Tobacco use is common in India and a majority of users are in rural areas. We examine tobacco use and smoking quit rates along gender and socioeconomic dimensions in rural Andhra Pradesh.
Design and methods
Data come from a cross-sectional survey. Markers of socioeconomic status (SES) were education, occupation, and income. Regression analyses were undertaken to examine determinants of current smoking, smoking quit rates, tobacco use by type (cigarettes, bidis, and chewing), and quantity consumed (number per day, pack-years).
Results
The weighted prevalence of current smoking and tobacco chewing was higher in men (50.3%, 95% confidence interval, CI, 48.1–52.6 and 5.0%, 95% CI 4.1–5.9, respectively) compared with women (4.8%, 95% CI 3.9–5.7 and 1.0%, 95% CI 0.6–1.4, respectively) and higher among older age groups. The quit rate was higher in women (45.5%, 95% CI 38.7–52.2) compared to men (18.8%, 95% CI 16.7–20.9). Illiterate individuals were more likely to be current smokers of any type compared to those with secondary/higher education (odds ratio, OR, 3.25, 95% CI 2.54–4.16), although cigarette smoking was higher in men of high SES. Smoking quit rates were positively associated with SES (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.76–3.71) for secondary/higher education vs. illiterates. Level of consumption increased with SES and those with secondary/higher education smoked an additional 1.93 (95% CI 1.08–2.77) cigarettes or bidis per day and had an additional 1.87 (95% CI 0.57–3.17) pack-years vs. illiterates.
Conclusions
The social gradients in cigarette smoking and level of consumption contrasted those for indigenous forms of tobacco (bidi smoking and chewing). International prevention and cessation initiatives designed at modifying Western-style cigarette usage will need to be tailored to the social context of rural Andhra Pradesh to effectively influence the use of cigarettes and equally harmful indigenous forms of tobacco.
GuptaISankarD. Tobacco consumption in India: a new look using data from the National Sample Survey. J Public Health Policy2003; 24: 233–245.
2.
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005–06: India: volume I, Mumbai: IIPS, 2007.
3.
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Global Adult Tobacco Survey India (GATS India), 2009–2010. New Delhi: Government of India, 2010.
4.
World Bank. Urban population (% of total), Washington, DC: The World Bank Group, 2012.
5.
SubramanianSVDavey SmithG. Patterns, distribution, and determinants of under- and overnutrition: a population-based study of women in India. Am J Clin Nutr2006; 84: 633–640.
6.
EbrahimSKinraSBowenL. The effect of rural-to-urban migration on obesity and diabetes in India: a cross-sectional study. PLoS Med2010; 7: e1000268–e1000268.
7.
Corsi DJ and Subramanian SV. Association between socioeconomic status and self-reported diabetes in India: a cross-sectional multilevel analysis. BMJ Open 2012; 2: e000895.
8.
JohnSHistory and culture of bidis in India: production, employment, marketing and regulations. In: GuptaPCAsmaS (eds). Bidi smoking and public health, New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, 2008, pp. 1–12.
9.
ShimkhadaRPeabodyJW. Tobacco control in India. Bull World Health Organ2003; 81: 48–52.
10.
BhonsleRBMurtiPRGuptaPCTobacco habits in India. In: GuptaPCHamnerJEMurtiPR (eds). Tobacco related cancer and other diseases, Bombay: Oxford University Press, 1992, pp. 25–46.
11.
GuptaPCRayCS. Smokeless tobacco and health in India and South Asia. Respirology2003; 8: 419–431.
12.
RamadasKSauvagetCThomasG. Effect of tobacco chewing, tobacco smoking and alcohol on all-cause and cancer mortality: a cohort study from Trivandrum, India. Cancer Epidemiol2010; 34: 405–412.
13.
JhaPJacobBGajalakshmiV. A nationally representative case–control study of smoking and death in India. N Engl J Med2008; 358: 1137–1147.
14.
DikshitRPKanhereS. Tobacco habits and risk of lung, oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancer: a population-based case–control study in Bhopal, India. Int J Epidemiol2000; 29: 609–614.
15.
CritchleyJAUnalB. Health effects associated with smokeless tobacco: a systematic review. Thorax2003; 58: 435–443.
16.
DikshitRGuptaPCRamasundarahettigeC. Cancer mortality in India: a nationally representative survey. Lancet2012; 379: 1807–1816.
17.
PetersenPE. Strengthening the prevention of oral cancer: the WHO perspective. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol2005; 33: 397–399.
18.
ReddyKSGuptaPC. Report on tobacco control in India, New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, 2004.
19.
World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2011: warning about the dangers of tobacco, Geneva: World Health Organization, 2011.
20.
AroraMMadhuR. Banning smokeless tobacco in India: policy analysis. Indian J Cancer2012; 49: 336–341.
21.
JandooTMehrotraR. Tobacco control in India: present scenario and challenges ahead. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev2008; 9: 805–810.
22.
JhaPGuindonEJosephRA. A rational taxation system of bidis and cigarettes to reduce smoking deaths in India. Econ Polit Weekly2011; 46: 44–51.
23.
RaniMBonuSJhaP. Tobacco use in India: prevalence and predictors of smoking and chewing in a national cross sectional household survey. Tob Control2003; 12: e4–e4.
24.
SubramanianSVNandySKellyM. Patterns and distribution of tobacco consumption in India: cross sectional multilevel evidence from the 1998–9 national family health survey. BMJ2004; 328: 801–806.
25.
NeufeldKJPetersDHRaniM. Regular use of alcohol and tobacco in India and its association with age, gender, and poverty. Drug Alcohol Depend2005; 77: 283–291.
26.
GuptaPC. Survey of sociodemographic characteristics of tobacco use among 99,598 individuals in Bombay, India using handheld computers. Tob Control1996; 5: 114–120.
27.
BobakMJhaPNguyenSPoverty and smoking. In: JhaPChaloupkaFJ (eds). Tobacco control policies in developing countries, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000, pp. 41–61.
28.
SubramanianSVNandySKellyM. Health behaviour in context: exploratory multi-level analysis of smoking, drinking and tobacco chewing in four states. Econ Polit Weekly2004; 39: 685–693.
29.
NarayanKMChadhaSLHansonRL. Prevalence and patterns of smoking in Delhi: cross sectional study. BMJ1996; 312: 1576–1579.
30.
SorensenGGuptaPCPednekarMS. Social disparities in tobacco use in Mumbai, India: the roles of occupation, education, and gender. Am J Public Health2005; 95: 1003–1008.
31.
ForeyBAThorntonAJLeePN. Systematic review with meta-analysis of the epidemiological evidence relating smoking to COPD, chronic bronchitis and emphysema. BMC Pulm Med2011; 11: 36–36.
32.
TeoKKOunpuuSHawkenS. Tobacco use and risk of myocardial infarction in 52 countries in the INTERHEART study: a case–control study. Lancet2006; 368: 647–658.
33.
LopezADCollishawNEPihaT. A descriptive model of the cigarette epidemic in developed countries. Tob Control1994; 3: 242–247.
34.
ChowCK. Cardiovascular risk factor levels and cardiovascular risk estimation in a rural area of India, Sydney: University of Sydney, 2007.
35.
PrignotJ. Quantification and chemical markers of tobacco-exposure. Eur J Respir Dis1987; 70: 1–7.
36.
KumarRPrakashSKushwahAS. Breath carbon monoxide concentration in cigarette and bidi smokers in India. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci2010; 52: 19–24.
37.
Directorate General of Employment and Training. Revised Indian National Classification of Occupations (NCO), New Delhi: Ministry of Labour, Government of India, 2004.
38.
ChowCKNaiduSRajuK. Significant lipid, adiposity and metabolic abnormalities amongst 4535 Indians from a developing region of rural Andhra Pradesh. Atherosclerosis2008; 196: 943–952.
39.
DuncanCJonesKMoonG. Health-related behaviour in context: a multilevel modelling approach. Soc Sci Med1996; 42: 817–830.
40.
SubramanianSVJonesKDuncanCMultilevel methods for public health research. In: KawachiIBerkmanLF (eds). Neighborhoods and health, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
41.
GelmanAHillJ. Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
42.
StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: release 12.1 SE. College Station, TX: Stata Corp, 2012.
43.
Rasbash J, Browne WJ, Healy M, et al. MLwiN Version 2.20. Bristol, UK: Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol, 2010.
44.
Barbeau EM, Krieger N and Soobader MJ. Working class matters: socioeconomic disadvantage, race/ethnicity, gender, and smoking in NHIS 2000. Am J Public Health 2004; 94: 269–278.
45.
JarvisMWardleJSocial patterning of individual health behaviours: the case of cigarette smoking. In: MarmotMGWilkinsonRG (eds). Social determinants of health, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
46.
LaaksonenMRahkonenOKarvonenS. Socioeconomic status and smoking: analysing inequalities with multiple indicators. Eur J Public Health2005; 15: 262–269.
47.
PatrickDLCheadleAThompsonDC. The validity of self-reported smoking: a review and meta-analysis. Am J Public Health1994; 84: 1086–1093.
48.
VartiainenESeppalaTLillsundeP. Validation of self reported smoking by serum cotinine measurement in a community-based study. J Epidemiol Community Health2002; 56: 167–170.
49.
YusufSHawkenSOunpuuS. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case–control study. Lancet2004; 364: 937–952.
50.
Subramanian SV, Corsi DJ, Subramanyam MA, et al. Jumping the gun: the problematic discourse on socioeconomic status and cardiovascular health in India. Int J Epidemiol 2013. Epub ahead of print 5 April 2013. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyt017.
51.
GuptaRGupthaSGuptaVP. Twenty-year trends in cardiovascular risk factors in India and influence of educational status. Eur J Prev Cardiol2012; 19: 1258–1271.
52.
CorsiDJSubramanianSVLearSA. Co-variation in dimensions of smoking behaviour: a multivariate analysis of individuals and communities in Canada. Health Place2013; 22: 29–37.
53.
JindalSKAggarwalANChaudhryK. Tobacco smoking in India: prevalence, quit-rates and respiratory morbidity. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci2006; 48: 37–42.
54.
SmithPFrankJMustardC. Trends in educational inequalities in smoking and physical activity in Canada: 1974–2005. J Epidemiol Community Health2009; 63: 317–323.
55.
ZamanMJPatelAJanS. Socio-economic distribution of cardiovascular risk factors and knowledge in rural India. Int J Epidemiol2012; 41: 1302–1314.
56.
JhaPChaloupkaFJ. Curbing the epidemic: governments and the economics of tobacco control, Washington, DC: World Bank, 1999.
57.
BansalRJohnSLingPM. Cigarette advertising in Mumbai, India: targeting different socioeconomic groups, women, and youth. Tob Control2005; 14: 201–206.
58.
ChowCKLockKMadhavanM. Environmental Profile of a Community’s Health (EPOCH): an instrument to measure environmental determinants of cardiovascular health in five countries. PLoS One2010; 5: e14294–e14294.
59.
World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2008: the MPOWER package, Geneva: World Health Organization, 2008.
60.
John RM, Rao RK, Rao MG, et al. The economics of tobacco and tobacco taxation in India. Paris: International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2010.
