We propose that perceptions of auditory loudness and interpersonal closeness are bidirectionally related. Across 12 experiments (total N = 2,219; 10 preregistered; with Singaporean, British, U.S. American, and Australian participants), we demonstrated that louder audio made people feel physically (Study 1a) and socially (Study 1b) closer to others, presumably because loudness activates interpersonal closeness-related concepts implicitly (Studies 1c and 1d). This loudness–interpersonal closeness effect was observed across diverse samples (Studies 2a, 3a, and S1), for longer listening intervals (Study 2b), and in natural settings (Studies 3a and 3b). Conversely, individuals made to feel socially excluded rated their surroundings as quieter (Study 4). Furthermore, following social exclusion, individuals showed a preference for louder volume (Study 5). Finally, exposure to loud stimuli mitigated detrimental psychological effects of social exclusion (Study 6). Theoretical implications for the social cognition of loudness, social exclusion and compensatory strategies, and practical implications for ameliorating loneliness are discussed.
AnderssonM. A. (2018). Modern social hierarchies and the spaces between: How are subjective status inconsistencies linked to mental well-being?Social Psychology Quarterly, 81, 48–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272517753687
2.
AronA.AronE. N.SmollanD. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
3.
BarsalouL. W. (2016). Situated conceptualization offers a theoretical account of social priming. Current Opinion in Psychology, 12, 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.009
4.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
5.
BeekmanJ. B.StockM. L.MarcusT. (2016). Need to belong, not rejection sensitivity, moderates cortisol response, self-reported stress, and negative affect following social exclusion. The Journal of Social Psychology, 156, 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2015.1071767
6.
BernsteinM. J.SaccoD. F.BrownC. M.YoungS. G.ClaypoolH. M. (2010). A preference for genuine smiles following social exclusion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 196–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.08.010
7.
BlackhartG. C.NelsonB. C.KnowlesM. L.BaumeisterR. F. (2009). Rejection elicits emotional reactions but neither causes immediate distress nor lowers self-esteem: A meta-analytic review of 192 studies on social exclusion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 269–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309346065
CheekJ. M.BuschC. M. (1981). The influence of shyness on loneliness in a new situation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 572–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616728174008
DeWallC. N.BaumeisterR. F. (2006). Alone but feeling no pain: Effects of social exclusion on physical pain tolerance and pain threshold, affective forecasting, and interpersonal empathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.1
12.
EdworthyJ.WaringH. (2006). The effects of music tempo and loudness level on treadmill exercise. Ergonomics, 49, 1597–1610. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130600899104
13.
EisenbergerN. I.LiebermanM. D.WilliamsK. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An FMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302, 290–292. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1089134
FettermanA. K.WilkowskiB. M.RobinsonM. D. (2018). On feeling warm and being warm: Daily perceptions of physical warmth fluctuate with interpersonal warmth. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 560–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617712032
16.
GantzW.GartenbergH. M.PearsonM. L.SchillerS. O. (1978). Gratifications and expectations associated with pop music among adolescents. Popular Music and Society, 6, 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007767808591113
17.
GardnerW. L.PickettC. L.BrewerM. B. (2000). Social exclusion and selective memory: How the need to belong influences memory for social events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 486–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200266007
18.
GocłowskaM. A.BaasM.CrispR. J.De DreuC. K. W. (2014). Whether social schema violations help or hurt creativity depends on need for structure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 959–971. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214533132
19.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
HillerW.GoebelG. (2007). When tinnitus loudness and annoyance are discrepant: Audiological characteristics and psychological profile. Audiology and Neurotology, 12, 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1159/000106482
22.
HyggeS.EvansG. W.BullingerM. (2002). A prospective study of some effects of aircraft noise on cognitive performance in schoolchildren. Psychological Science, 13, 469–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00483
23.
IJzermanH.NeyroudL.CoursetR.SchramaM.PostJ.PronkT. M. (2018). Socially thermoregulated thinking: How past experiences matter in thinking about our loved ones. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 349–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.08.008
24.
IJzermanH.SeminG. R. (2009). The thermometer of social relations: Mapping social proximity on temperature. Psychological Science, 10, 1214–1220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02434.x
25.
KolarikA. J.MooreB. C. J.ZahorikP.CirsteaS.PardhanS. (2016). Auditory distance perception in humans: A review of cues, development, neuronal bases, and effects of sensory loss. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 78, 373–395. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-1015-1
26.
KouS.McClellandA.FurnhamA. (2018). The effect of background music and noise on the cognitive test performance of Chinese introverts and extraverts. Psychology of Music, 46, 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735617704300
27.
KujawaS. G.LibermanM. C. (2009). Adding insult to injury: Cochlear nerve degeneration after temporary noise-induced hearing loss. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 14077–14085. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2845-09.2009
28.
LakinJ. L.ChartrandT. L.ArkinR. M. (2008). I am too just like you: Nonconscious mimicry as an automatic behavioral response to social exclusion. Psychological Science, 19, 816–822. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02162.x
29.
LakoffG.JohnsonM. (2003). Metaphors we live by (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
30.
LeeJ.ShrumL. J. (2012). Conspicuous consumption versus charitable behavior in response to social exclusion: A differential needs explanation. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 530–544. https://doi.org/10.1086/664039
31.
LjungR.SörqvistP.HyggeS. (2009). Effects of road traffic noise and irrelevant speech on children’s reading and mathematical performance. Noise & Health, 11, 194–198. https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.56212
32.
ManchaiahV.ZhaoF.OladejiS.RatinaudP. (2018). Examination of previously published data to identify patterns in the social representation of “loud music” in young adults across countries. Noise Health, 20, 16–22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01390
33.
ManerJ. K.DeWallC. N.BaumeisterR. F.SchallerM. (2007). Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the porcupine problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.42
34.
McCroskeyJ. C.RichmondV. P. (1990). Willingness to communicate: Differing cultural perspectives. Southern Communication Journal, 56, 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949009372817
35.
MeadN. L.BaumeisterR. F.StillmanT. F.RawnC. D.VohsK. D. (2011). Social exclusion causes people to spend and consume strategically in the service of affiliation. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 902–919. https://doi.org/10.1086/656667
36.
MuraruI.IorgaM.TurliucN. (2017). From perceived similarity of ideals to relationship satisfaction: A path analysis using dyadic data. American Journal of Applied Psychology, 5(1), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajap-5-1-3
37.
PerhamN.VizardJ. (2011). Can preference for background music mediate the irrelevant sound effect?Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 625–631. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1731
38.
PfundmairM.DanböckS. K.AgtheM. (2019). Out of the dark, into the light: The impact of social exclusion on judgments of darkness and brightness. Acta Psychologica, 199, 102901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102901
SchilderJ. D.IJzermanH.DenissenJ. J. (2014). Physical warmth and perceptual focus: A replication of IJzerman and Semin (2009). PLOS ONE, 9(11), Article e112772. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112772
41.
SedikidesC.CampbellW. K.ReederG. D.ElliotA. J. (1999). The relationship closeness induction task. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 23, 1–4.
42.
ShepherdD.WelchD.DirksK. N.MathewsR. (2010). Exploring the relationship between noise sensitivity, annoyance and health-related quality of life in a sample of adults exposed to environmental noise. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7, 3579–3594. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7103580
43.
SimmonsJ. P.NelsonL. D.SimonsohnU. (2013, January17–19). Life after P-hacking. Meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, New Orleans, LA, United States. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2205186
44.
UskulA. K.OverH. (2017). Culture, social interdependence, and ostracism. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 371–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417699300
45.
WanE. W.XuJ.DingY. (2014). To be or not to be unique? The effect of social exclusion on consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 40, 1109–1122. https://doi.org/10.1086/674197
46.
WheelerS. C.DeMarreeK. G.PettyR. E. (2014). Understanding prime-to-behavior effects: Insights from the active-self account. Social Cognition, 32, 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2014.32.supp.109
47.
WilliamsK. D. (2009). Ostracism: A temporal need-threat model. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 41, pp. 275–314). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)00406-1
48.
WilliamsK. D.CheungC. K.ChoiW. (2000). Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 748–762. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.748
49.
ZadroL.WilliamsK. D.RichardsonR. (2004). How low can you go? Ostracism by a computer is sufficient to lower self-reported levels of belonging, control, self-esteem, and meaningful existence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 560–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2003.11.006
50.
ZhangC.LakensD.IJsselsteijnW. A. (2015). The illusion of nonmediation in telecommunication: Voice intensity biases distance judgments to a communication partner. Acta Psychologica, 157, 101–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.02.011
51.
ZhouX.VohsK. D.BaumeisterR. F. (2009). The symbolic power of money: Reminders of money alter social distress and physical pain. Psychological Science, 20, 700–706. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02353.x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
