The present work takes a multimethod approach to examine young U.S. adults’ engagement across political, religious, and civic activities. Of key interest was how their motivations to engage (internal vs. external), emotions when thinking about the cause (other-focused vs. self-focused), and political ideology related to their past and future engagement. We collected 1,000 survey responses and 30 interview transcripts of young adults ages 18 to 29 to identify patterns in these outcomes. We argue that although motivation of varying sources can drive engagement, the source of young people's motivation (internal vs. external) has critical implications for whether social engagement is short-lived or potentially persists into the future. In addition, the motivational and emotional reactions that the participants had to their engagement varied as a function of their political ideology. Implications for understanding the factors that may strengthen engagement and a deeper consideration of the nature of external motivation are discussed.
BatsonC. Daniel. 1990. “How Social an Animal? The Human Capacity for Caring.”American Psychologist45(3):336–46.
3.
BaumeisterRoy F.LearyMark R.1995. “The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation.”Psychological Bulletin117(3):497–529.
4.
BeckerJulia C.TauschNicoleWagnerUlrich. 2011. “Emotional Consequences of Collective Action Participation: Differentiating Self-Directed and Outgroup-Directed Emotions.”Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin37(12):1587–98. doi:10.1177/0146167211414145.
5.
BennettW. LanceSegerbergAlexandra. 2012. “The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics.”Information, Communication & Society15(5):739–68. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661.
6.
BowyerBenjaminKahneJoseph. 2020. “The Digital Dimensions of Civic Education: Assessing the Effects of Learning Opportunities.”Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology69:101162. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2020.101162.
7.
CampbellDavid E.LaymanGeoffrey C.GreenJohn C.2020. Secular Surge: A New Fault Line in American Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
CarenNealGhoshalRaj AndrewRibasVanesa. 2011. “A Social Movement Generation: Cohort and Period Trends in Protest Attendance and Petition Signing.”American Sociological Review76(1):125–51.
9.
ChamberlinKristina G.PlantE. Ashby. 2023. “Systemic Sexism Recognition and Antisexism Encourage Gender Equality Activism: An Adaptation of Bystander Intervention Theory.”Journal of Applied Social Psychology53:991–24.
10.
DeciEdward L.RyanRichard M.1985. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
11.
DeciEdward L.RyanRichard M.2000. “The ‘What’ and ‘Why’ of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior.”Psychological Inquiry11(4):227–68. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.
12.
DoesSerenaDerksBelleEllemersNaomi. 2011. “Thou Shalt Not Discriminate: How Emphasizing Moral Ideals Rather Than Obligations Increases Whites’ Support for Social Equality.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology47(3):562–71. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.024.
13.
EarlJenniferScovillSamRamoElliot. 2022. “Digital Youth Politics.” Pp. 663–82 in The Oxford Handbook of Digital Media Sociology, edited by D. A. R.SobierajS.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197510636.013.48.
14.
EisenbergNancyEggumNatalie D.Di GiuntaLaura. 2010. “Empathy-Related Responding: Associations with Prosocial Behavior, Aggression, and Intergroup Relations.”Social Issues & Policy Review4(1):143–80. doi:10.1111/j.1751-2409.2010.01020.x.
15.
FeinbergMatthewWillerRobb. 2019. “Moral Reframing: A Technique for Effective and Persuasive Communication across Political Divides.”Social and Personality Psychology Compass13(12). doi: 10.1111/spc3.12501.
16.
GoldbergMatthew H.van der LindenSanderLeiserowitzAnthonyMaibachEdward. 2020. “Perceived Social Consensus Can Reduce Ideological Biases on Climate Change.”Environment and Behavior52(5):495–517.
17.
Green-DemersIsabellePelletierLuc G.MénardSophie. 1997. “The Impact of Behavioural Difficulty on the Saliency of the Association between Self-Determined Motivation and Environmental Behaviours.”Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement29(3):157–66. doi:10.1037/0008-400X.29.3.157.
18.
HardySam A.DollahiteDavid C.JohnsonNatalieChristensenJustin B.2015. “Adolescent Motivations to Engage in Pro-social Behaviors and Abstain from Health-Risk Behaviors: A Self-Determination Theory Approach.”Journal of Personality83(5):479–90. doi:10.1111/jopy.12123.
19.
HassonYossiTamirMayaBrahmsKia S.CohrsJ. ChristopherHalperinEran. 2018. “Are Liberals and Conservatives Equally Motivated to Feel Empathy toward Others?”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin44(10):1449–59. doi:10.1177/0146167218769867.
20.
Janoff-BulmanRonnieSheikhSanaBaldacciKate G.2008. “Mapping Moral Motives: Approach, Avoidance, and Political Orientation.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology44(4):1091–99. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.11.003.
21.
JostJohn T.GlaserJackKruglanskiArie W.SullowayFrank J.2003. “Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition.”Psychological Bulletin129(3):339–75. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339.
22.
JostJohn T.NosekBrian A.GoslingSamuel D.2008. “Ideology: Its Resurgence in Social, Personality, and Political Psychology.”Perspectives on Psychological Science3(2):126–36. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00070.x.
23.
KaikatiAndrew M.TorelliCarlos J.WinterichKaren PageRodasMaría A.2017. “Conforming Conservatives: How Salient Social Identities Can Increase Donations.”Journal of Consumer Psychology27(4):422–34. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2017.06.001.
24.
KelmanHerbert C.1958. “Compliance, Identification, and Internalization: Three Processes of Attitude Change.”Journal of Conflict Resolution2(1):51–60. doi:10.1177/002200275800200106.
25.
KivikangasJ. MatiasFernández-CastillaBelenJärveläSimoRavajaNiklasLönnqvistJan-Erik. 2021. “Moral Foundations and Political Orientation: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.”Psychological Bulletin147(1):55–94. doi:10.1037/bul0000308.
26.
KoestnerRichardLosierGaëtan F.VallerandRobert J.CarducciDonald. 1996. “Identified and Introjected Forms of Political Internalization: Extending Self-Determination Theory.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology70(5):1025–36. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.1025.
27.
KunstmanJonathan W.PlantE. AshbyZielaskowskiKateLaCosseJennifer. 2013. “Feeling in with the Outgroup: Outgroup Acceptance and the Internalization of the Motivation to Respond without Prejudice.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology105(3):443–57.
28.
LaCosseJenniferKrusemarkDanielleFoltzJenniferPlantE Ashby. 2023. “Antiracism: Development and Validation of a Measure Designed to Identify White Americans Who Proactively Fight to End Discrimination toward Black Americans.”Group Processes & Intergroup Relations26(1):180–202.
29.
LaCosseJenniferPlantE. Ashby. 2020. “Internal Motivation to Respond without Prejudice Fosters Respectful Responses in Interracial Interactions.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology119(5):1037–56.
PistoniCarloEllenaAdriano MauroAresiGiovanniMartaElenaPozziMaura. 2023. “Self-Determined Intention to Vote and the Mediating Role of Politicized Identification: A Study on Italian Young Adults during the 2018 Elections.”Social Psychology54(4):225–36. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000524.
34.
PlantE. AshbyDevinePatricia G.1998. “Internal and External Motivation to Respond without Prejudice.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology75(3):811–32. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.811.
35.
PlantE. AshbyDevinePatricia G.2009. “The Active Control of Prejudice: Unpacking the Intentions Guiding Control Efforts.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology96(3):640–52.
36.
PutnamRobert D.2000. “Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York, NY: Touchstone Books/Simon & Schuster.
37.
RadMostafa Salari. 2023. “Ramadan Fasting as a Goal-Pursuit: Why People Fast, and How Motives Affect Their Experience.”Motivation Science9(4):327–39. doi:10.1037/mot0000310.
38.
RyanRichard M.ConnellJames P.1989. “Perceived Locus of Causality and Internalization: Examining Reasons for Acting in Two Domains.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology57:749–61.
39.
RyanRichard M.DeciEdward L.2000. “Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being.”American Psychologist55(1):68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.68.
40.
SabucedoJosé-ManuelDonoMarcosAlzateMónicaSeoaneGloria. 2018. “The Importance of Protesters’ Morals: Moral Obligation as a Key Variable to Understand Collective Action.”Frontiers in Psychology9:418. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00418.
41.
SchubachBernhardThielmannIsabel. 2024. “Does a Left-Wing Political Orientation Really Go Along with Greater Prosociality? A Large-Scale Empirical Investigation.”Social Psychological and Personality Science16(7):719–31. doi:10.1177/19485506241298341.
42.
ShaverPhillipSchwartzJudithKirsonDonaldO’ConnorCary. 1987. “Emotion Knowledge: Further Exploration of a Prototype Approach.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology52(6):1061–86. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1061.
43.
SkitkaLinda J.HansonBrittany E.WisneskiDaniel C.2017. “Utopian Hopes or Dystopian Fears? Exploring the Motivational Underpinnings of Moralized Political Engagement.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin43(2):177–90. doi:10.1177/0146167216678858.
44.
SkitkaLinda J.MorganG. Scott. 2014. “The Social and Political Implications of Moral Conviction.”Political Psychology35:95–110. doi:10.1111/pops.12166.
45.
SkitkaLinda J.WisneskiDaniel C.2011. “Moral Conviction and Emotion.”Emotion Review3(3):328–30. doi:10.1177/1754073911402374.
46.
SmithChristianSnellPatricia. 2009. Souls in Transition: The Religious Lives of Emerging Adults in America. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195371796.001.0001.
47.
SobierajSarah. 2005. “Review of Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life, Theda Skocpol.”Social Forces83(4):1763–65.
48.
StewartBrandon D.MorrisDavid S. M.2021. “Moving Morality Beyond the In-Group: Liberals and Conservatives Show Differences on Group-Framed Moral Foundations and These Differences Mediate the Relationships to Perceived Bias and Threat.”Frontiers in Psychology12:579908. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.579908.
49.
TheocharisYannisBoulianneShelleyKoc-MichalskaKarolinaBimberBruce. 2023. “Platform Affordances and Political Participation: How Social Media Reshape Political Engagement.”West European Politics46(4):788–811. doi:10.1080/01402382.2022.2087410.
50.
TracyJessica L.RobinsRichard W.2004. “Target Article: ‘Putting the Self into Self-Conscious Emotions: A Theoretical Model.’”Psychological Inquiry15(2):103–25. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1502_01.
51.
TroppLinda R.BrownAmy C.2004. “What Benefits the Group Can Also Benefit the Individual: Group-Enhancing and Individual-Enhancing Motives for Collective Action.”Group Processes & Intergroup Relations7(3):267–82.
52.
van KleefGerben A.LelieveldGert-Jan. 2022. “Moving the Self and Others to Do Good: The Emotional Underpinnings of Prosocial Behavior.”Current Opinion in Psychology44:80–88. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.029.
53.
van ZomerenMartijn. 2021. “Toward an Integrative Perspective on Distinct Positive Emotions for Political Action: Analyzing, Comparing, Evaluating, and Synthesizing Three Theoretical Perspectives.”Political Psychology42(S1):173–94. doi:10.1111/pops.12795.
54.
van ZomerenMartijnPostmesTomSpearsRussell. 2008. “Toward an Integrative Social Identity Model of Collective Action: A Quantitative Research Synthesis of Three Socio-psychological Perspectives.”Psychological Bulletin134(4):504–35.
55.
van ZomerenMartijnPostmesTomSpearsRussell. 2012. “On Conviction's Collective Consequences: Integrating Moral Conviction with the Social Identity Model of Collective Action.”British Journal of Social Psychology51(1):52–71.
56.
VissersSaraHoogheMarcStolleDietlindMahéoValérie-Anne. 2012. “The Impact of Mobilization Media on Off-Line and Online Participation: Are Mobilization Effects Medium-Specific?”Social Science Computer Review30(2):152–69. doi:10.1177/0894439310396485.
57.
WeinsteinNettaRyanRichard M.2010. “When Helping Helps: Autonomous Motivation for Prosocial Behavior and Its Influence on Well-Being for the Helper and Recipient.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology98(2):222–44.
58.
YipLisetteThomasEmma F.AmiotCatherineLouisWinnifred R.McGartyCraig. 2023. “Autonomous Motives Foster Sustained Commitment to Action: Integrating Self-Determination Theory and the Social Identity Approach.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin50(5):750–65. doi:10.1177/01461672221148396.
59.
YipLisetteThomasEmma F.BliucAna-MariaBozaMihaelaKendeAnnaLizzio-WilsonMorganaReeseGerhardSmithLaura G. E.2024. “Motivations to Engage in Collective Action: A Latent Profile Analysis of Refugee Supporters.”British Journal of Social Psychology64(1):e12786. doi:10.1111/bjso.12786.
60.
ZaalMaarten P.SaabRimO’BrienKerryJeffriesCarlaBarretoManuelavan LaarColette. 2017. “You’re Either with Us or against Us! Moral Conviction Determines How the Politicized Distinguish Friend from Foe.”Group Processes & Intergroup Relations20(4):519–39. doi:10.1177/1368430215615682.
61.
ZebarjadiNiloufarAdlerEilyahuKlugeAnnikaSamsMikkoLevyJonathan. 2023. “Ideological Values Are Parametrically Associated with Empathy Neural Response to Vicarious Suffering.”Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience18(1):nsad029. doi:10.1093/scan/nsad029.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
