This study proposed that criminal guilt interacts with dominance and interview question to affect linguistic properties during criminal interviews. A field experiment tested effects of criminal guilt, dominance, and question on linguistic properties of suspects’ responses using a 2 (criminal guilt: guilty/innocent) × 4 (question: Q1/Q2/Q3/Q4) mixed-model design with dominance as a covariate and question as a repeated factor. Analysis of linguistic properties from 37 criminal interviews indicated a hypothesized two-way interaction among dominance and guilt on immediacy and a three-way interaction among dominance, question, and guilt on complexity explored as part of the research question. Several other direct effects for dominance and question were noted. Implications, limitations, and future research directions are discussed.
AfifiA. A.ClarkV.MayS. (2004). Computer-aided multivariate analysis. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall.
2.
AliM.LevineT. (2008). The language of truthful and deceptive denials and confessions. Communication Reports, 21, 82-91.
3.
American Psychological Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., Text revision). Washington, DC: Author.
4.
BauerC. L.FinkE. L. (1983). Fitting equations with power transformations: Examining variables with error. In BostromR. N. (Ed.), Communication yearbook7 (pp. 146-199). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
5.
BondG. D.LeeA. Y. (2005). Language of lies in prison: Linguistic classification of prisoners’ truthful and deceptive natural language. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 313-329.
6.
BullerD.BurgoonJ. (1996). Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory, 6, 203-242.
7.
BurgoonJ. K.DunbarN. E. (2000). An interactionist perspective on dominance-submission: Interpersonal dominance as a dynamic, situationally contingent social skill. Communication Monographs, 67, 96-121.
8.
BurgoonJ. K.HaleJ. L. (1984). The fundamental topoi of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 193-214.
9.
BurgoonJ. K.JohnsonM. L.KochP. T. (1998). The nature and measurement of interpersonal dominance. Communication Monographs, 65, 308-335.
10.
BurgoonJ. K.QinT. (2006). The dynamic nature of deceptive verbal communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 25, 76-96.
11.
CodyM. J.O’HairH. D. (1983). Nonverbal communication and deception: Differences in deception cues due to gender and communicator dominance. Communication Monographs, 50, 175-192.
12.
DolanM.BlackburnR. (2006). Interpersonal factors as predictors of disciplinary infractions in incarcerated personality disordered offenders. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 897-907.
13.
DunbarN. E. (2004). Dyadic power theory: Constructing a communication-based theory of relational power. Journal of Family Communication, 4, 235-248.
14.
DunbarN. E.AbraG. (2010). Observations of dyadic power in interpersonal interaction. Communication Monographs, 77, 657-684.
15.
DunbarN. E.JensenM. L.BurgoonJ. K.BessarabovaD. R.BernardD. R.RobertsonK. J.. . . BurgoonJ. K. (2010, January). The influence of power, deception and dominance on credibility and decision-making outcomes. Paper presented at the 43rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Science, Koloa, HI.
16.
FinkE. L. (2009). The FAQs on data transformation. Communication Monographs, 76, 379-397.
17.
FullerC. M.BirosD. P.WilsonR. L. (2009). Decision support for determining veracity via linguistic-based cues. Decision Support Systems, 46, 695-703.
18.
HancockJ. T.CurryL. E.GoorhaS.WoodworthM. (2008). On lying and being lied to: A linguistic analysis of deception in computer-mediated communication. Discourse Processes, 45, 1-23.
19.
InbauF. E.ReidJ. E.BuckleyJ. P.JayneB. C. (2001). Criminal interrogation and confessions. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
20.
JensenM. L.MeservyT. O.BurgoonJ. K.NunamakerJ. F. (2010). Automatic, multimodal evaluation of human interaction. Group Decision and Negotiation, 19, 367-389.
KossonD. S.LorenzA. R.NewmanJ. P. (2006). Effects of comorbid psychopathy on criminal offending and emotion processing in male offenders with antisocial personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 798-806.
23.
LevineT. R.ShawA.ShulmanH. C. (2010). Increasing deception detection accuracy with strategic questioning. Human Communication Research, 36, 216-231.
24.
MeyersL. S.GamstG.GuarinoA. J. (2006). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
NewmanM. L.PennebakerJ. W.BerryD. S.RichardsJ. M. (2003). Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 665-675.
26.
PennebakerJ. W.FrancisM. E.BoothR. J. (2001). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC): LIWC 2001. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
SeibelH. P.WallbrownF. H.ReuterE. K.BarnettR. W. (1990). Further evidence concerning motivational distortion on the sixteen personality factor primaries by male felons. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 367-375.
28.
UndeutschU. (1989). The development of statement reality analysis. In UndeutschU. (Ed.), Credibility assessment (pp. 101-121). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
29.
VrijA. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities (2nd ed.). Chichester, England: Wiley.
30.
VrijA.LealS.GranhagP. A.MannS.FisherR. P.HillmanJ.SperryK. (2009). Outsmarting the liars: The benefit of asking unanticipated questions. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 159-166.
31.
VrijA.MannS.FisherR. P. (2006). An empirical test of the behaviour analysis interview. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 329-345.
32.
VrijA.MannS.KristenS.FisherR. P. (2007). Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 499-518.
33.
ZhouL.BurgoonJ. K.TwitchellD. P.NunamakerJ. F. (2004). Automating linguistics-based cues for detecting deception in text-based asynchronous computer-mediated communication. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13, 81-106.
34.
ZhouL.BurgoonJ. K.ZhangD.NunamakerJ. F. (2004). Language dominance in interpersonal deception in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 381-402.
