Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Introduction:

Alkalising agents have the potential to enhance the efficacy of many antimicrobial agents used in the treatment of Urinary Tract Infections; they also have the potential to cause significant patient harm if used incorrectly. This work seeks to illustrate and quantify these risks and synergies by modelling drug solubility and supersaturation against pharmacokinetic data for commonly used antibiotic agents.

Methods:

Solubility-pH relationships are employed to quantify the crystalluria risk for compounds which may be reasonably expected to be co-prescribed—or co-administered—with urinary alkalisers (amoxicillin, nitrofurantoin, trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin). These results are correlated against reports of crystalluria in the literature and in the EU Adverse Drug Reaction database.

Results and Discussion:

We find a correlation between the maximum theoretical supersaturation attainable and crystalluria reports for sulfamethoxazole, amoxicillin and ciprofloxacin. Shifts in urine pH which can be induced by alkalising agents may produce supersaturated states (and thus induce crystalluria) and may also affect antimicrobial efficacy. The importance of employing biorelevant media to improve predictive capacity of this analysis is also discussed.

Conclusion:

Despite their widespread use, alkalising agents have significant effects on the pharmacokinetics of the most common drugs used to treat UTIs. With self-care set to increase, all OTC products should be critically re-evaluated to ensure patient safety, particularly within contexts where healthcare professionals are not involved in treatment selection. This analysis suggests a need for consistency across patient and healthcare professional documents to improve clarity.

Plain Language Summary

OTC Alkalising agents need additional warning information

Alkalising agents (e.g., sodium and potassium citrate) can be purchased in many locations without the supervision of a healthcare professional.

Although they are thought as innocuous agents, alkalisers can greatly influence the way some antibiotics behave in the body and this can potentially cause patient harm.

This work illustrates these risks and synergies by modelling drug solubility and supersaturation against pharmacokinetic data for commonly used antibiotic agents.

Manufacturers and patients should be aware that the use of alkalising agents with these drugs (and potentially many others) may cause unintended consequences.

Keywords

antimicrobial excretion pH efficacy supersaturation urinary alkalisation urinary pH urinary tract infection clinical pharmaceutics

Introduction

Urinary alkalising agents are classified as General Sale List products in the United Kingdom and Ireland and as such, they are widely available in supermarkets where they can be sold without the supervision of a healthcare professional. The market for Over-The-counter (OTC) medicines is worth $34 billion in the United States and $3.54 billion in the United Kingdom¹ and advocates for the increased use of OTC products predict dramatic healthcare savings in these continents.^2,3 This analysis suggests that OTC products will play a new role in future healthcare, and as such, they need to be critically evaluated within this new context to ensure patient safety.

Dysuria is one of the most common conditions encountered in primary care and can be treated by urinary alkalisers alone, or as adjuvants to antibiotics (e.g. trimethoprim, nitrofurantoin or ciprofloxacin). Some advocate for alkalization of the urine to improve antibiotic efficacy,⁴ however, there are number of factors to consider, discussed herein. Although alkalisation of the urine has been shown to decrease pain and urinary frequency associated with urinary tract infections (UTIs),⁵ systematic analysis indicates that evidence of their effectiveness is lacking.⁶ In a wider context, clinicians have utilised urinary alkalisation to reduce the systemic toxicity of acidic drugs,⁷ prevent crystalluria,^8,9 and treat acid-base imbalances. The effect of alkalising agents on urinary pH is determined by the patient biochemistry at the point of administration, which is known to change dramatically throughout the day. This can result in minimal (or no effect) in some patients and dramatic shifts in others.

Urine alkalisation can be achieved with citrate or bicarbonate salts, which act through their own distinct mechanism.¹⁰ If bicarbonate ions reach the renal tubules intact, they will cause increases in urinary pH. Urine alkalisation by citrate has been suggested to arise from its metabolism via the citric acid cycle to release CO₂ which is then catalysed to bicarbonate by carbonic anhydrase. However, the precise mechanism is likely to be more complex and renal handling of citrate has been discussed extensively by Simpson¹¹ and later by Hamm.¹² Oral alkalisers can cause a pH shift of > 1 unit in less than 1 hour (mean 12 h).⁷ Alkalisation can also occur as an unintended side-effect of other drugs such as antiacids, which can also raise urinary pH. One study illustrated that this effect is more pronounced when urine pH is approximately 5, where pH can increase up to 1 pH unit.¹³ A follow-up study by the same authors determined that it takes approximately 24 h for these changes to occur and they remain until approximately 24 h after cessation of treatment.¹⁴

Solution pH has a strong effect on the solubility of endogenous and exogenous species and rapid changes, therefore, may result in supersaturation and ultimately their precipitation. In the context of pharmaceutical care, this is referred to as drug induced crystalluria.⁹ Figure 1 illustrates that pH has a dramatic effect on the solubility of ionisable species. This becomes more important as pH approaches the pK_a of the drug.

Figure 1.

When the pH of a saturated solution of a weak acid (pK_a = 7.2) at pH 9 is rapidly decreased to pH 4, the drug will eventually precipitate out of solution to reach the new solubility equilibrium; precipitation is not always instant and the rate is proportional to the supersaturation ratio (i.e., the difference between the momentary solubility, C* and the equilibrium solubility, C_eq).

This pH effect on solubility also manifests itself in vivo in any anatomical site which can dramatically change the solution pH. Unsurprisingly, drug crystals have been observed in the gastrointestinal tract,¹⁵ macrophages (specifically their lysosomal compartment),¹⁶ and the renal system.⁸ The function of the kidneys is such that there are marked changes in filtrate composition (and pH) along the renal tubules as substances are excreted, metabolised and reabsorbed. Urine pH fluctuates over 24 h, usually within 5 to 8.5 but this range can extend in pathological situations (4.5–9).

Large shifts in urinary pH from alkalisers may cause renal damage resulting from the induction of crystalluria or alter the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic activity of various drugs, including those used to treat UTIs. Although thought of as innocuous agent, like any drug product, its use has its associated risks. The aim of this work is to provide an analysis of these risks to minimise patient harm.

Methodology

Analysis of products available in United Kingdom, United States, and Irish markets

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Drugs.com (USA), the electronic medicines compendium (UK) and the Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA) databases were searched for ‘alkaliser’, ‘urinary alkaliser’, ‘alkalizer’, ‘urinary alkalizer’, ‘bicarbonate’ and ‘citrate’. These searches were manually screened, and alkalising agents were added to the list compiled in Table 3.

Literature survey of drug induced crystalluria

The Scopus database (Search preformed on December 2020) was searched for ‘ciprofloxacin’, ‘trimethoprim’, ‘sulfamethoxazole OR co-trimoxazole’, ‘amoxicillin’, ‘nitrofurantoin’ AND ‘crystalluria’. Article abstracts and titles were then manually screened and articles that discussed new cases which identified drug induced crystalluria were used in the analysis (Figure S1).

Analysis of EU database for Suspected Adverse Reactions (EUADR)

Employing methodology published previously,¹⁷ The EUADR database was searched for products containing ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole (co-trimoxazole), amoxicillin, and nitrofurantoin. Results were screened to those reported by healthcare professionals only and refined by renal. The author recognises the limitations of this database, namely: the number of reports may be related to the publicity of the drug and or its adverse reactions, no information regarding how often the drug is prescribed accompanies the reports and, in many cases, it cannot be definitively proven that the drug is the cause of the observed event.

pH solubility curves

Equilibrium solubility studies were selected which allowed the drug to equilibrate for 24 h in 37 ºC, in aqueous solvents with ionic strength > 0.1 M across the range of pH found in the urine where possible. Studies that employed biorelevant media were rare but used when available. Data were extracted using WebPlotDigitiser (v. 4.4) and modelled using the Henderson-Hasselbalch model which has been derived previously¹⁸ (Table 1). The pK_a for each molecule was determined using the pK_a calculator implemented in Marvin which makes a prediction based on calculations of partial charges of atoms in the molecules.

Table 1.

Summary of data used in calculations.

Drug	pK_a^a	Solubility (mM)^b	Maximum urinary concentrations(mg/L) [mM]	Maximum Supersaturation ratio^c
Amoxicillin^d	7.16	41-2,877¹⁹	~12,500,000 [29,832]²³	70 (727)
Ciprofloxacin	6.18; 8.73	0.23-91^24–27	1981 [5.98]²⁸	395 (26)
Nitrofurantoin	7.2	1.68-47²²^,29	320 [1.34]³⁰	28 (<1)
Sulfamethoxazole	6.16	1.1-817³¹	1016 [3.2]³²	743 (2.9)
Trimethoprim	7.2	3.2-40³³^,34	720 [2.48]³⁵	12 (<1)

The pK_a calculator implemented in Marvin predicts pK_a data based on calculations of partial charges of atoms in the molecules.

Minimum-maximum solubility in biorelevant media when available.

Supersaturation attainable from maximum reported urinary concentrations in parenthesis.

Amoxicillin trihydrate.

Solubility data from Yu et al. was combined with that of Dahlan, McDonald, and Sunderland as they measured equilibrium solubility of trimethoprim closer to physiological temperatures of 37ºC, whereas the latter tested solubility at 32ºC. Preforming supersaturation analysis using data obtained from Dahlan, McDonald, and Sunderland predicted a supersaturation was greater than 1. The absence of literature reports regarding trimethoprim induced crystalluria prompted reanalysis with data closer to physiological temperatures.

One study evaluated the solubility of amoxicillin in the urine,¹⁹ although it was used in this analysis there are no details of the specificity of the quantification method for other penicillin derivatives or breakdown products and no details of the phase remaining (or its purity) after 24 h equilibrium studies. This is an important consideration as amoxicillin is known to degrade > 70% in aqueous solutions buffered to pH 7 within 24 h.²⁰

Another study suggested that complexation with urea and creatinine (found in the urine at approximately 250 mM and 1.5 mM respectively) will contribute to increased nitrofurantoin solubility and suggested that the shape of a solubility curve using urine may deviate from that obtained using pH buffers.^21,22 As such, the concentration of nitrofurantoin in these solutions was taken as the intrinsic solubility to increase the accuracy of the supersaturation model.

Pharmacokinetic data

Pharmacokinetic data for amoxicillin,^23,36,37 nitrofurantoin,^38–40 ciprofloxacin,^28,41,42 co-trimoxazole^32,43 (trimethoprim C_max)³⁵ was extracted from the literature as before with WebPlotDigitiser (v. 4.4). The highest observed datapoint is highlighted in the figure, was used to calculate the supersaturation that could have been generated in that patient. When available, the data was inserted into an excel sheet to obtain the standard deviation and mean, as this data was not available for sulfamethoxazole, the range was used as a surrogate for standard deviation.

Results and discussion

With relevance to the clinical context of dysuria, equilibrium solubility data has been obtained from the literature for ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim, nitrofurantoin, amoxicillin and sulfamethoxazole and modelled using Henderson-Hasselbalch to aid illustration (Figure 2). Importantly all of these drugs have a pK_a within the range of physiological urinary pH, therefore, rapid changes to the pH brought about by urinary alkalisers can present a risk for precipitation. Conversely, the opposite can be applied if crystalluria is determined to be caused by these drugs, patients could be treated with the acid or base to increase drug solubility and potentially redissolve the crystals.

Figure 2.

Equilibrium solubility data as a function of solution pH obtained from the literature for nitrofurantoin, trimethoprim, ciprofloxacin, sulfathiazole and amoxicillin.

Theoretically, precipitation is possible for all of these compounds as they all exhibit pH dependant solubility in the range of urinary pH. Critically, sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin and amoxicillin have been identified in clinical isolates using FTIR,⁴⁴ MS⁴⁵ and XPS.⁴⁶ In an attempt to quantify the risk of precipitation (i.e., crystalluria) solubility data must be placed in the context of supersaturation. Supersaturation describes the driving force for crystallisation where increased supersaturation reduces the critical cluster size and the nucleation rate. Equation 1 is a practical expression of the relationship between supersaturation, σ and nucleation rate, dN/dt where k and m denote the nucleation rate constant and nucleation order respectively.^47,48

\frac{d N}{d t} = k σ^{m}

(1)

Figure 3 reveals the maximum supersaturation attainable (calculated from the maximum and minimum solubility values across the pH range) for each agent alongside the number of hits from a literature analysis. Interestingly it highlights the significant risk of crystalluria with compounds that can attain large supersaturation indexes ⩾ 70.

Figure 3.

(a) Maximum supersaturation ratio of UTI anti-infectives (nitrofurantoin, σ ≈ 3; ciprofloxacin, σ ≈ 303; trimethoprim, σ ≈ 24; amoxicillin, σ ≈ 70 and sulfamethoxazole, σ ≈ 1345) labelled with number of hits from literature analysis. (b) Supersaturation on crystal nucleation rate.

Crystalluria has been observed in trimethoprim products, but only as trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.⁴⁹ This is unsurprising, as crystalluria is a common feature of sulfonamide antibiotics and is associated with urine pH < 7.^9,50–52 Amoxicillin induced crystalluria is also well characterised and has been widely reported,^8,23,45 it is associated with acidic urine around pH 5.²³

Ciprofloxacin crystalluria may be induced by increasing urine pH from 4.5 to 7.⁵³ Although it has been postulated (manufacture information) that this is because ciprofloxacin solubility is decreased in alkaline environments, this is not strictly correct.⁴⁶ From the pH solubility diagram in Figure 2 it is apparent that ciprofloxacin solubility increases above pH 7.5. This is due to the formation of a low solubility complex which precipitates from solution,^54–56 these results could be extrapolated to other quinolones which are known to precipitate in alkaline solutions in the presence of certain metal cations.²⁷ Alarmingly, crystalluria was observed in half (n = 3/6) of the participants administered 500 mg ciprofloxacin alongside sodium bicarbonate (42 mEq, three times daily for four doses) with additional fluid intake (not quantified).⁴⁶

While nitrofurantoin associated crystalluria is not widely described in the literature, one report was identified⁵⁷ and due to the acidity of the patients urine reported, and the solubility data above, nitrofurantoin crystalluria is plausible. However, it is possible that the authors have misidentified the, ‘small purple crystals’ observed. Purple crystals in urine catheter bags are commonly due to the precipitation of indirubin and indigo crystals, known as ‘Purple bag syndrome’.⁵⁸ This has been documented since 1857⁵⁹ and was described by their contemporaries as a well-known event in geriatric patients.⁶⁰ Although they report disappearance of the crystals after cessation of nitrofurantoin, presumably the authors changed the catheter, the nidus of the infection which may have contained the bacteria that catalysed the conversion of indole sulphate to indirubin and indigo.

The EU database of Suspected Adverse Drug Reactions reveals that—although rare—crystalluria has been suspected in all of the drugs used in UTIs, in descending order: co-trimoxazole (n = 87/2,330,256), ciprofloxacin (n = 52/25,853), amoxicillin (n = 25/30,683), nitrofurantoin (n = 7/6,325), trimethoprim (n = 2/2,891) and sulfamethoxazole (n = 0/611). The implication of ciprofloxacin, amoxicillin and co-trimoxazole in drug-induced crystalluria can be rationalised from the analysis above, and the absence of sulfamethoxazole reports is probably because it is almost exclusively prescribed as co-trimoxazole. A deeper analysis of nitrofurantoin hits revealed other drugs which may be responsible; separate reports contained methotrexate, amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin and piperacillin-tazobactam. One report may have been mischaracterised as it is associated with a publication that does not mention nitrofurantoin crystalluria (in fact the paper describes nitrofurantoin induced pneumonitis)⁶¹ which leaves two remaining reports. The two reports involving trimethoprim do not appear to have been mischaracterised.

Further context can be provided with the concentrations of drug that have been observed in the urine (Figure 4). With the exception of sulfamethoxazole, urinary concentrations can reach approximately 10² to 10³ the respective plasma concentrations for the drugs analysed (C_max as per manufacturer information: trimethoprim, 1–2 mg/L; amoxicillin, ~6 mg/L; ciprofloxacin, 0.56–3.7 mg/L; nitrofurantoin, ~1 mg/L and sulfamethoxazole, 57.4 mg/L).

Figure 4.

Urinary concentrations for various formulations of UTI antibiotics. Maximum urinary concentrations used for further analysis indicated with an arrow.

Figure 5 aims to highlight the risk supersaturation with clinically relevant concentrations. This may account for the quantity of reports for ciprofloxacin, amoxicillin and sulfamethoxazole with nitrofurantoin and trimethoprim illustrating undersaturation even at the highest concentrations available in the literature.

Figure 5.

Supersaturation ratio plotted as a function of urinary pH for observed maximum urinary concentrations of various antibiotics used in the treatment of UTIs. When supersaturation exceeds 1 the drug is prone to precipitation.

Changing solution pH (i.e. renal filtrate pH) can also alter the excretion of some drugs which is explained—in part—by their increased solubility in the medium. This may be rationalised by the influences of the drugs pK_a and its dramatic effect on the pH solubility curve and log D (Figure 6). This is generally illustrated using the classic examples of aspirin,⁶² methamphetamine⁶³ and methotrexate.⁶⁴ In the context of dysuria, key pharmaceuticals which are likely to be co-prescribed include nitrofurantoin, trimethoprim and ciprofloxacin and amoxicillin. Although this author could find no evidence to suggest that amoxicillin exhibits pH dependant excretion and clinical studies suggest that pH does not affect excretion of ciprofloxacin,⁶⁵ it is possible that increased excretion could be seen at the extremes of urinary pH for each of these drugs. Alkaline urine is known to increase the excretion rate of nitrofurantion²⁹ and the pH effect on trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole is well characterised.⁶⁶

Figure 6.

Calculated log P and D as a function of pH for nitrofurantoin, ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and amoxicillin. A decreasing log D value is correlated with increased solubility in water.

Notwithstanding active excretion/reabsorption, the propensity for the drug to penetrate into tissues can be estimated using log P and log D. Log D has a higher predictive capacity as it describes the partition coefficient—between octanol and water—of a drug molecule across the pH scale; this becomes particularly important for ionisable drugs as the unionised form has higher solubility in the organic phase (i.e. unionised molecules are expected to penetrate across biological membranes to a greater degree than their ionised counterparts). It could be hypothesised therefore, that increased ionisation could result in increased solubility in the urine, reduced reabsorption in the kidney, and subsequently increased clearance.

Evidence suggests that many antibiotics used in the treatment of UTIs demonstrate pH dependant synergy,⁶⁷ which could be exploited to reduce the treatment failure rate (Table 2). Although this is not the first time hypothesis has appeared in the literature, this author could find no randomised controlled trials to demonstrate that in vitro pH synergy is clinically translatable. With co-trimoxazole, alkalisation demonstrated increased efficacy against a variety of clinically relevant strains,^67,68 in E.coli (a common UTI pathogen), these effects become pronounced particularly at pH 7.⁶⁹ One study suggested that urinary pH > 6.5 is likely to decrease nitrofurantoin activity,⁷⁰ while acidic conditions increased activity.⁶⁷ Ciprofloxacin activity is also positively influenced by alkaline pH⁶⁷ whereas amoxicillin activity does not change.⁴ In the context of Log D, it could be postulated that this pH efficacy is related to the propensity of membrane penetration into the bacterial cytoplasm.

Table 2.

Effect of alkalisation on UTI antibiotics..

Drug	MaximumΔSolubility[M]^a	MaximumΔlog P^b	Pharmacokinetics	Pharmacodynamic effects
Sulfamethoxazole	0.816	-0.93	Increased excretion	in vitro synergy
Trimethoprim	-1.613	1.46	Decreased excretion	in vitro synergy
Nitrofurantoin	0.046	-1.56	Increased excretion	in vitro interaction
Ciprofloxacin	0.084	-0.94	No effect	in vitro synergy
Amoxicillin	0.899	-1.28	-	-

UTI: urinary tract infection.

Solubility shift as calculated from the Henderson-Hasselbach except in the case of trimethoprim which reaches pH_max when solution pH = 6.

The log D calculator implemented in Marvin predicts Log D of a molecule based on the atomic log P increment of its constituent atoms as per Viswanadhan et al.⁷¹

An analysis of products available on the British, American and Irish markets (Table 3) reveals that while sodium bicarbonate has similar effectiveness,⁷² citrate salts are used almost exclusively in OTC products. All products surveyed have a statement which reminds patients to speak to their doctor or pharmacist if they are on other medicines, this advice might be unclear for many patients; when specific drug related advice does appear, it is inconsistent. Some products have a statement which draws attention to interactions with other drugs, but these generally focus on the role of potassium and sodium as they are the predominant counter-ions to citrate (e.g., they recommend care with potassium sparing diuretics). Oracit®, Cytra-2®, Bicitra® expand this list to include salicylates and other agents such as antiacids and Cymaclear, effercitrate and Potassium citrate (Thornton & Ross), note the potential increased clearance of drugs and specifically mention nitrofurantoin. The British National Formulary monograph on citric acid and potassium citrate does not identify these risks highlighted by the manufacturers.

Table 3.

Selection of products available in United States, United Kingdom, and Irish markets.

Drug name	Manufacturer(s)	Active ingredient(s)	Region
Poly-Citra K	Janssen Pharmaceuticals	Citric acid and potassium citrate	USA
Potassium citrate	Generic (Rising, Zydus Pharma, Strides Pharma, Teva Pharms, Ani Pharms, Biopharma inc., Ascent pharms, Eywa).	Potassium citrate	USA, IRL and UK
UROCIT-K	Mission Pharma	Potassium citrate	USA
Cytra-K	Cypress Pharma	Citric acid and potassium citrate	USA
Virtrate-3	Virtus Pharmaceuticals, LLC	Citric acid, sodium and potassium citrates	USA
Oracit	CMP Pharma	Citric acid and sodium citrate	USA
Bicitra	Janssen Pharmaceuticals	Citric acid and sodium citrate	USA
Cystopurin	Pharmapac Ltd.	Potassium citrate	UK and IRL
Potassium citrate	Available generically	Potassium citrate	UK
Effercitrate	Cambridge Healthcare Supplies Ltd	Potassium citrate and citric acid	UK
Cymaclear	Teva Pharma	Potassium citrate	UK
Cymalon	Actavis Group	Sodium citrate	UK
Cystitis relief	The Boots Company	Sodium citrate	UK and IRL

Product information obtained from Drugs@FDA, Drugs.com (USA), the electronic medicines compendium (UK) and the Health Products Regulatory Authority (Ireland).

With self-care set to increase, all OTC products should be critically re-evaluated to ensure patient safety, particularly within contexts where healthcare professionals are not involved in treatment selection. This analysis suggests a need for consistency across patient and healthcare professional documents to improve clarity.

Conclusion

This work has illustrated how solubility-pH relationships can enable an analysis of crystalluria risk for compounds which may be reasonably expected to be co-prescribed—or co-administered—with urinary alkalisers, namely: ciprofloxacin, amoxicillin and sulfamethoxazole. These empirical relationships have been validated with systematic literature analysis and further explored with the EUADR database. The importance of employing biorelevant media to improve predictive capacity is also discussed particularly for nitrofurantoin and amoxicillin.

Future studies may expand on the in vitro results in the literature which suggest increased antimicrobial efficacy for trimethoprim (the most widely prescribed UTI antibiotic in the United Kingdom),^73,74 sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin, at increased pH, which could be achieved with alkalisers and vice versa for nitrofurantoin. Greater depth is needed to quantify the relationship between plasma and urinary concentrations and to relate urine pH to its the pharmacokinetic effects and to explore if there are other common drugs taken by patients that may be associated with crystalluria or changes in pharmacokinetics, this is a particular concern for drugs with a pK_a in the range of urinary pH.

Ethics

Our study did not require an ethical board approval because it does not contain identifiable patient information. All information is also available on the public domain.

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-taw-10.1177_20420986221080794 – Supplemental material for Alkalising agents in urinary tract infections: theoretical contraindications, interactions and synergy

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-taw-10.1177_20420986221080794 for Alkalising agents in urinary tract infections: theoretical contraindications, interactions and synergy by Oisín N. Kavanagh in Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety

Footnotes

Author contributions

Oisín N. Kavanagh: Conceptualisation; Data curation; Formal analysis; Investigation; Methodology; Visualisation; Writing—original draft; Writing——review & editing.

Conflict of interest statement

The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Oisín N. Kavanagh

Supplemental material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

Connelly

A breakdown of the over-the-counter medicines market in Britain in 2016. Pharm J 2017; 298: 7900.

Noone

Blanchette

. The value of self-medication: summary of existing evidence. J Med Econ 2018; 21: 201–211.

Consumer Healthcare Products Association. Value of OTC medicines to the US healthcare system. Consumer Healthcare Products Association, https://www.chpa.org/sites/default/files/media/docs/2020-10/Value-of-OTC-Medicines-to-the-US-Healthcare-System-03012019.pdf

Cunha

. An infectious disease and pharmacokinetic perspective on oral antibiotic treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative uropathogens: the importance of urinary antibiotic concentrations and urinary pH. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2016; 35: 521–526.

Ueda

Yoshida

Tanoue

, et al. Urine alkalization improves the problems of pain and sleep in hypersensitive bladder syndrome. Int J Urol 2014; 21: 512–517.

O’Kane

Dave

Gore

, et al. Urinary alkalisation for symptomatic uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 4: CD010745.

Rouch

Burton

Dabb

, et al. Comparison of enteral and parenteral methods of urine alkalinization in patients receiving high-dose methotrexate. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2017; 23: 3–9.

Werness

Bergert

Smith

. Crystalluria. J Cryst Growth 1981; 53: 166–181.

Perazella

. Crystal-induced acute renal failure. Am J Med 1999; 106: 459–465.

10.

Kamphuis

Wouter Van Hattum

De Bie

, et al. Method of alkalization and monitoring of urinary pH for prevention of recurrent uric acid urolithiasis: a systematic review. Transl Androl Urol 2019; 8(Suppl. 4): S448–S456.

11.

Simpson

. Citrate excretion: a window on renal metabolism. Am J Physiol 1983; 244: F223–F234.

12.

Hamm

. Renal handling of citrate. Kidney Int 1990; 38: 728–735.

13.

Gibaldi

Grundhofer

Levy

. Effect of antacids on pH of urine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1974; 16: 520–525.

14.

Gibaldi

Grundhofer

Levy

. Time course and dose dependence of antacid effect on urine pH. J Pharm Sci 1975; 64: 2003–2004.

15.

Sassene

Michaelsen

Mosgaard

, et al. In vivo precipitation of poorly soluble drugs from lipid-based drug delivery systems. Mol Pharm 2016; 13: 3417–3426.

16.

Baik

Rosania

. Macrophages sequester clofazimine in an intracellular liquid crystal-like supramolecular organization. PLoS One 2012; 7: e47494.

17.

García

Lertxundi

Aguirre

. Tramadol-induced hiccups: a case-noncase study in the European pharmacovigilance database. Ther Adv Drug Saf 2021; 12: 1–11.

18.

Kramer

Flynn

. Solubility of organic hydrochlorides. J Pharm Sci 1972; 61: 1896–1904.

19.

Tsuji

Nakashima

Hamano

, et al. Physicochemical properties of amphoteric β-lactam antibiotics I: stability, solubility, and dissolution behavior of amino penicillins as a function of pH. J Pharm Sci 1978; 67: 1059–1066.

20.

Jerzsele

Nagy

. The stability of amoxicillin trihydrate and potassium clavulanate combination in aqueous solutions. Acta Vet Hung 2009; 57: 485–493.

21.

Chen

L-K

Cadwallader

Jun

. Nitrofurantoin solubility in aqueous urea and creatinine solutions. J Pharm Sci 1976; 65: 868–872.

22.

Paul

Harrington

Bender

, et al. Effect of pH and of urea on nitrofurantoin activity. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1967; 125: 941–947.

23.

Sjövall

Westerlund

Alván

. Renal excretion of intravenously infused amoxycillin and ampicillin. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1985; 19: 191–201.

24.

Sun

Sakai

Tauchi

, et al. Determination of lipophilicity of two quinolone antibacterials, ciprofloxacin and grepafloxacin, in the protonation equilibrium. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2002; 54: 51–58.

25.

Fallati

Ahumada

Manzo

. El perfil de solubilidad de la Ciprofloxacina en función del pH. Acta Farm Bonaer 1994; 13: 73–77.

26.

Roca Jalil

Baschini

Sapag

. Influence of pH and antibiotic solubility on the removal of ciprofloxacin from aqueous media using montmorillonite. Appl Clay Sci 2015; 114: 69–76.

27.

Zipp

Davidson

. The effect of temperature and pH on the solubility of quinolone compounds: estimation of heat of fusion. Pharm Res 1994; 11: 522–527.

28.

Wagenlehner

FME

Kinzig-Schippers

Sörgel

, et al. Concentrations in plasma, urinary excretion and bactericidal activity of levofloxacin (500 mg) versus ciprofloxacin (500 mg) in healthy volunteers receiving a single oral dose. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2006; 28: 551–559.

29.

Woodruff

Malvin

Thompson

. The renal transport of nitrofurantoin: effect of acid-base balance upon its excretion. J Am Med Assoc 1961; 175: 1132–1135.

30.

Bach

Gold

Finland

. Absorption and urinary execretion of trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole: results with single doses in normal young adults and preliminary observations during therapy with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. J Infect Dis 1973; 128(Suppl.): 584–599p.

31.

Loftsson

Guoˇmundsdóttir

Frioˇriksdóttir

. The influence of water-soluble polymers and pH on hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin complexation of drugs. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1996; 22: 401–405.

32.

Bergan

Brodwall

. Human pharmacokinetics of a sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim combination. Acta Med Scand 1972; 192: 483–492.

33.

Dahlan

McDonald

Sunderland

. Solubilities and intrinsic dissolution rates of sulphamethoxazole and trimethoprim. J Pharm Pharmacol 1987; 39: 246–251.

34.

Yin

D-P

Liu

M-X

H-L

, et al. Solubility of trimethoprim in selected pure solvents and (water + ethanol/2-propanol) mixed-solvent systems. J Chem Eng Data 2016; 61: 404–411.

35.

Rylance

George

Healing

, et al. Single dose pharmacokinetics of trimethoprim. Arch Dis Child 1985; 60: 29–33.

36.

Arancibia

Guttmann

González

, et al. Absorption and disposition kinetics of amoxicillin in normal human subjects. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1980; 17: 199–202.

37.

Ponte

Gracia

Giménez

, et al. Urinary concentrations and bactericidal activity against amoxicillin-nonsusceptible strains of Escherichia coli with single-dose, oral, sustained-release amoxicillin/clavulanic acid: a phase I, open-label, noncomparative clinical trial in healthy volunteers. Clin Ther 2005; 27: 1043–1049.

38.

Hoener

Patterson

. Nitrofurantoin disposition. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1981; 29: 808–816.

39.

Jawetz

Hopper

Smith

, et al Nitrofurantoin in chronic urinary tract infection. AMA Arch Intern Med 1957; 100: 549–557.

40.

Naggar

Khalil

. Effect of magnesium trisilicate on nitrofurantoin absorption. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1979; 25: 857–863.

41.

Borner

Höffken

Lode

, et al. Pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin in healthy volunteers after oral and intravenous administration. Eur J Clin Microbiol 1986; 5: 179–186.

42.

Wagenlehner

FME

Kinzig-Schippers

Tischmeyer

, et al. Pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin XR (1000 mg) versus levofloxacin (500 mg) in plasma and urine of male and female healthy volunteers receiving a single oral dose. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2006; 27: 7–14.

43.

Brumfitt

Pursell

. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in the treatment of bacteriuria in women. J Infect Dis 1973; 128(Suppl.): 657–665p.

44.

De Liso

Garigali

Ferraris Fusarini

, et al. How to identify sulfamethoxazole crystals in the urine. Clinica Chimica Acta 2016; 452: 106–108.

45.

Barceló

Rodriguez

Lopez

, et al. Orbitrap^TM high-resolution mass spectrometry for the identification of amoxicillin crystalluria. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018; 56: 268–271.

46.

Thorsteinsson

Bergan

Oddsdottir

, et al. Crystalluria and ciprofloxacin, influence of urinary pH and hydration. Chemotherapy 1986; 32: 408–417.

47.

Nývlt

. Kinetics of nucleation in solutions. J Cryst Growth 1968; 3–4: 377–383.

48.

Richardson

Harker

Backhurst

. Crystallisation. In: Coulson

Richardson

(eds) Chemical engineering. Oxford: Elsevier, 2002, pp. 827–900.

49.

Fraser

Avellaneda

Graviss

, et al. Acute kidney injury associated with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. J Antimicrob Chemother 2012; 67: 1271–1277.

50.

Schwartz

Flippin

Reinhold

, et al. The effect of alkali on crystalluria from sulfathiazole and sulfadiazine. J Am Med Assoc 1941; 117: 514–515.

51.

Simon

. Sulfadiazine crystalluria revisited. Arch Intern Med 1990; 150: 2379–2384.

52.

Dorfman

Smith

. Sulfonamide crystalluria: a forgotten disease. J Urol 1970; 104: 482–483.

53.

Khan

Ortega

Bagwan

, et al. Crystal-induced acute kidney injury due to ciprofloxacin. J Nephropathol 2015; 4: 29–31.

54.

Turel

Živec

Pevec

, et al. Compounds of antibacterial agent ciprofloxacin and magnesium – crystal structures and molecular modeling calculations. Eur J Inorg Chem 2008; 2008: 3718–3727.

55.

Wallis

Charles

Gahan

, et al. Interaction of norfloxacin with divalent and trivalent pharmaceutical cations. In vitro complexation and in vivo pharmacokinetic studies in the dog. J Pharm Sci 1996; 85: 803–809.

56.

Urbaniak

Kokot

. Analysis of the factors that significantly influence the stability of fluoroquinolone-metal complexes. Anal Chim Acta 2009; 647: 54–59.

57.

Macdonald

. Nitrofurantoin crystalluria. Br Med J 1976; 2: 1044–1045.

58.

Kalsi

Ward

Lee

, et al. Purple urine bag syndrome: a rare spot diagnosis. Dis Markers 2017; 2017: 9131872.

59.

Golding

. Urinary deposits, their diagnosis, pathology, and therapeutical indications. London: John Churchill, 1857.

60.

Barlow

Dickson

JAS

. Purple urine bags. Lancet 1978; 311: 220–221.

61.

Capaccione

Tran

Leb

, et al. Acute pulmonary function decline and radiographic abnormalities: chronic cause? Breathe 2021; 17: 200286.

62.

Cham

Dykman

Bochner

. Urinary excretion of aspirin. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1982; 14: 562–564.

63.

Beckett

Rowland

. Urinary excretion kinetics of amphetamine in man. J Pharm Pharmacol 1965; 17: 628–639.

64.

Sand

Jacobsen

. Effect of urine pH and flow on renal clearance of methotrexate. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1981; 19: 453–456.

65.

Kamberi

Tsutsumi

Kotegawa

, et al. Influences of urinary pH on ciprofloxacin pharmacokinetics in humans and antimicrobial activity in vitro versus those of sparfloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999; 43: 525–529.

66.

Craig

Kunin

. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole: pharmacodynamic effects of urinary pH and impaired renal function. Studies in humans. Ann Intern Med 1973; 78: 491–497.

67.

Yang

Wang

, et al. The influence of urinary pH on antibiotic efficacy against bacterial uropathogens. Urology 2014; 84: 731.e1–731.e7.

68.

Burian

Erdogan

Jandrisits

, et al. Impact of pH on activity of trimethoprim, fosfomycin, amikacin, colistin and ertapenem in human urine. Pharmacology 2012; 90: 281–287.

69.

AlRabiah

Allwood

Correa

, et al. pH plays a role in the mode of action of trimethoprim on Escherichia coli. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0200272.

70.

Fransen

Melchers

MJB

Lagarde

CMC

, et al. Pharmacodynamics of nitrofurantoin at different pH levels against pathogens involved in urinary tract infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 2017; 72: 3366–3373.

71.

Viswanadhan

Ghose

Revankar

, et al. Atomic physicochemical parameters for three dimensional structure directed quantitative structure-activity relationships. 4. Additional parameters for hydrophobic and dispersive interactions and their application for an automated superposition of certain. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1989; 29: 163–172.

72.

Sakhaee

Nicar

Hill

, et al. Contrasting effects of potassium citrate and sodium citrate therapies on urinary chemistries and crystallization of stone-forming salts. Kidney Int 1983; 24: 348–352.

73.

Pujades-Rodriguez

West

Wilcox

, et al. Lower urinary tract infections: management, outcomes and risk factors for antibiotic re-prescription in primary care. EClinicalMedicine 2019; 14: 23–31.

74.

Ahmed

Farewell

Jones

, et al. Incidence and antibiotic prescribing for clinically diagnosed urinary tract infection in older adults in UK primary care, 2004-2014. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0190521.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.06 MB

Alkalising agents in urinary tract infections: theoretical contraindications,interactions and synergy

Abstract

Introduction:

Methods:

Results and Discussion:

Conclusion:

Keywords

Introduction

Methodology

Analysis of products available in United Kingdom, United States, and Irish markets

Literature survey of drug induced crystalluria

Analysis of EU database for Suspected Adverse Reactions (EUADR)

pH solubility curves

Pharmacokinetic data

Results and discussion

Conclusion

Ethics

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-taw-10.1177_20420986221080794 – Supplemental material for Alkalising agents in urinary tract infections: theoretical contraindications, interactions and synergy

Footnotes

Author contributions

Conflict of interest statement

Funding

ORCID iD

Supplemental material

References

Supplementary Material