives on mobile media: A flyover review. Mobile Media & Communication, 11(1), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579221134369
BeattieA. (2022). From poacher to protector of attention: The therapeutic turn of persuasive technology and ethics of a smartphone habit-breaking application. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 47(2), 337–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439211042667
BlairA. (2003). Reading strategies for coping with information overload ca 1550-1700. Journal of the History of Ideas, 64(1), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/3654293
15.
BordwellD.CarrollN. (Eds.). (2012). Post-theory: Reconstructing film studies. University of Wisconsin Press.
16.
BozanV.TreréE. (2023). When digital inequalities meet digital disconnection: Studying the material conditions of disconnection in rural Turkey. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 30(3), 1134–1148. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231174596
17.
BozanV.TreréE. (2024). The politics of disconnective Media: Unraveling the materiality of discourses on disconnectivity. Media and Communication, 12, 8586. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.8586
18.
BrennenB. (2019). Opting out of digital media. Routledge.
19.
BurrC.FloridiL. (2020). The ethics of digital well-being: A multidisciplinary perspective. In BurrL.FloridiL. (Eds.), Ethics of digital well-being. Philosophical studies series (Vol. 140). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50585-1_1
20.
CampbellS. W. (2020). Cutting the cord: Social and scholarly revolutions as CMC goes Mobile. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz021
21.
CastellsM.Fernández-ArdèvolM.QiuJ. L.SeyA. (2007). Conclusion: The Mobile network society. In CastellsM.Fernández-ArdèvolM.QiuJ. L.SeyA. (Eds.), Mobile communication and society: A global perspective (pp. 245–258). MIT Press. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6280872
22.
ChanM. (2023). Observations on mobile communication and well-being research. Mobile Media & Communication, 11(1), 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579221131232
23.
ChiaA.JorgeA.KarppiT. (2021). Reckoning with social media. Rowman & Littlefield.
DekkerC. A.BaumgartnerS. E. (2023). Is life brighter when your phone is not? The efficacy of a grayscale smartphone intervention addressing digital well-being. Mobile Media & Communication, 12(3), 688–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579231212062
26.
DekkerC. A.BaumgartnerS. E.SumterS. R.OhmeJ. (2024). Beyond the buzz: Investigating the effects of a notification-disabling intervention on smartphone behavior and digital well-being. Media Psychology, 28(1), 162–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2024.2334025
27.
de Segovia VicenteD.Van GaeverenK.MurphyS. L.Vanden AbeeleM. M. P. (2023). Does mindless scrolling hamper well-being? Combining ESM and log-data to examine the link between mindless scrolling, goal conflict, guilt, and daily well-being. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 29(1), zmad056. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmad056
28.
de Souza E SilvaA. (2006). From cyber to hybrid: Mobile technologies as interfaces of hybrid spaces. Space and Culture, 9(3), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331206289022
29.
de Souza e SilvaA.CampbellS. W.LingR. (2025). Hybrid space revisited: From concept toward theory. Communication Theory, 35(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtae023
30.
de Souza e SilvaA.ShellerM. (2014). Introduction: Moving toward adjacent possibles. In de Souza e SilvaA.Sheller M. (Eds.), Mobility and locative media (pp. 1–16). Routledge.
EnliG.FastK. (2023). Political solutions or user responsibilization? How politicians understand problems connected to digital overload. Convergence, 29(3), 675–689. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231160618
33.
EnliG.SyvertsenT. (2021). Disconnect to reconnect! self-help to regain an authentic sense of space through digital detoxing. In JanssonA.AdamsP. C. (Eds.), Disentangling: The geographies of digital disconnection (pp. 227–252). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197571873.003.0010
34.
FastK. (2021). The disconnection turn: Three facets of disconnective work in post-digital capitalism. Convergence, 27(6), 1615–1630. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565211033382
35.
FlayelleM.BreversD.KingD. L.MaurageP.PeralesJ. C.BillieuxJ. (2023). A taxonomy of technology design features that promote potentially addictive online behaviours. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2(3), 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00153-4
FuchsC.QiuJ. L. (2018). Ferments in the field: Introductory reflections on the past, present and future of communication studies. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy008
38.
GergenK. J. (2002). The challenge of absent presence. In KatzJ. E.AakhusM. (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 227–241). Cambridge University Press.
39.
GogginG. (2006). Cell phone culture: Mobile technology in everyday life. Routledge.
40.
HalfmannA.MeierA.ReineckeL. (2023). Trapped between goal conflict and availability norm? How users’ mobile messaging behavior during task engagement influences negative self-conscious emotions. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 36(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000381
41.
HallJ. A. (2023). What we do in the shadows: The consumption of mobile messaging by social media mobile apps in the twilight of the social networking era. Mobile Media & Communication, 11(1), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579221133610
42.
HelsperE. (2021). The digital disconnect: The social causes and consequences of digital inequalities. Sage.
43.
HorkheimerM.AdornoT. (2000). The culture industry: Enlightenment as mass deception (1944). In AdornoT.HorkheimerM. (Eds.), Dialectic of enlightenment (pp. 94–136). Herder and Herder.
44.
HuangY.MiaoW. (2021). Re-domesticating social media when it becomes disruptive: Evidence from China’s “super app” WeChat. Mobile Media & Communication, 9(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920940765
45.
ICA Mobile Communication Division. (2024). Conference call for papers for the ICA Mobile Communication Division to the 75th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association. https://www.icahdq.org/mpage/MOBILE_CFP
46.
JanssonA. (2024). The cultured traveller: Three theses on cultural capital and the taste for disconnection in tourism. In FastK.AlbrisK.KarlsenF.KaunA.LomborgS.SyvertsenT. (Eds.), The digital backlash and the paradoxes of disconnection (pp. 345–362). Nordicom. http://doi.org/10.48335/9789188855961
47.
JanssonA.AdamsP. C. (2021). Disentangling: The geographies of digital disconnection. Oxford University Press.
48.
JonesS.KarnowskiV.LingR.von PapeT. (2013). Welcome to mobile media & communication. Mobile Media & Communication, 1(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157912471456
49.
JonesS.KarnowskiV.LingR.von PapeT. (2022). Celebrating 10 years of mobile media & communication. Mobile Media & Communication, 11(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579221134909
50.
JorgeA. (2019). Social media, interrupted: Users recounting temporary disconnection on instagram. Social Media + Society, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119881691
51.
JorgeA. (2023). Pilgrimage to fátima and Santiago after COVID: Dis/connection in the post-digital age. Mobile Media & Communication, 11(3), 549–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579221151041
52.
KarlsenF. (2023). The digital detox camp: Practices and motivations for reverse domestication. In HartmanM. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of media and technology domestication (pp. 361–373). Routledge.
53.
KarlsenF.SyvertsenT. (2016). You can’t smell roses online. Intruding Media and reverse domestication. Nordicom Review, 37, 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0021
54.
KarlsenF.Ytre-ArneB. (2022). Intrusive media and knowledge work: How knowledge workers negotiate digital media norms in the pursuit of focused work. Information, Communication & Society, 25(15), 2174–2189. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1933561
55.
KarsayK.VandenboschL. (2021). Endlessly connected: Moving forward with agentic perspectives of mobile media (non-) use. Mass Communication and Society, 24(6), 779–794. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2021.1974785
56.
KatzJ. E.AakhusM. A. (2002). Conclusion: Making meaning of mobiles–a theory of apparatgeist. In KatzJ. E.AakhusM. (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 301–318). Cambridge University Press.
57.
KlingelhoeferJ.GilbertA.MeierA. (2024). Momentary motivations for digital disconnection: An experience sampling study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 29(5), zmae013. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmae013
58.
KrcmarM. (2009). Living without the screen: Causes and consequences of life without television. Norton.
59.
KuntsmanA.MiyakeE. (2022). Paradoxes of digital disengagement. In search of the opt-out button. University of Westminster Press.
60.
LicoppeC. (2004). ‘Connected’ presence: The emergence of a new repertoire for managing social relationships in a changing communication technoscape. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 22(1), 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1068/d323t
61.
LightB. (2014). Disconnecting with social networking sites. Springer.
62.
LingR. (2004). The mobile connection: The cell phone's impact on society. Elsevier.
63.
LingR. (2008). New tech, new ties: How mobile communication is reshaping social cohesion. MIT Press.
64.
LingR. (2012). Taken for grantedness: The embedding of mobile communication into society. MIT Press.
65.
LingR. (2017). A brief history of individual addressability: The role of mobile communication in being permanently connected. In VordererP.HefnerD.ReineckeL.KlimmtC. (Eds.), Permanently online, permanently connected (pp. 24–31). Routledge.
66.
LingR.CampbellS. W. (2009). The reconstruction of space and time: mobile communication practices. Transaction Publishers.
67.
LingR.CampbellS. (2011). Mobile communication: Bringing us together and tearing us apart. Transaction Publishers.
LingR.HaddonL. (2008). Children, youth and the mobile phone. In DortnerK.LivingstoneS. (Eds.), The international handbook of children, media and culture (pp. 137–151). Sage.
70.
LingR.LaiC.-H. (2016). Microcoordination 2.0: Social coordination in the age of smartphones and messaging apps. Journal of Communication, 66(5), 834–856. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12251
LomborgS.Ytre-ArneB. (2021). Advancing digital disconnection research: Introduction to the special issue. Convergence, 27(6), 1529–1535. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565211057518
73.
LythreatisS.SinghS. K.El-KassarA.-N. (2022). The digital divide: A review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121359
74.
ManderJ. (1978 [1977]). Four arguments for the elimination of television. Morrow.
75.
MannellK. (2019). A typology of mobile messaging’s disconnective affordances. Mobile Media & Communication, 7(1), 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157918772864
76.
MatthesJ.StevicA.KobanK.ThomasM. F.ForraiM.KarsayK. (2023). Fear of missing out, reflective smartphone disengagement, and loneliness in late adolescents. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 26(10), 731–738. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2023.0014
MutsvairoB.RagneddaM.MabvundwiK. (2023). ‘Our old pastor thinks the mobile phone is a source of evil.’ capturing contested and conflicting insights on digital wellbeing and digital detoxing in an age of rapid mobile connectivity. Media International Australia, 189(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X221090992
80.
NassenL.-M.VandeboschH.PoelsK.KarsayK. (2023). Opt-out, abstain, unplug. A systematic review of the voluntary digital disconnection literature. Telematics and Informatics, 101980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.101980
81.
NguyenM. H. (2021). Managing social media use in an “always-on” society: Exploring digital wellbeing strategies that people use to disconnect. Mass Communication and Society, 24(6), 795–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2021.1979045
82.
NguyenM. H.BüchiM.GeberS. (2022). Everyday disconnection experiences: Exploring people’s understanding of digital well-being and management of digital media use. New Media & Society, 26(6), 3657–3678. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221105428
83.
NicholasS.O'MalleyT. (2013). Moral panics, social fears and the media. Routledge.
84.
PostmanN. (2005 [1985]). Amusing ourselves to death. Penguin.
85.
RadeskyJ.HinikerA.McLarenC.AkgunE.SchallerA.WeeksH. M.CampbellS.GearhardtA. N. (2022). Prevalence and characteristics of manipulative design in mobile applications used by children. JAMA Network Open, 5(6), e2217641–e2217641. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.17641
86.
RadtkeT.ApelT.SchenkelK.KellerJ.von LindernE. (2022). Digital detox: An effective solution in the smartphone era? A systematic literature review. Mobile Media & Communication, 10(2), 190–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579211028647
87.
RainieH.WellmanB. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system (Vol. 10). MIT Press.
88.
ReineckeL.GilbertA.EdenA. (2022). Self-regulation as a key boundary condition in the relationship between social media use and well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45, 101296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.12.008
89.
ReineckeL.KlimmtC.MeierA.ReichS.HefnerD.Knop-HuelssK.RiegerD.VordererP. (2018). Permanently online and permanently connected: Development and validation of the online vigilance scale. PloS One, 13(10), e0205384. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205384
90.
RossM. Q.GilbertA.KlingelhoeferJ.MatassiM.NassenL. M.Van BruysselS.VerlindenA., & ParryD. A. (2024). Mapping a pluralistic continuum of approaches to digital disconnection. Media, Culture & Society, 46(4), 851–862. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437241228785
91.
RowbothamJ.StevensonK. (2003). Behaving badly: Social panic and Moral Outrage – Victorian and Modern Parallels. Aldershot: Ashgate.
92.
SchmuckD. (2020). Does digital detox work? Exploring the role of digital detox applications for problematic smartphone use and well-being of young adults using multigroup analysis. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(8), 526–532. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0578
93.
SchneiderF. M.LutzS.HalfmannA.MeierA.ReineckeL. (2021). How and when do mobile media demands impact well-being? Explicating the integrative model of Mobile Media use and need experiences (IM3UNE). Mobile Media & Communication, 10(2), 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579211054928
94.
SchrockA. R. (2015). Communicative affordances of mobile media: Portability, availability, locatability, and multimediality. International Journal of Communication, 9, 18. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/3288
95.
SchroederR.LingR. (2014). Durkheim and weber on the social implications of new information and communication technologies. New Media & Society, 16(5), 789–805. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813495157
96.
SpjeldnæsK. (2024). Power, pride, and patience in literary Reading: A paradox of precarious attention and disconnection. In FastK.AlbrisK.KarlsenF.KaunA.LomborgS.SyvertsenT. (Eds.), The digital backlash and the paradoxes of disconnection (pp. 363–382). Nordicom. http://doi.org/10.48335/9789188855961
SyvertsenT. (2020). Digital detox: The politics of disconnecting. Emerald Group Publishing.
99.
SyvertsenT. (2023). Framing digital disconnection: Problem definitions, values, and actions among digital detox organisers. Convergence, 29(3), 658–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565221122910
100.
SyvertsenT.EnliG. (2020). Digital detox: Media resistance and the promise of authenticity. Convergence, 26(5–6), 1269–1283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856519847325
101.
SyvertsenT.KarlsenF. (2024). Revisiting the past, being in the present, preparing for the future: Making sense of a digital-free holiday camp for adults. In FastK.AlbrisK.KarlsenF.KaunA.LomborgS.SyvertsenT. (Eds.), The digital backlash and the paradoxes of disconnection (pp. 303–324). https://doi.org/10.48335/9789188855961-15
102.
Tenenboim-WeinblattK.LeeC. J. (2020). Speaking across communication subfields. Journal of Communication, 70(3), 303–309. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa012
103.
TreréE.NataleS.KeightleyE.PunathambekarA. (2020). The limits and boundaries of digital disconnection. Media, Culture & Society, 42(4), 605–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720922054
104.
Van BruysselS.De WolfR.Vanden AbeeleM. (2023). Who cares about digital disconnection? Exploring commodified digital disconnection discourse through a relational lens. Convergence, 31(2), 521–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231206504
105.
Van BruysselS.De WolfR.Vanden AbeeleM. (2024). From bliss to burden: An ethnographic inquiry into how social, material and individual obstacles to digital well-being shape everyday life. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241288159
106.
Vanden AbeeleM. M. P. (2021). Digital wellbeing as a dynamic construct. Communication Theory, 31(4), 932–955. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaa024
107.
Vanden AbeeleM. M. P.NguyenM. H. (2022). Digital well-being in an age of mobile connectivity: An introduction to the special issue. Mobile Media & Communication, 10(2), 174–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579221080899
108.
Vanden AbeeleM. M. P.VandeboschH.KosterE. H. W.De LeynT.Van GaeverenK., de Segovia Vicente, D., Van Bruyssel, S., van Timmeren, T., De Marez, L., Poels, K., DeSmet, A., De Wever, B., Verbruggen, M., & Baillien, E. (2024). Why, how, when, and for whom does digital disconnection work? A process-based framework of digital disconnection. Communication Theory, 34(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtad016
109.
Vanden AbeeleM. M. P.WolfR. D.LingR. (2018). Mobile Media and social space: How anytime, anyplace connectivity structures everyday life. Media and Communication, 6(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i2.1399
110.
VordererP.HefnerD.ReineckeL.KlimmtC. (2017). Permanently online and permanently connected: A new paradigm for communication research? In VordererP.HefnerD.ReineckeL.KlimmtC. (Eds.), Permanently online, permanently connected: Living and communicating in a POPC world (pp. 3–9). Routledge.
111.
WellmanB.Quan-HaaseA.BoaseJ.ChenW.HamptonK.DiazI.MiyataK. (2003). The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism. J Computer-Mediated Communication, 8, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003.tb00216.x
112.
WinnM. (1980 [1977]). The plug-in drug. Bantham.
113.
WinstonB. (1998). Media technology and society: A History: From the telegraph to the internet. Routledge.
114.
WolfersL. N. (2024). A social constructivist viewpoint of media effects: Extending the social influence model of technology use to media effects. Communication Theory, 34(4), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtae015
WolfersL.CampbellS. W.LingR. (in press). Mobile Communication Theory: The State of the Field: An introduction to the special issue. Mobile Media and Communication.
117.
YouY. (2024). Stay focused and grow a forest: The design and paradoxes of gamified digital disconnection. In AlbrisK.FastK.KarlsenF.KaunA.LomborgS.SyvertsenT. (Eds.), The digital backlash and the paradoxes of disconnection (pp. 171–192). Nordicom. http://doi.org/10.48335/9789188855961
118.
Ytre-ArneB. (2023). Media use in digital everyday life. Emerald Publishing.
119.
Ytre-ArneB.SyvertsenT.MoeH.KarlsenF. (2020). Temporal ambivalences in smartphone use: Conflicting flows, conflicting responsibilities. New Media & Society, 22(9), 1715–1732. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820913561
