Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-1
Resolving the Puzzle of Conspiracy Worldview and Political Activism: Belief in Secret Plots Decreases Normative but Increases Nonnormative Political Engagement
It is a hitherto open and debated question whether the belief in conspiracies increases or attenuates the willingness to engage in political action. In the present article, we tested the notion, whether (a) the relation between belief in conspiracies and general political engagement is curvilinear (inverted U-shaped) and (b) there may be opposing relations to normative versus nonnormative forms of political engagement. Two preregistered experiments (N = 194, N = 402) support both propositions and show that the hypothetical adoption of a worldview that sees the world as governed by secret plots attenuates reported intentions to participate in normative, legal forms of political participation but increases reported intentions to employ nonnormative, illegal means of political articulation. These results provide first evidence for the notion that political extremism and violence might seem an almost logical conclusion when seeing the world as governed by conspiracies.
Abalakina-PaapM.StephanW. G.CraigT.GregoryW. L. (1999). Beliefs in conspiracies. Political Psychology, 20, 637–647.
2.
BartlettJ.MillerC. (2010). The power of unreason: Conspiracy theories, extremism and counter-terrorism. Demos.
3.
BruderM.HaffkeP.NeaveN.NouripanahN.ImhoffR. (2013). Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy mentality questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 225.
4.
CichockaA.GórskaP.JostJ. T.SuttonR. M.BilewiczM. (2018). What inverted U can do for your country: A curvilinear relationship between confidence in the social system and political engagement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115, 883–902.
5.
DafoeA.ZhangB.CaugheyD. (2018). Information equivalence in survey experiments. Political Analysis, 26, 399–416.
6.
DouglasK. M.SuttonR. M.CichockaA. (2017). The psychology of conspiracy theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 538–542.
7.
GoertzelT. (1994). Belief in conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 15, 731–742.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford.
10.
ImhoffR.BruderM. (2014). Speaking (un-)truth to power: Conspiracy mentality as a generalized political attitude. European Journal of Personality, 28, 25–43.
11.
ImhoffR.KochA. (2017). How orthogonal are the Big Two of social perception? On the curvilinear relation between agency and communion. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 12, 122–137.
12.
ImhoffR.LambertyP. (2017). Too special to be duped: Need for uniqueness motivates conspiracy beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 724–734.
13.
ImhoffR.LambertyP. (2018). How paranoid are conspiracy believers? Towards a more fine-grained understanding of the connect and disconnect between paranoia and belief in conspiracy theories. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 909–926.
14.
ImhoffR.LambertyP. (in press). Conspiracy theories as psycho-political reactions to perceived power. In ButterM.KnightP. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of conspiracy theories. Routledge.
15.
ImhoffR.LambertyP.KleinO. (2018). Using power as a negative cue: How conspiracy mentality affects epistemic trust in sources of historical knowledge. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 1364–1379.
16.
JolleyD.DouglasK. M. (2014a). The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PLoS One, 9, e89177.
17.
JolleyD.DouglasK. M. (2014b). The social consequences of conspiracism: Exposure to conspiracy theories decreases intentions to engage in politics and to reduce one’s carbon footprint. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 35–56.
18.
JolleyD.DouglasK. M.LeiteA. C.SchraderT. (2019). Belief in conspiracy theories and intentions to engage in everyday crime. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58, 534–549.
19.
JolleyD.DouglasK. M.SuttonR. M. (2018). Blaming a few bad apples to save a threatened barrel: The system-justifying function of conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 39, 465–478.
20.
LantianA.MullerD.NurraC.DouglasK. M. (2017). “I know things they don’t know!” The role of need for uniqueness in belief in conspiracy theories. Social Psychology, 48, 160–173.
21.
MarshA. (1974). Explorations in unorthodox political behaviour: A scale to measure “protest potential.”European Journal of Political Research, 2, 107–129.
22.
MoskalenkoS.McCauleyC. (2009). Measuring political mobilization: The distinction between activism and radicalism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 21, 239–260.
23.
ParkinW. S.GruenewaldJ.JandroE. (2017). Extremist violence from the fatherland to the homeland: A comparison of far-right homicide in Germany and the United States. International Criminal Justice Review, 27, 85–107.
24.
PattieC.SeydP.WhiteleyP. (2003). Citizenship and civic engagement: Attitudes and behaviour in Britain. Political Studies, 51, 443–468.
25.
PickelS. (2012). Das politische Handeln der Bürgerinnen und Bürger–ein Blick auf die Empirie[Citizens' political behavior - an empirical perspective]. In WeissenoG.BuchsteinH. (Eds.), Politisch Handeln: Modelle, Möglichkeiten, Kompetenzen[Political Action: Models, Opportunities, Competencies] (pp. 39–57). Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.
26.
RuchtD. (1996). The impact of national contexts on social movement structures: A cross-movement and cross-national comparison. In McAdamD.McCarthyJ. D.ZaldM. N. (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings (pp. 185–204). Cambridge University Press.
27.
SaabR.SpearsR.TauschN.SasseJ. (2016). Predicting aggressive collective action based on the efficacy of peaceful and aggressive actions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 529–543.
28.
SullivanD.LandauM. J.RothschildZ. K. (2010). An existential function of enemyship: Evidence that people attribute influence to personal and political enemies to compensate for threats to control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 434–449.
29.
SwamiV. (2012). Social psychological origins of conspiracy theories: The case of the Jewish conspiracy theory in Malaysia. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 280.
30.
SwamiV.ColesR.StiegerS.PietschnigJ.FurnhamA.RehimS.VoracekM. (2011). Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real-world and fictitious conspiracy theories. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 443–463.
31.
SwamiV.FurnhamA. (2012). Examining conspiracist beliefs about the disappearance of Amelia Earhart. The Journal of General Psychology, 139, 244–259.
32.
TauschN.BeckerJ. C.SpearsR.ChristO.SaabR.SinghP.SiddiquiR. N. (2011). Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and nonnormative collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 129–148.
33.
van ProoijenJ. W. (2016). Sometimes inclusion breeds suspicion: Self-uncertainty and belongingness predict belief in conspiracy theories. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 267–279.
34.
van ProoijenJ. W.AckerM. (2015). The influence of control on belief in conspiracy theories: Conceptual and applied extensions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29, 753–761.
35.
Van ZomerenM.PostmesT.SpearsR. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504–535.
36.
VitriolJ. A.MarshJ. K. (2018). The illusion of explanatory depth and endorsement of conspiracy beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 955–969.
37.
WhitsonJ. A.GalinskyA. D. (2008). Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception. Science, 322, 115–117.
38.
WoodM. J. (2016). Conspiracy suspicions as a proxy for beliefs in conspiracy theories: Implications for theory and measurement. British Journal of Psychology, 108, 507–527.
39.
WoodM. J.DouglasK. M.SuttonR. M. (2012). Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 767–773.
40.
WrightS. C.TaylorD. M.MoghaddamF. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994–1003.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
