Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2022-1
Predicting Behavioral Intentions to Prevent or Mitigate COVID-19: A Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis of Attitudes,Norms,and Perceived Behavioral Control Effects
We examined the effectiveness of attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control (PBC) of the theory of planned behavior on COVID-19 relevant behavioral intentions and behaviors. We conducted a meta-analysis of 335 effect sizes from 83 samples across 31 countries (N = 68,592). We found strongest effects for PBC, but contrary to previous research also moderately strong effects of subjective norms. Focusing on systematic context effects: (a) norm–behavior associations at individual level were strengthened if population norms were stronger; (b) collectivism strengthened norm effects in line with cultural theories, but also attitude and PBC associations, suggesting that COVID-relevant behaviors show collective action properties; (c) in line with cultural theory, tightness–looseness strengthened normative effects on behaviors; and (d) contrary to post-modernization theory, national wealth weakened attitude and PBC associations. These analyses provide new theoretical and practical insights into behavioral dynamics during an acute public health crisis.
AbramsD.AndoK.HinkleS. (1998). Psychological attachment to the group: Cross-cultural differences in organizational identification and subjective norms as predictors of workers’ turnover intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(10), 1027–1039. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672982410001
AllcottH.BoxellL.ConwayJ. C.GentzkowM.ThalerM.YangD. Y. (2020). Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic (No. w26946). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w26946
4.
ArmitageC. J.ConnerM. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(Pt 4), 471–499. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939
5.
BerkeyC. S.HoaglinD. C.MostellerF.ColditzG. A. (1995). A random-effects regression model for meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 14(4), 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780140406
6.
BicchieriC.FunckeA. (2018). Norm change: Trendsetters and social structure. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 85(1), 1–21.
7.
BiddlestoneM.GreenR.DouglasK. M. (2020). Cultural orientation, power, belief in conspiracy theories, and intentions to reduce the spread of COVID-19. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(3), 663–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12397
8.
BoerD.FischerR. (2013). How and when do personal values guide our attitudes and sociality? Explaining cross-cultural variability in attitude–value linkages. Psychological Bulletin, 139(5), 1113–1147. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031347
9.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P. T.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis (1st ed.). Wiley.
10.
CaoC.LiN.LiuL. (2020). Do national cultures matter in the containment of COVID-19?International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-07-2020-0334
ChiuC.-Y.GelfandM. J.YamagishiT.ShteynbergG.WanC. (2010). Intersubjective culture: The role of intersubjective perceptions in cross-cultural research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 482–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610375562
13.
CialdiniR. B.WosinskaW.BarrettD. W.ButnerJ.Gornik-DuroseM. (1999). Compliance with a request in two cultures: The differential influence of social proof and commitment/consistency on collectivists and individualists. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(10), 1242–1253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299258006
14.
CohenP.CohenJ.AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1999). The problem of units and the circumstance for POMP. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34(3), 315–346. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3403_2
15.
CookeR.DahdahM.NormanP.FrenchD. P. (2016). How well does the theory of planned behaviour predict alcohol consumption? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 10(2), 148–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2014.947547
16.
CourtneyE. P.GoldenbergJ. L.BoydP. (2020). The contagion of mortality: A terror management health model for pandemics. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(3), 607–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12392
17.
CzeislerM. É.TynanM. A.HowardM. E.HoneycuttS.FulmerE. B.KidderD. P.RobbinsR.BargerL. K.Facer-ChildsE. R.BaldwinG.RajaratnamS. M. W.CzeislerC. A. (2020). Public attitudes, behaviors, and beliefs related to COVID-19, stay-at-home orders, nonessential business closures, and public health guidance—United States, New York City, and Los Angeles, May 5–12, 2020. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 69(24), 751–758. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6924e1
18.
DryhurstS.SchneiderC. R.KerrJ.FreemanA. L. J.RecchiaG.van der BlesA. M.SpiegelhalterD.van derL. S. (2020). Risk perceptions of COVID-19 around the world. Journal of Risk Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1758193
19.
EomK.KimH. S.ShermanD. K. (2018). Social class, control, and action: Socioeconomic status differences in antecedents of support for pro-environmental action. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 77, 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.03.009
20.
EomK.KimH. S.ShermanD. K.IshiiK. (2016). Cultural variability in the link between environmental concern and support for environmental action. Psychological Science, 27(10), 1331–1339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616660078
21.
FariasJ. E. M.PilatiR. (2020). Violating social distancing amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Psychological factors to improve compliance. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/apg9e
22.
FischerR. (2006). Congruence and functions of personal and cultural values: Do my values reflect my culture’s values?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(11), 1419–1431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206291425
23.
FischerR. (2017). Personality, values, culture: An evolutionary approach (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316091944
24.
FischerR.BoerD. (2011). What is more important for national well-being: Money or autonomy? A meta-analysis of well-being, burnout, and anxiety across 63 societies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 164–184. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023663
25.
FischerR.FerreiraM. C.AssmarE.RedfordP.HarbC.GlazerS.ChengB.-S.JiangD.-Y.WongC. C.KumarN.KärtnerJ.HoferJ.AchouiM. (2009). Individualism-collectivism as descriptive norms: Development of a subjective norm approach to culture measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(2), 187–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022109332738
26.
FischerR.MansellA. (2009). Commitment across cultures: A meta-analytical approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(8), 1339–1358. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.14
27.
FischerR.Van de VliertE. (2011). Does climate undermine subjective well-being? A 58-nation study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(8), 1031–1041. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211407075
28.
FisherZ.TiptonE. (2015). robumeta: An R-package for robust variance estimation in meta-analysis. ArXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.02220
29.
GelfandM. J.JacksonJ. C.PanX.NauD.PieperD.DenisonE.DagherM.LangeP. A. M. V.ChiuC.-Y.WangM. (2021). The relationship between cultural tightness–looseness and COVID-19 cases and deaths: A global analysis. The Lancet Planetary Health, 5(3), e135–e144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30301-6
30.
GelfandM. J.RaverJ. L.NishiiL.LeslieL. M.LunJ.LimB. C.DuanL.AlmaliachA.AngS.ArnadottirJ.AycanZ.BoehnkeK.BoskiP.CabecinhasR.ChanD.ChhokarJ.D’AmatoA.FerrerM.FischlmayrI. C.…YamaguchiS. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332(6033), 1100–1104. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197754
HarrerM.CuijpersP.FurukawaT.EbertD. D. (2019). dmetar: Companion R package for the guide “Doing meta-analysis in R”(R package version 0.0.9000). https://dmetar.protectlab.org/authors.html
33.
HofstedeG. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. SAGE.
34.
HooftE. A. J. V.JongM. D. (2009). Predicting job seeking for temporary employment using the theory of planned behaviour: The moderating role of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(2), 295–316. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317908X325322
35.
HouZ.DuF.ZhouX.JiangH.MartinS.LarsonH.LinL. (2020). Cross-country comparison of public awareness, rumors, and behavioral responses to the COVID-19 epidemic: Infodemiology study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(8), e21143. https://doi.org/10.2196/21143
36.
InglehartR. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization. Princeton University Press.
37.
JachimowiczJ. M.HauserO. P.O’BrienJ. D.ShermanE.GalinskyA. D. (2018). The critical role of second-order normative beliefs in predicting energy conservation. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(10), 757–764. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0434-0
38.
KochańczykM.LipniackiT. (2021). Pareto-based evaluation of national responses to COVID-19 pandemic shows that saving lives and protecting economy are non-trade-off objectives. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 2425. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81869-2
39.
KonstantopoulosS. (2011). Fixed effects and variance components estimation in three-level meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 2(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.35
40.
LeungK.MorrisM. W. (2015). Values, schemas, and norms in the culture–behavior nexus: A situated dynamics framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(9), 1028–1050. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.66
41.
LiW. X. (2021). Worldwide inverse correlation between Bacille Calmette–Guérin (BCG) immunization and COVID-19 mortality. Infection, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-020-01566-6
42.
McDermottM. S.OliverM.SvensonA.SimnadisT.BeckE. J.ColtmanT.IversonD.CaputiP.SharmaR. (2015). The theory of planned behaviour and discrete food choices: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12(1), 162. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0324-z
43.
MoritaH.KatoH.HayashiY. (2020). International comparison of behavior changes with social distancing policies in response to COVID-19 (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3594035). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3594035
44.
MorrenM.GrinsteinA. (2016). Explaining environmental behavior across borders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.05.003
45.
MorrisC. N. (1983). Parametric empirical Bayes inference: Theory and applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78(381), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1983.10477920
46.
MorrisM. W.HongY.ChiuC.LiuZ. (2015). Normology: Integrating insights about social norms to understand cultural dynamics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.03.001
47.
Motta ZaninG.GentileE.ParisiA.SpasianoD. (2020). A preliminary evaluation of the public risk perception related to the COVID-19 health emergency in Italy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093024
48.
NardiV. A. M.JardimW. C.LadeiraW.SantiniF. (2019). Predicting food choice: A meta-analysis based on the theory of planned behavior. British Food Journal, 121(10), 2250–2264. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-08-2018-0504
49.
PaquinR. S.KeatingD. M. (2017). Fitting identity in the reasoned action framework: A meta-analysis and model comparison. The Journal of Social Psychology, 157(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2016.1152217
50.
PetersonR. A.BrownS. P. (2005). On the use of beta coefficients in meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.175
51.
ProsserA. M. B.JudgeM.BolderdijkJ. W.BlackwoodL.KurzT. (2020). ‘Distancers’ and ‘non-distancers’? The potential social psychological impact of moralizing COVID-19 mitigating practices on sustained behaviour change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(3), 653–662. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12399
RiemerH.ShavittS.KooM.MarkusH. R. (2014). Preferences don’t have to be personal: Expanding attitude theorizing with a cross-cultural perspective. Psychological Review, 121(4), 619–648. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037666
54.
RoosP.GelfandM.NauD.LunJ. (2015). Societal threat and cultural variation in the strength of social norms: An evolutionary basis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129, 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.01.003
SchwartzS. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In KimU.TriandisH. C.KâğitçibaşiÇ.ChoiS.-C.YoonG. (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 85–119). SAGE Publications, Inc.
SmithP. B. (2017). Cultural values versus cultural norms as predictors of differences in helping behaviors and in emotion regulation: A preliminary nation-level test related to the Leung-Morris model. Management and Organization Review, 13(4), 739–766. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2017.51
59.
SparkmanG.WaltonG. M. (2017). Dynamic norms promote sustainable behavior, Even if it is counternormative. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1663–1674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617719950
60.
SparkmanG.WaltonG. M. (2019). Witnessing change: Dynamic norms help resolve diverse barriers to personal change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 82, 238–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.01.007
61.
Tanner-SmithE. E.TiptonE.PolaninJ. R. (2016). Handling complex meta-analytic data structures using robust variance estimates: A tutorial in R. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 2(1), 85–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-016-0026-5
62.
TempletonA.GuvenS. T.HoerstC.VestergrenS.DavidsonL.BallentyneS.MadsenH.ChoudhuryS. (2020). Inequalities and identity processes in crises: Recommendations for facilitating safe response to the COVID-19 pandemic. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(3), 674–685. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12400
63.
TriandisH. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism (1st ed.). Routledge.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
66.
WelzelC. (2013). Freedom rising: Human empowerment and the quest for emancipation. Cambridge University Press.
67.
WhiteK. M.SmithJ. R.TerryD. J.GreensladeJ. H.McKimmieB. M. (2009). Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and in-group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(1), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X295207
YamagishiT.HashimotoH.SchugJ. (2008). Preferences versus strategies as explanations for culture-specific behavior. Psychological Science, 19(6), 579–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02126.x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
