Changes in the extracellular microenvironment and osteogenic responses of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells induced by in vitro direct electrical stimulation

Abstract

Electrical stimulation (ES) has potential to be an effective tool for bone injury treatment in clinics. However, the therapeutic mechanism associated with ES is still being discussed. This study aims to investigate the initial mechanism of action by characterising the physical and chemical changes in the extracellular environment during ES and correlate them with the responses of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs). Computational modelling was used to estimate the electrical potentials relative to the cathode and the current density across the cell monolayer. We showed expression of phosphorylated ERK1/2, c-FOS, c-JUN, and SPP1 mRNAs, as well as the increased metabolic activities of MSCs at different time points. Moreover, the average of 2.5 μM of H₂O₂ and 34 μg/L of dissolved Pt were measured from the electrically stimulated media (ES media), which also corresponded with the increases in SPP1 mRNA expression and cell metabolic activities. The addition of sodium pyruvate to the ES media as an antioxidant did not alter the SPP1 mRNA expression, but eliminated an increase in cell metabolic activities induced by ES media treatment. These findings suggest that H₂O₂ was influencing cell metabolic activity, whereas SPP1 mRNA expression was regulated by other faradic by-products. This study reveals how different electrical stimulation regime alters cellular regenerative responses and the roles of faradic by-products, that might be used as a physical tool to guide and control cell behaviour.

Keywords

Electrical stimulation mesenchymal stem/stromal cells computational modelling faradic by-products bone regeneration

Introduction

Following the observation of bone regeneration around the direct current (DC) cathode by Yasuda¹ in 1953, there have been a number of the pre-clinical studies on the applications of electrical stimulation (ES) in orthopaedics reported in the literature.^2
–9 The idea of using ES in modern orthopaedics has since become attractive, and in 1979, the use of ES was approved by the FDA for non-union fracture treatments.^10,11 Currently, there are more than 10 types of commercial ES devices available from companies such as Zimmer Biomet and Orthofix.^12,13

In general, there are several methods for delivering ES to bone tissue, including direct methods (e.g. implanted electrodes), and indirect methods (e.g. capacitive coupling and inductive stimulation).^14,15 Pre-clinical and clinical studies showed that all of these methods were capable of promoting bone healing to some extent, particularly in spinal fusion.^11
–13 The stimulating effects of ES could be transmitted to the cells in the form of an electrostatic field, electromagnetic field, or electric current, depending on the configuration of the ES device.^14,15 For example, the capacitive coupling delivers the electrostatic field to the tissue, whereas the inductive ES delivers the electromagnetic field.^14,15 On the other hand, direct ES with the implanted electrodes delivers the electric current through the interfaces between the electrode and the tissue.^14
–16 The current delivered by direct ES includes non-faradic and faradic charges. Non-faradic charge is delivered through the re-distribution and adsorption of the charged ions at the electrode surfaces to form the double layer, whilst faradic current is a result of charge injection into electrolyte that is responsible for the electrochemical reactions.^16
–18 However, the exact underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms that regulated the electrically induced cell mineralisation in vitro and bone deposition in vivo were not completely elucidated, and thus this study aimed to explore further to understand the mechanism of action and the potential stimulating factors of direct ES.^11,13

According to the literature, it appears that every method of ES altered the intracellular calcium level by inducing either calcium influx or calcium release from intracellular storage, which promoted osteoblast proliferation and osteogenic protein expressions from mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs).^19
–21 This could be due to the accumulation of charges on cell membrane that eventually led to the opening of the voltage gated calcium channels.²² Moreover, changes in intracellular calcium level as a result of ES could also influence cell migration and orientation via electrotaxis.^21,23
–28 Calcium-dependent responses to ES could also influence the expressions of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), collagen type I, and other cellular osteogenic activities.^29
–39 In addition to calcium, the distribution of other soluble ions and their channels on the cell membrane as well as the molecules, which play a key role in cell function, such as sodium, potassium, adenosine triphosphate (ATP), and reactive oxygen species (ROS), were also tailorable by ES.^40
–46

It is noted that not only delivery method of ES that could cause variation in cellular responses and the clinical outcome, but also the electrode systems and materials. Direct ES method, in particular, is the only method that involved direct contact between electrode and tissue.^14,15 In the in vitro models, various electrodes were used, such as carbon, metals, conductive polymers, and salt bridges.⁴⁷ However, it appears that the majority of the implantable orthopaedic ES devices used clinically and those used in vivo were composed of bare metallic electrodes, such as titanium, platinum, and stainless steel.^{1
–4,48
–50} One of the key characteristics of bare electrode was the generation of faradic by-products from electrochemical reactions.^9,14,15,46 These reactions were not applicable in the salt bridge system, since the salt bridges have isolated the cells from electrode contact and the ionic current was delivered without the by-products.^15,47 The by-products from cathodic reactions, such as the hydroxyl ions and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated by oxygen reduction reaction, were particularly of interests based on the early observation of new bone formation around the cathode in vivo.^{1
–4,48
–51} These by-products have been hypothesised to be involved in the mechanism of electrically induced osteogenesis.^{9,11,51
–53} The suggested mechanisms include the enhancement of osteoblastic activities and the suppression of osteoclastic activities by an increase in pH.^11,53
–55 On the other hand, the electrically generated H₂O₂ was suggested to trigger osteoclastic bone resorption and VEGF secretion from macrophages, which could promote bone remodelling and vascularisation.^{11,51,53,56,57} Moreover, the recent study has found that the faradic by-products could also influence the SPP1 mRNA expression from macrophages.³⁴ This response was relevant to osteogenesis because SPP1, or osteopontin, is one of the bone matrix proteins and is also a biomarker for the osteogenic activities of bone cells.³⁴

It has been reported that ROS also played a role in initiating cellular signalling and activities of the MSCs.^58
–61 This could be beneficial for bone repair and regeneration as MSCs were capable of differentiating towards the osteoblastic phenotypes in vitro and secreting the bioactive factors in vivo.^62
–65 Hence, in this study, we investigated and analysed the initial mechanism of action of direct ES and the role of faradic by-products, in particular. It was hypothesised that the MSC activities could be regulated by the faradic by-products during the application of direct ES. This study addressed this hypothesis by using end-to-end experimental design, starting from characterising the changes in extracellular microenvironment induced by ES towards the evaluation of the responses from human bone marrow-derived MSCs (hBM-MSCs), including protein expression, mRNA expression, and cell proliferation. Computational modelling was used to visualise the changes in the electrolyte potential and current density during direct ES, and the generation of faradic by-products in the culture media was also characterised. These changes were discussed in relation to the observed cellular responses in order to deconstruct the potential stimulating factors during direct ES.

Materials and methods

Cell culture and culture media preparation

Commercial primary human bone marrow-derived MSCs (hBM-MSCs) (Lot No. 6F4392, Lonza) were expanded in MSC Growth Medium 2 (PromoCell) containing 1% antibiotic antimycotic solution. Cells were cultured at 37°C, 5% CO₂. All reagents used in this study were supplied from Sigma-Aldrich, UK, unless stated otherwise. In the experiments, Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) containing 4.5 g/L glucose, 4 mM L-glutamine, and without sodium pyruvate was used. DMEM was supplemented with 10% heat inactivated foetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% antibiotic antimycotic solution before use as growth media (GM). 100 mM sodium pyruvate solution was further diluted into GM as required. Cells at passage 7 were seeded into six-well plates at the density of 10,000 cells/cm² with 3 ml of GM. Media were changed the day after seeding accordingly to the experimental condition and every 3 days afterwards. Osteogenic medium (OM) was prepared by supplementing GM with 10 mM β-glycerophosphate, 0.17 mM (50 µg/ml) L-ascorbic acid 2-phosphate, and 10 nM dexamethasone. Cells were cultured until reaching the time point when the data were collected.

Direct ES system

The ES chambers used in this study were adapted and modified from the original design by Mobini and Leppik, et al.^37,38 L-shaped platinum (Pt) electrodes (99.95% platinum wires with 0.5 mm diameter) were fitted into standard 6-well plate lid as shown in Figure 1(a) and (b), similarly to those used in our previous study.³⁴ Constant direct current (DC) voltage of 2.2 V was supplied from the generator (B&K Precision). This regime was not invasive for when applied directly to the MSCs in vitro (direct ES) for 1 h daily, and thus it was used throughout the study.^38,39,49 In direct ES experiments, the control groups were non-stimulated cells cultured in GM and OM. In the case of electrically stimulated media (ES Media), acellular media were incubated overnight before being exposed to ES for 1 h. The ES media, which contain faradic by-products, were transferred to the cells immediately after stimulation every day to mimic daily ES.³⁴ In the ES media experiments, the control groups were cells treated with non-stimulated media (Control Media) with and without sodium pyruvate.

Figure 1.

Direct electrical stimulation device used in this study. (a) Schematic diagram and (b) representative image of the assembled devices. (c) Computer-aided geometry and (d) meshed structure used in computational modelling.

Computational electrochemistry modelling and validation

A computational model was built with COMSOL^® Multiphysics 5.2 (COMSOL AB). Secondary Current Distribution interface from Electrochemistry module was used. This module calculated the transport of charged ions in an electrolyte and current conduction in electrodes based on Ohm’s law with a charge balance:

i = - σ \nabla ϕ

(1)

\nabla \cdot i = Q

(2)

where i is the current density vector (A/m²), σ is the conductivity (S/m), ϕ is the potential (V), and Q is the general current source term (A/m³).

Furthermore, it also took into account the activation overpotentials due to charge transfer reactions, described by the Butlet-Volmer equation:

i = i_{0} (\exp (\frac{α_{a} F η}{R T}) - \exp (\frac{- α_{c} F η}{R T}))

(3)

where i is the electrode current density (A/m²), i₀ is the exchange current density (A/m²), α_a is the anodic transfer coefficient, α_c is the cathodic transfer coefficient, F is the Faraday’s constant (C/mol), η is the activation overpotential (V), R is the gas constant (J/(K mol)), and T is the temperature (K). The activation overpotential was defined in the following way:

η = E_{e l e c t r o d e} - E_{e q}

(4)

where E_electrode is the electrode potential and E_eq is the equilibrium potential for the electrode reaction.

Figure 1(c) shows the computer-aided model that was composed of 3-ml culture medium and two L-shaped Pt electrodes. The electrodes were placed 22 mm apart in parallel. In the model assumption, the anode underwent oxidation reaction, whilst the cathode underwent reduction reaction. Cell voltage between 0 and 5 V was applied at the anode, and ground voltage was applied at the cathode. Assuming symmetric electrochemical reactions, the equilibrium potential magnitude at each electrode were equal. The parameters used in the simulation are tabulated in Table 1. 207,982 tetrahedral elements were generated with the mesh size ranging from 0.00676 to 0.676 mm, as shown in Figure 1(d). The electrolyte potential relative to the cathode at arbitrary points: A; and B, at each applied voltage were simulated and compared against the experimental values for model validation. The electrolyte potential and current density distribution across the x-y and y-z surfaces under the similar direct ES condition to those used for cell culture experiments were simulated and visualised.

Table 1.

Parameters used in the computational model.

Name	Expression	Description	Reference
alpha_a	0.5	Anodic transfer coefficient	Kumsa et al.⁶⁶
alpha_c	0.5	Cathodic transfer coefficient	Kumsa et al.⁶⁶
Ecell	0–5 V	Applied voltage	n/a
Eeq_a	$\frac{E_{cell}}{2} (at E_{cell} \leq 1.5 V)$	Anode equilibrium potential	Empirical data (supplemental information)
	$\frac{E_{cell}}{2} (1 - (0.0000343 e^{(2.564 E_{c e l l})}))$ $(at 1.5 V < E_{cell} < 3.0 V)$
	$\frac{E_{cell}}{2} (1.3558 - 0.1444 E_{c e l l}) (at E_{cell} \geq 3.0 V)$
Eeq_c	$- \frac{E_{cell}}{2} (at E_{cell} \leq 1.5 V)$	Cathode equilibrium potential
	$- \frac{E_{cell}}{2} (1 - (0.0000343 e^{(2.564 E_{c e l l})}))$
	$(at 1.5 V < E_{cell} < 3.0 V)$
	$- \frac{E_{cell}}{2} (1.3558 - 0.1444 E_{c e l l}) (at E_{cell} \geq 3.0 V)$
i0_a	4 A/m²	Anode exchange current density	Kita⁶⁷
i0_c	4 A/m²	Cathode exchange current density	Kita⁶⁷
T	298 K	Temperature	n/a
Sigma	1.5 S/m	Electrolyte conductivity	Mittal et al.⁶⁸

Note: The bold coefficients from empirically fitted equations are dimensionless.

For total current measurement, digital multimetre (M-830B, Sinometer) was connected in series to one representative chamber of the ES device, and the other chambers were disconnected from the circuit. Data were recorded at the applied voltage between 0 and 5 V. For electrolyte potential measurement, ground of the multimetre was connected to the ground channel of the generator, whilst the Pt wire was used as a measuring probe. The probe was submerged into the culture media through the guided holes on the device during direct ES to measure the potential at point A and B relative to the cathode. Each point was located on the diameter of the well and 7 mm away from the anode and the cathode, respectively. The measurements were conducted at room temperature (RT).

H₂O₂ concentration measurement

Fluorometric hydrogen peroxide assay kit (MAK165, Sigma-Aldrich) was used to measure H₂O₂ concentration. It comprises assay buffer, 20 U/ml horseradish peroxidase, and red peroxidase substrate. Working solution was prepared based on manufacturer’s instructions. 50 µl of samples were transferred into 96-well plate followed by the addition of 50 µl working solution and 30-minute RT incubation, respectively. Fluorescence intensity was measured at excitation wavelength of 544 nm and emission wavelength of 590 nm. The measured intensity was subtracted by background readings. Concentration of H₂O₂ was calculated using the calibration curve from standard H₂O₂ solution supplied with the kit diluted in GM. In the experiment, acellular media were incubated overnight prior to the experiment, and the measurement was carried out immediately after stimulation.

Inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy

Serum-free acellular GM samples were incubated overnight before applying ES for 1 h. The stimulated samples were filtered through 0.45 μm membrane and diluted 50 times in 2% of 1:1 HNO₃ and HCl mixture before being analysed for the dissolved platinum content using Inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS) spectrometer (7700×, Agilent).

Fluorescence staining of ERK1/2

Cells were cultured on glass coverslips placed in 6-well plate treated with GM. Immediately after 30 min and 1 h of ES, cell monolayers were washed with Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS), fixed with 10% neutral buffered formalin solution for 10 min, and washed three times with DPBS. The fixed samples were permeabilised by 0.2% Triton^® X-100 in DPBS for 10 min and washed three times with DPBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 0.1% Tween^® 20 (VWR), hereafter denoted by PBST. The permeabilised samples were incubated at RT for 30 min with 10% goat serum in PBST and stained with rabbit anti-phosphorylated ERK1/2 (T202/T185) (Abcam) diluted 1:100 in PBST at 4°C overnight. The samples were washed again with PBST three times and stained with goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor^® 488 (Abcam) diluted 1:1000 in PBST and 5 mg/ml 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) diluted 1:5000 in PBST at room temperature for 1 h. Finally, the samples were mounted on the microscope slides using Fluoroshield mounting medium (Abcam). Images were captured using a confocal laser scanning microscope (TCS SP5, Leica) at excitation/emission wavelength of 488/520 and 405/455 nm.

mRNA extraction and real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR)

mRNA was extracted from the samples after 1 h and after 7 days of direct ES or ES media treatment using spin columns (RNeasy Mini Kit, Qiagen) following the supplier’s protocol. Briefly, cell monolayers were washed two times with DPBS before being scraped off and homogenised in the supplied lysis buffer RLT using syringes and 25G needles. Seventy percent ethanol was added into the lysates before passing through the spin columns via centrifugation. The columns were then washed with supplied washing buffers: RW1; and RPE, and the purified mRNAs were eluted by passing RNase-free water through the columns. Final mRNA concentration was measured using NanoDrop™ Lite spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

RT-qPCR was carried out using QuantiFast SYBR^® Green RT-PCR Kit and QuantiTect Primer Assay (Qiagen). Details of the primers are shown in Table 2; however, their sequences are proprietary. Final reaction volume of 25 μl was composed of 15.25 µl of reaction mix and 9.75 µl of mRNA sample (9 ng). Reverse transcription was carried out at 50°C for 10 min. PCR was activated at 95°C for 5 min before entering cycle stage, which consisted of 10-s denaturation at 95°C and 30-s annealing/extension at 60°C. Fluorescence data were recorded up to 40 cycles using StepOnePlus™ Real-Time PCR System and StepOnePlus™ Software v2.3 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Fold expression was calculated using ΔΔC_T method in relative to the endogenous reference gene (GAPDH) and normalised to the samples from Control (non-stimulated) group.

Table 2.

Details of the primers used in this study.

Target gene	Assay ID	Translated protein
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH)	Hs_GAPDH_1_SG	GAPDH
c-FOS	Hs_FOS_1_SG	c-FOS
c-JUN	Hs_JUN_1_SG	c-JUN
Runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2)	Hs_RUNX2_1_SG	RUNX2
Secreted phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1)	Hs_SPP1_1_SG	Secreted phosphoprotein 1 or osteopontin

Cell metabolic activity assay

Resazurin assay (Deep Blue Cell Viability™ Kit, BioLegend) was used in this study to determine cell metabolic activity after 10 days of direct ES or ES media treatment. The stock solution was diluted in GM to make 10% working solution. To implement the assay, cell culture supernatant was replaced with 1 ml of working solution before being incubated at 37°C for 1 h. Fluorescence intensity was measurement at excitation wavelength of 544 nm and emission wavelength of 590 nm. The measured intensity was subtracted by background readings.

Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity assay

ALP activity was quantified after 10 days of direct ES using commercial colorimetric assay kit (K412, BioVision). Cell monolayers were washed two times with DPBS before being scraped off and homogenised in 500 µl assay buffer by passing through 25G needles. Cell lysates were centrifuged and 20 µl of supernatants were used in the assay. About 50 µl of 5 mM p-nitrophenyl phosphate (pNPP) was added to the samples followed by 1 h incubation at room temperature. Stop solution was used to inhibit the reactions in negative control samples and also to terminate the reactions of the samples after incubation. Absorbance of the mixtures was measured at the wavelength of 412 nm and subtracted by the absorbance of negative control samples. Data were normalised to cell metabolic activity measured from resazurin assay.

Statistical analysis

Data were collected from between two and six samples (replicates) per experiment, which were stimulated by different pairs of electrodes. There were three experiments conducted in parallel, and different ES devices were used for each experiment. Parametric tests were used in this study due to small sample size, and the testing methods are described in the figure legends. The analyses were carried using GraphPad Prism 7 software (GraphPad Software, USA). p-values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Computational electrochemical modelling and validation

The total current passing through the well during ES at the applied voltage of up to 5 V was measured in order to determine the empirical coefficients for the equilibrium potentials at the electrodes as described in Supplemental information and Figure S1. Figure 2(a) shows the measured total current in function of the applied voltage, in which the relationship was non-linear between 1.5 and 3.0 V and was linear from round 3.5 V and higher. Furthermore, the computed electrolyte potentials relative to the cathode using the obtained empirical coefficients are shown in Figure 2(b) together with the measured potentials. It was found that the magnitude of the measured electrolyte potentials was smaller than those obtained from the computational modelling, although both datasets are consistent in terms of their trends.

Figure 2.

(a) Measured total current passing through one representative chamber during electrical stimulation (ES). (b) Computational (in silico) and measured electrolytic potential in one representative chamber during ES. The associated front-view schematic diagrams of each experimental set-up are shown on the left.

The distribution of electrolyte potential and current density magnitude in the chamber were further visualised at the applied voltage of 2.2 V, which represented the condition used in cell culture experiment. It was found that the distribution along z direction was dependent on the shape of electrodes, whilst the distribution in the middle of the chamber was homogenous, Figure 3(a). Furthermore, slight heterogeneity of the potential distribution across the cell culture surface could also be noticed, and the potential theoretically sensed by the cells during direct ES was in the range between 1.09 and 1.12 V relative to the cathode, Figure 3(b) and (d). On the other hand, the current density magnitude was much higher in the vicinity of the electrodes than in the middle area, as shown in Figure 3(c). The maximum current density magnitude was observed at the electrode surfaces, which dramatically decreased within 3-mm distance from the anode and cathode before reaching plateau of approximately 0.5 A/m² at the centre of the well, Figure 3(e).

Figure 3.

(a and b) Distribution of the computational electrolyte potential relative to the cathode at the applied voltage of 2.2 V across the y-z plane and across the x-y plane (cell culture surface), respectively. (c) Computational current density magnitude distribution across the x-y plane at the applied voltage of 2.2 V. Scale grids are in mm. (d and e) Computational electrolyte potential and current density magnitude between two electrodes at the centre of the well at the applied voltage of 2.2 V.

Acellular media characterisation

The results showed that the average H₂O₂ concentration in the acellular media was increased to 2.5 μM after 1 h of stimulation, and changes in H₂O₂ concentration were linearly proportional to the stimulation time within 30–90 min range, as shown in Figure 4(a). Moreover, the performance of sodium pyruvate as an antioxidant was also tested. It was seen that the H₂O₂ concentration increased by 1-h ES was reduced by around 90% with sodium pyruvate supplementation at 5 mM or higher, Figure 4(b) and (c). The elemental analysis from ICP-MS has shown a significant increase in dissolved Pt content in the culture media to around 34 µg/L after 1-h ES, Figure 4(d).

Figure 4.

(a) H₂O₂ concentration of the acellular growth media (GM) in function of the electrical stimulation (ES) time. Error bars represent SD (n = 6 replicates), and dash line represents linear trend line. (b) The reduction in H₂O₂ concentration of the acellular GM after 1 h of ES by sodium pyruvate ranging from 1 to 20 mM relative to 0 mM. Error bars represent SD (n = 3 replicates). * represents p < 0.05 (one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s pairwise comparison) when compared with 1 mM. (c) H₂O₂ concentration of the acellular GM after 1 h of ES without and with 5 mM sodium pyruvate. Error bars represent SD (n = 3 experiments). *represents p < 0.05 (unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test) when compared with GM without sodium pyruvate. (d) Measured dissolved Pt content in the acellular GM after 1 h of ES using ICP-MS. Error bars represent SD (n = 3 experiments).

Phosphorylated ERK1/2 staining

Figure 5 shows the fluorescence images indicative of phosphorylated ERK1/2 from cells electrically stimulated for 30 min and 1 h in comparison with non-stimulated cells. It was noticeable that direct ES has activated the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 within the first 30 min of stimulation, and the increased expression of phosphorylated ERK1/2 was still detectable after 1 h of direct ES.

Figure 5.

Fluorescence images of cells after 30 min and 1 h of electrical stimulation in comparison with non-stimulated cells with 10× optical magnification. Nuclei are stained blue, and phosphorylated ERK1/2 is stained green. Scale bars = 250 µm. The images are representative from three experiments. Positive control samples are cells treated with 200 ng/ml phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) for 30 min, and negative control samples are also PMA-treated cells with the absence of primary antibody staining.

mRNA expressions and cell metabolic activity

Figure 6(a) shows that the expression of c-FOS and c-JUN mRNAs were significantly upregulated after 1 h of direct ES. However, these were not the case when treating the cells with the faradic by-products from the electrically stimulated media (ES media) for 1 h (p > 0.05), Figure 6(b). Furthermore, after 7 days of 1-h daily direct ES, a significant upregulation of SPP1 mRNA expression has been observed, whereas the level of RUNX2 mRNA expression was not affected by ES, Figure 6(c). Changes in the expression of c-FOS and c-JUN mRNAs were no longer significant after 7 days of 1-h daily direct ES, supplemental Figure S2. An increase in SPP1 expression was also observed when treating the cells with ES media for 7 days, and the supplementation of 5 mM sodium pyruvate did not alter the level of SPP1 expression induced by ES media, Figure 6(d) and (e).

Figure 6.

(a and b) c-FOS and c-JUN mRNA expressions after 1 h of direct electrical stimulation (ES) and after 1 h of exposure to the electrically stimulated media (ES media), respectively. (c) RUNX2 and SPP1 mRNA expression after 7 days of 1-h daily direct ES. (d and e) SPP1 expression after 7 days of treatment with ES media and ES media containing 5 mM sodium pyruvate, respectively. (f–h) Cell metabolic activity after 10 days of 1-h daily direct ES, treatment with ES media, and treatment with ES media containing 5 mM sodium pyruvate, respectively. Error bars in (a–e) represent upper and lower 95% confidence limits (n = 3 experiments). Error bars in (f–h) represent SD (n = 3 experiments). * represents p < 0.05 (unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test) when compared with Control (non-stimulated) group. In (b), & represents p < 0.05 (unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test) when compared with Direct ES group. In (d, e, g and h), & and # represent p < 0.05 (one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s pairwise comparison) when compared with Direct ES and ES media without sodium pyruvate groups, respectively.

On the other hand, it was found that cell metabolic activity was significantly increased after 10 days of 1-h daily direct ES, and this trend was also found when treating the cells with ES media for 10 days, as shown in Figure 6(f) and (g). However, the supplementation of 5 mM sodium pyruvate has suppressed the effect of ES media on cell metabolic activity, Figure 6(h). It was noted that the level of c-FOS and SPP1 mRNA expressions and cell metabolic activity as a result of direct ES were significantly different from the responses from cells treated with ES media with and without sodium pyruvate.

mRNA expressions, cell metabolic activity, and ALP activities in osteogenic media (OM)

It could be seen in Figure 7(a) that the upregulation of SPP1 mRNA expression as a result of direct ES was also detectable when culturing the cells in OM. Although RUNX2 mRNA expression has increased by around 2.5 folds when treating the cells with OM in non-stimulated group, there was still no significant difference between stimulated and non-stimulated cells in OM. Likewise, an increase in cell metabolic activity after direct ES was also significant in OM-treated cells, as shown in Figure 7(b). Moreover, OM treatment has significantly increased the cellular ALP activity after 10 days, although it appeared that the stimulated cells exhibited lower level of ALP activity than non-stimulated cells, Figure 7(c).

Figure 7.

(a) RUNX2 and SPP1 m RNA expressions after 7 days of 1-h daily direct ES in osteogenic media (OM). (b) Cell metabolic activity and (c) ALP activity after 10 days of 1-h daily direct ES in OM. Error bars in (a) represent upper and lower 95% confidence limits (n = 3 experiments). Error bars in (b and c) represent SD (n = 3 experiments). * and & represent p < 0.05 (two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s pairwise comparison) when compared with Control (GM) and Control (OM) groups, respectively.

Discussion

This study shows that direct ES has changed the physical and chemical conditions of the extracellular microenvironment, which consequently influenced the activities of MSCs. The effects of each stimulating factors were evaluated by comparing the cellular responses to direct ES and to the medium that was conditioned by ES (ES media) in presence or absence of sodium pyruvate as an antioxidant, in which the effect of electrical factors, electrically generated H₂O₂, and other types of faradic by-products could be discussed. Interestingly, our results showed that changes in MSCs responses were influenced by both faradic and non-faradic charges, which supported the hypothesis of this study that the MSC activities could be regulated by the faradic by-products. Although we have shown previously that faradic by-products could influence the activities of macrophages, here we suggest that MSCs also respond to the faradic by-products that could contribute to the mechanism of electrically induced osteogenesis.³⁴

Changes in microenvironment under direct ES and faradic by-products generation

Computational modelling has been an effective tool for voltage optimisation and the visualisation of electric field during ES in human bone and skin tissues as well as in the in vitro model.^69
–71 In this study we utilised similar technique to visualise and calculate the physical changes in microenvironment under in vitro direct ES. The results suggested that the voltage applied directly to the culture media should not exceed 3.0 V to avoid water splitting and excessive electrolysis that are cytotoxic. Moreover, we showed that, in our electrical stimulation system, the electrolyte potential increased by direct ES exhibited the voltage loss of approximately 30% from the computational values, which was observable in the system that involves charge transfer across the electrode-electrolyte interfaces.⁷² The computed current density magnitude at the centre of the chamber during direct ES in our study was less than the threshold of 5 A/m² that could cause cell or tissue necrosis.^9,14 However, it should be noted that cell necrosis was still expectable at the area close to the electrode surfaces and previously was found to be significant in pre-osteoblasts and macrophages.³⁴ In terms of the computational model, it is understood that the model used in this study still requires an improvement for its boundary conditions as it currently relies on the empirical input and did not cover the effect of Helmholtz double layer at the electrode-electrolyte interfaces.

Apart from these physical changes, this study also investigated the chemical changes in culture media as a result of ES. It was reported earlier that the direct ES could generate OH^- and H₂O₂ as well as trace elements from electrode materials as a result of electrochemical reactions.^51,73 Moreover, this particular direct ES system and regime was further reported in our previous study that pH of the culture media did not significantly change, whereas the electrically generated H₂O₂ was detectable after 1 h of ES.³⁴ It was also found in this study that the electrically generated H₂O₂ concentration was linearly proportional to the stimulation time within 30 to 90 min range. On the other hand, the trace of Pt, which was our electrode material, was detectable at around 34 µg/L in the electrically stimulated media. This level of Pt dissolution was lower than the cytotoxic concentration reported previously that the viability of murine fibroblasts and human neuroblastoma were significantly reduced at the Pt dissolution concentration of 1.64 mg/L or higher.⁷⁴ Consistently, the cytotoxic effects of Pt dissolution in this study were not statistically significant. Furthermore, it was found that sodium pyruvate could neutralise the electrochemically generated H₂O₂ from this direct ES system by converting H₂O₂ into acetate, CO₂, and water.⁷⁵ The aforementioned changes in the culture media were the identified faradic by-products in this study. In addition, it is worth noting that the generation of faradic by-products was also dependent on chemistry of the culture media, material and surface area of the electrodes, as well as the ES regime, which influenced charge transfer during the stimulation (i.e. charge injection capacity).^16,76
–78

MSC responses to direct ES and the roles of faradic by-products

ERK is one member of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) signalling cascade besides c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNK) and p38.⁷⁹ The activation of ERK1/2 signalling could lead to a variety of cellular responses, including MSC proliferation and differentiation.^79,80 It was found in this study that direct ES has induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation within the first 30 min of stimulation, and the phosphorylation was prolonged for at least another 30 min of stimulation. The activation of ERK1/2 signalling in the electrically stimulated cells was consistent with an increase in c-FOS mRNA expression, which was the ERK1/2 transcription factor.⁸¹ Slight increase in c-JUN expression was also observed after 1 h of stimulation, which could also be induced by ERK1/2 signalling.⁸² Based on our current results, we were unable to confirm the involvement of JNK signalling. On the other hand, the upregulation of c-FOS and c-JUN mRNA expression was not significant when treating the cells with ES media for 1 h in comparison with cells treated with non-stimulated media. This finding implied that ERK1/2 phosphorylation and the transcription of c-FOS and c-JUN were induced by the electrical factors, not the faradic by-products. It could also be hypothesised that the signal from ES is transduced to the cells through MAPK pathways.²³ Furthermore, it was found that the level of c-FOS and c-JUN mRNA expression were not significantly different from non-stimulated cells after 7 days of direct ES, which indicated that ERK1/2 signalling was only activated at the early stage of ES. In addition, the electrically induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation was also found when applying pulsed ES in both in vitro and in vivo.^83
–85

The expression of two osteogenic markers were characterised after 7 days of direct ES: SPP1; and RUNX2. SPP1 mRNA was responsible for translating osteopontin, which is a necessary protein for bone remodelling and mineralisation.^86,87 Meanwhile, RUNX2 mRNA was expressed from the cells committed to the osteogenic lineage.⁸⁸ It was found that direct ES has significantly increased the level of SPP1 mRNA expression, whilst having no effect on the expression of RUNX2 mRNA. This was consistent with the responses from pre-osteoblasts reported in our previous study that the ES regime used in this study does not directly promote cell differentiation towards the osteogenic lineage during the early stage, but influences their pro-osteogenic gene expression.³⁴ Moreover, we have demonstrated that SPP1 mRNA expression could also be promoted by treating the cells with ES media, and the addition of sodium pyruvate did not significantly alter this upregulation. This finding suggested that the upregulation of SPP1 mRNA expression by ES media was not due to the electrically generated H₂O₂, but due to the other type of the faradic by-products. Whether or not this was also the case for macrophages in our previous study, this question would need to be addressed in future.³⁴ Although the faradic by-products have not been fully characterised yet, we have analysed one candidate which was the dissolved Pt ion in the ES media. It has been reported that metallic ions have played a role in directing the activities of MSCs and osteoblasts.^89
–91 However, there were only distant correlations between Pt and MSC activities or osteopontin expression reported in the literatures.^92,93 Otherwise, this response could also be induced by other products from any molecules that underwent redox reactions during direct ES.

Cell metabolic activity was also increased after 10 days of 1-h daily ES, which could be correlated with an increase in cell proliferation.⁹⁴ Similar to SPP1 mRNA expression, it was found that cell metabolic activity could be increased by treating cells with ES media. However, changes in cell metabolic activity by ES media was not significant with the presence of sodium pyruvate, which suggested that the electrically generated H₂O₂ had a pivotal role in promoting MSCs proliferation. The enhancement of MSCs and other mammalian cell proliferation by exogenous H₂O₂ has been studied previously and it was suggested that physiological concentration of exogenous H₂O₂ was capable of promoting cell proliferation without causing oxidative damage.^95
–97 Although the mechanism was not well understood, one of the plausible mechanism could be the phosphorylation of the H₂O₂-responsive signalling proteins, that is, heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein C1/C2 (hnRNP-C1/C2), which consequently initiated cellular signalling towards cell proliferation.⁹⁷ Furthermore, it was observed from this study that direct ES could also potentially be used as a tool to deliver the controllable amount of exogenous H₂O₂ to the cells.

It could be understood that an increase in SPP1 mRNA expression and proliferation of MSCs induced by ES were potentially through ERK1/2 and c-FOS and c-JUN transcription pathways, whereas the mechanisms involving faradic by-products may need further investigation.^98,99 Consistent cellular responses to direct ES have been found in osteogenic media as well in terms of their SPP1 mRNA expression and metabolic activity. Strikingly, we also observed a significant decrease in ALP activity of the stimulated cells cultured in osteogenic media compared with the non-stimulated cells. It is important to point out the variation of cellular responses to direct ES as the previous studies suggest that MSCs derived from rat adipose or bone tissues have expressed osteogenic markers and undergone mineralisation, despite being stimulated with similar regime to this study.^38,39,49,100 Nonetheless, we have noticed that in fact there was a difference in O₂ level in the culturing condition as the direct ES system in the aforementioned studies with rat MSCs were incorporated with hypoxic condition (3–5% O₂). Hence, it is plausible that the cellular responses to direct ES could also be influenced by the changes in O₂ level.^101
–103 Otherwise, the reduction in ALP activity could also be due to the trade-off between cell proliferation and differentiation, since the stimulated cells in this experiment were more proliferative than non-stimulated cells.^104,105 On the other hand, the reduction in ALP activity and mineralisation after ES was also found in rat dental pulp stem cells as reported by a recent study.¹⁰⁶

Clinical relevance of the findings from this study, limitations and future works

The findings from this study suggested that the increased MSC proliferation and the osteopontin expression from the MSCs could be involved in the mechanism of electrically induced osteogenesis found in the early studies. Our computational data also supported the ideas and hypotheses that the mechanism of ES could involve the changes in current density and extracellular potential, which regulated the level of intracellular Ca²⁺ and other ions by mediating the voltage-sensitive receptors and hyperpolarisation, respectively.^{14,100,107,108} These changes would then play a role in directing cellular activities and influence the MSC responses observed in this study.^100,109,110 Although the influence of direct ES on the osteogenic differentiation of MSCs was not evident, it is expected that the electrically induced osteopontin expression from the MSCs would subsequently regulate bone remodelling and mineralisation.^{86,87,110
–112} Furthermore, the role of electrically generated H₂O₂ and other faradic by-products in promoting proliferation and osteopontin expression from the MSCs were also observed, which could be another parallel mechanism. It is plausible that the electrically generated H₂O₂ could influence cells such as MSCs and osteoclasts nearby the injury site to promote remodelling of the defected bone tissue.^{57,60,96,113,114} In addition, the osteopontin expression from the electrically stimulated MSCs was consistent with the result observed previously in pre-osteoblasts and macrophages.³⁴ Therefore, it could be thought that there were more than one cell type working synergistically in response to ES towards the osteogenesis, in vivo. However, it could still be asked whether or not the dissolved Pt was relevant when comparing with the in vivo and clinical studies as it was likely to be the product from the oxidation at the anode, which was usually implanted into the surrounding muscles and not at the injured bone tissue.^11,73 This could be confirmed in future by comparing the cellular responses to anodic and cathodic ES media.

Moreover, the investigation of cellular responses to ES and bone matrix quantification after 28 days would also be worth investigating as it would strengthen the findings in terms of the long-term clinical outcome, as well as the investigation of the responses from the MSCs of different donors and/or different passages. On the other hand, incorporating ES with the biocompatible conductive scaffolds would also be another potential strategy for orthopaedic treatments as it could enhance cellular activities further towards bone regeneration.^115,116

Conclusion

The responses of MSCs to direct ES could be regulated by both non-faradic and faradic charges, which altered the physical and chemical conditions of the extracellular microenvironment and cell membrane. There were two hypothetical mechanisms concluded from this study. The first mechanism was the activation of ERK1/2 signalling and c-FOS and c-JUN transcription by the changes in electrolyte potentials and current density, which correlated with the increased SPP1 mRNA expression and cell metabolic activity. The second mechanism was induced by the faradic by-products in the ES media, including H₂O₂, which also resulted in the increases in SPP1 mRNA expression and cell metabolic activity. These mechanisms are believed to be associated with the electrically induced osteogenesis. We believe that these findings will be helpful for the development of scalable electrical stimulation systems for controlling the cell fate in future.

Supplemental Material

sj-pdf-1-tej-10.1177_2041731420974147 – Supplemental material for Changes in the extracellular microenvironment and osteogenic responses of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells induced by in vitro direct electrical stimulation

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-tej-10.1177_2041731420974147 for Changes in the extracellular microenvironment and osteogenic responses of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells induced by in vitro direct electrical stimulation by Kasama Srirussamee, Ruikang Xue, Sahba Mobini, Nigel J Cassidy and Sarah H Cartmell in Journal of Tissue Engineering

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

The authors also thank Mr Paul Lythgoe and Manchester Analytical Geochemistry Unit (MAGU) for their ICP services.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study is a continued work from the project that was previously funded by BBSRC grant (BB/M013545/1). It also receives funding from The Royal Thai Government Scholarship (ST 4729) and Rosetrees Trust (M484).

ORCID iD

Kasama Srirussamee

Supplemental material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

Yasuda

The classic fundamental aspects of fracture treatment. Clin Orthop Relat R 1977; 124: 5–8.

Bassett

Pawluk

Becker

RO.

Effects of electric currents on bone in vivo. Nature 1964; 204: 652–654.

Baranowski

Black

Brighton

, et al. Electrical osteogenesis by low direct current. J Orthop Res 1983; 1: 120–128.

Brighton

Friedenberg

Black

, et al. Electrically induced osteogenesis - relationship between charge, current-density, and the amount of bone formed - introduction of a new cathode concept. Clin Orthop Relat R 1981; 161: 122–132.

Bassett

Pawluk

Pilla

AA.

Acceleration of fracture repair by electromagnetic fields. A surgically noninvasive method. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1974; 238: 242–262.

Bassett

Pawluk

RJ.

Noninvasive methods for stimulating osteogenesis. J Biomed Mater Res 1975; 9: 371–374.

Bassett

CA.

Pulsing electromagnetic fields: a new method to modify cell behavior in calcified and noncalcified tissues. Calcif Tissue Int 1982; 34: 1–8.

Rubinacci

Black

Brighton

, et al. Changes in bioelectric potentials on bone associated with direct-current stimulation of osteogenesis. J Orthop Res 1988; 6: 335–345.

Spadaro

Becker

RO.

Function of implanted cathodes in electrode-induced bone-growth. Med Biol Eng Comput 1979; 17: 769–775.

10.

Oishi

Onesti

ST.

Electrical bone graft stimulation for spinal fusion: a review. Neurosurgery 2000; 47: 1041–1055.

11.

Khalifeh

Zohny

MacEwan

, et al. Electrical stimulation and bone healing: a review of current technology and clinical applications. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 2018; 11: 217–232.

12.

Haglin

Jain

Eltorai

AEM

, et al. Bone growth stimulation: a critical analysis review. JBJS Rev 2017; 5: 1–11.

13.

Griffin

Bayat

Electrical stimulation in bone healing: critical analysis by evaluating levels of evidence. Eplasty 2011; 11: 303–353.

14.

Balint

Cassidy

Cartmell

SH.

Electrical stimulation: a novel tool for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2013; 19: 48–57.

15.

Thrivikraman

Boda

Basu

Unraveling the mechanistic effects of electric field stimulation towards directing stem cell fate and function: a tissue engineering perspective. Biomaterials 2018; 150: 60–86.

16.

Merrill

Bikson

Jefferys

JGR

. Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols. J Neurosci Methods 2005; 141: 171–198.

17.

Bertucci

Koppes

Dumont

, et al. Neural responses to electrical stimulation in 2D and 3D in vitro environments. Brain Res Bull 2019; 152: 265–284.

18.

Zhao

Mehta

Zhao

Biomedical applications of electrical stimulation. Cell Mol Life Sci 2020; 77: 2681–2699.

19.

Brighton

Wang

Seldes

, et al. Signal transduction in electrically stimulated bone cells. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83A: 1514–1523.

20.

Khatib

Golan

Cho

Physiologic electrical stimulation provokes intracellular calcium increase mediated by phospholipase C activation in human osteoblasts. FASEB J 2004; 18: 1903–1905.

21.

Hammerick

James

Huang

, et al. Pulsed direct current electric fields enhance osteogenesis in adipose-derived stromal cells. Tissue Eng Pt A 2010; 16: 917–931.

22.

Blank

Ionic processes at membrane surfaces: the role of electrical double layers in electrically stimulated ion transport. In: Blank

Findl

(eds) Mechanistic approaches to interactions of electric and electromagnetic fields with living systems. New York: Springer US, 1987, pp.1–13.

23.

Hammerick

Longaker

Prinz

FB.

In vitro effects of direct current electric fields on adipose-derived stromal cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2010; 397: 12–17.

24.

Banks

Luckman

PSB

Frith

, et al. Effects of electric fields on human mesenchymal stem cell behaviour and morphology using a novel multichannel device. Integr Biol 2015; 7: 693–712.

25.

Cortese

Palama

D’Amone

, et al. Influence of electrotaxis on cell behaviour. Integr Biol 2014; 6: 817–830.

26.

Ferrier

Ross

Kanehisa

, et al. Osteoclasts and osteoblasts migrate in opposite directions in response to a constant electrical-field. J Cell Physiol 1986; 129: 283–288.

27.

Mobini

Talts

Xue

, et al. Electrical stimulation changes human mesenchymal stem cells orientation and cytoskeleton organization. J Biomater Tiss Eng 2017; 7: 829–833.

28.

Ozkucur

Monsees

Perike

, et al. Local calcium elevation and cell elongation initiate guided motility in electrically stimulated osteoblast-like cells. PLoS One 2009; 4: 1–10.

29.

Griffin

Sebastian

Colthurst

, et al. Enhancement of differentiation and mineralisation of osteoblast-like cells by degenerate electrical waveform in an in vitro electrical stimulation model compared to capacitive coupling. PLoS One 2013; 8: 1–9.

30.

Wang

Clark

Brighton

CT.

Up-regulation of bone morphogenetic proteins in cultured murine bone cells with use of specific electric fields. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88a: 1053–1065.

31.

Bodamyali

Bhatt

Hughes

, et al. Pulsed electromagnetic fields simultaneously induce osteogenesis and upregulate transcription of bone morphogenetic proteins 2 and 4 in rat osteoblasts in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1998; 250: 458–461.

32.

Kang

Hong

Kang

, et al. Regulation of osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells by controlling electromagnetic field conditions. Exp Mol Med 2013; 45: 1–9.

33.

Sun

Liu

Lipsky

, et al. Physical manipulation of calcium oscillations facilitates osteodifferentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. FASEB J 2007; 21: 1472–1480.

34.

Srirussamee

Mobini

Cassidy

, et al. Direct electrical stimulation enhances osteogenesis by inducing Bmp2 and Spp1 expressions from macrophages and preosteoblasts. Biotechnol Bioeng 2019; 116: 3421–3432.

35.

Balint

Cassidy

Hidalgo-Bastida

, et al. Electrical stimulation enhanced mesenchymal stem cell gene expression for orthopaedic tissue repair. J Biomater Tiss Eng 2013; 3: 212–221.

36.

Griffin

Iqbal

Sebastian

, et al. Degenerate wave and capacitive coupling increase human MSC invasion and proliferation while reducing cytotoxicity in an in vitro wound healing model. PLoS One 2011; 6: e23404.

37.

Leppik

Bhavsar

Oliveira

KMC

, et al. Construction and use of an electrical stimulation chamber for enhancing osteogenic differentiation in mesenchymal stem/stromal cells in vitro. J Visualized Exp 2019; 143: e59127. DOI: 10.3791/59127.

38.

Mobini

Leppik

Barker

JH.

Direct current electrical stimulation chamber for treating cells in vitro. Biotechniques 2016; 60: 95–98.

39.

Mobini

Leppik

Parameswaran

, et al. In vitro effect of direct current electrical stimulation on rat mesenchymal stem cells. PeerJ 2017; 5: e2821.

40.

Ozkucur

Perike

Sharma

, et al. Persistent directional cell migration requires ion transport proteins as direction sensors and membrane potential differences in order to maintain directedness. BMC Cell Biol 2011; 12: 4.

41.

Bustamante

Fernandez-Verdejo

Jaimovich

, et al. Electrical stimulation induces IL-6 in skeletal muscle through extracellular ATP by activating Ca2+ signals and an IL-6 autocrine loop. Am J Physiol-Endocrinol Metab 2014; 306: E869–E882.

42.

Kwon

Lee

Chun

Electrical stimulation drives chondrogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells in the absence of exogenous growth factors. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 39302.

43.

Wang

, et al. Superoxide plays critical roles in electrotaxis of fibrosarcoma cells via activation of ERK and reorganization of the cytoskeleton. Free Radical Bio Med 2012; 52: 1888–1896.

44.

Sauer

Rahimi

Hescheler

, et al. Effects of electrical fields on cardiomyocyte differentiation of embryonic stem cells. J Cell Biochem 1999; 75: 710–723.

45.

Espinosa

Leiva

Pena

, et al. Myotube depolarization generates reactive oxygen species through NAD(P)H oxidase; ROS-elicited Ca²⁺ stimulates ERK, CREB, early genes. J Cell Physiol 2006; 209: 379–388.

46.

Leppik

Oliveira

KMC

Bhavsar

, et al. Electrical stimulation in bone tissue engineering treatments. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2020; 46: 231–244.

47.

Meng

Rouabhia

Zhang

Electrical stimulation in tissue regeneration. Appl Biomed Eng 2011; 23: 37–62.

48.

Yonemori

Matsunaga

Ishidou

, et al. Early effects of electrical stimulation on osteogenesis. Bone 1996; 19: 173–180.

49.

Leppik

Han

Mobini

, et al. Combining electrical stimulation and tissue engineering to treat large bone defects in a rat model. Sci Rep 2018; 8: 6307.

50.

Fredericks

Smucker

Petersen

, et al. Effects of direct current electrical stimulation on gene expression of osteopromotive factors in a posterolateral spinal fusion model. Spine 2007; 32: 174–181.

51.

Bodamyali

Kanczler

Simon

, et al. Effect of Faradic products on direct current-stimulated calvarial organ culture calcium levels. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1999; 264: 657–661.

52.

Brighton

Adler

Black

, et al. Cathodic oxygen-consumption and electrically induced osteogenesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1975; 107: 277–282.

53.

Gan

Glazer

PA.

Electrical stimulation therapies for spinal fusions: current concepts. Eur Spine J 2006; 15: 1301–1311.

54.

Galow

A-M

Rebl

Koczan

, et al. Increased osteoblast viability at alkaline pH in vitro provides a new perspective on bone regeneration. Biochem Biophys Rep 2017; 10: 17–25.

55.

Ramp

Lenz

Kaysinger

KK.

Medium Ph modulates matrix, mineral, and energy-metabolism in cultured chick bones and osteoblast-like cells. Bone Miner 1994; 24: 59–73.

56.

Cho

Hunt

Hussain

MZ.

Hydrogen peroxide stimulates macrophage vascular endothelial growth factor release. Am J Physiol-Heart Circ 2001; 280: H2357–H2363.

57.

Bax

Alam

ASMT

Banerji

, et al. Stimulation of osteoclastic bone-resorption by hydrogen-peroxide. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1992; 183: 1153–1158.

58.

Atashi

Modarressi

Pepper

MS.

The role of reactive oxygen species in mesenchymal stem cell adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation: a review. Stem Cells Dev 2015; 24: 1150–1163.

59.

Visweswaran

Pohl

Arfuso

, et al. Multi-lineage differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells - to Wnt, or not Wnt. Int J Biochem Cell B 2015; 68: 139–147.

60.

Yun

Lee

, et al. Reactive oxygen species induce MMP12-dependent degradation of collagen 5 and fibronectin to promote the motility of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Br J Pharmacol 2014; 171: 3283–3297.

61.

Gao

Chen

, et al. The role of mitochondria in osteogenic, adipogenic and chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Protein Cell 2017; 8: 439–445.

62.

Kassem

Abdallah

BM.

Human bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells: biological characteristics and potential role in therapy of degenerative diseases. Cell Tissue Res 2008; 331: 157–163.

63.

Caplan

AI.

Mesenchymal stem cells. J Orthop Res 1991; 9: 641–650.

64.

Caplan

AI.

Mesenchymal stem cells: time to change the name!

Stem Cell Transl Med 2017; 6: 1445–1451.

65.

Jaiswal

Haynesworth

Caplan

, et al. Osteogenic differentiation of purified, culture-expanded human mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. J Cell Biochem 1997; 64: 295–312.

66.

Kumsa

Bhadra

Hudak

, et al. Electron transfer processes occurring on platinum neural stimulating electrodes: a tutorial on the i(V-e) profile. J Neural Eng 2016; 13: 052001.

67.

Kita

Periodic variation of exchange current density of hydrogen electrode reaction with atomic number and reaction mechanism. J Electrochem Soc 1966; 113: 1095–1111.

68.

Mittal

Rosenthal

Voldman

NDEP microwells for single-cell patterning in physiological media. Lab Chip 2007; 7: 1146–1153.

69.

Isaacson

Stinstra

MacLeod

, et al. Developing a quantitative measurement system for assessing heterotopic ossification and monitoring the bioelectric metrics from electrically induced osseointegration in the residual limb of service members. Ann Biomed Eng 2010; 38: 2968–2978.

70.

Sun

YS.

Electrical stimulation for wound-healing: simulation on the effect of electrode configurations. Biomed Res Int 2017; 2017(6): 1–9.

71.

Eswaramoorthy

Bethapudi

Almelkar

, et al. Regional differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells proves the role of constant electric potential in enhancing bone healing. J Med Biol Eng 2018; 38: 804–815.

72.

Carmo

Fritz

Merge

, et al. A comprehensive review on PEM water electrolysis. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2013; 38: 4901–4934.

73.

Brummer

Mchardy

Turner

MJ.

Electrical-stimulation with Pt electrodes - trace analysis for dissolved platinum and other dissolved electrochemical products. Brain Behav Evol 1977; 14: 10–22.

74.

Wissel

Brandes

Putz

, et al. Platinum corrosion products from electrode contacts of human cochlear implants induce cell death in cell culture models. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0196649.

75.

Asmus

Mozziconacci

Schoneich

Low-temperature NMR characterization of reaction of sodium pyruvate with hydrogen peroxide. J Phys Chem A 2015; 119: 966–977.

76.

McHardy

Robblee

Marston

, et al. Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes. IV. Factors influencing Pt dissolution in inorganic saline. Biomaterials 1980; 1: 129–134.

77.

Robblee

McHardy

Marston

, et al. Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes. V. The effect of protein on Pt dissolution. Biomaterials 1980; 1: 135–139.

78.

Brummer

Turner

MJ.

Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes: I-a method for determination of “real” electrode areas. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1977; 24: 436–439.

79.

Zhang

Liu

HT.

MAPK signal pathways in the regulation of cell proliferation in mammalian cells. Cell Res 2002; 12: 9–18.

80.

Jaiswal

Bruder

, et al. Adult human mesenchymal stem cell differentiation to the osteogenic or adipogenic lineage is regulated by mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem 2000; 275: 9645–9652.

81.

Murphy

Smith

Chen

, et al. Molecular interpretation of ERK signal duration by immediate early gene products. Nat Cell Biol 2002; 4: 556–564.

82.

Leppa

Saffrich

Ansorge

, et al. Differential regulation of c-Jun by ERK and JNK during PC12 cell differentiation. EMBO J 1998; 17: 4404–4413.

83.

Sgambato

Pages

Rogard

, et al. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) controls immediate early gene induction on corticostriatal stimulation. J Neurosci 1998; 18: 8814–8825.

84.

Hernandez-Bule

Paino

Trillo

, et al. Electric stimulation at 448 kHz promotes proliferation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Physiol Biochem 2014; 34: 1741–1755.

85.

Kim

Song

, et al. Novel effect of biphasic electric current on in vitro osteogenesis and cytokine production in human mesenchymal stromal cells. Tissue Eng Pt A 2009; 15: 2411–2422.

86.

Chen

Shou

Zhang

, et al. An osteopontin-integrin interaction plays a critical role in directing adipogenesis and osteogenesis by mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 2014; 32: 327–337.

87.

Singh

Gill

Kaur

, et al. Role of osteopontin in bone remodeling and orthodontic tooth movement: a review. Prog Orthod 2018; 19: 18.

88.

Komori

Regulation of osteoblast differentiation by Runx2. Adv Exp Med Biol 2010; 658: 43–49.

89.

Sun

Wataha

Hanks

CT.

Effects of metal ions on osteoblast-like cell metabolism and differentiation. J Biomed Mater Res 1997; 34: 29–37.

90.

Schumacher

Lode

Helth

, et al. A novel strontium(II)-modified calcium phosphate bone cement stimulates human-bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation in vitro. Acta Biomater 2013; 9: 9547–9557.

91.

Farack

Wolf-Brandstetter

Glorius

, et al. The effect of perfusion culture on proliferation and differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells on biocorrodible bone replacement material. Mater Sci Eng B-Adv 2011; 176: 1767–1772.

92.

Roodhart

JML

Daenen

LGM

Stigter

ECA

, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells induce resistance to chemotherapy through the release of platinum-induced fatty acids. Cancer Cell 2011; 20: 370–383.

93.

Zhang

Zhao

, et al. Osteopontin expression is associated with platinum-based chemotherapy response and prognosis of patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer. J Buon 2014; 19: 742–748.

94.

O’Brien

Wilson

Orton

, et al. Investigation of the Alamar Blue (resazurin) fluorescent dye for the assessment of mammalian cell cytotoxicity. Eur J Biochem 2000; 267: 5421–5426.

95.

Stone

Yang

SP.

Hydrogen peroxide: a signaling messenger. Antioxid Redox Sign 2006; 8: 243–270.

96.

Khatlani

Algudiri

Alenzi

, et al. Preconditioning by hydrogen peroxide enhances multiple properties of human decidua basalis mesenchymal stem/multipotent stromal cells. Stem Cells Int 2018; 2018: 6480793.

97.

Stone

Collins

The role of hydrogen peroxide in endothelial proliferative responses. Endothelium 2002; 9: 231–238.

98.

Walker

Preston

Magnay

, et al. Nicotinic regulation of c-fos and osteopontin expression in human-derived osteoblast-like cells and human trabecular bone organ culture. Bone 2001; 28: 603–608.

99.

Kato

Okura

Hamada

, et al. Cell stress induces upregulation of osteopontin via the ERK pathway in type II alveolar epithelial cells. PLoS One 2014; 9(6): e100106.

100.

Bhavsar

Cato

Hauschild

, et al. Membrane potential (Vmem) measurements during mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) proliferation and osteogenic differentiation. PeerJ 2019; 7: e6341.

101.

Shi

, et al. Hypoxia promotes osteogenesis of human placental-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Tohoku J Exp Med 2016; 239: 287–296.

102.

Yang

Tsai

, et al. Hypoxia inhibits osteogenesis in human mesenchymal stem cells through direct regulation of RUNX2 by TWIST. PLoS One 2011; 6(9): e23965.

103.

Hung

Shih

YRV

, et al. Hypoxia promotes proliferation and osteogenic differentiation potentials of human mesenchymal stem cells. J Orthop Res 2012; 30: 260–266.

104.

Ruijtenberg

van den Heuvel

Coordinating cell proliferation and differentiation: antagonism between cell cycle regulators and cell type-specific gene expression. Cell Cycle 2016; 15: 196–212.

105.

Golding

Pillemer

Roussou

, et al. Inverse relationship between proliferation and differentiation in a human Tnp-specific B-cell line - cell-cycle dependence of antibody secretion. J Immunol 1988; 141: 2564–2568.

106.

Oliveira

KMC

Leppik

Keswani

, et al. Electrical stimulation decreases dental pulp stem cell osteo-/odontogenic differentiation. Biores Open Access 2020; 9: 162–173.

107.

Zhang

Kang

, et al. Electrical stimulation of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells in conductive scaffolds and the roles of voltage-gated ion channels. Acta Biomater 2016; 32: 46–56.

108.

Mycielska

Djamgoz

MB.

Cellular mechanisms of direct-current electric field effects: galvanotaxis and metastatic disease. J Cell Sci 2004; 117: 1631–1639.

109.

Zhang

, et al. Enhanced proliferation of porcine bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells induced by extracellular calcium is associated with the activation of the calcium-sensing receptor and ERK signaling pathway. Stem Cells Int 2016; 2016(2): 1–11.

110.

Lee

Hwang

, et al. Elevated extracellular calcium ions promote proliferation and migration of mesenchymal stem cells via increasing osteopontin expression. Exp Mol Med 2018; 50(11): 142.

111.

Chellaiah

Kizer

Biswas

, et al. Osteopontin deficiency produces osteoclast dysfunction due to reduced CD44 surface expression. Mol Biol Cell 2003; 14: 173–189.

112.

Holm

Gleberzon Jared

Liao

, et al. Osteopontin mediates mineralization and not osteogenic cell development in vitro. Biochem J 2014; 464: 355.

113.

Deng

Feng

, et al. Oxidative preconditioning promotes bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells migration and prevents apoptosis. Cell Biol Int 2009; 33: 411–418.

114.

Fraser

JHE

Helfrich

Wallace

, et al. Hydrogen peroxide, but not superoxide, stimulates bone resorption in mouse calvariae. Bone 1996; 19: 223–226.

115.

Angulo-Pineda

Srirussamee

Palma

, et al. Electroactive 3D printed scaffolds based on percolated composites of polycaprolactone with thermally reduced graphene oxide for antibacterial and tissue engineering applications. Nanomaterials 2020; 10: 428.

116.

Cheng

Y-C

Chen

C-H

Kuo

H-W

, et al. Electrical stimulation through conductive substrate to enhance osteo-differentiation of human dental pulp-derived stem cells. Appl Sci 2019; 9: 3938.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.21 MB

Changes in the extracellular microenvironment and osteogenic responses of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells induced by in vitro direct electrical stimulation

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Materials and methods

Cell culture and culture media preparation

Direct ES system

Computational electrochemistry modelling and validation

H2O2 concentration measurement

Inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy

Fluorescence staining of ERK1/2

mRNA extraction and real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR)

Cell metabolic activity assay

Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity assay

Statistical analysis

Results

Computational electrochemical modelling and validation

Acellular media characterisation

Phosphorylated ERK1/2 staining

mRNA expressions and cell metabolic activity

mRNA expressions, cell metabolic activity, and ALP activities in osteogenic media (OM)

Discussion

Changes in microenvironment under direct ES and faradic by-products generation

MSC responses to direct ES and the roles of faradic by-products

Clinical relevance of the findings from this study, limitations and future works

Conclusion

Supplemental Material

sj-pdf-1-tej-10.1177_2041731420974147 – Supplemental material for Changes in the extracellular microenvironment and osteogenic responses of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells induced by in vitro direct electrical stimulation

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iD

Supplemental material

References

Supplementary Material

H₂O₂ concentration measurement