Evidence has shown that couple closeness is positively correlated with relational satisfaction, but explanatory constructs have not been identified. Also, much research on relational satisfaction tests individual psychological correlates of satisfaction outside of couple interdependence. The latent variable model makes it possible to test such interdependencies at the individual, dyadic, and cross-individual levels. The authors predicted that the positive association between closeness and satisfaction would be partially mediated by attributional charity for positive and negative partner behavior. Using the latent variable model, they found that couples who had mutually high perceptions of closeness reported mutual satisfaction and made more positive attributions for partner behavior. However, when only one partner perceived high closeness, there were no effects on that partner's attributions or satisfaction. Findings suggest that relational satisfaction is contingent not just on individuals'perceptions, but also on the implicit communication of attributional charity that depends on couple interdependence.
Acitelli, L.K., Rogers, S., & Knee, C.R. (1999). The role of identity in the link between relationship thinking and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 591-618.
2.
Aron, A., & Aron, E.N. (1986). Love and the expansion of self: Understanding attraction and satisfaction. New York: Hemisphere/ Harper & Row.
3.
Aron, A., & Aron, E.N. (1996). Love and expansion of the self: The state of the model. Personal Relationships, 3, 45-58.
4.
Aron, A., Aron, E.N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596-612.
5.
Aron, A., Aron, E.N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 241-253.
6.
Aron, A., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2001). Including others in the self: Extensions to own and partner's group memberships. In C. Constantine & M. B. Marilynn (Eds.), Individual self, relational self, collective self (pp. 89-108). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
7.
Bagarozzi, D.A., & Giddings, C.W. (1983). Conjugal violence: A critical review of current research and clinical practices. American Journal of Family Therapy, 11, 3-15.
8.
Baron, R.M. & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
9.
Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L.M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226-244.
10.
Baucom, D.H., Sayers, S.L., & Duhe, A. (1989). Attributional style and attributional patterns among married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 56, 596-607.
11.
Berscheid, E., Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. (1989). The Relationship Closeness Inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 792-807.
12.
Bradbury, T.N., & Fincham, F.D. (1990). Attributions in marriage: Review and critique . Psychological Bulletin, 107, 3-33.
13.
Clements, M.L., Cordova, A.D., Markman, H.J., & Laurenceau, J. (1997). The erosion of marital satisfaction over time and how to prevent it. In R. J. Sternberg & M. Hojjat (Eds.), Satisfaction in close relationships (pp. 335-355). New York: Guilford.
14.
Collins, N.L. & Read, S.J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 644-663.
15.
Cooley, C.H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribner's.
16.
Duck, S. (1998). Human relationships. London : Sage.
17.
Fincham, F.D. (1985). Attributions processes in distressed and nondistressed couples: 2. Responsibility for marital problems. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 94, 183-190.
18.
Fincham, F.D., & Bradbury, T.N. (1989). The impact of attributions in marriage: An individual difference analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 69-85.
19.
Fincham, F.D., & Bradbury, T.N. (1992). Assessing attributions in marriage: The Relationship Attribution Measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 457-468.
20.
Gonzalez, R., & Griffin, D. (1997). On the statistics of interdependence: Treating dyadic data with respect. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (pp. 271-302). New York: John Wiley.
21.
Gonzalez, R., & Griffin, D. (2004). Measuring individuals in a social environment: Conceptualizing dyadic and group interaction. In C. Sansone, C. C. Morf, & A. T. Panter (Eds.), The Sage handbook of methods in social psychology (pp. 313-334). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
22.
Harvey, J.H., Weary, G., & Stanley, M.A. (1985). Attribution theory and research: Still vital in the 1980s. In J. H. Harvey & G. Weary (Eds.), Attribution: Basic issues and applications (pp. 104). New York: Academic Press.
23.
Hewstone, M. (1990). The "ultimate attribution error"? A review of literature on intergroup causal attribution. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 311-335.
24.
Holman, T.B., Larson, J.H., Stahmann, R.F., & Carroll, J.S. (2001). General principles, implications, and future directions . In T. B. Holman (Ed.), Premarital prediction of marital quality or breakup: Research, theory, and practice (pp. 191-223). New York: Kluwer Academic.
25.
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Jacobson, N.S. (1985). Causal attributions of married couples: When do they search for causes? What do they conclude when they do?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1398-1412.
26.
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Jacobson, N.S. (1988). Toward a methodology for coding spontaneous causal attributions: Preliminary results with married couples . Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 7, 101-112.
27.
Jacobson, N.S. (1984). A component analysis of behavioral marital therapy: The relative effectiveness of behavior exchange and communication/problem-solving training. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 295-305.
28.
Jones, E.E., & Nisbett, R.E. (1971). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. New York: General Learning Press.
29.
Karney, B.R., Bradbury, T.N., Fincham, F.D., & Sullivan, K.T. (1994). The role of negative affectivity in the association between attributions and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 413-424.
30.
Kenny, D.A. (1996). Models of non-independence in dyadic research . Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 279-294.
31.
Kramer, J.J., & Conoley, J.C. (1992). Mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements .
32.
Kurdek, L.A. (1998). Relationship outcomes and their predictors: Longitudinal evidence from heterosexual married, gay cohabiting and lesbian cohabitating couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 553-568.
33.
Levinger, G., & Snoek, J.D. (1972). Attraction in relationship: A new look at interpersonal attraction. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
34.
Markman, H.J., & Kraft, S. (1989). Men and women in marriage: Dealing with gender differences in marital therapy. Behavior Therapist, 12, 51-56.
35.
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P.R. (2001). Attachment theory and intergroup bias: Evidence that priming the secure base schema attenuates negative reactions to out-groups . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 97-115.
36.
Peterson, C., Semmel, A., von Bayer, C., Abramson, L.Y., Metalsky, G.I., & Seligman, M.E. (1982). The attributional style questionnaire. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 6, 287-300.
37.
Pettigrew, T.W. (1979). The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport's cognitive analysis of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 461-476.
38.
Rosenberg, M.J. (1965). When dissonance fails: On eliminating evaluation apprehension from attitude measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 28-42.
39.
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings . Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 174-220.
40.
Schmitt, D.P. (2002). Personality, attachment and sexuality related to dating relationship outcomes: Contrasting three perspectives on personal attribute interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology , 41, 589-610.
41.
Shaefer-Porter, R.L., & Hendrick, S.S. (2000). Attributions, behavioral reactions and relationship satisfaction. Family Therapy, 27, 1-18.
42.
Sillars, A., Shellan, W., McIntosh, A., & Pomegranate, M. (1997). Relational characteristics of language: Elaboration and differentiation in marital conversations. Western Journal of Communication, 61, 403-422.
43.
Spanier, G.B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15-28.
44.
Spanier, G.B. (1989). Bequeathing family continuity. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 3-13.
45.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
46.
Weiss, R.L. (1980). Strategic behavioral marital therapy: Toward a model for assessment and intervention (pp. 229-271). In J. P. Vincent (Ed.), Advances in family intervention, assessment and theory, Vol. 1 (pp. 229-271). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
