People’s environmental protection behavior largely depends on their perception of the economic and social environment. Through six studies, this article investigates the relationship between perceived economic mobility and pro-environmental engagement. Using the World Values Survey, Study 1 (N = 59,948) found that lower mobility is linked to lower pro-environmental intentions. Studies 2 (N = 243) and 3 (N = 235) manipulated mobility in real and virtual society, supporting Study 1’s findings. Study 4 (N = 219) introduced cynicism, showing that lower mobility was associated with higher cynicism, which in turn was associated with lower pro-environmental behavior. Studies 5 (N = 234) and 6 (N = 294) manipulated mobility and measured cynicism as well as environmental donation, providing further evidence. Our findings expand research on perceived economic mobility, highlighting its broader impact on behavior that affects the natural environment.
BakH.YiY. (2020). When the American dream fails: The effect of perceived economic inequality on present-oriented behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 37(10), 1321–1341. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21369
2.
BarefootJ. C.DodgeK. A.PetersonB. L.DahlstromW. G.WilliamsR. B. (1989). The Cook-Medley hostility scale: Item content and ability to predict survival. Psychosomatic Medicine, 51(1), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-198901000-00005
3.
BertholdA.ColognaV.HardmeierM.SiegristM. (2023). Drop some money! The influence of income and subjective financial scarcity on pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 91, Article 102149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102149
4.
BrowmanA. S.DestinM.CarswellK. L.SvobodaR. C. (2017). Perceptions of socioeconomic mobility influence academic persistence among low socioeconomic status students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.03.006
5.
ChanH.-W.TamK.-P. (2021). Do people’s assumptions about the social world matter? The effects of social axioms on environmental attitude and efficacy beliefs. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 75, Article 101598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101598
6.
ChenQ.WangY.ZhangY. (2024). Developing strengths or remedying weaknesses? How perceived social mobility affects parents’ purchase preferences for children’s educational products. Journal of Marketing, 88(5), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429231224333
7.
ChenS.YangS.ChenH. (2023). Nonmonotonic effects of subjective social class on pro-environmental engagement. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 90, Article 102098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102098
8.
ChettyR.GruskyD.HellM.HendrenN.ManducaR.NarangJ. (2017). The fading American dream: Trends in absolute income mobility since 1940. Science, 356(6336), 398–406. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal4617
9.
ChoyB. K. C.EomK.LiN. P. (2021). Too cynical to reconnect: Cynicism moderates the effect of social exclusion on prosociality through empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 178, Article 110871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110871
10.
CookW. W.MedleyD. M. (1954). Proposed hostility and Pharisaic-virtue scales for the MMPI. Journal of Applied Psychology, 38(6), 414–418. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0060667
11.
DavidaiS.GilovichT. (2018). How should we think about Americans’ beliefs about economic mobility?Judgment and Decision Making, 13(3), 297–304. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500007737
12.
DayM. V.FiskeS. T. (2017). Movin’ on up? How perceptions of social mobility affect our willingness to defend the system. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(3), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616678454
13.
DayM. V.FiskeS. T. (2019). Understanding the nature and consequences of social mobility beliefs. In JettenJ.PetersK. (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 365–380). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_23
14.
DissanayakeD. M. S. (2022). The mediating mechanism of consumer ethical beliefs in determining the influence of cynicism and empathy on green buying intention. Vidyodaya Journal of Management, 8(I), Article 5602. https://doi.org/10.31357/vjm.v8iI.5602
15.
DuH.LiangY.ChiP.KingR. B. (2021). Chinese perceive upward social mobility: How future mobility is influenced, but not limited by past mobility. International Journal of Psychology, 56(6), 951–960. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12771
EomK.KimH. S.ShermanD. K. (2018). Social class, control, and action: Socioeconomic status differences in antecedents of support for pro-environmental action. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 77, 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.03.009
18.
GangadharanL.GrossmanP. J.VecciJ. (2021). Moving on up: The impact of income mobility on antisocial behaviour. European Economic Review, 134, Article 103686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.103686
19.
GrandinA.GuillouL.Abdel SaterR.FoucaultM.ChevallierC. (2022). Socioeconomic status, time preferences and pro-environmentalism. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 79, Article 101720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101720
20.
GreenglassE. R.JulkunenJ. (1989). Construct validity and sex differences in Cook-Medley hostility. Personality and Individual Differences, 10(2), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(89)90206-7
21.
GuinierL. (2004). From racial liberalism to racial literacy: Brown v. Board of Education and the interest-divergence dilemma. Journal of American History, 91(1), 92–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/3659616
22.
HayesA. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
23.
HernandezI. A.SilvermanD. M.RosarioR. J.DestinM. (2023). Concern about experiencing downward socioeconomic mobility generates precarious types of motivation among students of color. Social Psychology of Education, 26(3), 761–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09763-5
24.
HewettR.ShantzA.MundyJ. (2019). Information, beliefs, and motivation: The antecedents to human resource attributions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(5), 570–586. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2353
25.
HuiC. M.HuiH. H. N. (2009). The mileage from social axioms: Learning from the past and looking forward. In LeungK.BondM. H. (eds.), Psychological aspects of social axioms (pp. 13–30). Springer.
26.
InglehartR.HaerpferC.MorenoA.WelzelC.KizilovaK.Diez-MedranoJ.LagosM.NorrisP.PonarinE.PuranenB. (Eds.). (2022.). World values survey: All rounds-country-pooled datafile (Dataset version 3.0.0.). JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat. https://doi.org/10.14281/18241.17
27.
JaegerC. M.SchultzP. W. (2017). Coupling social norms and commitments: Testing the underdetected nature of social influence. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 51, 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.03.015
28.
JettenJ.MolsF.HealyN.SpearsR. (2017). “Fear of falling”: Economic instability enhances collective angst among societies’ wealthy class. Journal of Social Issues, 73(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12204
29.
JettenJ.MolsF.SteffensN. K. (2021). Prosperous but fearful of falling: The wealth paradox, collective angst, and opposition to immigration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(5), 766–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220944112
30.
JiangT.SedikidesC. (2022). Awe motivates authentic-self pursuit via self-transcendence: Implications for prosociality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123(3), 576–596. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000381
KleinS. A.HorstenL. K.HilbigB. E. (2022a). The effect of environmental versus social framing on pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 84, Article 101897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101897
33.
KleinS. A.NockurL.ReeseG. (2022b). Prosociality from the perspective of environmental psychology. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 182–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.09.001
34.
KrausM. W. (2015). Americans still overestimate social class mobility: A pre-registered self-replication. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 170097. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01709
35.
KrausM. W.TanJ. J. X. (2015). Americans overestimate social class mobility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 58, 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.01.005
LangeF. (2023). Behavioral paradigms for studying pro-environmental behavior: A systematic review. Behavior Research Methods, 55(2), 600–622. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01825-4
38.
LangeF.SteinkeA.DewitteS. (2018). The Pro-Environmental Behavior Task: A laboratory measure of actual pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 56, 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.02.007
39.
LeoniakK. J.CwalinaW. (2019). The role of normative prompts and norm support cues in promoting light-switching behavior: A field study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 64, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.04.014
40.
LeungA. K. Y.KohB. (2019). Understanding pro-environmental intentions by integrating insights from social mobility, cosmopolitanism, and social dominance. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 22(2), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12348
41.
LiH.XieX.ZouY.WangT. (2024). “Take action, buddy!”: Self–other differences in passive risk-taking for health and safety. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 110, Article 104542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104542
42.
LiuZ.LuanM.LiH.StokerJ. I.LammersJ. (2024). Psychological power increases the desire for social distance but reduces the sense of social distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 110, Article 104528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104528
43.
MatsuoM. (2019). Effect of learning goal orientation on work engagement through job crafting: A moderated mediation approach. Personnel Review, 48(1), 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2017-0346
44.
MouleR. K.BurrussG. W.GiffordF. E.ParryM. M.FoxB. (2019). Legal socialization and subcultural norms: Examining linkages between perceptions of procedural justice, legal cynicism, and the code of the street. Journal of Criminal Justice, 61, 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2019.03.001
45.
OttoS.PensiniP.ZabelS.Diaz-SieferP.BurnhamE.Navarro-VillarroelC.NeamanA. (2021). The prosocial origin of sustainable behavior: A case study in the ecological domain. Global Environmental Change, 69, Article 102312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102312
46.
PolicarpoM. C.ApaolazaV.HartmannP.ParedesM. R.D’SouzaC. (2023). Social cynicism, greenwashing, and trust in green clothing brands. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 47(5), 1950–1961. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12971
47.
RaoT.-T.YangS.-L.YuF.XuB.-X.WeiJ. (2022). Perception of class mobility moderates the relationship between social class and prosocial behaviour. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 25(1), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12466
48.
RichardF. D.BondC. F.Stokes-ZootaJ. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7(4), 331–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331
49.
Ritterman WeintraubM. L.FernaldL. C. H.AdlerN.BertozziS.SymeS. L. (2015). Perceptions of social mobility: Development of a new psychosocial indicator associated with adolescent risk behaviors. Frontiers in Public Health, 3, Article 62. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2015.00062
50.
RosenthalS.HoK. L. (2020). Minding other people’s business: Community attachment and anticipated negative emotion in an extended norm activation model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 69, Article 101439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101439
51.
SagioglouC.ForstmannM.GreitemeyerT. (2019). Belief in social mobility mitigates hostility resulting from disadvantaged social standing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(4), 541–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218789073
52.
Sánchez-RodríguezÁ.WillisG. B.JettenJ.Rodríguez-BailónR. (2019). Economic inequality enhances inferences that the normative climate is individualistic and competitive. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(6), 1114–1127. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2557
53.
ShariffA. F.WiwadD.AkninL. B. (2016). Income mobility breeds tolerance for income inequality: Cross-national and experimental evidence. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(3), 373–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616635596
54.
StavrovaO.EhlebrachtD. (2016). Cynical beliefs about human nature and income: Longitudinal and cross-cultural analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(1), 116–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000050
55.
StavrovaO.EhlebrachtD. (2019). The cynical genius illusion: Exploring and debunking lay beliefs about cynicism and competence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(2), 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218783195
56.
StavrovaO.EhlebrachtD.RenD. (2024). Cynical people desire power but rarely acquire it: Exploring the role of cynicism in leadership attainment. British Journal of Psychology, 115(2), 226–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12685
57.
StavrovaO.EhlebrachtD.VohsK. D. (2020). Victims, perpetrators, or both? The vicious cycle of disrespect and cynical beliefs about human nature. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(9), 1736–1754. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000738
58.
SwimJ. K.BloodhartB. (2018). The intergroup foundations of climate change justice. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(3), 472–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217745366
59.
Van LangeP. A. M.JoiremanJ. A. (2008). How we can promote behavior that serves all of us in the future. Social Issues and Policy Review, 2(1), 127–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2409.2008.00013.x
60.
VerhagenT.Van DolenW. (2011). The influence of online store beliefs on consumer online impulse buying: A model and empirical application. Information & Management, 48(8), 320–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2011.08.001
61.
WangX.ChenW.-F.HongY.-Y.ChenZ. (2022). Perceiving high social mobility breeds materialism: The mediating role of socioeconomic status uncertainty. Journal of Business Research, 139, 629–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.014
62.
WangX.WangX.ChenZ. (2023). High social mobility leads to delayed reproduction. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 52(4), 1365–1377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02551-4
63.
WenF.WitteveenD. (2021). Does perceived social mobility shape attitudes toward government and family educational investment?Social Science Research, 98, Article 102579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102579
64.
WhyteM. K.HanC. (2008). Popular attitudes toward distributive injustice: Beijing and Warsaw compared. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 13(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-008-9016-8
65.
XieY.DongH.ZhouX.SongX. (2022). Trends in social mobility in postrevolution China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(7), Article e2117471119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2117471119
66.
YanL.KehH. T.ChenJ. (2021). Assimilating and differentiating: The curvilinear effect of social class on green consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(6), 914–936. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucaa041
67.
YoonS.KimH. C. (2016). Keeping the American Dream alive: The interactive effect of perceived economic mobility and materialism on impulsive spending. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(5), 759–772. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.15.0053
68.
YoonS.KimH. C. (2018). Feeling economically stuck: The effect of perceived economic mobility and socioeconomic status on variety seeking. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(5), 1141–1156. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx091
69.
ZhaoY.SuiJ.ZhouX. (2023). Effect of perceived economic mobility and income on charitable behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 40(7), 1316–1328. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21820
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
