Few experiences direct affect, behavior, and cognition as thoroughly as feelings of power and powerlessness. The present study examined 403 participants’ narrated experiences feeling powerful (n = 196) or powerless (n = 207) using Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) analysis to identify social contexts that might explain the effects of power on emotion expression. Powerful narratives contained more frequent communication about work, whereas powerless narratives contained more frequent communication about sex. Moreover, powerless narratives conveyed greater negative emotionality. A parallel mediation analysis revealed that communication about work and sex helped to explain the association between self-reported feelings of power and expressions of negative emotionality. When participants felt powerful and communicated about work, they expressed lower negative emotionality; when participants felt powerless and communicated about sex, they expressed higher negative emotionality. Modest differences in emotional expression between women and men indicated that power research should report analyses including gender as a control variable. Findings provide direction to the next wave of power research, which should examine organizations and intimate relationships as contexts in which power dynamics are salient.
AndersonC.BerdahlJ. L. (2002). The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1362–1377. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1362
AndersonC.GalinskyA. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk‐taking. European journal of social psychology, 36(4), 511–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.324
ArmstrongE. A.Gleckman-KrutM.JohnsonL. (2018). Silence, power, and inequality: An intersectional approach to sexual violence. Annual Review of Sociology, 44(1), 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041410
BarghJ. A.RaymondP.PryorJ. B.StrackF. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power → sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(5), 768–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.768
8.
BerdahlJ. L.MartoranaP. (2006). Effects of power on emotion and expression during a controversial group discussion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(4), 497–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.354
9.
BladerS. L.ChenY. (2014). What’s in a name? Status, power, and other forms of social hierarchy. In ChengJ.TracyJ.AndersonC. (Eds.), The psychology of social status (pp. 71–95). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0867-7_4
10.
BombariD.Schmid MastM.BachmannM. (2017). Felt power explains the link between position power and experienced emotions. Emotion, 17(1), 55–66
CarneyD. R.DuboisD.NichiporukN.ten BrinkeL.RuckerD. D.GalinskyA. D. (2013). The deception equilibrium: The powerful are better liars but the powerless are better lie-detectors. [Manuscript submitted for publication].
13.
ChoM.KeltnerD. (2020). Power, approach, and inhibition: Empirical advances of a theory. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 196–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.013
14.
CohnM. A.MehlM. R.PennebakerJ. W. (2004). Linguistic markers of psychological change surrounding September 11, 2001. Psychological Science, 15(10), 687–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00741.x
15.
CôtéS.KrausM. W.ChengB. H.OveisC.Van der LöweI.LianH.KeltnerD. (2011). Social power facilitates the effect of prosocial orientation on empathic accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023171
16.
DuboisD.RuckerD. D.GalinskyA. D. (2015). Social class, power, and selfishness: When and why upper and lower class individuals behave unethically. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(3), 436–449. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000008
17.
EaglyA. H.WoodW. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54(6), 408–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.6.408
18.
EdwardsK. M.SylaskaK. M.BarryJ. E.MoynihanM. M.BanyardV. L.CohnE. S.WalshW. A.WardS. K. (2015). Physical dating violence, sexual violence, and unwanted pursuit victimization: A comparison of incidence rates among sexual-minority and heterosexual college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(4), 580–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514535260
19.
FischerJ.FischerP.EnglichB.AydinN.FreyD. (2011). Empower my decisions: The effects of power gestures on confirmatory information processing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1146–1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.008
FiskeS. T.DépretE. (1996). Control, interdependence and power: Understanding social cognition in its social context. European review of social psychology, 7(1), 31–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779443000094
22.
FlynnF. J.GruenfeldD.MolmL. D.PolzerJ. T. (2011). Social psychological perspectives on power in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(4), 495–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839212440969
23.
FoulkT. A.De PaterI. E.SchaererM.du PlessisCh.LeeR.ErezA. (2020). It’s lonely at the bottom (too): The effects of experienced powerlessness on social closeness and disengagement. Personnel Psychology, 73(2), 363–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12358
24.
FrenchJ. R. P.RavenB. (1959). The bases of social power. In CartwrightD. P. (Ed), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
25.
FuglestadP. T.LevertD. (2021). Self-monitoring, status, and balance of power in romantic relationships. Self and Identity. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2021.2000486
GalinskyA. D.MageeJ. C.GruenfeldD. H.WhitsonJ. A.LiljenquistK. A. (2008). Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1450–1466. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012633
28.
GalinskyA. D.RuckerD. D.MageeJ. C. (2015). Power: Past findings, present considerations, and future directions. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R.SimpsonJ. A.DovidioJ. F. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Interpersonal relations (pp. 421–460). American Psychological Association.
29.
GruenfeldD. H.InesiM. E.MageeJ. C.GalinskyA. D. (2008). Power and the objectification of social targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.111
GuinoteA.ChenS. (2017). Power as active self: From acquisition to the expression and use of power. In DeauxK.SnyderM. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190224837.013.24
33.
HayesA. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. Guilford Press.
34.
KacewiczE.PennebakerJ. W.DavisM.JeonM.GraesserA. C. (2013). Pronoun use reflects standings in social hierarchies. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(2), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X13502654
KendallP. C.OlinoT. M.CarperM.MakoverH. (2017). On the importance of temporal precedence in mediational analyses. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 85(1), 80–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000152
37.
LammersJ.StokerJ. I. (2019). Power affects sexual assertiveness and sexual esteem equally in women and men. Archives of sexual behavior, 48(2), 645–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1285-5
38.
LefcourtH. M. (Ed), (2013). Research with the locus of control construct: Extensions and limitations. Elsevier.
39.
LivingstonT. N.DavisD. (2020). Power affects perceptions of sexual willingness: Implications for litigating sexual assault allegations. Violence and Gender, 7(3), 116–120. https://doi.org/10.1089/vio.2019.0068
40.
LivingstonT. N.VikT. A. (2021). Empowering, humbling, and of course arousing”: A qualitative analysis of experiences with power in sexual relationships. Sexuality & Culture, 25, 1204–1226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-021-09834-9
41.
MageeJ. C.GalinskyA. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self‐reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management annals, 2(1), 351–398. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520802211628
42.
MageeJ. C.GalinskyA. D.GruenfeldD. H. (2007). Power, propensity to negotiate, and moving first in competitive interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(2), 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206294413
43.
MillerE. (2018). Reclaiming gender and power in sexual violence prevention in adolescence. Violence Against Women, 24(15), 1785–1793. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801217753323
44.
NewmanM. L.PennebakerJ. W.BerryD. S.RichardsJ. M. (2003). Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(5), 665–675. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029005010
45.
PennebakerJ. W.BoothR. J.BoydR. L.FrancisM. E. (2015). Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2015. Austin, TX: Pennebaker Conglomerates.
ReitE.SchaererM.ChuC. (2020). The effect of absolute powerlessness on risk taking. New Orleans, LA: Society for Personality and Social Psychology Annual Convention. [Paper presentation].
48.
RStudio Team (2020). RStudio: Integrated development for R. RStudio, PBC. http://www.rstudio.com/
49.
RuckerD. D.GalinskyA. D. (2016). The agentic-communal model of power: Implications for consumer behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10(1), 1–5
50.
SchaererM.FoulkT.du PlessisC.TuM.KrishnanS. (2021). Just because you’re powerless doesn’t mean they aren’t out to get you: Low power, paranoia, and aggression. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 165(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.03.005
51.
SchaererM.SwaabR. I.GalinskyA. D. (2015). Anchors weigh more than power: Why absolute powerlessness liberates negotiators to achieve better outcomes. Psychological Science, 26(2), 170–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614558718
52.
SchmidP. C.KleimanT.AmodioD. M. (2015). Power effects on cognitive control: Turning conflict into action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(3), 655–663. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000068
53.
Schmid MastM.JonasK.HallJ. A. (2009). Give a person power and he or she will show interpersonal sensitivity: The phenomenon and its why and when. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(5), 835–850. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016234
54.
Van BovenL.LoewensteinG. (2003). Social projection of transient drive states. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(9), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203254597
55.
VikT. A.LivingstonT. N. (2022). “Power is easy to get, difficult to maintain, and delicate to use”: Experienceswith power and powerlessness in organizations [Manuscript submitted for publication].
56.
WeickM.GuinoteA. (2008). When subjective experiences matter: Power increases reliance on the ease of retrieval. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(6), 956–970. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.956
57.
WinterichK. P.HanS.LernerJ. S. (2010). Now that I’m sad, it’s hard to be mad: The role of cognitive appraisals in emotional blunting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(11), 1467–1483. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210384710
58.
WoodW.EaglyA. H. (2012). Biosocial construction of sex differences and similarities in behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 46(1), 55–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394281-4.00002-7
