Americans hold an association linking Black with physical threat. Across domains, conservatives tend to be more threat sensitive. The current research tests whether associations linking Black to physical threat are associated with political conservatism. Pilot studies clarify that conservatism is associated with physical versus other types of threats (e.g., symbolic, distinctiveness). In Study 1, conservatism corresponds with stronger perceptions of physical threat of unambiguously Black stimuli. In Study 2, conservatism was linked to a stronger association between perceiving point-light walkers as physical threats and as Black versus White. In Study 3, conservatism was linked to a stronger association between perceiving names as physical threats and as Black versus White. In Study 4, conservatism was associated with a stronger automatic Black-threat association, and this relationship mediated the link between conservatism and an automatic Black-criminal association. Consequently, anti-Black attitudes among relative conservatives may be partially underlaid by associations linking Black to physical threat.
BroussardK. A. (2015). Predictors of racial prejudice: A meta-analysis of the influence of religion and political orientation [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Northern Iowa.
2.
BrownX.RuckerJ. M.RichesonJ. A. (2021). Political ideology moderates White Americans’ reactions to racial demographic change. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211052516
3.
ChiricosT.WelchK.GertzM. (2004). Racial typification of crime and support for punitive measures. Criminology, 42, 358–390.
4.
CooleyE.Brown-IannuzziJ. L.CottrellD. (2019). Liberals perceive more racism than conservatives when police shoot Black men—but, reading about White privilege increases perceived racism, and shifts attributions of guilt, regardless of political ideology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 85, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103885
5.
CooleyE.Brown-IannuzziJ. L.PayneB. K.SteeleJ.CipolliW. (2023). Groups amplify the perceived threat and justification for using force against Black people protesting for racial equality—especially among social conservatives. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 26(7), 1565–1588.
6.
CornelisI.Van HielA. (2006). The impact of cognitive styles of authoritarianism based conservatism and racism. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2801_4
7.
CottrellC. A.NeubergS. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to “prejudice.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 770–789.
8.
CraigM. A.RichesonJ. A.,(2014). On the precipice of a “majority-minority” America: Perceived status threat from the racial demographic shift affects White Americans’ political ideology. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1189–1197.
9.
CraigM. A.RuckerJ. M.RichesonJ. A. (2018). Racial and political dynamics of an approaching “majority-minority” United States. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 677, 204–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716218766269
10.
CrawfordJ. T. (2014). Ideological symmetries and asymmetries in political intolerance and prejudice toward political activist groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 284–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.08.002
11.
CrawfordJ. T. (2017). Are conservatives more sensitive to threat than liberals? It depends on how we define threat and conservatism. Social Cognition, 35(4), 354–373. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2017.35.4.354
12.
DambrunM.GuimondS.,(2004). Implicit and explicit measures of prejudice and stereotyping: Do they assess the same underlying knowledge structure?. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34(6), 663–676.
13.
DevineP. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 5–18.
14.
DevineP. G.PlantE. A.AmodioD. M.Harmon-JonesE.VanceS. L. (2002). The regulation of explicit and implicit race bias: The role of motivations to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 835.
15.
DoddM. D.BalzerA.JacobsC. M.GruszczynskiM. W.SmithK. B.HibbingJ. R. (2012). The political left rolls with the good and the political right confronts the bad: Connecting physiology and cognition to preferences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 367(1589), 640–649. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0268
16.
DondersN. C.CorrellJ.WittenbrinkB. (2008). Danger stereotypes predict racially biased attentional allocation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1328–1333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.002
17.
DovidioJ.KawakamiK.JohnsonC.JohnsonB.HowardA. (1997). On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(5), 510–540. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1997.1331
18.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (2004). Aversive racism. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1–52). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(04)36001-6
19.
DovidioJ. F.KawakamiK.GaertnerS. L. (2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 62–68.
20.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual-process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78, 1861–1894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00672.x
21.
DukesK. N.GaitherS. E. (2017). Black racial stereotypes and victim blaming: Implications for media coverage and criminal proceedings in cases of police violence against racial and ethnic minorities. Journal of Social Issues, 73, 789–807.
22.
DuntonB. C.FazioR. H. (1997). An individual difference measure of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 316–326.
23.
DunwoodyP. T.FunkeF. (2016). The aggression-submission-conventionalism scale: Testing a new three factor measure of authoritarianism. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 4(2), 571–600. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v4i2.168
24.
EndersC. K.TofighiD. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121–138.
25.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
26.
FazioR. H. (1986). How do attitudes guide behavior. Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior, 1, 204–243.
27.
FesslerD. M. T.PisorA. C.HolbrookC. (2017). Political orientation predicts credulity regarding putative hazards. Psychological Science, 28, 651–660. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617692108
28.
FritzM. S.MacKinnonD. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18, 233–239.
29.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.NosekB. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141
30.
GreenwaldA. G.NosekB. A.BanajiM. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216.
31.
GreenwaldA. G.SmithC. T.SriramN.Bar-AnanY.NosekB. A. (2009). Implicit race attitudes predicted vote in the 2008 U.S. presidential election. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 9(1), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2009.01195.x
32.
Haney-LópezI. (2014). Dog whistle politics: How coded racial appeals have reinvented racism and wrecked the middle class. Oxford University Press.
33.
HayesA. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
34.
HodsonG.BusseriM. A. (2012). Bright minds and dark attitudes: Lower cognitive ability predicts greater prejudice through right-wing ideology and low intergroup contact. Psychological Science, 23(2), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611421206
35.
HodsonG.ChomaB. L.BoisvertJ.HaferC. L.MacInnisC. C.CostelloK. (2013). The role of intergroup disgust in predicting negative outgroup evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(2), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.11.002
36.
HodsonG.CostelloK. (2007). Interpersonal disgust, ideological orientations, and dehumanization as predictors of intergroup attitudes. Psychological Science, 18(8), 691–698. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01962.x
37.
InbarY.PizarroD. A.BloomP. (2009). Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals. Cognition and Emotion, 23(4), 714–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930802110007
38.
JohnsonJ.LecciL.DovidioJ. F. (2023). White Americans’ blame attributions and empathy towards Black victims of police violence: How pejorative stereotypes “engulf the field.”British Journal of Social Psychology, 63(2), 936–955. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12712
39.
JostJ. T.FedericoC. M.NapierJ. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, function, and elective affinities. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 60, 307–337.
40.
JostJ. T.NapierJ. L.ThorisdottirH.GoslingS. D.PalfaiT. P.OstafinB. (2007). Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with conservatism or ideological extremity?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(7), 989–1007.
41.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
42.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
43.
KangJ.BennettM.CarbadoD.CaseyP.LevinsonJ. (2011). Implicit bias in the courtroom. UCLA Law Review, 59, 1124–1186.
LehmannP. S. (2020). Race, ethnicity, crime type, and the sentencing of violent felony offenders. Crime & Delinquency, 66(6), 770–805. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128720902699
47.
LevittS. D.DubnerS. J. (2008). Freakonomics. INCA.
48.
LilienfeldS. O.LatzmanR. D. (2014). Threat bias, not negativity bias, underpins differences in political ideology. Behavioral and Brain Science, 37(3), 318–319. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1300263X
49.
LöwA.WeymarM.HammA. O. (2015). When threat is near, get out of here: Dynamics of defensive behavior during freezing and active avoidance. Psychological Science, 26(11), 1706–1716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615597332Löw2015
50.
MarchD. S. (2023). Perceiving a danger within: Black Americans associate Black men with physical threat. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 14, 942–951. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506221142970
51.
MarchD. S.GaertnerL.OlsonM. A. (2018a). On the prioritized processing of threat in a dual implicit process model of evaluation. Psychological Inquiry, 29, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2018.1435680
52.
MarchD. S.GaertnerL.OlsonM. A. (2018b). Clarifying the explanatory scope of the dual implicit process model. Psychological Inquiry, 29, 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2018.1435622
53.
MarchD. S.GaertnerL.OlsonM. A. (2021). Danger or dislike: Distinguishing threat from negative valence as sources of automatic anti-Black bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121(5), 984–1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000288
54.
MarchD. S.OlsonM. A.GaertnerL. (2020). Lions, and tigers, and implicit measures, oh my! Implicit assessment and the valence vs. threat distinction. Social Cognition, 38, S154–S164. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2020.38.supp.s154
55.
McDermottM. (1994). Race/class interactions in the formation of political ideology. Sociological Quarterly, 35, 347–366.
56.
McLeanS. P.GarzaJ. P.WiebeS. A.DoddM. D.SmithK. B.HibbingJ. R.EspyK. A. (2014). Applying the flanker task to political psychology: A research note. Political Psychology, 35(6), 831–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12056
57.
MillerS. L.ManerJ. K.BeckerD. V. (2010). Self-protective biases in group categorization: Threat cues shape the psychological boundary between “us” and “them.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 62–77.
58.
MillsM.GonzalezF. J.GiuseffiK.SievertB.SmithK. B.HibbingJ. R.DoddM. D. (2016). Political conservatism predicts asymmetries in emotional scene memory. Behavioural Brain Research, 306(1), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2016.03.025
59.
MillsM.SmithK. B.HibbingJ. R.DoddM. D. (2014). The politics of the face-in-the-crowd. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1199–1213. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035177
60.
MurayamaK.UsamiS.SakakiM. (2022). Summary-statistics-based power analysis: A new and practical method to determine sample size for mixed-effects modeling. Psychological Methods, 27, 1014–1038. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000330
61.
NailP. R.HartonH. C.DeckerB. P. (2003). Political orientation and modern versus aversive racism: Tests of Dovidio and Gaertner’s (1998) integrated model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 754–770. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.754
62.
NavarreteC. D.OlssonA.HoA. K.MendesW. B.ThomsenL.SidaniusJ. (2009). Fear extinction to an out-group face: The role of target gender. Psychological Science, 20, 155–158.
63.
NeubergS. L.KenrickD. T.SchallerM. (2011). Human threat management systems: Self-protection and disease avoidance. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 1042–1051.
64.
ÖhmanA.MinekaS. (2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108(3), 483–522. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.483
65.
OxleyD. R.SmithK. B.AlfordJ. R.HibbingM. V.MillerJ. L.ScaloraM.HatemiP. K.HibbingJ. R. (2008). Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science, 321(5896), 1667–1670. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1157627
66.
PayneB. K.KrosnickJ. A.PasekJ.LelkesY.AkhtarO.TompsonT. (2010). Implicit and explicit prejudice in the 2008 American presidential election. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(2), 367–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.11.001
67.
RiekB. M.ManiaE. W.GaertnerS. L. (2006). Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 336–353.
68.
SaleminkE.van den HoutM. A.KindtM. (2007). Selective attention and threat: Quick orienting versus slow disengagement and two versions of the dot probe task. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 607–615.
69.
SchallerM.NeubergS. L. (2012). Danger, disease, and the nature of prejudice(s). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1–54.
70.
SearsD. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515–530.
SibleyC. G.RobertsonA.WilsonM. S. (2006). Social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism: Additive and interactive effects. Political Psychology, 27, 755–768. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00531.x
73.
StephanW. G.StephanC. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In OskampS. (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–45). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
74.
SternC.AxtJ. R. (2019). Group status modulates the associative strength between status quo supporting beliefs and anti-Black attitudes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(7), 946–956. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618799067
75.
TalaskaC. A.FiskeS. T.ChaikenS. (2008). Legitimating racial discrimination: Emotions, not beliefs, best predict discrimination in a meta-analysis. Social Justice Research, 21, 263–296.
76.
ThiemK. C.NeelR.SimpsonA. J.ToddA. R. (2019). Are Black women and girls associated with danger? Implicit racial bias at the intersection of target age and gender. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45, 1427–1439.
77.
WebsterR. J.BurnsM. D.PickeringM.SaucierD. A. (2014). The suppression and justification of prejudice as a function of political orientation. European Journal of Personality, 28, 44–59.
78.
WelchK. (2007). Black criminal stereotypes and racial profiling. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23, 276–288.
79.
WettsR.WillerR. (2019). Who is called by the dog whistle? Experimental evidence that racial resentment and political ideology condition responses to racially encoded messages. Socius, 5, 1–20.
80.
WhitleyB. E.Jr. (1999). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 126–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.126
81.
WilsonM. S.SibleyC. G. (2012). Social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism: Additive and interactive effects on political conservatism. International Society of Political Psychology, 34, 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00929.x
82.
WiltonL.SanchezD. T.GiamoL. (2014). Seeing similarity or distance? Racial identification moderates intergroup perception after biracial exposure. Social Psychology, 45(2), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000168
83.
WittenbrinkB.JuddC. M.ParkB. (1997). Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationship with questionnaire measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 262.
84.
ZellE.BernsteinM. J. (2014). You may think you’re right. . . Young adults are more liberal than they realize. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 326–333.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
