In this article we examine the findings of three studies of right-wing authoritarianism conducted in South Africa. The main aim of the article is to report on the validity and reliability of measures of right-wing authoritarianism across three samples, namely a group of police officers, a group of students at a historically English university and a group of students at a historically Afrikaans university. Two measures of authoritarianism were used: the 30-item version of Altemeyer's (1981, 1988) Right-wing Authoritarianism (RWA) scale and the 14-item version of Altemeyer's RWA scale developed by Duckitt (1993a) for use in South African samples. Participants were also given measures of conservatism, prejudice and political beliefs. These scales were then subjected to analyses of internal consistency, factor analysis and correlational analysis. The findings depart somewhat from previous studies in this area in that they do not show the levels of validity and reliability reported in other contexts, nor do these measures perform as theoretically indicated by Altemeyer (1981, 1988) and Duckitt (1989, 1991a). Across all three samples, low correlations were found with measures of prejudice, conservatism and political party preferences. In addition, the three-component model (authoritarian aggression, authoritarian submission and conventionalism) proposed by these authors did not emerge in factor analysis. These findings cause the authors to question the use of RWA scales in South Africa, with a number of implications for authoritarian research in this context.
AdornoT. W.Frenkl-BrunswickE.LevinsonD. J.SanfordR. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality.New York: Harper
2.
AltemeyerB. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism.Manitoba, Canada: University of Manitoba Press
3.
AltemeyerB. (1988). Enemies of freedom.London: Jossey Bass
4.
AltemeyerB. (1996). The authoritarian spectre.Cambridge: Harvard University Press
5.
AltemeyerB. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality”. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 47–92
6.
BanduraA. (1977). Social learning theory.Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall
7.
BilligM. (1978). Fascists: A social psychological view of the National Front.London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
8.
BrownR. (1965). Social psychology.New York: The Free Press
9.
BrownR. (1988). Intergroup relations. In HewstoneM.StroebeW.CodolJ. P.StephensonG. M. (Eds.), Introduction to social psychology (pp. 381–410). Oxford: Basil Blaekwell
10.
ChristieR.CookP. (1958). A guide to published literature relating to the authoritarian personality through 1956. Journal of Psychology, 45, 171–199
11.
DuckittJ. (1989). Authoritarianism and group identification: A new view of an old construct. Political Psychology, 10, 63–84
12.
DuckittJ. (1991a). Prejudice and racism. In FosterD.Louw-PotgieterJ. (Eds.), Social Psychology in South Africa (pp. 171–206). Johannesburg: Lexicon
13.
DuckittJ. (1991b). The development and validation of a subtle racism scale in South Africa. South African Journal of Psychology, 21, 233–239
14.
DuckittJ. (1992). The social psychology of prejudice.New York: Praeger
15.
DuckittJ. (1993a). Right-wing authoritarianism among white South African students: Its measurement and its correlates. Journal of Social Psychology, 133(4), 553–574
16.
DuckittJ. (1993b). Further validation of a subtle racism scale in South Africa. South African Journal of Psychology, 23(3), 116–119
17.
DuckittJ. (2001). A dual process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 41–113
18.
DuckittJ.FisherK. (2003). Social threat and ideological attitudes. Political Psychology, 24, 199–221
19.
DuckittJ.WagerC.du PlessisI.BirumI. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 75–93
20.
DurrheimK. D.FosterD. (1995). The structure of socio-political attitudes in South Africa. The Journal of Social Psychology, 135, 387–402
21.
DurrheimK.FosterD. (1997). Tolerance of ambiguity and a content specific construct. The Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 22(5), 741–750
22.
EdwardsD.LegerP. (1995). Psychometric properties of the right-wing authoritarianism scale in black and white South African students. International Journal of Psychology, 30(1), 47–68
23.
FeldmanS. (2003). Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 24, 41–74
24.
FeldmanS.StennerK. (1997). Perceived threat and authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 18, 741–770
25.
HeavenP. C. L.RayJ. J. (1980). Non-authoritarian Afrikaners. In HeavenP. C. L. (Ed.), Authoritarianism: South African studies.Bloemfontein: P. J. de Villiers. Retrieved June 29, 2006 from http://jonjayray.tripod.com/nonauaf.html
26.
HymanH. H.SheatsleyP. B. (1954). The authoritarian personality: A methodological critique. In ChrisiteR.JahodaM. (Eds.), Studies in the scope and method of “the authoritarian personality” (pp. 50–122). New York: The Free Press
27.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375
28.
MacCroneT. D. (1937). Race attitudes in South Africa: Historical, experimental and psychological studies.London: Oxford University Press
29.
MartinJ. L. (2001). The authoritarian personality 50 years later: What lessons are there for political psychology?. Political Psychology, 22, 1–26
30.
MeloenJ. D. (1993). The F scale as a predictor of fascism: An overview of 40 years of authoritarianism research. In StoneW.F.LedererG.ChristieR. (Eds.), Strength and Weakness: The Authoritarianism Personality Today (pp. 47–69). New York: Springer-Verlag
31.
MeloenJ. D.van der LindenG.de WitteH. (1996). A test of the approaches of Adorno et al., Lederer and Altemeyer of authoritarianism in Belgium Flanders: A research note. Political Psychology, 17, 643–656
32.
MynhardtJ. (1980). Prejudice among Afrikaans and English-speaking South African students. Journal of Social Psychology, 110, 9–17
33.
OrpenC. (1975). Authoritarianism revisited: A critical examination of “expressive” theories of prejudice. In MorseS.OrpenC. (Eds.), Contemporary South Africa: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 103–111). Johannesburg: Juta
34.
OrpenC. (1980). Socio-cultural and personality factors in prejudice: The case of white South Africa. In HeavenP. C. L. (Ed.), Authoritarianism: South African studies.Bloemfontein: PJ. de Villiers
35.
PettigrewT. F. (1958). Personality and socio-cultural factors in inter-group attitudes: Acrossnational comparison. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 29–42
36.
RayJ. J. (1976). Do authoritarians hold authoritarian attitudes?. Human Relations, 29, 307–325
37.
RokeachM. (1960). The Open and Closed Mind: Investigations into the nature of belief systems and personality systems.New York: Basic Books
38.
SalesS. M. (1973). Threat as a factor in authoritarianism: An analysis of archival data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 44–57
39.
SamelsonF. (1993). The authoritarian character from Berlin to Berkeley and beyond: The odyssey of a problem. In StoneW. F.LedererG.ChristieR. (Eds.), Strength and Weakness: The Authoritarian Personality Today (pp. 22–43). New York: Springer-Verlag
40.
SchlachterA.DuckittJ. (2002). Psychopathology, authoritarian attitudes, and prejudice. South African Journal of Psychology, 32(2), 1–8
41.
ShilsE. A. (1954). Authoritarianism: ‘Right’ and ‘Left’. In ChrisiteR.JahodaM. (Eds.), Studies in the scope and method of ‘the authoritarian personality’ (pp. 24–49). Glencoe: The Free Press
42.
StoneW. F. (1993). Psychodynamics, cognitive functioning, or group orientation: Research and theory of the 1980s. In StoneW. F.LedererG.ChristieR. (Eds.), Strength and Weakness: The Authoritarian Personality Today (pp. 159–181). New York: Springer-Verlag
43.
StoneW. F.SmithL. D. (1993). Authoritarianism: Left and Right. In StoneW. F.LedererG.ChristieR. (Eds.), Strength and weakness: The authoritarian personality today (pp. 144–156). New York: Springer-Verlag
44.
StoneW. F.LedererG.ChristieR. (1993). Introduction: Strength and weakness. In StoneW. F.LedererG.ChristieR. (Eds.), Strength and weakness: The authoritarian personality today (pp. 6–21). New York: Springer-Verlag
45.
TaylorI. A. (1960). Similarities in the structure of extreme social attitudes. Psychological Monographs, 74, 1–32
