Recent work suggests that good/bad out-group favoritism of Blacks for Whites may reflect positive associations with White rather than negative associations with Black. The Dual Implicit Process Model suggests that Blacks may come to associate their own group with threat, even absent a concurrent Black-negative association. This work tests this idea among Black Americans. Three studies tested this possibility using mouse-tracking (Study 1) and evaluative priming tasks (Studies 2 and 3) to assess how quickly participants make judgments involving Black versus White male faces and names. All studies found that that Black Americans hold automatic Black-threat associations absent automatic Black-negative associations. This supports the Dual Implicit Process Model’s threat versus negativity distinction within the realm of anti-Black bias and supplements recent work by showing that the presence of out-group favoritism on one dimension (i.e., threat) can occur even in the absence of out-group favoritism on a seemingly related dimension (i.e., negativity).
BatyF.Delignette-MullerM.-L. (2004). Estimating the bacterial lag time: Which model, which precision?International Journal of Food Microbiology, 91, 261–277.
2.
CalanchiniJ.SchmidtK.ShermanJ. W.KleinS. A. (2022). The contributions of positive outgroup and negative ingroup evaluation to implicit bias favoring outgroups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119, Article e2116924119.
3.
CameronC. D.Brown-IannuzziJ. L.PayneB. K. (2012). Sequential priming measures of implicit social cognition: A meta-analysis of associations with behavior and explicit attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 330–350.
4.
CorrellJ.ParkB.JuddC. M.WittenbrinkB. (2002). The police officer’s dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 1314–1329.
5.
CorrellJ.WittenbrinkB.CrawfordM. T.SadlerM. S. (2015). Stereotypic vision: How stereotypes disambiguate visual stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 219–233.
6.
CottrellC. A.NeubergS. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different social groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to “prejudice.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 770–789.
7.
DavidE. J. R.SchroederT. M.FernandezJ. (2019). Internalized racism: A systematic review of the psychological literature on racism’s most insidious consequences. Journal or Social Issues, 4, 1057–1086.
8.
De HouwerJ.HermansD.RothermundK.WenturaD. (2002). Affective priming of semantic categorization responses. Cognition & Emotion, 16, 643–666.
9.
DevineP. G.ElliotA. J. (1995). Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton Trilogy revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1139–1150.
10.
DevineP. G.PlantE. A.AmodioD. M.Harmon-JonesE.VanceS. L. (2002). The regulation of explicit and implicit race bias: The role of motivations to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 835–848.
11.
FreemanJ. B. (2018). Doing psychological science by hand. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27, 315–323.
GoffP. A.LloydT.GellerA.RaphaelS.GlaserJ. (2016). The science of justice: Race, arrests, and police use of force. Center for Policing Equity.
14.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919.
15.
KahnK. B.DaviesP. G. (2011). Differentially dangerous? Phenotypic racial stereotypicality increases implicit bias among ingroup and outgroup members. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 569–580.
16.
KieferM.SimE. J.WenturaD. (2015). Boundary conditions for the influence of unfamiliar non-target primes in unconscious evaluative priming: The moderating role of attentional task sets. Consciousness & Cognition, 35, 342–356.
17.
KruegerJ. (1996). Personal beliefs and cultural stereotypes about racial characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 536–548.
18.
MarchD. S.GaertnerL. (2021). A method for estimating the time of initiating correct categorization in mouse-tracking. Behavior Research Methods, 53, 2439–2449. doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01575-9
19.
MarchD. S.GaertnerL.OlsonM. A. (2017). In harm’s way: On preferential response to threatening stimuli. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 1519–1529. doi.org/10.1177/0146167217722558
20.
MarchD. S.GaertnerL.OlsonM. A. (2018a). On the prioritized processing of threat in a Dual Implicit Process Model of evaluation. Psychological Inquiry, 19, 1–13.
21.
MarchD. S.GaertnerL.OlsonM. A. (2018b). Clarifying the explanatory scope of the Dual Implicit Process Model. Psychological Inquiry, 29, 38–43.
22.
MarchD. S.GaertnerL.OlsonM. A. (2020). Lions, and tigers, and implicit measures, oh my! implicit assessment and the valence vs. threat distinction. Social Cognition, 38, 154–164.
23.
MarchD. S.GaertnerL.OlsonM. A. (2021). Danger or dislike: Distinguishing threat from valence as sources of automatic anti-Black bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121, 984–1004. doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000288
24.
MarchD. S.GaertnerL.OlsonM. A. (2022). On the automatic nature of threat: Physiological and evaluative responses to survival-threats outside conscious perception. Affective Science, 3, 135–144. doi.org/10.1007/s42761-021-00090-6
25.
MarchD. S.GrahamR. (2015). Exploring implicit ingroup and outgroup bias toward Hispanics. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 18, 89–103. doi.org/10.1177/1368430214542256
26.
NosekB. A.SmythF. L.HansenJ. J.DevosT.LindnerN. M.RanganathK. A.. . . BanajiM. R. (2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 18(1), 36–88.
27.
O’BrienF.CousineauD. (2014). Representing error bars in within subject designs in typical software packages. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 10, 58–70. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.10.1.p056
28.
OkonofuaJ. A.EberhardtJ. L. (2015). Two strikes: Race and the disciplining of young students. Psychological Science, 26, 617–624.
29.
OliverM. B. (2003). African American men as “criminal and dangerous”: Implications of media portrayals of crime on the “criminalization” of African American men. Journal of African American Studies, 7, 3–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12111-003-1006-5
30.
PaolineI. I. I. E. A.GauJ. M.TerrillW. (2018). Race and the police use of force encounter in the United States. The British Journal of Criminology, 58(1), 54–74.
31.
SchallerM.NeubergS. L. (2012). Danger, disease, and the nature of prejudice(s). In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 46, pp. 1–54). Academic Press.
32.
TukeyJ. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison Wesley.
WelchK. (2007). Black criminal stereotypes and racial profiling. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23, 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986207306870
35.
WrightJ. E.HeadleyA. M. (2020). Police use of force interactions: Is race relevant or gender germane?The American Review of Public Administration, 50, 851–864.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
