Little is known about the words that romantic couples use during emotionally heightened moments such as when feeling annoyed with their partner. In the present study, young adult couples received mobile phones that audio-recorded 50% of their day and prompted hourly self-reports of partner-related annoyance. Actor–partner models tested within-person (hourly) and between-person (across the day) associations between feelings of annoyance and spoken anger words; furthermore, exposure to retrospectively assessed parent-to-child aggression (PCA) was examined as a moderator of these links. Men reporting more annoyance across the day as well as greater PCA used more overall anger words. For women, hourly anger words fluctuated in relation to men’s annoyance; moreover, greater PCA strengthened the link between women’s own hourly reported annoyance and anger words. Our findings highlight nuances in couples’ communication of everyday relationship distress and point to the role of PCA in next-generation romantic relationships.
AndrewsJ. A.FosterS. L.CapaldiD.HopsH. (2000). Adolescent and family predictors of physical aggression, communication, and satisfaction in young adult couples: A prospective analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 195–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.68.2.195
2.
ArendM. G.SchäferT. (2019). Statistical power in two-level models: A tutorial based on Monte Carlo simulation. Psychological Methods, 24, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000195
BrodyL. R.HallJ. A. (2010). Gender, emotion, and socialization. In ChrislerJ.McCrearyD. (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology (pp. 429–454). Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1465-1_21
5.
BurmanB.MargolinG.JohnR. S. (1993). America’s angriest home videos: Behavioral contingencies observed in home reenactments of marital conflict. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 28–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.61.1.28
ButnerJ.DiamondL. M.HicksA. M. (2007). Attachment style and two forms of affect coregulation between romantic partners. Personal Relationships, 14, 431–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00164.x
8.
CapaldiD. M.ShorttJ. W.CrosbyL. (2003). Physical and psychological aggression in at-risk young couples: Stability and change in young adulthood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 1–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2003.0001
9.
CaughlinJ. P.VangelistiA. L. (2006). Conflict in dating and marital relationships. In OetzelJ. G.Ting-ToomeyS. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of conflict communication: Integrating theory, research, and practice (pp. 129–157). Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412976176.n5
10.
ChaplinT. M.ColeP. M.Zahn-WaxlerC. (2005). Parental socialization of emotion expression: Gender differences and relations to child adjustment. Emotion, 5, 80–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.80
11.
CookW. L.KennyD. A. (2005). The actor–partner interdependence model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 101–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01650250444000405
12.
CotterA.ProctorK. B.Brestan-KnightE. (2018). Assessing child physical abuse: An examination of the factor structure and validity of the Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scale (CTSPC). Children and Youth Services Review, 88, 467–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.03.044
13.
CuiM.DurtschiJ. A.DonnellanM. B.LorenzF. O.CongerR. D. (2010). Intergenerational transmission of relationship aggression: A prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 688–697. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021675
14.
CummingsE. M.BallardM.El-SheikhM. (1991). Responses of children and adolescents to interadult anger as a function of gender, age, and mode of expression. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1982(37), 543–560.
15.
CurranP. J.BauerD. J.WilloughbyM. T. (2006). Testing and probing interactions in hierarchical linear growth models. In BergemanC. S.BokerS. M. (Eds.), The Notre Dame series on quantitative methodology: Methodological issues in aging research (Vol. 1, pp. 99–129). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16.
DaviesP. T.Sturge-AppleM. L. (2007). The impact of domestic violence on children’s development. In HamelJ.NichollsT. L. (Eds.), Family interventions in domestic violence: A handbook of gender inclusive theory and treatment (pp. 165–190). Springer.
17.
EndersC. K.TofighiD. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121–138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121
18.
FischerA. H.EversC. (2011). The social costs and benefits of anger as a function of gender and relationship context. Sex Roles, 65, 23–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9956-x
19.
GortnerE. M.PennebakerJ. W. (2003). The archival anatomy of a disaster: Media coverage and community-wide health effects of the Texas A&M bonfire tragedy. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 22, 580–603. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.22.5.580.22923
20.
GreenfieldL. A.RandM. R.CravenD.KlausP. A.PerkinsC. A.RingelC.WarcholG.MastonC.FoxJ. A. (1998). Violence by intimates. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
21.
HalfordW. K.SandersM. R.BehrensB. C. (2000). Repeating the errors of our parents? Family-of-origin spouse violence and observed conflict management in engaged couples. Family Process, 39, 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2000.39206.x
22.
HatfieldE.CacioppoJ. T.RapsonR. L. (1994). Emotional contagion: Studies in emotion and social interaction. Cambridge University Press.
23.
IrelandM. E.SlatcherR. B.EastwickP. W.ScissorsL. E.FinkelE. J.PennebakerJ. W. (2011). Language style matching predicts relationship initiation and stability. Psychological Science, 22, 39–44. doi:10.1177/0956797610392928
24.
KaranA.WrightR. C.RobbinsM. L. (2017). Everyday emotion word and personal pronoun use reflects dyadic adjustment among couples coping with breast cancer. Personal Relationships, 24, 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12165
25.
LaurenceauJ. P.BolgerN. (2012). Analyzing diary and intensive longitudinal data from dyads. In MehlM.ConnerT. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 407–422). Guilford.
26.
LiuJ.LemayE. P.JrNealA. M. (2018). Mutual cyclical anger in romantic relationships: Moderation by agreeableness and commitment. Journal of Research in Personality, 77, 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.09.002
27.
MansonJ. H.RobbinsM. L. (2017). New evaluation of the electronically activated recorder (EAR): Obtrusiveness, compliance, and participant self-selection effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 658. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00658
28.
MehlM. R. (2017). The electronically activated recorder (EAR): A method for the naturalistic observation of daily social behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 184–190. http://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416680611
29.
MehlM. R.GoslingS. D.PennebakerJ. W. (2006). Personality in its natural habitat: Manifestations and implicit folk theories of personality in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 862–877. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.862
30.
MehlM. R.PennebakerJ. W. (2003). The sounds of social life: A psychometric analysis of students’ daily social environments and natural conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 857–870. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.857
31.
MehlM. R.PennebakerJ. W.CrowD. M.DabbsJ.PriceJ. H. (2001). The electronically activated recorder (EAR): A device for sampling naturalistic daily activities and conversations. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 33, 517–523. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195410
OgolskyB. G.BowersJ. R. (2013). A meta-analytic review of relationship maintenance and its correlates. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 343–367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407512463338
34.
O’LearyK. D. (1988). Physical aggression between spouses. In Van HasseltV. B.MorrisonR. L.BellackA. S.HersenM. (Eds.), Handbook of family violence (pp. 31–55). Springer.
35.
O’LearyK. D.BarlingJ.AriasI.RosenbaumA.MaloneJ.TyreeA. (1989). Prevalence and stability of physical aggression between spouses: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 263–268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.57.2.263
36.
PennebakerJ. W.BoothR. J.FrancisM. E. (2007). Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC [Computer software]. LIWC.net, 135.
37.
PennebakerJ. W.BoydR. L.JordanK.BlackburnK. (2015). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. University of Texas at Austin.
38.
Radke-YarrowM.KochanskaG. (1990). Anger in young children. In SteinN. L.LeventhalB.TrabassoT. R. (Eds.), Psychological and biological approaches to emotion (pp. 297–310). Psychology Press.
39.
RobbinsM. L.LópezA. M.WeihsK. L.MehlM. R. (2014). Cancer conversations in context: Naturalistic observation of couples coping with breast cancer. Journal of Family Psychology, 28, 380–390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0036458
40.
ScherbaumC. A.FerreterJ. M. (2009). Estimating statistical power and required sample sizes for organizational research using multilevel modeling. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 347–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107308906
41.
Schwartz1H. A.EichstaedtJ. C.KernM. L.DziurzynskiL.RamonesS. M.AgrawalM.ShahA.KosinskiM.StillwellD.SeligmanM. E. P.UngarL. H. (2013). Personality, gender, and age in the language of social media: The open-vocabulary approach. PloS one, 8(9), e73791. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073791
SillarsA.ShellenW.McIntoshA.PomegranateM. (1997). Relational characteristics of language: Elaboration and differentiation in marital conversations. Western Journal of Communication (includes Communication Reports), 61, 403–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570319709374587
44.
SimmonsR. A.GordonP. C.ChamblessD. L. (2005). Pronouns in marital interaction: What do “you” and “I” say about marital health?Psychological Science, 16, 932–936. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01639.x
StoryL. B.KarneyB. R.LawrenceE.BradburyT. N. (2004). Interpersonal mediators in the intergenerational transmission of marital dysfunction. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 519–529. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.18.3.519
47.
StrausM. A.HambyS. L.FinkelhorD.MooreD. W.RunyanD. (1998). Identification of child maltreatment with the Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scales: Development and psychometric data for a national sample of American parents. Child Abuse & Neglect, 22, 249–270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(97)00174-9
48.
SunJ.SchwartzH. A.SonY.KernM. L.VazireS. (2019). The language of well-being: Tracking fluctuations in emotion experience through everyday speech. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(2), 364–387.
49.
TausczikY. R.PennebakerJ. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 24–54. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0261927X09351676
50.
TimmonsA. C.BaucomB. R.HanS. C.PerroneL.ChaspariT.NarayananS.MargolinG. (2017). New frontiers in ambulatory assessment: Big data methods for capturing couples’ emotions, vocalizations, and physiology in daily life. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 552–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617709115
Williams-BaucomK. J.AtkinsD. C.SevierM.EldridgeK. A.ChristensenA. (2010). “You” and “I” need to talk about “us”: Linguistic patterns in marital interactions. Personal Relationships, 17, 41–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01251.x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
