Research and theorizing suggest two competing—yet untested—hypotheses for how European Americans’ and Asians’ feeling of being “in control” might differ when excluded by a close other (e.g., a good friend). Drawing on different national contexts (i.e., United States, Japan), cultural groups (i.e., Japanese, Asian/Asian Americans, European Americans), and exclusion paradigms (i.e., relived, in vivo), four separate experiments (N = 2,662) examined feelings of control when excluded by a close- or distant-other. A meta-analysis across these experiments indicated that Asians and Asian Americans felt more in control than European Americans when the excluder was a close other. In contrast, no consistent pattern emerged when the excluder was a distant other. This research has implications for cultural variations in aggressiveness as well as health and well-being following exclusion’s threat to perceived control.
BlancaM. J.AlarcónR.ArnauJ.BonoR.BendayanR. (2018). Effect of variance ratio on ANOVA robustness: Might 1.5 be the limit?Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 937–962. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0918-2
2.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P. T.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
3.
ChenZ.WilliamsK. D.FitnessJ.NewtonN. C. (2008). When hurt will not heal: Exploring the capacity to relive social and physical pain. Psychological Science, 19(8), 789–795. https://doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02158.x
4.
DijkstraM. T. M.HomanA. C. (2016). Engaging in rather than disengaging from stress: Effective coping and perceived control. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1415. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01415
5.
DowneyG.FreitasA.MichaelisB.KhouriH. (1998). The self-fulfilling prophecy in close relationships: Rejection sensitivity by romantic partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 545–560.
6.
EysenckH. J. (1959). Manual of the Maudsley personality inventory. University of London Press.
7.
FiskeS. T.YamamotoM. (2005). Coping with rejection: Core social motives across cultures. In WilliamsK. D.ForgasJ. P.von HippelW. (Eds.), Sydney symposium of social psychology series. The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (p. 185–198). Psychology Press.
8.
GarrisC. P.OhbuchiK. I.OikawaH.HarrisM. J. (2011). Consequences of interpersonal rejection: A cross-cultural experimental study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(6), 1066–1083. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022110381428
9.
GelfandM. J.RaverJ. L.NishiiL.LeslieL. M.LunJ.LimB. C.DuanL.AlmaliachA.AngS.ArnadottirJ.AycanZ.BoehnkeKBoskiP.CabecinhasR.ChanD.ChhokarJ.D’AmatoA.FerrerM.FischlmayrI. C.AycanZ. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332(6033), 1100–1104. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197754
10.
GraupmannV.PfundmairM.MatsoukasP.ErberR. (2016). Rejection via video: The impact of observed group and individual rejection. Social Psychology, 47, 345–350. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000283
11.
HaaseC. M.HeckhausenJ.SilbereisenR. K. (2012). The interplay of occupational motivation and well-being during the transition from university to work. Developmental Psychology, 48(6), 1739–1751. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026641
12.
HelzerE. G.JayawickremeE. (2015). Control and the “good life”: Primary and secondary control as distinct indicators of well-being. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(6), 653–660. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615576210
13.
KimH. S.ShermanD. K.TaylorS. E. (2008). Culture and social support. American Psychologist, 63(6), 518–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X
14.
KimelS. Y.MischkowskiD.KitayamaS.UchidaY. (2017). Culture, emotions, and the cold shoulder: cultural differences in the anger and sadness response to ostracism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(9), 1307–1319. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022117724900
15.
KitayamaS.KarasawaM.CurhanK. B.RyffC. D.MarkusH. R. (2010). Independence and interdependence predict health and wellbeing: Divergent patterns in the United States and Japan. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 163. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00163
16.
KitayamaS.UchidaY. (2005). Interdependent agency: An alternative system for action. In R. M. SorrentinoCohenD.OlsonJ. M.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), Cultural and social behavior: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 10, pp. 137–164). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
17.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
OverH.UskulA. K. (2016). Culture moderates children’s responses to ostracism situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(5), 710–724. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000050
20.
ParkJ.YamaguchiS.SawaumiT.MorioH. (2018). Dialectical thinking and its influence in the world: A new perspective on East Asians’ control orientations. In Spencer-RodgersJ.PengK. (Eds.), The psychological and cultural foundations of East Asian cognition: Contradiction, change, and holism (pp. 309–334). Oxford University Press.
21.
PfundmairM.AydinN.DuH.YeungS.FreyD.GraupmannV. (2015). Exclude me if you can: Cultural effects on the outcomes of social exclusion. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(4), 579–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022115571203
22.
PfundmairM.GraupmannV.FreyD.AydinN. (2015). The Different behavioral intentions of collectivists and individualists in response to social exclusion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(3), 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214566186
23.
PickettC. L.GardnerW. L.KnowlesM. (2004). Getting a cue: The need to belong and enhanced sensitivity to social cues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(9), 1095–1107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203262085
24.
RenD.WesselmannE. D.WilliamsK. D. (2013). Interdependent self-construal moderates coping with (but not the initial pain of) ostracism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 320–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12037
25.
SatoK.YukiM.NorasakkunkitV. (2014). A socio-ecological approach to cross-cultural differences in the sensitivity to social rejection: The partially mediating role of relational mobility. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 10, 1549–1560. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022114544320
26.
SawaumiT.YamaguchiS.ParkJ.RobinsonA. R. (2015). Japanese control strategies Regulated by Urgency and Interpersonal Harmony: Evidence based on extended conceptual framework. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(2), 252–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022114563749
27.
SimmonsJ. P.NelsonL. D.SimonsohnU. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632
TedeschiJ. T. (2001). Social power, influence, and aggression. In ForgasJ. P.WilliamsK. D. (Eds.), Social influence: Direct and indirect processes (pp. 109–128). Psychol Press.
30.
ThomsonR.YukiM.TalhelmT.SchugJ.KitoM.AyanianA.BeckerJ. C.BeckerM.ChiuC-y.ChoiH.-S.FerreiraC. M.FülöpM.GulP.Houghton-IlleraA. M.JoasooM.JongJ.KavanaghC. M.KhutkyyD.ManziC.…VissermanM. L. (2018). Relational mobility predicts social behaviors in 39 countries and is tied to historical farming and threat. PNAS, 115(29), 7521–7526. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1713191115
31.
TriandisH. C. (1995). A theoretical framework for the study of diversity. In ChemersM. M.OskampS.CostanzoM. A. (Eds.), Claremont symposium on applied social psychology, Vol. 8. Diversity in organizations: New perspectives for a changing workplace (p. 11–36). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243405.n2
32.
TwengeJ. M.BaumeisterR. F.DeWallC. N.CiaroccoN. J.BartelsJ. M. (2007). Social exclusion decreases prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.56
33.
UskulA. K.OverH. (2014). Responses to social exclusion in cultural context: Evidence from farming and herding communities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(5), 752–771. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0035810
34.
UskulA. K.OverH. (2017). Culture, social interdependence, and exclusion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(4), 371–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417699300
35.
van BeestI.WilliamsK. D. (2006). When inclusion costs and exclusion pays, exclusion still hurts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(5), 918–928. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.918
WilliamsK. D.ZadroL. (2005). Ostracism: The indiscriminate early detection system. In WilliamsK. D.ForgasJ. P.von HippelW. (Eds.), Sydney symposium of social psychology series. The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (p. 19–34). Psychology Press.
38.
YaakobiE.WilliamsK. D. (2016). Recalling an attachment event moderates distress after ostracism. European Journal of Personality, 30(3), 258–273.
39.
YamaguchiS. (2001). Culture and control orientations. In MatsumotoD. (Ed.), The handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 223–243). Oxford University Press.
40.
YamaguchiS.KuhlmanD. M.SugimoriS. (1995). Personality correlates of allocentric tendencies in individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 658–672.
41.
YukiM.SchugJ. (2012). Relational mobility: A socioecological approach to personal relationships. In GillathO.AdamsG.KunkelA. (Eds.), Decade of behavior 2000–2010. relationship science: Integrating evolutionary, neuroscience, and sociocultural approaches (pp. 137–151). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13489-007
42.
ZadroL.WilliamsK. D.RichardsonR. (2004). How low can you go? Ostracism by a computer is sufficient to lower self-reported levels of belonging, control, self-esteem, and meaningful existence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(4), 560–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2003.11.006
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
