Evidence for Cultural Variability in Right-Wing Authoritarianism Factor Structure in a Politically Unstable Context

Abstract

Right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) has been a central explanatory concept and predictor of sociopolitical and intergroup attitudes over the last decades. Research indicates RWA is formed by the subdimensions of authoritarianism, traditionalism, and conservatism. The objective of this study was to assess the cross-cultural validity of this three-factor model in a politically unstable context where an alternative factor model was observed. Data from four Brazilian samples (N _total = 1,083) were assessed to test whether a four-factor model (with conservatism split) identified in Brazil recently was better fitting than the three-factor model. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and 3-year longitudinal evidence confirmed the four-factor model is the best RWA structure in the Brazilian context and that only the pro-trait conservatism items indexing submission to authority have adequate psychometric properties. Implications for future RWA propositions are discussed.

Keywords

authoritarianism right-wing authoritarianism traditionalism conservatism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alencastro

Beck

(2018, December 30). Temer de saída: O legado para bolsonaro [Temer leaving: The legacy for Bolsonaro]. O Globo. Retrieved from https://oglobo.globo.com/brasil/temer-de-saida-legado-para-bolsonaro-23335277

Altemeyer

(1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.

Altemeyer

(1996). The authoritarian specter. London, England: Harvard University Press.

Altemeyer

. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 47–92.

Bujang

M. A.

Baharum

(2017). A simplified guide to determination of sample size requirements for estimating the value of intraclass correlation coefficient: A review. Archives of Orofacial Sciences, 12, 1–11.

Cantal

Milfont

T. L.

Wilson

M. S.

Gouveia

V. V

. (2015). Differential effects of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on dimensions of generalized prejudice in Brazil. European Journal of Personality, 29, 17–27.

Costa

A. B.

Machado

W. L.

Bandeira

D. R.

Nardi

H. C.

(2016). Validation study of the revised version of the scale of prejudice against sexual and gender diversity in Brazil. Journal of Homosexuality, 63, 1446–1463.

Duckitt

(2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In Zanna

M. P.

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 41–113). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Duckitt

Bizumic

(2013). Multidimensionality of right-wing authoritarian attitudes: Authoritarianism-conservatism-traditionalism. Political Psychology, 34, 841–862.

10.

Duckitt

Bizumic

Krauss

S. W.

Heled

(2010). A tripartite approach to right-wing authoritarianism: The authoritarianism-conservatism-traditionalism model. Political Psychology, 31, 685–715.

11.

Duckitt

Fisher

(2003). The impact of social threat on worldview and ideological attitudes. Political Psychology, 24, 199–222.

12.

Duckitt

Sibley

C. G.

(2017). The dual process motivational model of ideology and prejudice. In Sibley

C. G.

Barlow

F. K.

(Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice (pp. 188–221). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

13.

Etchezahar

(2012). Las Dimensiones del Autoritarismo: Análisis de la Escala de Autoritarismo del Ala de Derechas (RWA) en una Muestra de Estudiantes Universitarios en la Ciudad de Buenos Aires [The dimensions of authoritarianism: Analysis of the Right-Wing Authoritarianism Scale (RWA) in a undergraduate students sample in Buenos Aires]. Psicologia Política, 12, 591–603.

14.

Feldman

(2003). Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 24, 41–74.

15.

Funke

(2005). The dimensionality of right-wing authoritarianism: Lessons from the dilemma between theory and measurement. Political Psychology, 26, 195–218.

16.

The Global Economy. (2019). Political stability—Country rankings. Retrieved from https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/rankings/wb_political_stability/

17.

Gray

Durrheim

(2006). The validity and reliability of right-wing authoritarianism in South Africa. South African Journal of Psychology, 36, 500–520.

18.

Holgado-Tello

F. P.

Chacón-Moscoso

Barbero-García

Vila-Abad

(2010). Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables. Quality & Quantity, 44, 153–166.

19.

Koo

T. K.

M. Y.

(2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15, 155–163.

20.

Mavor

K. I.

Louis

W. R.

Sibley

C. G.

(2010). A bias-corrected exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of right-wing authoritarianism: Support for a three-factor structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 28–33.

21.

Peterson

Gerstein

(2005). Fighting and flying: Archival analysis of threat, authoritarianism, and the North American Comic Book. Political Psychology, 26, 887–904.

22.

Schreiber

(2019). Governo Bolsonaro surfa em herança de Temer e quer leiloar aeroportos, ferrovia e portos nos 100 primeiros dias [Bolsonaro continues Temer's efforts to sell airports, railroads and ports at auctions in the first 100 days of government]. BBC News Brasil, 18 February. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/brasil-47214138

23.

Sibley

C. G.

Duckitt

(2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248–279.

24.

Van Hiel

Pandelaere

Duriez

(2004). The impact of need for closure on conservative beliefs and racism: Differential mediation by authoritarian submission and authoritarian dominance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 824–837.

25.

Vilanova

DeSousa

D. A.

Koller

S. H.

Costa

A. B.

(2018). Cross-cultural adaptation and factor structure of the Brazilian version of the right-wing authoritarianism. Trends in Psychology, 26, 1317–1334.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB