Climate change poses extensive threats to human survival, highlighting the urgent need to promote pro-environmental engagement. We propose that economic inequality undermines pro-environmental engagement by reducing individuals’ future orientation (i.e., the extent to which people attend to or prioritize future outcomes). Across three studies, we tested this prediction using cross-national secondary data (Study 1, N = 35,017), an online survey (Study 2, N = 885), and an online experiment (Study 3, N = 299). Our results consistently showed that economic inequality negatively predicted pro-environmental engagement reflected in intention and behavior measures, and that future orientation accounted for this association. Specifically, exposures to or perceptions of higher economic inequality shifted individuals’ focus away from long-term outcomes, thereby reducing environmentally friendly actions. These findings highlight economic inequality as a barrier to sustainable behavior and suggest that reducing inequality or reshaping inequality perceptions may promote collective actions to protect the natural environment.
AdlerN. E.EpelE. S.CastellazzoG.IckovicsJ. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, White women. Health Psychology, 19(6), 586–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586
2.
AguinisH.GottfredsonR. K.CulpepperS. A. (2013). Best-practice recommendations for estimating cross-level interaction effects using multilevel modeling. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1490–1528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313478188
BaekJ.GweisahG. (2013). Does income inequality harm the environment?: Empirical evidence from the United States. Energy Policy, 62, 1434–1437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.097
5.
BakH.YiY. (2020). When the American dream fails: The effect of perceived economic inequality on present-oriented behavior. Psychology and Marketing, 37, 1321–1341. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21369
BaumgärtnerS.DruppM. A.MeyaJ. N.MunzJ. M.QuaasM. F. (2017). Income inequality and willingness to pay for environmental public goods. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 85, 35–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2017.04.005
8.
BertheA.ElieL. (2015). Mechanisms explaining the impact of economic inequality on environmental deterioration. Ecological Economics, 116, 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.04.026
9.
BertholdA.ColognaV.HardmeierM.SiegristM. (2023). Drop some money! The influence of income and subjective financial scarcity on pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 91, Article 102149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102149
BoyceJ. K. (2003). Inequality, cooperation, and environmental sustainability. In BalandJ. M.BowlesS.BardhanP. (Eds.), Inequality and environmental protection (pp. 314–348). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691187389
12.
Bruderer EnzlerH. (2015). Consideration of future consequences as a predictor of environmentally responsible behavior: Evidence from a general population study. Environment and Behavior, 47(6), 618–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513512204
13.
BruecknerM.LedermanD. (2018). Inequality and economic growth: The role of initial income. Journal of Economic Growth, 23(3), 341–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-018-9156-4
14.
CallanM. J.SheadN. W.OlsonJ. M. (2011). Personal relative deprivation, delay discounting, and gambling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(5), 955–973. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024778
15.
CarmiN. (2013). Caring about tomorrow: Future orientation, environmental attitudes and behaviors. Environmental Education Research, 19(4), 430–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.700697
16.
CarmiN.ArnonS.M. (2014). The role of future orientation in environmental behavior: Analyzing the relationship on the individual and cultural levels. Society & Natural Resources, 27, 1304–1320. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2014.928393
17.
CarstensenL. L.LangF. R. (1996). Future Time Perspective Scale (FTP) [Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t31314-000
ChenS.WanF.YangS. (2022). Normative misperceptions regarding pro-environmental behavior: Mediating roles of outcome efficacy and problem awareness. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 84, Article 101917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101917
20.
Cifuentes-FauraJ. (2022). European Union policies and their role in combating climate change over the years. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 15(8), 1333–1340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-022-01156-5
21.
Corral-VerdugoV.Fraijo-SingB.PinheiroJ. Q. (2006). Sustainable behavior and time perspective: Present, past, and future orientation and their relationship with water conservation behavior. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 40, 139–147.
22.
DavidaiS. (2018). Why do Americans believe in economic mobility? Economic inequality, external attributions of wealth and poverty, and the belief in economic mobility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 138–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.07.012
23.
ElgarF. J.StefaniakA.WohlM. J. A. (2020). The trouble with trust: Time-series analysis of social capital, income inequality, and COVID-19 deaths in 84 countries. Social Science & Medicine, 263, Article 113365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113365
24.
EllisB. J.FigueredoA. J.BrumbachB. H.SchlomerG. L. (2009). Fundamental dimensions of environmental risk: The impact of harsh versus unpredictable environments on the evolution and development of life history strategies. Human Nature, 20(2), 204–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-009-9063-7
25.
EnzlerH. B.DiekmannA.LiebeU. (2019). Do environmental concern and future orientation predict metered household electricity use?Journal of Environmental Psychology, 62, 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.02.004
26.
EpperT.FehrE.Fehr-DudaH.KreinerC. T.LassenD. D.Leth-PetersenS.RasmussenG. N. (2020). Time discounting and wealth inequality. American Economic Review, 110(4), 1177–1205. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20181096
27.
FranzenA.MeyerR. (2010). Environmental attitudes in cross-national perspective: A multilevel analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000. European Sociological Review, 26(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp018
28.
García-SánchezE.García-CastroJ. D.WillisG. B.Rodríguez-BailónR. (2025). Economic inequality and unfairness evaluations of income distribution negatively predict political and social trust: Evidence from Latin America over 23 years. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 16(4), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506231221310
29.
García-SánchezE.WillisG. B.Rodríguez-BailónR.García-CastroJ. D.Palacio-SañudoJ.PoloJ.Rentería-PérezE. (2018). Perceptions of economic inequality in Colombian daily life: More than unequal distribution of economic resources. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1660. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01660
GriskeviciusV.AckermanJ. M.CantúS. M.DeltonA. W.RobertsonT. E.SimpsonJ. A.ThompsonM. E.TyburJ. M. (2013). When the economy falters, do people spend or save? Responses to resource scarcity depend on childhood environments. Psychological Science, 24(2), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612451471
32.
GürN. (2020). Does social trust promote behaviour aimed at mitigating climate change?Economic Affairs, 40, 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecaf.12384
HuoR.YangS.DongC.ChenS. (2025). Perceived economic inequality inhibits pro-environmental engagement. British Journal of Social Psychology, 64(2), Article e12815. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12815
35.
IrwinK.BeriganN. (2013). Trust, culture, and cooperation: A social dilemma analysis of pro-environmental behaviors. The Sociological Quarterly, 54(3), 424–449. http://doi.org/10.1111/tsq.12029
36.
ISSP Research Group. (2023). International Social Survey Programme: Environment IV - ISSP 2020. GESIS, Cologne. ZA7650 Data file Version 2.0.0. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14153
37.
JettenJ.MolsF.PostmesT. (2015). Relative deprivation and relative wealth enhances anti-immigrant sentiments: The v-curve re-examined. PLoS One, 10(10), Article e0139156. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139156
38.
JoiremanJ. (2005). Environmental problems as social dilemmas: The temporal dimension. In StrathmanA.JoiremanJ. (Eds.), Understanding behavior in the context of time: Theory, research, and application (pp. 289–304). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410613516
39.
JoiremanJ.ShafferM. J.BallietD.StrathmanA. (2012). Promotion orientation explains why future-oriented people exercise and eat healthy: Evidence from the two-factor consideration of future consequences-14 scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(10), 1272–1287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212449362
40.
JorgensonA.SchorJ.HuangX. R. (2017). Income inequality and carbon emissions in the United States: A state-level analysis, 1997–2012. Ecological Economics, 134, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2016.12.016
41.
Kadic-MaglajlicS.Arslanagic-KalajdzicM.MicevskiM.DlacicJ.ZabkarV. (2019). Being engaged is a good thing: Understanding sustainable consumption behavior among young adults. Journal of Business Research, 104, 644–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.040
42.
KanitsarG. (2022). The inequality-trust nexus revisited: At what level of aggregation does income inequality matter for social trust?Social Indicators Research, 163, 171–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-022-02894-w
43.
KleblC.JettenJ. (2024). Perceived inequality increases support for structural solutions to climate change. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 15(2), 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506231169328
44.
KormosC.GiffordR. (2014). The validity of self-report measures of proenvironmental behavior: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.09.003
45.
LangeF.SteinkeA.DewitteS. (2018). The pro-environmental behavior task: A laboratory measure of actual pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 56, 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.02.007
46.
LawK. F.ColaizziG.SyropoulosS. (2025). Climate change is an intergenerational challenge that requires intergenerationally focused behavioral solutions. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 61, Article 101467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2024.101467
47.
LevyA.OrionN.LeshemY. (2018) Variables that influence the environmental behavior of adults. Environmental Education Research, 24(3), 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1271865
48.
LiY.SewellD. K.SaberS.ShankD. B.KashimaY. (2021). The climate commons dilemma: How can humanity solve the commons dilemma for the global climate commons?Climatic Change, 164(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-02989-2
49.
LinJ.LiW.GuoZ.KouY. (2023). When and why does economic inequality predict prosocial behaviour? Examining the role of interpersonal trust among different targets. European Journal of Social Psychology, 54(1), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.3007
50.
LiuX. (2012). Jiazhiguan xinshengtai fanshi yiji huanjingxinli kongzhiyuan dui qinhuanjingxingwei de yingxiang [The new ecological paradigm of values and the influence of sources of environmental psychological control on pro-environmental behavior] [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. Beijing Forestry University.
51.
LiuY.ZhangM.LiuR. (2020). The impact of income inequality on carbon emissions in China: A household-level analysis. Sustainability, 12, Article 2715. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072715
52.
LiuZ.SunX.BaoR.MaR. (2024). Why do people always want more? Perceived economic inequality leads people to be greedy by enhancing relative deprivation. British Journal of Psychology, 115(4), 616–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12706
53.
LuH. J.ChangL. (2019). Aggression and risk-taking as adaptive implementations of fast life history strategy. Developmental Science, 22(5), Article e12827. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12827
54.
MagnanA. K.PörtnerH. O.DuvatV. K.GarschagenM.GuinderV. A.ZommersZ.Hoegh-GuldbergO.GattusoJ. P. (2021). Estimating the global risk of anthropogenic climate change. Nature Climate Change, 11(10), 879–885. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01156-w
55.
MilfontT. L.WilsonJ.DinizP. (2012). Time perspective and environmental engagement: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Psychology, 47(5), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2011.647029
56.
NeamanA.OttoS.VinokurE. (2018). Toward an integrated approach to environmental and prosocial education. Sustainability, 10(3), Article 583. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030583
57.
NolanJ. M.SchultzP. W. (2015). Prosocial behavior and environmental action. In SchroederD. A.GrazianoW. G. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior (pp. 626–652). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780195399813.013.011
58.
NortonM. I.ArielyD. (2011). Building a better America—one wealth quintile at a time. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393524
59.
OttoS.PensiniP.ZabelS.Diaz-SieferP.BurnhamE.Navarro-VillarroelC.NeamanA. (2021). The prosocial origin of sustainable behavior: A case study in the ecological domain. Global Environmental Change, 69, Article 102312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102312
60.
Pavalache-IlieM.CazanA. M. (2018). Personality correlates of pro-environmental attitudes. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 28(1), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2018.1429576
61.
PayneB. K.Brown-IannuzziJ. L.HannayJ. W. (2017). Economic inequality increases risk taking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(18), 4643–4648. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616453114
62.
PickettK. E.WilkinsonR. G. (2010). Inequality: An underacknowledged source of mental illness and distress. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 197(6), 426–428. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.109.072066
63.
PirlottA. G.MacKinnonD. P. (2016). Design approaches to experimental mediation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.012
64.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ. Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
65.
RuggeriK.PaninA. (2022). Temporal discounting is linked to economic stability and inequality. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(10), 1331–1332. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01393-9
66.
Sánchez-RodríguezÁ.JettenJ.Willis SánchezG. B.Rodríguez BailónR. M. (2019). High economic inequality makes us feel less wealthy. International Review of Social Psychology, 32(1), Article 17. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.333
67.
Sánchez-RodríguezÁ.WillisG. B.JettenJ.Rodríguez-BailónR. (2019). Economic inequality enhances inferences that the normative climate is individualistic and competitive. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(6), 1114–1127. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2557
68.
SchaubS. (2022). Global relationships between time preference and environmental policy performance. Environmental Science & Policy, 128, 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.11.017
69.
SchmalorA.HeineS. J. (2022). The construct of subjective economic inequality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(1), 210–219. http://doi.org/10.1177/1948550621996867
SchoemannA. M.BoultonA. J.ShortS. D. (2017). Determining power and sample size for simple and complex mediation models. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 379–386. http://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617715068
72.
SemenzaJ. C.HallD. E.WilsonD. J.BontempoB. D.SailorD. J.GeorgeL. A. (2008). Public perception of climate change: Voluntary mitigation and barriers to behavior change. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(5), 479–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.020
73.
ShahenM. E.KotaniK.SaijoT. (2021). Intergenerational sustainability is enhanced by taking the perspective of future generations. Scientific Reports, 11, Article 2437. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81835-y
74.
ShiJ.WangX.ChenZ. (2022). Polluted humanity: Air pollution leads to the dehumanization of oneself and others. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 83, Article 101873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101873
75.
SkylarkW. J.CallanM. J. (2021). Personal relative deprivation and pro-environmental intentions. PLoS One, 16(11), Article e0259711. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259711
76.
SoltF. (2020). Measuring income inequality across countries and over time: The Standardized World Income Inequality Database. Social Science Quarterly, 101(3), 1183–1199. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12795
77.
SoutterA. R. B.BatesT. C.MõttusR. (2020). Big Five and HEXACO personality traits, proenvironmental attitudes, and behaviors: A meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 913–941. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620903019
78.
SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P.FongG. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 845–851. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845
79.
SteinbergL.GrahamS.O’brienL.WoolardJ.CauffmanE.BanichM. (2009). Age differences in future orientation and delay discounting. Child Development, 80(1), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01244.x
80.
SternP. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
81.
SternP. C.DietzT.AbelT.GuagnanoG. A.KalofL. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 81–97. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24707060
82.
StrathmanA.GleicherF.BoningerD. S.EdwardsC. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 742–752. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.742
83.
ThielmannI.SpadaroG.BallietD. (2020). Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(1), 30–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000217
TrumpK. S. (2023). Income inequality is unrelated to perceived inequality and support for redistribution. Social Science Quarterly, 104(2), 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13269
86.
VonaschA. J.SjåstadH. (2021). Future-orientation (as trait and state) promotes reputation-protective choice in moral dilemmas. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(3), 383–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619899257
87.
WangQ.LiL.LiR. (2023). Uncovering the impact of income inequality and population aging on carbon emission efficiency: An empirical analysis of 139 countries. Science of The Total Environment, 857, Article 159508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159508
88.
WeiC.DangJ.LiuL.LiC.TanX.GuZ. (2023). Economic inequality breeds corrupt behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 62(2), 949–971. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12610
89.
WidyastamanP. A.HartonoD. (2022). Economic inequality decomposition and spatial pattern of crime in Indonesia. Papers in Applied Geography, 8(3), 268–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/23754931.2021.1991842
90.
WillisG. B.García-SánchezE.Sánchez-RodríguezÁ.García-CastroJ. D.Rodríguez-BailónR. (2022). The psychosocial effects of economic inequality depend on its perception. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(5), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00044-0
WyssA. M.KnochD.BergerS. (2022). When and how pro-environmental attitudes turn into behavior: The role of costs, benefits, and self-control. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 79, Article 101748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101748
93.
YangC.ZhaoS. (2019). Determining preference for potential: The role of perceived economic mobility. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 47(6), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.8019
94.
YangY.KonrathS. (2023). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between economic inequality and prosocial behaviour. Nature Human Behaviour, 7, 1899–1916. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01681-y
95.
YitzhakiS. (1979). Relative deprivation and the Gini coefficient. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93, 321–324. https://doi.org/10.2307/1883197
ZimbardoP. G.BoydJ. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271–1288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.127
98.
ZengZ. X.TianC. Y.MaoJ. Y.van ProoijenJ. W.ZhangY.YangS. L.XieX. N.GuoY. Y. (2024). How does economic inequality shape conspiracy theories? Empirical evidence from China. British Journal of Social Psychology, 63(2), 477–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12689
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
