To benefit from information provided by other people, people must be somewhat credulous. However, credulity entails risks. The optimal level of credulity depends on the relative costs of believing misinformation and failing to attend to accurate information. When information concerns hazards, erroneous incredulity is often more costly than erroneous credulity, given that disregarding accurate warnings is more harmful than adopting unnecessary precautions. Because no equivalent asymmetry exists for information concerning benefits, people should generally be more credulous of hazard information than of benefit information. This adaptive negatively biased credulity is linked to negativity bias in general and is more prominent among people who believe the world to be more dangerous. Because both threat sensitivity and beliefs about the dangerousness of the world differ between conservatives and liberals, we predicted that conservatism would positively correlate with negatively biased credulity. Two online studies of Americans supported this prediction, potentially illuminating how politicians’ alarmist claims affect different portions of the electorate.
AhnW.-Y.KishidaK. T.GuX.LohrenzT.HarveyA.AlfordJ. R.. . . DayanP. (2014). Nonpolitical images evoke neural predictors of political ideology. Current Biology, 24, 2693–2699. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.050
2.
AltemeyerB. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality.” In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47–92). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3.
AltshteynI. (2014). Evidence for a warning bias in information transmission in social networks (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of California, Los Angeles.
4.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC.VohsK. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
5.
BebbingtonK.MacLeodC.EllisonT. M.FayN. (2017). The sky is falling: Evidence of a negativity bias in the social transmission of information. Evolution & Human Behavior, 38, 92–101. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.07.004
6.
BoydR.RichersonP. J. (2006). Culture and the evolution of the human social instincts. In LevinsonS.EnfieldN. (Eds.), Roots of human sociality (pp. 453–477). Oxford, England: Berg.
7.
BoyerP.ParrenN. (2015). Threat-related information suggests competence: A possible factor in the spread of rumors. PLoS ONE, 10(6), Article e0128421. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128421
8.
CarneyD. R.JostJ. T.GoslingS. D.PotterJ. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29, 807–840. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00668.x
9.
CornelisI.Van HielA.RoetsA.KossowskaM. (2009). Age differences in conservatism: Evidence on the mediating effects of personality and cognitive style. Journal of Personality, 77, 51–88. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00538.x
10.
CrowsonH. M.ThomaS. J.HestevoldN. (2005). Is political conservatism synonymous with authoritarianism?The Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 571–592. doi:10.3200/SOCP.145.5.571-592
11.
DoddM. D.BalzerA.JacobsC. M.GruszczynskiM. W.SmithK. B.HibbingJ. R. (2012). The political left rolls with the good and the political right confronts the bad: Connecting physiology and cognition to preferences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367, 640–649. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0268
12.
DuckittJ. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41–114). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
13.
DuckittJ.WagnerC.du PlessisI.BirumI. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 75–93. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.75
14.
FedericoC. M.HuntC. V.ErgunD. (2009). Political expertise, social worldviews, and ideology: Translating “competitive jungles” and “dangerous worlds” into ideological reality. Social Justice Research, 22, 259–279. doi:10.1007/s11211-009-0097-0
15.
FesslerD. M. T. (2006). Steps toward the evolutionary psychology of a culture-dependent species. In CarruthersP.LaurenceS.StichS. (Eds.), The innate mind: Vol. 2. Culture and cognition (pp. 91–117). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
16.
FesslerD. M. T.HolbrookC.PollackJ. S.Hahn-HolbrookJ. (2014). Stranger danger: Parenthood increases the envisioned bodily formidability of menacing men. Evolution & Human Behavior, 35, 109–117. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.11.004
17.
FesslerD. M. T.PisorA. C.NavarreteC. D. (2014). Negatively-biased credulity and the cultural evolution of beliefs. PLoS ONE, 9(4), Article e0095167. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0095167
18.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.NosekB. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029–1046. doi:10.1037/a0015141
19.
HibbingJ. R.SmithK. B.AlfordJ. R. (2014). Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 37, 297–307. doi:10.1017/S0140525X13001192
20.
HilbigB. E. (2009). Sad, thus true: Negativity bias in judgments of truth. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 983–986. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.012
21.
HilbigB. E. (2012a). Good things don’t come easy (to mind): Explaining framing effects in judgments of truth. Experimental Psychology, 59, 38–46. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000124
22.
HilbigB. E. (2012b). How framing statistical statements affects subjective veracity: Validation and application of a multinomial model for judgments of truth. Cognition, 125, 37–48. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.009
KemmelmeierM. (2008). Is there a relationship between political orientation and cognitive ability? A test of three hypotheses in two studies. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 767–772. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.08.003
25.
KnollB. R.O’DanielT. J.CusatoB. (2015). Physiological responses and political behavior: Three reproductions using a novel dataset. Research & Politics, 2(4). doi:10.1177/2053168015621328
26.
KurzbanR. (2007). Representational epidemiology: Skepticism and gullibility. In GangestadS. W.SimpsonJ. A. (Eds.), The evolution of mind: Fundamental questions and controversies (pp. 357–362). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
27.
LilienfeldS. O.LatzmanR. D. (2014). Threat bias, not negativity bias, underpins differences in political ideology. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 37, 318–319. doi:10.1017/S0140525X1300263X
28.
MillsM.GonzalezF. J.GiuseffiK.SievertB.SmithK. B.HibbingJ. R.DoddM. D. (2016). Political conservatism predicts asymmetries in emotional scene memory. Behavioural Brain Research, 306, 84–90. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2016.03.025
29.
MillsM.SmithK. B.HibbingJ. R.DoddM. D. (2014). The politics of the face-in-the-crowd. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1199–1213. doi:10.1037/a0035177
R Development Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.3.1) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org/
32.
ReedA. E.ChanL.MikelsJ. A. (2014). Meta-analysis of the age-related positivity effect: Age differences in preferences for positive over negative information. Psychology and Aging, 29, 1–15. doi:10.1037/a0035194
33.
RozinP.RoyzmanE. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 296–320. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2
34.
SedekG.KossowskaM.RydzewskaK. (2014). The importance of adult life-span perspective in explaining variations in political ideology. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 37, 329–330. doi:10.1017/S0140525X13002732
35.
StubbersfieldJ. M.TehraniJ. J.FlynnE. G. (2015). Serial killers, spiders and cybersex: Social and survival information bias in the transmission of urban legends. British Journal of Psychology, 106, 288–307. doi:10.1111/bjop.12073
van LeeuwenF.ParkJ. H. (2009). Perceptions of social dangers, moral foundations, and political orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 169–173. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.02.017
39.
WeedenJ.KurzbanR. (2016). Do people naturally cluster into liberals and conservatives?Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2, 47–57. doi:10.1007/s40806-015-0036-2
40.
WhiteM. P.PahlS.BuehnerM.HayeA. (2003). Trust in risky messages: The role of prior attitudes. Risk Analysis, 23, 717–726. doi:10.1111/1539-6924.00350
41.
WilsonG. D.PattersonJ. R. (1968). A new measure of conservatism. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 7, 264–269. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1968.tb00568.x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
